BEAUTY AND THE QUARK

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

DO YOU THINK WE CAN FIND ULTIMATE MEANING TO THE UNIVERSE IN COMPLICATION OR IN REDUCTION?

― Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Or, has anyone used QuarkXPress 5 yet? This is one upgrade I have no interest in. Maybe part of the reason why it took so many years for it to come out is that by the time they got to v4, it was pretty much "done".

― Sean, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

APPARENTLY IN COMPLICATION

― Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Joyce has no claim to the ultimate meaning.

― Mr Noodles, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

by the time they got to v4 it was done???! v4 was a minor tinkering with the (ahem) "perfect" toy that was v3 (Quark Xpress is MY bitch).

InDesign 2 is v nice, Quark 5 is OK

― Alan Trewartha, Thursday, 21 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes InDesign 2.0 looks the business... Table functions! xml capability! Cheap than quark! Transparency options! Now, if we only persuade the printers of the world to ditch quark en masse.

― Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Thursday, 21 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it's not the printers that need encourging. i'm sure they'll be happy to take indesign created PDFs. (unless you mean high street copy shop printers who are in my book, come the revolution up against the wall, etc) It's the sodding precious designers.

Not-fascinating-at-all fact of the day. GLAMOUR magazine = done in InDesign

― Alan Trewartha, Thursday, 21 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

We do everything in Illustrator, anyway. Bwahaha.

― Sodding Precious-Designer, Mrs, Friday, 22 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.