The F word (6 letters not 4)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
When is it approite for people to use ethnic or cultrual slurs ?
Never, only if you are reclaiming the word, among friends as a matter of fondness . Do we respell it ( ie ArtsPhag)

anthony, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Using slurs is a terrible, terrible vice of mine, although I try not to go out of my way to be hurtful. I rationalise it by saying that I'd rather be thought of as a boor than as being self-righteous.

tarden, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It depends. Obviously never, ever do a Jennifer Lopez and use words that are racial slurs which have been reclaimed by the homies (closest I have come is HNIC, which is my friend Marcus' nickname for himself = Head N In Charge. See, can't even WRITE the word). I've been doing work at a black girls' magazine and I'm liked because I'm Not Afraid To Ask, can spot a weave at 50 paces and have picked up all sorts of Jamaican slang an' ting.

Homoslang is different, Miss Thing, and due to the number of total queens and art fags I know, used constantly (but I tend not to use 'faggot'). Also, I *do* work on fashion magazines and was the one who told THEM about Paris Is Burning, hello? When I say I'm reading someone, I do not mean Tolstoy, have even been known to do palare and one of the funniest things I have ever heard is a Glaswegian being forced to say 'turdburglar'. I just like having funny coded ways of saying things (*everyone else: 'tch, get HER'*)

Other stuff - white trash doesn't bother me as a saying, but if posh English person goes on about it a la Nathan Barley (oh, not him again...) I start talking about nursery food, bedwetting and playing Hit The Biscuit at boarding school. Anti-Irish stuff bad too from same mouths. Indian friends who are Punjabi have a whole repertoire but I only use it with them, eg Skipinder The Punjabi Kangaroo; it's basically heimlische humour, which I grew up with (my home town is famously Jewish, Dan P will back me up on this one). I do know my toches from my elbow in Yiddish because of...

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My buddies are alot more sesitive about appearing anti semetic then homophobic. They thrash my fagdom but do not touch Daves jewishness.

anthony, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why anyone would ever be anti-Semitic is beyond me!

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Round here being pro-Palestinian is seen to be anti-semetic, and often played on as such in the media by pro-Israeli groups. Its a dangerous line which happily the kids at SOAS walk every day.

Pete, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As people who know me know, I play around with fairly light examples of gay slang just to keep everyone guessing (and also because, dammit, it's fun). Beyond that, I avoid those minefields!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Alot of people are belive me. But what i meant was people can joke about my being gay alot more and using alot more taboos then David being jewish. Its not anti semitism.

anthony, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Like I said upthread, I grew up in a heavily Jewish suburb. The surrounding WASP suburbs had covenants on the properties precluding sales of houses to Jews until the 1970's, hence the posh ghetto. So imagine the FURORE when Owen Franken (Al Franken's li'l brother and a Newsweek photog) turned up with stuff about Israeli human rights violations in Palestine in a Mastreclass For Gifted Students scenario. I saw a side of my classmates I hadn't seen before. The Zionist faction was bigger than I ever thought possible and some of the girls were literally crying with rage at the audacity of anti-Zionist Owen, calling him a self-hating Jew and all that. All the while I'm thinking 'wait a minute: you've all been shunted into ghetto situations and lost family members, yet you don't want to hear about the Israeli army doing it to anyone else?' Apparently not...

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

is faggot the 6 letter word, or is there something else I'm not aware of, like friend?

Geoff, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I must say the whole Isreal situation doesn't gel nicely with the general Jewish sentiment of "We have been opressed". The only reason the Jews are in charge is becase a US president (Truman i think? ) decided to recognise the Jewish state. They basically invaded .

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was going to say something, but the spectacular Pandora's box opened by Mike has caused me to scurry in the other direction.

Dan Perry, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hmmm. My (non-Jewish) Dad and me have tried to convince my Jewish mum and auntie that the situation in Israel is a bit, like, unfair on the Palestinians. My dad was told he 'didn't understand' (as he is not Jewish) and I was told I was a traitor as I am supposed to be Jewish. I never asked to be Jewish! I eat bacon and prawns and stuff! The whole thing makes me very uncomfortable about my family's attitude.

Emma, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

When those who have suffered Dispora finally get to go home, they do.
The Jewish people have had Zion as a goal for 2000 years. This is a fight between Isaac and Ishmael. Of course it is bloody and confusing and angry. I do think the Jews are wrong but i understand where they are coming from.

anthony, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I don't think anyone here would deny the Jewish people a right to a homeland. It's how the other people living in and around it are treated that remains the big beef.

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

no denial re jewish homeland, no denial re palestinian homeland, only nile in egypt - ouch...

Geoff, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think when Israel starts setting highly trained and well equipped army on children throwing stones I stop seeing where Israel is coming from .

Emma, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, the Jewish people have the right to a homeland. But the only way that homeland would ever have been safe or non-detrimental to someone else was if that homeland had been placed smack in the middle of the United States.

Before anyone calls me anti-semetic, let me please point out 1) that I hate *all* people regardless of religion or race and 2) Semetic, as I understand it, is actually a blanket term for all people of a middle eastern racial original- both Jews and Arabs are Semetic peoples. So being pro-Palestine and anti-Semetic is a Semantic paradox.

Kate the Saint, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Or when the palestinans bomb crowded markets.
No one is a hero in this sitution both are nasty villians.

anthony, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

So being pro-Palestine and anti-Semetic is a Semantic paradox.

It's anti-Semantic! Wa-hey.

Dan Perry, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Don't Jewish people feel like Isreal is just a big Jewish Ghetto anyways? I mean its dry and dusty and hot. Why aren't they complaining that they have to have THAT as their homeland? It seems like instead of a homeland it s more like national segregation. It seems kind of liek if Gulianni said "Ok you jews can have South Bronx. That will be your home now."

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suzy, err... I'm not actually convinced that the whole Jewish homeland thing was a great idea, although I can completely sympathise with the calls for it, in a post-Holocaust context. Yes, I do recognise its right to exist now, as obviously you can't turn back the clock.

I'm quite ignorant on this whole topic though, and no doubt I could be convinced to change my opinion.

Nick, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Israelis have managed to kill far more Palestinians than vice versa. Not that I think either side should be killing each other, but the fact remains.

Emma, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Obviously the Holocaust context is what prompted the setting-aside of that space. People of my mum's generation (she went to the same schools as me) DID NOT TALK ABOUT the Holocaust until the 1970s. Too painful, apparently, most of them had relatives at close hand who were sporting dodgy Auschwitz-type tattoos. We've talked about the need of Americans not to be 'quite' American vis-a-vis having/funding an Old Country in lots of other threads (a girl I knew at college was from a rich Detroit family of Zionist terrorist funders). And as for Jewish homeland in the middle of Middle America...are you sure you have never been to St Louis Park?

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

didn't the soviet union have a pseudo-autonomous jewish area on the far east (between mongolia and vladivostock)? began with b i think?

gareth, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suzy, of course I know where the *real* Jewish homeland is. I've been to the Upper West Side, thank you. ;-)

Kate the Saint, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If black folks can refer to each other as they niggaz, then I will refer to my asian friends as my chinkz, my hispanic friends as my wetbackz, and my honky friends as my crackaz.

JM, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not to be pedantic, but the term anti-Semite was coined in the 19th century by a German anti-Jewish propagandist, to put a "scientific sheen" on anti-Jewish bigotry. The term has nothing to do with other peoples who speak Semitic languages (such as Arabs). It's definitely not nice and it's definitely bigoted to hate Arabs, but one who hates Arabs isn't an anti-Semite.

Anyway, re slurs against my own tribe -- the term "Polack" isn't, in and of itself, an offensive slur. Its meaning in Polish is roughly equivalent to the Italian "paisan," and Poles and Polish-Americans tend to use the word the same way Italians and Italian-Americans use the word "paisan." However, calling someone a "dumb Polack" is bigoted.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Where doe s Mick come from anyways?

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mick = Mc? As in McDonald?

David Raposa, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was wondering when someone was going to bring up another minority... it gets a bit weird when the only people being discussed are Jews and gays. I can't really comment, as the only "minority" I'm a member of actually consists of 52% of the world's population.

Kate the Saint, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For the Irish? Common enough first name or nickname (ref 'Guido' in NYC and environs for Italian-Americans, at least of a certain sort), so from there it was easy to slip into parlance.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

re: jimmy the mod's comment, what are thoughts on usage of 'nigga' by white obvious non-racists? i.e. the scene at jimmie's house in pulp fiction, 'dead nigga in my garage', etc. symptom how a non- black person can be steeped in urban black culture and yet forbidden one of the most used bits of lingo, a theory i've brought up before to explain eminem's usage of 'faggot' ('kill these niggaz dead' = obviously okay with everyone as long as it's black on black, 'kill these faggots dead' = for some reason, less okay). more thoughts on this later.

ethan, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

also: i use 'mick' almost constantly when the situation presents itself because 1) i am irish and so people will not protest and 2) i think it's really funny. european- based slurs are reasonably safe nowadays anyway, has anyone noticed the growing trend of 'italians are dumb' jokes on the simpsons recently? not that this is okay.

ethan, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pokey the Penguin really had it in for the Italians too.

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What I find really weird about the Simpsons is the way Apu can be this ridiculous stereotype last seen on British TV circa awful-70s sitcom 'Mind Your Language'. And that Pakistani restaurant owner in that Seinfeld episode - even worse! I don't even know if I mind. I just don't think you'd get away with it on a home-grown British programme these days. I guess Indians and Pakistanis aren't a big enough pressure group in the otherwise super-PC US.

Nick, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I can't think of any anti-French Quebecer slurs besides "frogs" and "pea soups" (the latter of which we allegedly used to have 3 meals a day) and neither is partcularly nasty. Anglo Canadians = squareheads, which sounds even less threatening.

Patrick, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm not really sure I want to be in on this discussion; however I do need to make a correction: wetbacks refers specifically to Mexicans, not the entirety of Hispanics.

Ally, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What is the slur for Tarts?

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeah but on the Simpsons evryone is made to look stupid. My guess the Italian jokes are a response to the current popularity of "The Sapranos".

tOM p, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well, I don't think anyone here would deny the Jewish people a right to a homeland.

Think again on that one -- I'll happily deny any religious / ethnic / racial group the right to a homeland. The idea of an Israeli state was philosophically problematic from the get-go in that it assumes individuals have a need and a right to segregate themselves from others based on religious history. As soon as you agree that Jews had a "right" to do this, you have very little argument against, say, white American racists claiming a "right" to a white American homeland. I see very little difference between the creation and expansion of Isreal, with regard to Palestinians, and the westward expansion of the United States, with regard to Native Americans.

Nick: I think the Apu steretypes are cut through by the fact that Apu has quite a bit more dignity than any of the shows other characters -- and also by the fact that the stereotypes tend to come from others more than from himself. Recall the episode where his religion was described as "miscellaneous" and he responded with "I am Hindu. There are 600 million of us."?

Nitsuh, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

One of my favorite Apu-related bits was the flight over to India with him and Homer and the Christian chorus bugging everyone in the airport as they got off the plane...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Choir, rather. Singing group. Thing.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sorry Nitsuh, that doesn't quite correlate. Jews actually have ancient and well-documented historical links to the region they have made into their 'homeland'. As do the Palestinians, and while it's more than a bit rich for Israelis to treat them the way they do, the Palestinian people don't compare with Native Americans in terms of the levels of persecution suffered (I always wonder how many Native Americans people who rush to defend in this manner...ACTUALLY KNOW).

White Americans emigrated to a New World with little regard for its original inhabitants' rights to the land. Each and every one is descended from immigrants - as I am constantly reminding those family members of mine who moan about new waves of immigrants coming in and Hoovering up their valuable tax dollars. They could no more presume to found a homeland based on whiteness than Australians or New Zealanders.

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

POKEY THE PENGUIN!! He rocks my world. Even if he does have an inexplicable problem with Italians.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think there's much to say and argue about concerning Israeli- Palestinian relations and the Jewish ( or any other ethnic group's) right to a homeland. One thing I can say with clarity is that the issue is not a clear-cut one. Being Jewish, I am ( or I was, attending a Jewish school ) surrounded with this kind of talk a lot. And I'm not going to argue about it here, so maybe this is a wasted post.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That looks more like an Irish flag than the Italian flag in the Pokey the Penguin cartoon.

Re Israel and Zionism: I think people are forgetting the background of the Zionist movement. It was founded and gained momentum after the Dreyfus trials and some of the worst outbreaks of anti-Semitic violence and pogroms (in Austria and Russia) in history; Herzl and others had concluded that even assimilated, secularized Jews would never be perfectly safe in Western Europe and needed their own homeland. That doesn't excuse the Israelis' treatment of the Palestinians, but it does add context as to why Jewish settlers came to Palestine in the first place.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes Mitch, it was.

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I lied, then, I am going to comment. Tadeusz makes an important point. Setting aside any ideas of Biblical and religious entitlement to certain land, after the Holocaust the displaced Jews needed a place to exist, preferably one that would shield them from discrimination and genocide. So, yes, that's one explanation from the creation of a Jewish homeland.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suzy: Let me be clear that the comparison was one of principle and not detail -- I'm not trying to equate the situations on a logistical level. I made the comparison because regardless of roots or "rights," in both cases you have a situation where a group of people was "introduced" (or "reintroduced") into a region that was already inhabited. And in both cases, the introduced group restricted the movements, land ownership, and political organization of the already-inhabiting group, sometimes bloodily -- and in both cases, the introduced group slowly and deliberately expanded into land previously left to the already-inhabiting group (note Sharon's continuing reluctance to put a freeze on Israeli settlements). Israeli offers of a restricted Palestinian state are fairly comparable to the U.S. offering the state of Oklahoma as an always- and-forever Indian reservation. And in both cases, a nation deals with residents on what it claims as its own soil as a block -- essentially applying the rules of war to a contingent with no officially recognized home or leadership. What other nation carries out internationally-visible assassinations of political dissidents, sans trial? What other nation restricts and monitors the movements of a particular ethnic/religious group living on what it claims as its own soil? And what other nation has felt free to expel a massive portion of its residents and indefinitely deny them the ability to return to their homes?

You distinguish the situations by rightly pointing out that (a) the Jewish people have long-standing ties to the region, and (b) the levels of control exerted over Native Americans and Palestinians were not nearly the same. You are right on both counts. But with regard to (a) the idea of long-standing ties to a region does not equate to moral or political sovreignty over the region -- if it did, a good portion of Americans could claim a fundamental right to repatriation to Ireland or Germany or wherever. You do not own where your ancestors lived. With regard to (b), I'd posit that the level of oppression is hardly material.

None of this is to say that I don't completely understand and sympathize with the position of Israel, and none of this is to say that I put any moral support behind the methods Palestinians have used to correct these problems. But I do feel like many of us in the Western world like to boil the problem down to "Boy, those two groups of people really hate each other and can't get along." Very few people seem willing to admit that many of the actions of Israel, if undertaken by any other nation, would be clear and internationally scandalous violations of basic principles of human rights and the scope of political sovereignty.

Nitsuh, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was talking History, not Bible (not quite the same)...religion shouldn't entitle people to anything. I'm one of those pain in the ass atheists!

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mitch: I certainly understand the bases for the formation of a Jewish homeland, but I think that the absolute horror of the Holocaust may have prompted the international community to overstep the case, a bit. For example: are you of the opinion that all blacks in America should have been "repatriated" to Liberia, as was once thought possible? One could argue, based on the continuing segregation and racism of the U.S. long after Liberia's creation, that ex-slaves deserved a homeland as well. But do we really think that would have been an improvement, morally and logistically?

Nitsuh, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Thanks for such a considered response, Nitsuh. On point of fact, though, if your grandparents came from EEC Europe you can too repatriate from America, should you choose. I'm not sure of the status concerning other countries. I agree with everything you've pointed out about Israeli behaviour in Palestine. My least favourite human trait is when the formerly oppressed turn around and pick on someone else as though they have forgotten what that's like. Sharon = twunt of the highest order.

Growing up in Minneapolis (highest urban NA population in entire US) I've seen great positive changes upon returning there periodically in terms of NA quality of life and opportunities to succeed on the same terms as others. Fifteen years ago the situation was dire in comparison. It's so hard to deal with the mistakes and plain evilness meted out by settler forbears in a sensible, modern way, ie. not feeling the need to say sorry every twenty seconds and actually being relevant about how people live today. A lot of people are working very hard, together, to make things more level.

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, a very interesting point, Nitsuh, something that I'm going to have to carefully consider in the future. If you are correct in your opinion that the world overcompenstated in providing the Jews with a homeland then the focus falls not on politics, but on the religious right to certain land which is, to say the least, a slippery issue.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'd like to momentarily relieve any potential tensions over this issue by stating that Nitsuh is surely one of the most articulate and intelligent posters currently inhabiting this community.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What Mitch said, with bells on. Where do they grow Nitsuh brains, and can I have one, please?

suzy, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Clearly the answer is cloning Nitsuh brains. Two hot issues for the price of one! I still admire the fact he hasn't chewed me out for my aggro colonizing of his AMG reviews. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 20 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

six years pass...

Homoslang is different, Miss Thing

strgn, Sunday, 9 March 2008 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

three years pass...

i call black people gays, gay people chinese, chinese people spanish, and spanish people i dont call cos i cant buy cell phones that speak mexican

DiMarceau Fishpower, Sunday, 5 February 2012 18:50 (fourteen years ago)

Using slurs is a terrible, terrible vice of mine --tarden

dave cool, Sunday, 5 February 2012 18:53 (fourteen years ago)

i wish dom was alive to see this thread http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif

dave cool, Sunday, 5 February 2012 19:54 (fourteen years ago)

my first thought when reading the thread title was ... "fenian"? lol west of scotland proddy schooled upbringing

zappi, Sunday, 5 February 2012 19:58 (fourteen years ago)

Too bad frogbs isn't around for this bump right now.

Gonjasufjanstephen O'Malley (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 5 February 2012 20:00 (fourteen years ago)

Using slurs is a terrible, terrible vice of mine --tarden
― dave cool, Sunday, February 5, 2012 6:53 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

it's a character in a Jerzy Kosinski book, dave.

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 5 February 2012 20:00 (fourteen years ago)

thank you for enlightening me http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif

dave cool, Sunday, 5 February 2012 20:04 (fourteen years ago)

fucker

Alan Shearer (ken c), Monday, 6 February 2012 17:44 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.