This is the companion thread to these—
Give It Up For Graham: ILE Vote of Thanks! and Give It Up for Andrew
Thank you Keith!!!!
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
Damn straight. Rah!
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
w00t!
― emil.y, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
That's kind of you, but really no thanks necessary... Maybe see some of you in London this weekend, if you're about.
― Keith, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:36 (eighteen years ago)
8080!
― stet, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.character-costumes.com/c%20tiger%20thumbs%20up%20cut%20out.jpg
― Ms Misery, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
thx keith
― jergïns, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.photo.net/photo/pcd0133/monument-valley-goats-40.1.jpg
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2007/03/09/wborat.jpg
Thanking to you!
― Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.scribbler.co.uk/library/cards/congratulations/cconlfm18/cconlfm18275.jpg
― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
http://i10.tinypic.com/6fuhowy.gif
― StanM, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Roger-Daltrey-Photograph-C10045704.jpeg
― Alba, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)
http://falsedawn.blogspot.com/mears3.jpg
thanks everyone for the bottle, I'll be in my hotel room ... feel free to pop on up.
― zaxxon25, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
Keith rules.
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/3/3d/Splode.jpg
― libcrypt, Thursday, 7 June 2007 01:31 (eighteen years ago)
thanking u
― gr8080, Thursday, 7 June 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)
after the graham and andrew nf debacles i wonder how this one will end up.
― sanskrit, Thursday, 7 June 2007 01:46 (eighteen years ago)
keith is clearly already becoming tempestuous
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)
but yeah i thought of that too - the curse of ILX!
Ride a Rock Horse!
― PJ Miller, Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)
http://scoopsnoodle.com/lix/yay.gif
― jhøshea, Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)
what andrew nf debacle?
― blueski, Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)
the one where he was away for weeks at a time without telling anybody and blew up at people for no reason any time anyone suggested anything maybe?
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)
Yay! http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/large/awinnerisyou-37081.jpg Waht? http://otani.vet.cornell.edu/spiral_waves/java_applet_flow.gif
― onimo, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:00 (eighteen years ago)
No more holidays for Keith then.
― PJ Miller, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)
i think of that more as a fiasco than a debacle.
― blueski, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)
writing an HTML parser is sort of like a holiday
FROM FUN
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)
-- blueski, Thursday, June 7, 2007 11:49 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
i don't know what ticked him off. i liked the dude but i think it ended with him posting a picture of his nutsack to wdyll. not a good look.
― sanskrit, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)
i know what ticked him off.
― blueski, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)
stay on topic!
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
I know Keith to be of sound mind.
― Alba, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:50 (eighteen years ago)
What ticked Andrew off, stevem?
― Rock Hardy, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)
he was tired of being sexually objectified on wdyll threads. and all the fussin and feudin.
PS cheers 2 keef
― blueski, Thursday, 7 June 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.mullsports.com/images/pose_for_the_camera.jpg
― Ste, Thursday, 7 June 2007 13:01 (eighteen years ago)
yay for keef
<3 <3 Remove Bookmark from this Thread <3 <3
― koogs, Thursday, 11 June 2009 11:13 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, like the new bookmark changes! View Previous Page much better than view all 10000 messages!
Here are some crumpets for you:
http://www.mysupermarket.co.uk/Images/ExternalImages/ProductsDetailed/30/019730.jpg
― Colonel Poo, Thursday, 11 June 2009 11:23 (sixteen years ago)
> View Previous Page much better than view all 10000 messages!
yes, this too. (that said, the way around it was to bookmark the page, go back to board and click on the thread again so it gives you the first 50 / last 50 view).
― koogs, Thursday, 11 June 2009 11:36 (sixteen years ago)
if you could do that for normal (unbookmarked) threads too that would be awwwwwwesome.
― man saves ducklings from (ledge), Thursday, 11 June 2009 11:45 (sixteen years ago)
great work on the unbookmark button!
― Oh baby if only you knew I'm down to a hundred-and-two (stevie), Thursday, 11 June 2009 11:59 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, it's awes
― DUDE, I DON'T LOSE (call all destroyer), Thursday, 11 June 2009 12:13 (sixteen years ago)
Happy Bir eh, yay Keith for being awesome!
― StanM, Thursday, 11 June 2009 14:56 (sixteen years ago)
Props!
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Z S), Thursday, 11 June 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
This is totally unimportant, but in Firefox (3.0.10, Windows XP, using style.css with no browser CSS overrides as far as I recall) the "Bookmark removed" div at the top of the page is always visible for me. Happens whether I'm logged in or not, doesn't appear in IE.
Sorry if you just haven't got round to changing the stylesheets yet, but since it works in IE I thought it was worth mentioning.
If you're changing the "show all messages" code, is there any chance you could make it not hide things if the number of extra posts is under, say, 5, so you don't ever see "skipping 1 message"? Obviously not a big deal, so, er, sorry, thanks...
― a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 11 June 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)
(CSS issue is fixed now, so thank you if you fixed it, or sorry if I was still looking at a cached version. Thanks!)
― a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 11 June 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah sorry, it's the browser cache not picking up the most recent version...
― Keith, Thursday, 11 June 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)