A friend of mine bought a vibrator for the wife of another dude. He couldn't understand why dude wanted to beat him up?
Classic or dud:?
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)
hahahahahahahaha.
This needs more context.
― Will M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)
dude, you have GOT to be joking.
― stevienixed, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)
omg
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
NO WAI
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)
Well, Guy A, Girl A and Guy B are the main characters here.
Guy and Girl A are married.
Girl A, Guy B and my wife are out the other night having some cocktails. Somehow, it came up that Girl A had never had a vibrator. Guy B runs around the corner...literally, around the corner...to the local sex shop and gets a top-of-the-line rabbit-style vibe. Much embarassment ensues. When Guy A shows up, he gets very upset at the purchase of a vibrator for his wife, and threatens to beat up Guy B.
My wife said the evening went from awkward to bare-assed awkward to naked in front your parents while singing the national anthem awkward.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)
he might as well have stuck his dick on her mouth.
― stevienixed, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
Curb Your Enthusiasm as reality TV.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
i mean, in, but on will do the trick as well.
That is HY-sterical!
― J, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
It would have been awesome if Guy A had hit Guy B with the vibrator.
― dan m, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
o_0
― river wolf, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
i bet tuomas does this all the time.
Reality show as REALITY! Like, no comfort barrier of the television screen. CYE playing itself out five feet from you!
I, obv., say dud. And I would have beaten up Dude B if he had purchased a vibrator for my wife.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
This would be less bad if it weren't "Top of the line" I think. Almost a subtext of "yr husband's cheap but not me, he bought you none and I bought you DA BEST!"
― Will M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
what did Girl A have to say about all this?
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
ha yeah that is totally some CYE shit
― sleep, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
Honestly, I don't really think it's so bad. Being spur-of-the-moment, and precipitated by drinking is better than it being premeditated, sent via mail, wrapped in a nice package, etc.
I guess it depends on how close these people are. Amongst certain friends of mine this would be funny and not a big deal at all, with no sexxxy ulterior motives or anything.
― joygoat, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
CYE playing itself out five feet from you!
So brilliant/horrifying.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
But yeah, a good old fashioned dildo-whipping would have made it 10x better.
Guy A is a tool. Guy B is a fool but sweet. It's all really silly.
― Michael White, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
Exactly. Sort of like a grandparent getting the kid something that the parents can't afford - like, stay the FUCK out of our biz, yo.
Just awkwardness. I got a text message while playing music at another bar, and almost spat out my drink. WTF was Dude B thinking?
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
yeah joygoat i know people with whom this would be more than cool, and Guy A would have been like "can you get me one next." not all of my social groups are like that mind you! Now I kind of want to do it to people I know wouldn't be cool with it jsut to see the insane reactions!! Hahaa!
― Will M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
I think it's ill-advised, deffo, and if I were Girl A I'd probably have something to say about the inappropriateness on my own behalf unless we were really good friends with clear boundaries. I have to say, though, that I don't think it's any of Guy A's business unless she finds the attentions of Guy B intrusive/threatening/etc and Dear Husband perceives that she's asking for, or in need of, support or protection.
XXP Thank you.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
True crimes end up on Law and Order so why not this on CYE, I ask.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
Why was he so enthusiastic abt getting her a vibrator? was it from personal experience?
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah context is important here - under the circumstances described, I know at least one of my friends would laugh their arse off if this happened with their wife.
But I guess Guy A & B don't know each other that well?
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
AS CLASSIC AS CLASSIC GETS
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
Complete Dud
― Mr. Que, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)
It's sort of charming the first time yr guy does the whole defending-territory thing at a party, esp if the person he's defending you from is kind of a creep, but that is for when boys/girls/humans are young and stupid. Any other time of life = NO HOMO PALEO
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
I can't imagine anyone not taking this as a spontaneous goodwill gesture or an inane drunken joke. If anyone should do the beating (verbally, one hopes) it should be Girl A and, if dispelased, she should have told him to go return it.
― Michael White, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
As I heard, not from personal experience - he just thought it would be funny. Apparently, the girls (and dude A) didn't think so.
And while I can see your point that it might not be some husbands' business, I hope you can understand that some other couples are quite alright with their partner getting upset about stuff like this. This couple was obv. one of the latter. Not a marking of territory, I think, but a "Hey. Get the fuck out my sex life, DUDE. If we need a third, we'll call." But with feeling.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
Not a marking of territory, I think, but a "Hey. Get the fuck out my sex life, DUDE. If we need a third, we'll call." But with feeling.
Yup.
― Mr. Que, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
I don't think Girl A is at any risk of running off with a guy who buys her a vibrator as his first act of affection anyway
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
or, what B.L.A.M. said
how could this not be classic i wonder.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
Whatever floats their collective marital boat, I guess. How would I know.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
I have a sex shop literally around the corner from me -- the best in the city, actually. I have made no impulse purchases there, certainly not for anyone else's wife. Because that would be nuts.
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)
Images of an awkward teenager showing up in a rental tux for prom with a vibrator, instead of a corsage, held out at the door are flooding my brane and making it hard to chew. STOP.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)
Invite them all out for the next LA FAP.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
Can we get back to this "top of the line" bit? That puts this joke in the multi-hundred dollar range, dunnit? If it were to be a funny wouldn't a 20-dollar one with a funny name like "magic penis" work? THAT's the mixed signal imo!
― Will M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
you have to consider the social implications of extramarital dildo intrusion before you automatically chalk this sort of thing up to defending one's "territory"
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
Well, vibrators are really about the woman's experience, even though they have plenty of co-ed uses. So my assumption is/was that Guy B intended the gift to be for Girl A irrespective of her Marital Obligation, therefore it's not about Mr and Mrs A's shared sex life at all.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
Good point.
― Mr. Que, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
A friend -- married gal, not a close one -- told me a similar story. She worked at a university and would have lunch with the same guy all the time, and they would talk about sex and things, kind of joking, and then one day he too bought her a top-of-the-line rabbit. Several hours after this I was having a beer with her and she was trying to make sense of it and had decided to give it back.
Lost touch with her, ran into her a year or two later, and she had divorced her husband and was getting married to one of her coworkers. Not the rabbit guy, though.
― Eazy, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
I mean, I'm almost positive it's still a horrible idea!! But you know, that's up to Girl A to decide/enforce.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
It sounds like it was one of the rabbit vibrators prominently featured on Sex and the City, only with a remote control. My wife said it was one of the more expensive ones that you can get without getting into handmade or blown glass dildos.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)
http://store.babeland.com/vibrators-rabbit-style
A little research provides pricing info
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)
<i>Well, vibrators are really about the woman's experience, even though they have plenty of co-ed uses. So my assumption is/was that Guy B intended the gift to be for Girl A irrespective of her Marital Obligation, therefore it's not about Mr and Mrs A's shared sex life at all.</i>
But he gave it to her! If there was no tension between them, then no problem. But if there was...well, it's like giving drawers or a bar of soap to a lady!
― Eazy, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:59 (eighteen years ago)
i had no idea you could even get blown glass dildos. i wonder if they show how theyre made when you go to glass blowing shops in camrbidge or wherever.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 8 June 2007 16:59 (eighteen years ago)
it could be worse i suppose. the guy could have had a vibrator custom built in his er image.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
B is not married. He recently was dumped by his girlfriend of two years, and has taken this as a cue to further detach from reality w/r/t to intergender relations. And by further, I mean PAST batshit insane.
Also - Yes. My wife does not like the proprietary implications of the "MY VAGINA. KEEP OUT." response, but likes feeling protected from bat-shit insane, sexually awkward sex toy gifters. But I can see the other side of that...totally. Bitches be people, not property.
Now, hos are a different story.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
"It's called 'Adam'."
― Michael White, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
Unbelievably classic. Just for us though, not for anyone directly involved.
― Chris in Belfast, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)
"Unbelievably classic. Just for us though, not for anyone directly involved."
OTM
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)
Ach well, yeah. I think a woman's sexual satisfaction is a weird and highly personal thing, and kind of difficult to get to for a lot of people -- and can have very little to do with yr partner. Plus it's not really anyone's problem but your own if you don't get there -- you have to ask for what you want, and if it isn't forthcoming, go out and GET it. And I say this as someone who isn't particularly good at either of those things! But it's nice to think that there are people who actually think you deserve the best-possible experience and care that you get it.
On the other hand it sounds like Guy B is a problem case, really, so the real situation isn't nearly as balanced as the hypothetical one.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:46 (eighteen years ago)
"can have very little to do with yr partner"
prob reason no. 1 why the guy bought the thing in the first place.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
I mean, real life in being a big mess shocker.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
Er, XP to self
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
Great, now we've gone and made Laurel start talking to herself again.
― Michael White, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
I would like to buy everyone on this thread a vibrator.
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
(As long as you're okay with it.)
How did they get to talking about vibrators with a batshit insane guy in the first place? That seems like a topic to be studiously avoided.
― J, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
I'm sure I wouldn't know anything about that.
― Laurel, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
Sometimes people drink alcohol.
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)
I was trying to think what I would do in this situation, and which of my male friends for which this might be appropriate behavior - there are a couple queer friends of mine I can totally see doin this and it would all be laughable, funny, sorta endearing. Lonely single straight male friend however - yeah I'd be kinda angry or at least "dude wtf are you thinking"
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)
"I was thinking about your wife's vagina. What? Don't look at me like that."
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
Actual CYE moment, when Jeff tells Larry that he was masturbating and Larry's wife just "popped in there".
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)
Kenan you are of course obviously correct and I am DENSE.
― J, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)
(about the alcohol, I mean)
― J, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah. Frankly, Girl A should have just told him to take it back.
"I'm a married woman. I cannot possibly accept vibrators from other men. Thank you for the gesture, but I must refuse."
― Michael White, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
Ideally, she would also faint and require smelling salts and waved handkercheifs to revive her.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
i'd have left it as a tip.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 8 June 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
Just for a second, just to see how it feels.
― Kerm, Friday, 8 June 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
it occurs to me that most ladies who would find this sort of thing hilarious probably already own said device
also this story: so so funny
― jhøshea, Friday, 8 June 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
Totally.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 June 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)
Leaving a vibrator as gratuity is creepier than buying one for your married friend.
― Eazy, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
Leaving sex toys as gratuity for your bartender is a great way to get buybacks.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
only in a gay bar, dude
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
Let's all buy Dennis Kucinich's wife a vibrator and see if he tries to beat us up.
― Eppy, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)
haha so what if he did? You could just hold him at arm's length while he took futile swings at you.
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)
This reminds me: Dennis Kucinich's Wife!
― Kerm, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)
xpost No it would be like that time the home-schooled 5-year-old who used to live next door tried to beat me up and I performed your suggested maneuver and he nailed me right in the balls.
― Eppy, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)
Except Kucinich would nail you in the balls and then yell something about vibrators as colonialism or something.
― Eppy, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
...and then apologize and offer you a butterfly.
― Kerm, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
So to speak.
― Eppy, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)
this thread = trucker-hat thread for a new generation. keep it up.
(and you can take that comment any way you like.)
(and, er, that one.)
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
I just read that rabbit vibrators aren't actually that great.
― tokyo rosemary, Friday, 8 June 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
"read"
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 8 June 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
germaine greer says that they're no good iirc. something to do with gel being fucked-up.
― That one guy that quit, Friday, 8 June 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)
So maybe that's why Guy A was offended?
― Kerm, Friday, 8 June 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
"Gel? That does it!"
― kenan, Friday, 8 June 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)
-- elmo argonaut, Friday, 8 June 2007 20:12 (1 hour ago) Link
i get free meals at Olive Garden this way
― latebloomer, Friday, 8 June 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)
I'm still holding out for the Kucinich and wife sitcom:
http://www.nndb.com/people/060/000024985/short-crop.jpg http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/01.06.00/gifs/magnolia-0001.jpg
― jaymc, Friday, 8 June 2007 22:52 (eighteen years ago)
The scenario presented in the thread question is just DOING MY FUCKINg HEAD IN.
― Pashmina, Friday, 8 June 2007 22:57 (eighteen years ago)
HAhah omg I gotta stop sleeping at night or something, I miss all the fun.
― Trayce, Friday, 8 June 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)
hahahaha you guys, wow
― HI DERE, Saturday, 9 June 2007 03:52 (eighteen years ago)
C/D: Beating another man's wife with a vibrator.
― libcrypt, Saturday, 9 June 2007 04:04 (eighteen years ago)
A+
― gr8080, Saturday, 9 June 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
Punjabi joke inadequately translated:
Two bosom buddies meet after a long time, buddy A says, "How you've changed brother, your ass is now so huge". The second one says, "Oh, that reminds me, how's my sister in law?"
― Heave Ho, Friday, 2 November 2007 06:54 (eighteen years ago)