http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6223968.stm
It's Friday, it's a race thread, it's a class thread, it's a gender thread. Let us begin.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:14 (eighteen years ago)
Nothing to do with the 'soical engineering' experiment caried out by this Government? Which seems to have produced millions a feral kids where being uneducated,uninformed and uncultivated is something to be proud of?
Markus, Royston
Takes one to know one doesn't it?
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:20 (eighteen years ago)
... and who can't spell "social"
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 09:22 (eighteen years ago)
hurrah, more grist to the http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/ mill
― Alan, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:25 (eighteen years ago)
"caried" - does that mean the Government based their behavioural/manneristic targets on the role model of Cary Grant?
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:28 (eighteen years ago)
What is required is to find some activity at which he excells and then he will concentrate and become respected, stress is reduced and he is more likely to be able to learn.
Trish Niblock, Edinburgh
This lady writes a lot of sense there is nothing like success to breed success It is better to reach a standard in 16 weeks than to fail to reach the same standard in 8 weeks
Richard Harvey, Brighton, United Kingdom
You couldnt Make it Up I Blame the Sixtees
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:31 (eighteen years ago)
Putting disadvantaged children into better schools is like putting estates in a well off area. Pointless because it will just bring the other children down and distract them.
Rich H, Harrow, United Kingdom
Harrow, note.
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:32 (eighteen years ago)
What is required is to find some activity at which he excells
Spelling for instance?
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 09:33 (eighteen years ago)
Rich Halfwit?
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 09:34 (eighteen years ago)
I'm just waiting to see if it'll be Lex, Kate, or Jagger that pushes this thread into 300 posts.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:34 (eighteen years ago)
>> Putting disadvantaged children into better schools is like putting estates in a well off area. Pointless because it will just bring the other children down and distract them.
LOL that's what they did with me, and the only distraction that caused was me getting bullied for having a common accent and called a spod and a geek because I got good marks in everything without doing any work.
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:38 (eighteen years ago)
This is how the 11 Plus started.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:41 (eighteen years ago)
!!!!!DICIPLINE!!!!! Schools aren't in control of students. Students are in control of the teachers as they have an upper hand in that teachers are only allowed to shout. As we all know, children get used to people shouting at them especially if they are from a poor abckground with parents surrounded by stress over money. In these situations parents are more likely to shout at their children. Bring back dicipline. bring back the fear in students for the teachers and get rid of the yobs.
Chris, Swindon
As Genesis P. Orridge so rightly stated: "I want some DICIPLINE in here!!!!"
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:47 (eighteen years ago)
bring back the fear in students for the teachers
The grammar pathos on this thread is unbearable.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:48 (eighteen years ago)
Getting the Fear, as Charlie Manson was apt to say
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 09:48 (eighteen years ago)
As we all know, children get used to people shouting at them especially if they are from a poor abckground with parents surrounded by stress over money
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,750 for "middle class debt". (0.23 seconds)
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:49 (eighteen years ago)
Is that a body modification technique?
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:50 (eighteen years ago)
It wasn't disadvantaged kids that held things up in classes at my school, it was the thick tossers who didn't wanna learn nuffink.
― blueski, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:50 (eighteen years ago)
As opposed to the thick tossers whose parents can pay for tutors to help them pass exams
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)
The kids these people are complaining about are most likely of all children to receive regular, vigorous physical discipline at home. Which kinda fucks their theory.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)
We had to have the obligatory "sexualism" entry:
From the way my boys are taught in school I'd say the teaching system is biased against them. The teaching books and curriculum are optimised for girls with 95% of primary school teachers being women, as men don't want to teach that age in case they are accused of 'sexual harassement' against the kids. Add to it that it's not-PC to show any interest to white kids and hey-presto, white boys are doing poorly at school. What a surprise!
EarlyMan n, Somerset, United Kingdom
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:55 (eighteen years ago)
It Takes a Nation of Thick Bastards to Hold Us Back
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)
it's not-PC to show any interest to white kids
Honestly, where do people get this shite. Does anyone even know what "PC" means?
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)
Add to it that it's not-PC to show any interest to white kids
Y'what?
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)
We live in a politically correct society in which the needs and preferences of the minority outweigh the needs and preferences of the majority. The worse type of person to be in today's society, is white, male, British, heterosexual and young. This is exacerbated further by poverty. How to address it? Control the crazy political correctness that we see in Britain. Remember that the majority needs and preferences should always outweight those of the minorities. That is democracy.
Brian Heath, London
RECOMMEND Recommended by 93 people
When will the discrimination against white, heterosexual males ever end?
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 22 June 2007 09:58 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/canada-magazine/issue16/site/images/g8leaders.jpg
Onimo asks: "Does anyone even know what 'PC' means?"
Colin from Bracknell replies: "Could it be the over compensation of PC that is leaving the white boys to their own devices?"
Nicely ambiguous, that.
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)
The worse type of person to be in today's society, is white, male, British, heterosexual and young. This is exacerbated further by poverty. How to address it? Control the crazy political correctness that we see in Britain. Remember that the majority needs and preferences should always outweight those of the minorities. That is democracy.
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)
I think is used to work with this guy. I know it's a fairly common name but this guy was always saying things like "If you want to get on in this country you've got to be a disabled black lesbian Muslim dwarf."
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
ned, the majority of those white males are gay though.
― Alan, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
The Disabled Black Lesbian Muslim Dwarves...I'm always getting friend requests from them on MySpace.
― blueski, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:05 (eighteen years ago)
No simple answer, but try: 1. De-feminising the curriculum (i.e. put books and subjects that are of interest to boys back in to the system). 2.Encourage parents to understand that they have a responsibility , you don't leave it all to the schools/teachers. 3.Forget 'childrens rights' and re-introduce discipline. 4Discard 'trendy' teaching and return to 'traditional' teaching methods. 5.Ignore Health & Safety 'police' and bring back some danger into childrens lives..
H R, United Kingdom
I make that five simple answers.
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)
Simple-minded more like, amirite?
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)
bring back some danger into childrens lives.
Like when they appointed that school caretaker in Soham.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)
bring back some danger into childrens lives
hahaha
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)
(There is a debate to be had about allowing children to take controlled risks during play, tho. But I don't want to interrupt the hilarity/misery on here.)
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:09 (eighteen years ago)
I can't help but notice that the Prime Minister of Japan isn't white. THIS IS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD MR BLAIR
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
bring back some danger into childrens lives..
And H R is just the man for the job
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/09/redknappPA110906_501x700.jpg
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:12 (eighteen years ago)
BATHOS surely?
― tissp, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:13 (eighteen years ago)
More sorrow than hilarity
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
Forget 'childrens rights'
!!!
― tissp, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
I wistfully long for the day when white heterosexual males are the most privileged group in this country, but I just can't see it happening :(
― Michael Philip Philip Philip philip Annoyman, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one, in a sea of unstoppable multiculturalism
― tissp, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)
It'd be good if either Brian Keith or the melted-faced bung-taker Harry Redknapp Googled their way to this thread and pushed it to 300, you get a bit sick of the usual patterns.
― Michael Philip Philip Philip philip Annoyman, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:19 (eighteen years ago)
It makes me want to put my foot through the monitor and send ILX's Most Controversial Posters the bill.
― Michael Philip Philip Philip philip Annoyman, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)
I dunno...what about compulsory intelligence tests for all pupils (note: not SATS-style academic examination but purely IQ/learning receptability-based tests) aged about 8 or 9? Regardless of their background, the more responsive children could be sent to well-run Government-funded grammar schools, thus enabling them to have the education they deserve? Probably just a pipe-dream, alas.
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)
That was a spoof, LJ, right?
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:22 (eighteen years ago)
HERE WE GO AGAIN ON OUR OWN, GOING DOWN THE ONLY ROAD WE'VE EVER KNOWN
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:22 (eighteen years ago)
In the "I suppose he does have a point" department:
The usual collection of 'blame single parents' and 'on benefits, what do you expect' nonsense. Even if they achieve they are priced out of HE. You name callers who think it is all so simple should not even be allowed to vote as it is clear you do not understand the important issues within society you are voting on. I, worked three job to get my Degree then my MPhil and now cannot find a job. Tell me why I studied and sacificed. I am a single dad, guess I don' deserve a job, scum like me
dave, nantwich
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:23 (eighteen years ago)
"look, i admitted dom's into my own."
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:12 (eighteen years ago)
dom's slightly more nuanced view
and its not often you hear those words
― 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:17 (eighteen years ago)
Wasn't his point about Annabel Chong or something?
― acrobat, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:17 (eighteen years ago)
something about wrestling i thought
Shane Douglas used to be a teacher before he wrestled.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:22 (eighteen years ago)
Right, now instead of sniping at my proposed solution, can you guys provide of your own? I'm interested to see whether anyone can come up with something convincing.
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:26 (eighteen years ago)
*provide one of
Like Marcello I was singled out at primary school and even then I remember thinking that this was bullshit because the girl I liked ended up in a different group, those retarding my education in the important things in life like kiss chase and postman's knock.
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:27 (eighteen years ago)
Right, now instead of sniping at my proposed solution, can you guys provide of your own?
Well, how about ending charitable status for public schools, for a start.
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 11:29 (eighteen years ago)
It doesn't make sense to give the clever kids all the resources. Intelligent working class kids will still do well no matter where they are (I went to a shithole of a school where some teachers didn't bother turning up to their own lessons, but I still did alright). Clever kids are more likely to work out how to learn things without decent resources, it makes more sense to give more help to the people who aren't capable of that.
― V, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:31 (eighteen years ago)
your proposed solution was nothing,and you've condeded everything. so there's nothing more to discuss there.
schools should differentiate pupils in a nunaced way (good) and it's a tricky situation (yes), but something should then be done so everyone is happy. THIS IS NOT A PIPE DREAM. it's a fair description of the present situation - with the divisiveness of grammar schools and other school funding inequities pissing it up for everyone. focusing on intelligence tests can go to hell. like the 11+ did (did it?)
it is indeed a tricky situation. and what's awful about it is the idea that the government or the parents might have the answer to it all.
unfortunately the 80s conservative government introduced a national curriculum which stopped schools coping with said tricky situation in diverse and appropriate ways. they killed diversity and experimentation. the free-market only works in some situations it seems.
― Alan, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:32 (eighteen years ago)
how about ensuring a living wage and affordable, well-funded childcare for parents so that by age 4 their children aren't already behind
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:32 (eighteen years ago)
ding ding ding
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)
xxxxpost to Tom D: I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that, as long as a system of extremely well-run, well-taught grammar schools was instated in order to give parents the option of giving their children a more academically demanding education. My own parents sometimes say that they wish they'd sent me to a state school; the trouble is that there aren't any good state or grammar schools in my area, and the best education for me that they could think of was independent education. I wouldn't be averse to changing this.
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:35 (eighteen years ago)
*installed
2nd proposal: ban grammar schools and close down all existing ones
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 11:36 (eighteen years ago)
there aren't any good state or grammar schools in my area
because parents who can afford it take their kids out
cf: nhs
― 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:38 (eighteen years ago)
Circular 10/65
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:39 (eighteen years ago)
Can I just say that everything I say on this thread is conjecture, and not necessarily my firm, long-held belief. When I said 'intelligence tests', Alan, I didn't mean 'like the 11+', I meant a far more general, far more abstract test of basic intelligence, perhaps incorporating a teacher's gut instinct and a diverse set of logical and lateral-thinking puzzles.
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
Without wishing to denigrate such as worthy profession, I wouldn't give two fucks for some teachers' "gut instincts".
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)
3rd proposal: middle class twats to stop gettin' the vapours when their kids come within two feet of a poor person, or a black person and stop kicking the step-ladders out from beneath anyone who's a potential rival to Little Johnny's future career prospects
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)
... but I won't hold my breath on that one
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 11:44 (eighteen years ago)
a diverse set of logical and lateral-thinking puzzles
what does this even mean? havent we learnt by now to stop seperating our society out. for there to be good schools there have to be bad schools, sorry, 'not quite as good schools'
― 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:44 (eighteen years ago)
Does being good at lateral thinking puzzles make you more suited to plumbing or medicine?
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)
i hear these "middle class" parents are having a hard time getting their kids into the best (in terms of location as much as anything else) schools.
as Ken said himself on TV last night, London is baby booming.
― blueski, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)
Gareth, I only wish all schools were good, but realistically, this is never going to happen! You could propose, however, a means by which teachers are shuffled around in an ATTEMPT to equalise all schools. That would be an interesting proposition.
Onimo, not necessarily, but it might raise your chances of having the sort of mind that would allow you to make a major scientific breakthrough later on in life.
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)
its the great irony of capitalism, for there to be rich people there obviously have to be poor people, yet all rich people do is worry about the fact that there are poor people on their doorstep.
lol@gentrifiers
― 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)
You could propose, however, a means by which teachers are shuffled around in an ATTEMPT to equalise all schools.
You could also propose ending private education and grammar schools.
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 11:50 (eighteen years ago)
YOU COULD. I'd be interested to see how that worked!
Also, I sincerely hope that 3rd proposal wasn't aimed over here. We're not like that in the slightest.
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)
i already saw that you ceded that we should "differentiate pupils in a nunaced way", and i said so, and further said that this is happening. it used to happen before the SATS and NC structure was enforced. teachers like streaming abilities - it's a great, if coarse, way to deal with a diversity of needs.
― Alan, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)
Even with 'just state schools', though, some would clearly be more academic than others.
Alan, this is what I'm saying. I'm saying that SATS are a bad, bad thing, and NV in fact compared my model to the previous one (whilst admittedly describing that previous one as shite).
― Just got offed, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
You could call it COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)
At my school the boys with the poorest grades were also the most disruptive/class joker OR bullyish types and this was pretty clear by the end of the first year even (with 4 more to go). Only one or two of them were financially disadvantaged or from single parent households (other kids in this position did well of course). None of them stayed on after GCSEs to do A-Levels. The teachers tried to instil discipline, perhaps not hard enough, but they failed ultimately. If these kids had been all put together into the same form early on with dedicated and strict teachers assigned to tutor them for the rest of their time at school that might've helped, but being in the same classes as your friends was often a distraction for most kids - isolation unhealthy and not really feasible either. Not sure what the answer is.
― blueski, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)
in fact teacher gut instinct is nearly ALL that is used to say which set a kid goes in. there is no structure to say (that i know of) if you get score X you are in set Y next year. teachers use scores from various tests and their judgements, plus practical constraints, to stream kids.
― Alan, Friday, 22 June 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)
Can someone let me know when this thread gets around to sending them back up the chimneys? Ta.
We could send them to work in the mines.
Oh wait.
― tissp, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:00 (eighteen years ago)
do any teachers post to ilx?
― acrobat, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
They've got proper work to do
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)
i doubt if working teachers have time to post to ILX during office hours like us slackers. (i was very briefly a teacher, and it was a long time ago.)
x-post!
― Alan, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)
There are a few teachers and former teachers on ILX. I'm not sure if any of them teach/taught at primary school level.
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)
That's why I was careful to say "some teachers" when I was slagging them off :)
― onimo, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
i teach a post-grad course part-time, tho i'm guessing my perspective won't be much help here.
― stevie, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)
its the middle classes that are going to feel the real pain over the next decade or so-- 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:35 (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
-- 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 10:35 (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
hahahaha!
As opposed to the people who don't have enough money to get easy credit, I suppose? Or is the only real pain that which is suffered by the middle classes?
― Stone Monkey, Friday, 22 June 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)
I think that was supposed to be a joke
― Tom D., Friday, 22 June 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)
i think gareth was being ironic, tho i really never know for sure anymore.
― stevie, Friday, 22 June 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)
well its kind of a joke but yea, cheap credit basically (working class have already been fucked over, but until the middle class feels the pinch everything is good with the world never had it so good etc etc)
― 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)
Or is the only real pain that which is suffered by the middle classes?
dingdingding you could get this impression if you watched the bbc or read newspapers
― 696, Friday, 22 June 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
(ps my comment not meant as a slight on gareth, more my reading comprehension)
― stevie, Friday, 22 June 2007 13:14 (eighteen years ago)
wait a minute, dom has interviewed more than one p0rn star? weird.
― acrobat, Friday, 22 June 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
bring back the workhouse.
― darraghmac, Friday, 22 June 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)
-- 696, Friday, June 22, 2007 11:17 AM (9 months ago) Bookmark Link
-- Dom Passantino, Friday, June 22, 2007 11:22 AM (9 months ago) Bookmark Link
So did Spike Dudley
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 3 April 2008 13:37 (seventeen years ago)