IMAGES! LARGE AND MANY!

I loves the Gradeee.

http://www.posivy.com/NLCscan.jpg

need more per post. batshit rightwing cartoons work better in volume.

new limits are a++

(enough to get loose but not too much aka 'requests' thread with all those fucking dogs)

more limits on size!!!

new limits are a++

-- jergïns, Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:43 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

u mean the current ones or the ones i posted at the start of the thread?

i.e. 1500x1500 and 10 per post?

http://www.kodak.com/US/images/en/health/scientific/products/imgStationXRayImagingModule/Image2.jpg

i don't care if they don't up the size (though it does kind of suck if you're trying to link to a graph or detailed chart/image or something), but the limit to 3 is completely unreasonable. there are a LOT of reasons besides img flooding why one would be posting more than 3 pictures at a time (for example you're posting pix from an event!). so arbitrary, it seems like 10 or so would be a lot more reasonable of a limit if we HAVE to have limits.

i don't care if they don't up the size (though it does kind of suck if you're trying to link to a graph or detailed chart/image or something),

OR SANTORUM.JPG

THIS IS ILX NOT THE SCIENCE FAIR.

yeah santorum.jpg is one of the detailed charts i was thinking of! other things that just go to shit when you repost them here: tombot's network chart, the cheddar beer boobs harrison ford thing, 80% of graphs, hilarious comic strips that are vertical instead of horizontal

the thing is that i don't even really understand not putting a pretty large limit on img size i suppose because it's not BLOCKING huge images from appearing (ie saving pplz bandwith and lagtimes) but just resizing them, so why bother, i guess? besides stopping (someone) from posting like a 3 million x 3 million image or something.

limits on image size diminish the scott seward experience.

1500x1500 and 10 per post

^^this

Until image limits are revoked, this thread RIP:

THIS IS THE THREAD WHERE WE SUM UP ILX CLUSTERFUCK THREADS SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ THEM.

NO LIMITS!!

http://hitparade.ch/cdimages/2_unlimited-no_limit_s_1.jpg

l-r keith, stet

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

no limits aka roam free scott seward

I picked this. People can use CSS to limit image size if they want to!!!

yeah, somebody should seriously post an EASILY OFFENDED stylesheet!

1) images all 300 x 300 or smaller
2) expletives replaced with !$@#%?
3) ..?

3) replaces all Dom P posts with pictures of Nathalie's daughter.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

Looks like I bet on the wrong horse ;_;

FUCK YOU ILX.

I was with ya, gr8e, what can I do?

gr8080 you're only fucking yourself

Uh, math here says that only 34% of respondents support no change to the image limitations. The problem is that the vote for changes was split between 4 options, but still has close to a 2/3 majority.

In other words, statistics are a pain in the ass, but this poll actually shows that a majority of those who voted support changing the image limitations.

yeah i was thinking that while walking back from lunch just now.

poll should only have two options:

1. keep limits
2. no limits

OR

1. keep limits
2. new limits (10 per post 1500 x 1500)

THIS IS WHY THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM WORKS PPL.

is this the first poll anyone's taken seriously? like seriously enough to bring out the 'stats' argument?

p.s. no limits

jergins became IRE mod via polling.

neat

Just so you know, any rules you might stipulate would apply to normal mortals, but scott seward is a man unto himself, an alien, a man without a country, he knows no bounds, and rules would just bounce off him like teflon. just warning you (like i did my family when they met him).

We really need instant run-off polling!

image limitations are bullshit

plz friends imagine this (maybe nsfw) x100 it must be understood by all