That thing on Richard and Judy where they watch some youtube clips presented to them by a man who claims to be a comedian.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Most excruciating t.v. ever?

Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

What is "Richard and Judy"?

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:36 (eighteen years ago)

I am guessing: something British.

dan m, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:37 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_%26_Judy

I mean they call them "internet funnies"

Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:37 (eighteen years ago)

british programme for the unemployed.

get a job, jarlmai.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:37 (eighteen years ago)

ROFL with Jon and me on Friday

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:39 (eighteen years ago)

(sorry John u no I got <3 4u)

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

Beaten by R&J.

Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

have i got news for you also frequently plunders youtube. ditto, the daily show. it's 'you've been framed' for the web2.0 generation.

koogs, Thursday, 23 August 2007 08:46 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

Richard and Judy costing £181 per viewer

Ratings for Richard and Judy's latest show are so low that they are now costing satellite channel Watch £181 per viewer.

The presenters signed to the channel last year in a £1million deal, however, ratings for their show have now dropped as low as 11,000, reports the Daily Mail.

Richard And Judy's New Position launched with 100,000 viewers last October but viewing figures have dropped dramatically since then.

The show continues to attract big-name guests but has failed to find an audience, despite moving to a new 6pm timeslot.

As co-presenters of This Morning, the couple once attracted audiences of up to three million viewers but viewing figures began to slide after they moved to Channel 4.

It was seen as a gamble when they announced last year that they were moving to Watch - and it doesn't seem to have paid off.

jed_, Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:00 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't even know there was a channel called Watch. Not that I would have watched.

super shareaholic firefox add (onimo), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:16 (seventeen years ago)

It's just a re-brand of one of the UK Gold channels I think.

Neurotic in a Nuts Way (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:17 (seventeen years ago)

Which might mean there's BBC money tied up in there somehow?

Neurotic in a Nuts Way (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:18 (seventeen years ago)

i've no idea why i bumped this.

jed_, Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:18 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah it does. Joint venture between Worldwide and Virgin Media. Good work, fellas.

Neurotic in a Nuts Way (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:19 (seventeen years ago)

It's just a re-brand of one of the UK Gold channels I think.

The website is under uktv.co.uk so that would be right. Virgin channel 124 - somewhere between Sky and Dave.

super shareaholic firefox add (onimo), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:20 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/02/20/article-1151264-03993710000005DC-118_468x623.jpg

James Mitchell, Saturday, 21 February 2009 20:33 (seventeen years ago)

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/02/21/article-1151264-0399395A000005DC-352_224x423_popup.jpg

Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 21 February 2009 21:16 (seventeen years ago)

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/02/21/article-1151264-0399395A000005DC-352_224x423_popup.jpg

Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 21 February 2009 21:16 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.