"Absolutely NO danger to the population!" - so... why the secrecy then?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2351165.ece
― StanM, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 06:43 (seventeen years ago)
Well hey, it fell off the back of a truck, it was probably broken anyway =D
― Trayce, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 07:30 (seventeen years ago)
Now, I'm no atomic weapons expert, but I'm pretty sure you need to do more to a nuclear bomb than drop it off a truck to make it actually detonatable? I mean, if the vehicle had crashed would it even have gone off? Maybe this is misplaced faith but I'd assume they aren't driving fully armed nuclear warheads around in trucks.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 08:05 (seventeen years ago)
There's a reason why the atomic core is encased in high explosives.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 08:13 (seventeen years ago)
now i have denim in my head
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 08:44 (seventeen years ago)
i think at school once they showed us a video of a train with nuclear stuff on it crashing into a concrete block, as a "test" or something.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 08:45 (seventeen years ago)
<I>"Absolutely NO danger to the population!" - so... why the secrecy then?</I>
Or why tell it now? There's a connection to princess Diana. We'll find out in a few decades.
― nathalie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 08:49 (seventeen years ago)
It's here, it was more to show how safe the flasks are, rather than a test, I think http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lHtRZ_k0s7M
― Bocken Social Scene, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 09:05 (seventeen years ago)
relax a-bombs can be destroyed by missiles while airbourne without detonating I SAW IT ON 24
― blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 09:56 (seventeen years ago)
The second accident occurred at Coulport naval base, Strathclyde, on December 3, 1987
Oh great.
― pfunkboy, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 10:02 (seventeen years ago)