Mark Radcliffe: the final nail in his coffin

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I just heard him, and Marc 'Lard' Riley, doing the voiceover for a trailer on Five Live giving away tickets to this farcical Golden Jubilee concert at Buckingham Palace (Collins, Clapton, Elton John and the like).

YEEEEEEEEEUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Never a hero fallen so far.

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 3 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I would like to see Mark Thomas with a reformed Sex Pistols on a carnival float, playing God Save the Queen going past the entrance to this concert.

DJ Martian, Sunday, 3 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if the queen had any brains she'd have insisted the pistols play this gig, and if rotten had any wit, he'd have accepted (actually he has plenty of wit obv, but since he wasn't asked etc)

ps why aren't i allowed to call her "the queen", robin?

mark s, Sunday, 3 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nice idea, but I think I'd be more inclined myself to play, say, "The Reflex" or "Back To Life (However Do You Want Me)" as vital anti- traditionalist statements while this thing is going on. Mass indifference / immersion in other ways of seeing the world = more powerful than minority anger / mass servility.

Mark S: it doesn't make sense if you don't use capitals, and it probably doesn't make sense at all, but I just find The Queen a terribly archaic way of referring to her, almost as though she's being worshipped, whereas mentioning the Queen casually just suits her true level. I am ridiculously irritated, far beyond logic, by use of capital letters to donate IMPORTANCE (see also The Beatles, as opposed to the Beatles).

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 3 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

but robin, in the beatles, surely the 'the' is part of the name and should therefore be capitalized, as opposed to happy mondays where there is no 'the', therefore any 'the' would not be capitalized.

I just find The Queen a terribly archaic way of referring to her

an archaic referral for an archaic institution.

gareth, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But surely referring to The Beatles as opposed to the Beatles is a sure sign of pomposity and overt reverence, as with the Queen? If "Revolution In The Head" described them simply as the Beatles it'd be approx 32,576 times better than it is obv.

(note: the above may not be strictly true)

"an archaic referral for an archaic institution": well quite, but for as long as she's still around it seems fitting to refer to her in the least reverential way possible, ditto with references to the Times and the Daily Telegraph.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I can see it both ways. I agree that 'The Queen' seems too reverential, but it can serve the purpose of distinguishing between the queen of whom you are a subject (ie the British Queen in this case) and a foreign monarch eg 'the Queen of Belgium'.

I haven't checked to see if this is actually true btw so master of style Mark S. may rumble me.

David Inglesfield, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I am ridiculously irritated, far beyond logic, by use of capital letters to donate IMPORTANCE (see also The Beatles, as opposed to the Beatles).

I am interested in this. Can you give any other examples?

David Inglesfield, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Mike Hanley?

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

WHere do we have it that Mark Radcliffe is anti-royalist? I cas see exactly why he was asked (chosen/selected - after all he does have a contract with the BBC which would probably include things like voice- overs for advertising certain events) - he is an acceptible voice for both Radio 1, 2 and 5 - the target audiences. Fact of the matter is he and Riley make the sting amusing and could actually provoke this kind of debate (assumptions re: Northerners not loving the Queen, civic pride etc etc).

Heroes are people too.

Pete, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

as a sub editor the capitalisation of "The" in the middle of a sentence drives me crazy: it has NO SANCTION in english grammar/punc that i am prepared to accept... "We are called 'The [xx] Gallery' ie 'The is part of our name so please capitalise" "OK, if you insist: '[y] is showing at the The [xx] Gallery'" "Not what we meant!" "OK so 'the' is NOT part of the name, it is the Definite Article and belongs to the PUBLIC part of the ENGLISH LANGUAGE which you do not own, [xx] Gallery, and in that language unless it comes at the beginning of the sentence 'The" has a little letter ph34r m3 ect"

related to robin's irritation: styleguides usually claim the The Times is the only paper that is allowed to capitalise the the as part of its name (eg it is the Guardian and the Telegraph... )

You would say "Royalty" (meaning phil the greek et al) but "Begian royalty". "Bernice is Queen of [zz]" but "Bernice threw a big royal party and all the other queens were invited..."

mark s, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Guardian style guide generally follows Mark S's advice (and doesn't even capitalise the Times.)

Big expection: book titles. eg. "I wuv The Catcher in the Rye" not "I wuv the Catcher in the Rye".

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Err.. exception.

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You would say "Royalty" (meaning phil the greek et al) but "Begian royalty". "Bernice is Queen of [zz]" but "Bernice threw a big royal party and all the other queens were invited..."

This supports the *logic* of what I said but then the thing about the non-capitalisation of 'the' takes precedence. Am I correct?

Oh, but what about Christian references (His work...The Lamb of God...that sort of thing)?

David Inglesfield, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Where did this start anyway? Who writes The Queen as opposed to the Queen? No one, in my experience.

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Check your Christmas telly schedules; it's always The Queen. I think it's meant to be an honorific of sorts to do it this way.

If a pop group want their 'the' capitalised, it's always The Group.

suzy, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well if it's at the beginning of the sentence it HAS to be The Queen e.g: The Queen's Speech 3:00 BBC1.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well yeah, obv. I meant except for at the start of sentences.

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

In Christmas tellt schedules its always The Queen as the the comes at the beginning of the sentence The Queen (which is what the TV speech is called). Though it wouldn't surprise me if the BBC were a bit forelock tugging on this issue.

Pete, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Monday 3pm - first instance of Monobrain usage of the week.

Pete, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Don't you mean The Monobrain?

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This has reminded me that one of my mates recently sent me an email in which he called me The Emma Hamilton (cannot remember if he capitalised The or not). I questioned him on his weird usage but he assured me it was a compliment. Hmmm.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Emma Hamilton

A reference to that pub again?

David Inglesfield, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No a reference to ME again. He explained it was to single me out from all the other girls called Emma Hamilton.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm... well if you call countries 'the ____' it is generally held to show a lack of respect, Emma (eg. Ukranians don't like their country being called the Ukraine). Same goes for 'the Congo', I think.

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Where I work we would of course italicise The Catcher in the Rye, so that is sidestepped

And it is korrekt grammar to say: "Yo Bubba, pass me the The Catcher in the Rye but not the Moominvalley in November", even tho it sounds like grave mentalism, and most will compress. Cap 'The' mid-sentence a creeping solecism, I fear. Yeah, God gets caps wherever, if you wanna.

mark s, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Last time I checked I was a person not a country, and as it has been claimed up thread that The Queen is reverential I think I will continue to assume that my mate was not dissing me.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Emma Hamilton is like a foreign country: they punctuate things differently there.

Tim, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

'The' in front of country names (in their English versions) often signifies a country based around a river (e.g. The Gambia, The Congo). it came up in a Guardian Notes and Queries once, i can't remember the exact details though.

michael, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Now I'm having an identity crisis. Am I human? Or a geographical feature?

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe a river runs through you?

Pete, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what about La Belle France? can foreigners use whatever happens to be "the" in the local lingo?

what is this thread about please?

katie, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if you could be a geographical feature what would you be? isthmus always goes quite quickly. An ox-bow lake perhaps? How about an arrete peak?

Alan Trewartha, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

A VOLCANO.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought the soy milk was meant to stop that.

Tom, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

WHAT?

I just love volcanoes is all.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Is Emma troubled with mucus?

N., Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This is the ultimate ILe thread! Mutation, strange words, quips, proof that Ile is not down the dumper.

I think so anyway.

chris, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If volcanoes spewed out mucus instead of BOILING HOT bits of the middle of the earth then they would hardly be worth bothering about. And thank you for asking but I am mucus free and in fine fettle.

Emma, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually it was Andrew Littlefield who referred to The Queen rather than the Queen during the Prince Philip thread last week, which caught my eye. The Guardian's policy of referring to the Times rather than The Times is one of my favourite things about it.

Surely the use of "His" etc. in a religious context depends on how much of an, er, believer you are? I remember, as late as 1992, a reference being made to "The Queen surveys Her Scouts at Windsor", as though she was on a Godlike level, and if the person who insisted on the capital h hadn't been asleep since about 1960, I'd be very surprised. Maybe it was a misprint, because I can't imagine even the Scout Association having that attitude to her by the time of the, ahem, Annus Horribilis.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

B-b-but what about Mark Radcliffe and his coffin? Or is he going to be caught in some sort of Vesuvius like out pouring of lava burying him alive.

Pete, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh no, it's all MY fault now! Please blame it on a tendency to capitalise anything I possibly can rather than any kind of forelock- tugging 'respect', tho'.

Andrew L, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That's OK, Andrew. I used to overuse capitals like that as well.

What Pete mentioned - I just used to adore the Graveyard Shift and wouldn't have imagined him doing such a thing, but this is the nature of the relatively high profile he enjoys now. Radcliffe is heard on all the BBC networks bar Radio 3, which is obviously a sign of his diversity of interests. It's as much a "nail in the coffin of what remains of my naive adolesence" thing as anything else.

Assumptions re. Northerners not loving the Queen - I think it's more to do with the fact that the old "official culture" of the 1950s, which was the height of reverence for her, was essentially a Home Counties thing and was bound up with the old BBC culture of patronising and dismissive attitudes towards the North. It was always false, though, because traditional Northern conservative socialists were usually as monarchist as High Tories in the South. Relative indifference / active opposition to the monarchy isn't something I'd define in regional terms, except that areas with a large retired population will, for that reason, have a higher percentage of people who still revere the monarchy.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well Robin, re Radcliffe, I'm sure I'm just repeating myself... I listen to M&L in the afternoon quite regularly still, and it's a labour of love that's doing my head in. It's painful to hear them playing stuff they hate, but it's also painful to hear them laying into a lot of great new music and adopting the nu-prog stuff instead. I know they love all that old prog and Zep etc, but to hear them going wild over Elbow is unsettling.

This is partly rose-tinted graveyard shift at work, cos I resented their Oasis fixation then too.

Also their talking all the way through that Jamiraquai song last week = CLASSIC!

Alan at school, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if the queen had any brains she'd book elbow instead of elton

mark s, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If the Queen had any sense she'd book Howard Jones heh

Alan T is right: they can sound increasingly fogeyish these days and generalising in their dismissive attitudes. I'm aware that's probably an age thing (they're both in their 40s now) but when someone pointed us towards an M&L thread on another forum I said that the people on it were as blindly reluctant to admit that Radio 1 had to move on from their tastes as DLT fans were in 1993, and my opinions on this matter have not changed.

I didn't like their Oasis love back in 95/6 either, but they played enough interesting music (wouldn't define my tastes now as it did then though) for me to forgive them.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

they are beginning to remind me of when presenters on cduk (that guy out of hollyoaks) get overly pleased when a.n.other indie band plays, and they mug too much to camera (look mum i like indie). radcliffe was always passable, but not that much more (not a criticsm but...). riley of course is more of a shame, but even so.

i am surprised they haven't been shunted over to radio 2 yet (or have they?). they have done 'stuff' for music, i know, and i don't have anything against them, but they are part of a bygone age. they don't really cross my radar at all, and there is no reason they should

gareth, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"they are part of a bygone age": yes exactly Gareth, the era of the inkies, the era when British indie still had something that could at least be described as cultural importance. Let them be seen as such, as much as Alan Freeman or someone is.

In time I'm sure they'll be on Radio 2, though probably more likely a weekend Jonathan Ross-type show than every day.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

six years pass...

I would like to see Mark Thomas with a reformed Sex Pistols on a carnival float, playing God Save the Queen going past the entrance to this concert.

-- DJ Martian, Sunday, 3 March 2002 01:00 (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

Wouldn't enjoy this.

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Sunday, 15 June 2008 14:14 (seventeen years ago)

Nice idea, but I think I'd be more inclined myself to play, say, "The Reflex" or "Back To Life (However Do You Want Me)" as vital anti- traditionalist statements

^^^ RoCa had it covered, holmes.

banriquit, Sunday, 15 June 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think mark and 'lard' work together any more.

that period when they replaced chris evans was a key event for x-fm listeners of my age and acquaintance. in reality they weren't any good at it, but for the aforementioned it was a glimpse of nationalo radio As It Should Be.

banriquit, Sunday, 15 June 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)

Radcliffe now dispenses sub-par banter on Radio 2 of an evening with Stuart Maconie. Is Riley still on Radio 6, I keep forgetting that exists.

ailsa, Sunday, 15 June 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/feb/01/mark-radcliffe-stuart-maconie-radio-2-6-music

the pinefox, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)

Blog: Is Radcliffe and Maconie's move a good thing?

Also..

Whiley, who lost her weekday Radio 1 slot in 2009 to move to a weekend show, will now leave Radio 1, bringing the curtain down on a 17-year career with the station.

"I've loved working at Radio 1 for the past 17 years. It's given me opportunities I could only have dreamt of," said Whiley.

"As well as supporting my love of music, Radio 1 have also supported and accommodated me bringing three further children into the world, something, as a woman, I will always be grateful for."

?

Mark G, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)

"I appeal to you, as a woman!"

the pinefox, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

Sometimes it's hard to be a woman.

Y Kant Torres Red (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:57 (fourteen years ago)

your wife caught you again?

Algerian Goalkeeper, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)

OMG women.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.