German Politician Wants Marriages To Expire After 7 Years

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

By Madeline Chambers
Fri Sep 21, 4:00 AM ET

BERLIN (Reuters) - Bavaria's most glamorous politician -- a flame-haired motorcyclist who helped bring down state premier Edmund Stoiber -- has shocked the Catholic state in Germany by suggesting marriage should last just 7 years.

Gabriele Pauli, who poses on her web site in motorcycle leathers, is standing for the leadership of Bavaria's Christian Social Union (CSU) -- sister party of Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) -- in a vote next week.

She told reporters at the launch of her campaign manifesto on Wednesday she wanted marriage to expire after seven years and accused the CSU, which promotes traditional family values, of nurturing ideals of marriage which are wide of the mark.

"The basic approach is wrong ... many marriages last just because people believe they are safe," she told reporters. "My suggestion is that marriages expire after seven years."

After that time, couples should either agree to extend their marriage or it should be automatically dissolved, she said.

Fifty-year-old Pauli, twice divorced, is a maverick intent on shaking up her male-dominated and mainly Catholic party which has dominated Bavarian politics since World War Two.

"This is about bringing ideas into the CSU and starting a discussion," she told German television on Thursday after she had unleashed a wave of criticism from other politicians.

Former foe Stoiber said she did not belong in the CSU and European lawmaker Ingo Freidrich dismissed her views.

"She is diametrically contradicting our Christian, ethical values," Freidrich said.

Peter Ramsauer, head of the CSU in Germany's parliament, compared Pauli's ideas to "the dirt under your fingernails".

Pauli, who attracted attention earlier this year when she posed for a magazine wearing long black latex gloves, was at the centre of a snooping scandal which eventually led to Stoiber, Bavarian premier for 14 years, saying he would stand down early.

She said his office tried to obtain details about lovers and alcohol consumption to use against her.

The CSU will elect Stoiber's successor as party head at a conference next week. He will be replaced as state premier in early October.

Viewed as a party rebel, Pauli stands almost no chance of winning next week's vote. The contest has been fought mainly between Bavarian state economy minister Erwin Huber and German Consumer Minister Horst Seehofer.

The popularity of Seehofer, a 58-year-old married father of three, has suffered from the disclosure that he had been having an affair with a younger woman who recently had his baby.

nicky lo-fi, Friday, 21 September 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)

I know it could get awkward in year seven, and it's not the most romantic...

but I think it's fucking brilliant.

nicky lo-fi, Friday, 21 September 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

I've been saying this for years. In fact, all "dating"/relationships should be contractually finite with options to renew. Sure, it's awkward if you're at the end and not renewing, but it's better than the misery of indefinitely being stuck in a relationship with someone you don't dislike enough to "break up" with, but don't like enough to feel positively spending the next X days/months/years with.

Will M., Friday, 21 September 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

Seems like it has a chance to make an otherwise very nasty situation a bit more civil. For those who are happy, they can choose to celebrate the renewal as they see fit.

patita, Friday, 21 September 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

I kind of like the current system, where the default is that you stay married until you say you aren't. This has the virtue of simplicity. By forcing couples to re-enlist on a recurring basis, you open the door to all kinds of bureaucratic mishaps every time the paperwork gets filed.

Why is dissolution on an arbitrary schedule better than dissolution at the will of the couple? We let couples decide who, when and how to marry. Why not trust them to decide about divorce, too?

Seems to me more like a stupid attention-grabbing ploy than a serious policy suggestion.

Aimless, Friday, 21 September 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

I think people who say, "Oooh, I like that!" to this idea should be forced to spend every waking hour of their lives in line at the RMV until they re-evaluate their apparent need for more beaurocracy in their lives.

HI DERE, Friday, 21 September 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

beaurocracy

The rule of guys named Beau?

Michael White, Friday, 21 September 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)

Beaur, rather.

Aimless, Friday, 21 September 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

http://emol.org/tv/programs/intothewest/beau_bridges-1.jpg

gabbneb, Friday, 21 September 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.