Mannahatta

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

awesome

and what, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

yah

jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.wcs.org/media/image/upperwestside21.jpg

ps lol

jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, this is discussed a bit in this book i'm reading

kenan, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

It's kind of a nice testament to NYC's pro-public-space socialist days that my reaction to the UWS rendering is basically "umm yeah, that is indeed what I imagine it would look like if Riverside Park grew several blocks over into Central Park"

nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

neat

s1ocki, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, also, obviously this is what it would look like had it not been built up - just look upstate for inspiration, no?

tehresa, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 01:52 (eighteen years ago)

not much of the hudson valley is old growth, if any at all. it would look significantly different.

and riverside and central parks, lovely as they are, are just as man-made environments as the skyscrapers adjacent to them.

gonna read this article in a bit, looks neat.

hstencil, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 03:31 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, this is discussed a bit in this book i'm reading

no it isn't

gabbneb, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 04:33 (eighteen years ago)

or, at least, depopulated future manhattan is not the same thing

gabbneb, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 04:35 (eighteen years ago)

gabbneb do you wear a tophat, monocle, and huge ass neck corset?

sanskrit, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 04:39 (eighteen years ago)

on weekends he wears sweatpants.

hstencil, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 05:04 (eighteen years ago)

haha, hstencil has good recall, but no i don't actually wear sweatpants very often. and no, sanskrit, i only wear fattushis.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 05:14 (eighteen years ago)

no it isn't

-- gabbneb, Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:33 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

or, at least, depopulated future manhattan is not the same thing

-- gabbneb, Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:35 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

Dude, the project is discussed. There's a picture from this project. It's used to illustrate the state of wildness that Manhattan will try to return to. Have you read the book?

kenan, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

what do you think? :) my bad!

gabbneb, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

how do you like that book kenan?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

It's science-a-licious. (But also obviously speculative.) The prose is pretty full-blooded, considering how dry and gloomy the subject matter might have been.

kenan, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

so uh recommended? is the prose too full-blooded? cause it sounds pretty awesome.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

No, it's great! Yeah, recommended.

kenan, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

i think i will read this

jhøshea, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:58 (eighteen years ago)

It's important, too, that he never seems to be acting judgmental, or implying that the world would definitely be better off without us in a larger sense. (Though lots of animals would love it.) The tone is just, "This is what would likely happen."

kenan, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.