Kettle Chips calls in US union-busters to stop recognition
― Billy Dods, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:04 (seventeen years ago)
Shame as they're deliciously snackable.
― Billy Dods, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:05 (seventeen years ago)
They keep sending me free packets (i.e. one every eight months or so)
Can I eat those?
― Mark G, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago)
No, send them to me and I will dispose of them in a way which avoids worker exploitation.
― Billy Dods, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:07 (seventeen years ago)
hmm, not sure about this. i'll keep buying and enjoying their crisps until they actually do something that i disagree with, as opposed to not liking trade union for the sake of it.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:19 (seventeen years ago)
they came for the crisp manufacturers, but i said nothing, because i was not a crisp manufacturer...
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:24 (seventeen years ago)
'they' could just as easily refer to muscle-flexing unions.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
the muscle flexing unions these workers aren't allowed to join?
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:29 (seventeen years ago)
allowed?
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:31 (seventeen years ago)
para 1:
A British private equity company has called in one of the leading US union-busters to stop workers at one of the country's best-known upmarket crisp producers, Kettle Chips, joining a trade union.
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
"We were called in by the workers when they did not receive annualised payments for overtime." -- Miles Hubbard, Unite's eastern region organiser
whoa watch those muscles, they could put somebody's eye out!
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
KETTLECHIP POTEMKIN!
― Pete, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:37 (seventeen years ago)
para 2:
The California-based Burke Group has been engaged by Lion Capital, owners of Kettle Foods, to dissuade the 340 workers at their Norwich factory from joining Unite, the country's largest union.
maybe i misunderstand 'dissuade'. i certainly don't equate it with 'stop'.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:37 (seventeen years ago)
darraghmac that's pitiful.
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:38 (seventeen years ago)
rest of the article not count?
they don't seem to be engaging in anything like unfair work practices or bad pay/conditions, quite the contrary.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:39 (seventeen years ago)
-- Pete, Monday, October 1, 2007 3:37 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
omg
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago)
-- darraghmac, Monday, October 1, 2007 3:39 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link
except they didn't receive the annualized pay for overtime...
can't the workers join the union anyway tracer?
what, exactly can these 'union-busters' do? i'm genuinely curious.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago)
from wikipedia (the whole article is worth reading):
Methods of union busting
* 4.1 Dirty tricks * 4.2 Propaganda * 4.3 Intelligence operations * 4.4 Legal obstruction * 4.5 Favoritism and division * 4.6 Creating an illusion of progress * 4.7 Supervisors at the point of attack * 4.8 Declare innocence; comply with the law; blame the union * 4.9 Strike breaking * 4.10 Lockouts
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:47 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.tbglabor.com/
― gff, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
Is there a Facebook group I can join to express solidarity with these workers?
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
Positive employee relations and labor relations can best be attained by effective leadership and programs that:
* Treat all employees with dignity and respect * Encourage participation in decisions impacting employee work lives * Select, train, and develop effective frontline leadership * Communicate openly and honestly with employees * Resolve workplace concerns and issues in a timely equitable manner * Compensate employees consistent with marketplace philosophy * Recognize and reward exemplary performance * Review processes to ensure a fit with client culture and values * Ensure that policies and practices are applied consistently
― gff, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ see? no problem
yes, theoretically i see what you're driving at.
i just don't see enough evidence to boycott the company just yet. the union obviously wants in, the company obviously doesn't want them in.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
yes there are two sides to every story after all
― gff, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:07 (seventeen years ago)
Are they called Kettle Crisps in the UK? I mean, wouldn't Kettle Chips confuse the poor Britishers and make them think they're buying a bag of soggy freedom fries?
― libcrypt, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
we are not quite that stupid (almost, just not quite)
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
Do you have pork rinds in the UK?
― libcrypt, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
the union obviously wants in, the company obviously doesn't want them in.
It shouldn't be up to the company in the first place.
― Neil S, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.hairybarsnacks.com/images/pork_scratching_picture3.jpg
xp
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
Mmm, pork scratchings!
― Neil S, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
It shouldn't be up to the company in the first place
and it's not. but why is it taken for granted that company=evil workers=downtrodden masses union=fair balance.
maybe i'm just tetchy after the tube strike ruined my week in london. I'm just saying that it'd take a lot more than what's in the article above to get me out on the street with my firebrand killing executives.
(or boycotting delicious crisps)
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
Kettle Kracklin's
― dan m, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
that would probably read better with ; between evil and workers and again between masses and union, sorry.
― darraghmac, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
but the tube drivers were right to strike darragh ;)
(jol out!)
i hope kettle chips ppl realise the folly of not letting the workers unionise, brit unions are so near to toothless it's perverse not to, because you get a wodge of bad publicity and bad feeling among staff, rather than working with them that costs you next to nothing.
christ if even WALMART realise this, it seems to be the sensible way forward...
― CarsmileSteve, Monday, 1 October 2007 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
and it's not. but why is it taken for granted that company=evil workers=downtrodden masses union=fair balance
for me, its because the only time i ever had to go on strike (which i didn't want to do) it was because my employer was pulling shit like this, not paying for work done, and they would have continued to do so if we hadn't gone on strike. i needed the right to strike, the right to union representation, and i don't see why others should be denied it.
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
which isn't to say, unions are all great etc, obviously. but that's how my sympathies fall.
― stevie, Monday, 1 October 2007 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
i had the jamacian jerk flavor last night it was yumm
― chaki, Monday, 1 October 2007 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
If the workers want to join a union, they should be allowed to join a union. If the owners don't want their workers to join a union and take steps to prevent this, then they should get an anal massage with a broomstick. It doesn't matter a damn whether the workers' lot will improve under a union. They have a right to free association and to collective bargaining, regardless.
― Aimless, Monday, 1 October 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago)
Kettle chips are excellent. The Jalapeno hot are especially tasty.
Under the Taft Hartley Act in the US it's illegal to use these kind of tactics to prevent unionizing. Query whether Britain has such a law.
― Bill Magill, Monday, 1 October 2007 17:54 (seventeen years ago)
The thing is, frankly, this is an easy boycott - there are loads of delicious crisps out there!
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
Time to go back to Sabritones.
― Abbott, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.greentourismadvice.co.uk/supplierphotos/41.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:46 (seventeen years ago)
xxp none deliciouser though! hello, spicy thai. the price is what makes it a relatively easy boycott.
― tremendoid, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:47 (seventeen years ago)
spicy thai chips are godlike
― gff, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:49 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.tyrrellspotatochips.co.uk/nav_potatochips/logo.gif
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:49 (seventeen years ago)
'Spensive tho.
― Abbott, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:50 (seventeen years ago)
Cheap and delicious! http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:O84QW2LVU2kZKM:http://snackspot.org.uk/images/walkersWorcesterSauce.jpeg
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:52 (seventeen years ago)
haha Taft-Hartley, known for imposing limits on employers!
― milo z, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
xp And now free from Sudan1!
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.atlantaillustrated.com/blogs/blog02/uploaded_images/hot%20fries%202-763936.jpg
cheap and delicious!
― chaki, Monday, 1 October 2007 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
kettle chips a bit too oily and salty and overflavoured but hell i'm in for a boycott. thank god only kettle chips have shitty labour relations, i might have to boycott things i regularly buy.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 1 October 2007 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
and they are TOO HARD.
britain, on signing up to the EU workers charter thingy (it has a proper name) only ten years after everyone else, due to TORY, introduced a relatively limited right to free asociation, in that it doesn't apply to small and medium sized employers (under 250 staff), but in larger in employers they MUST recognise a union (and therefore negotiate with it) once 50% of a appropriate group of staff join said union. you also have to right to be accompanied by a union representative to disciplinary/greivance procedures whether union is recognised or not (i *think*).
man i totally used to know ALL this stuff...
― CarsmileSteve, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:03 (seventeen years ago)
salt and pepper kettle chips might be the best chips ever made
― chaki, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:03 (seventeen years ago)
Top 5, for sure.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:06 (seventeen years ago)
chaki otm
― river wolf, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
yes. CHAKI FOR PRESIDENT
― Mr. Que, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
2x otm
― dan m, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:23 (seventeen years ago)
top 5 chips
1. kettle - salt and pepper 2. trader joes - salsa chips (RIP) 3. fritos - honey bbq twists 4. birdseye hawaiian - sweet maui onion 5. doritos - nacho
― chaki, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
We don't get some of those over here. I still have a lot of love for Salt & Vinegar Pringles too, the Crystal Meth of potato snacks.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:34 (seventeen years ago)
I agree.
― Michael White, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:48 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.typophile.com/files/utz_3593.gif
― Eisbaer, Monday, 1 October 2007 21:49 (seventeen years ago)
Chaki there is something missing from yr list and its name is Hostess brand Ketchup Chips. I had them in Toronto and OMGOMGOMGOMG!
― Jon Lewis, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:14 (seventeen years ago)
oh i need to try those.... also missing are any form of pickle chips but mostly Charlie's Chips - Dill Pickle flavor.
― chaki, Monday, 1 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)
wau http://www.taquitos.net/dbimages13/Lays-K.jpg http://farm1.static.flickr.com/3/4833733_7d6d716a33.jpg
― chaki, Monday, 1 October 2007 23:56 (seventeen years ago)
i've repeated this story, but once in north england i bought lamb + mint crisps at a gas station. grossed the whole car out. could only finish 2/3 the bag.
― sanskrit, Monday, 1 October 2007 23:59 (seventeen years ago)
there is a facebook page http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=5233937858&ref=mf
― martin_t, Saturday, 6 October 2007 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
yes, theoretically i see what you're driving at.i just don't see enough evidence to boycott the company just yet. the union obviously wants in, the company obviously doesn't want them in.-- darraghmac, Monday, October 1, 2007 10:06 AM (5 days ago) Bookmark Link
-- darraghmac, Monday, October 1, 2007 10:06 AM (5 days ago) Bookmark Link
A union is not some outside entity that foists itself on a company. It is a collective of workers who want the to have access to the same power that their employer has through the employer's alliance in trade orgs, etc. The union doesn't just come in and say "Oh hi, we're going to organize your workers," the workers have to actively seek out a union to help them organize. Organizers jobs are hard enough without banging their heads against a wall trying to organize the unwilling.
― Jesse, Saturday, 6 October 2007 18:30 (seventeen years ago)
And obviously a company does not want their workers represented by a union! Having the balance of power solidly in your favor is a pretty sweet state of affairs.
― Jesse, Saturday, 6 October 2007 18:32 (seventeen years ago)
And lastly, union busters are the lowest of the low. A curse on their heads.
― Jesse, Saturday, 6 October 2007 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
how do union busters work, exactly?
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 6 October 2007 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
I don't have time to go into it, but pretty much divide and conquer. And intimidate. See Wikipedia.
― Jesse, Saturday, 6 October 2007 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
there was preemptive union busting at the hospital where I worked in Iowa a long time ago. It was ugly to see. It was in response to the presence of an organizer in the workforce - somebody who'd asked around about whether people might want to unionize and had made it known, evidently to one too many people, that he could help make it happen.
The hospital hired a firm that specialized in preempting unionization. All the supervisors were given training, and then, over the course of a week or so, on every potentially affected ward of the hospital, employees were called in one at a time to meet with two or three supervisors, who'd then ask us: "Do you have any needs or concerns that aren't being addressed by the hospital?" "Are you aware that if you feel you need a raise or more time off, etc., you can bring that up with your direct supervisor at any time?" "Do you feel you are being treated unfairly by management?" etc etc. Few employees are likely to respond to such a situation by saying "Yeah, there's a hell of a lot that's messed up about this place": you're sitting there surrounded by bosses, and you're all alone. Then they ask you to sign a document that says you don't have any concerns that you want addressed right away. It doesn't say you don't want to unionize; it just says that you were given an opportunity to voice any concerns and you didn't have any at that time. Once everybody's signed (and everybody signs, believe me), they present these documents to union leadership and tell them to leave the hospital alone since the workers have stated they are all quite happy.
Reason # 123,694 in a series relating to why if you gotta work in the medical field you'll wanna stay the fuck out of managed care.
― J0hn D., Saturday, 6 October 2007 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
Oh yeh. And spreading lies and misuderstanding about what a union is.
xpost
― Jesse, Saturday, 6 October 2007 19:22 (seventeen years ago)
oh chaki, the dill chips were my favorite ever. mmmm dill. i love dill.
― tehresa, Saturday, 6 October 2007 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
i need a union-buster in the nausea in my gut
― remy bean, Saturday, 6 October 2007 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
I still have a lot of love for Salt & Vinegar Pringles too, the Crystal Meth of potato snacks.
Have you tried the 'rice' pringles? They are PCP in crisp form.
― Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 6 October 2007 21:51 (seventeen years ago)
D@rnielle on the money.
And believe me, the money is what this is always about.
Anally massaged with a broomstick is way too good for union busters.
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 6 October 2007 22:20 (seventeen years ago)
Man, that article is too much
> We're not sure what Unite the union wish to do for our employees.
> We were called in by the workers when they did not receive annualised payments for overtime.
Fucking lazy bastards! Wanting to get paid more for working longer!
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 6 October 2007 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
i have to confess that i bought a bag of spicy thai with lunch after having my curiosity piqued by this thread. not as fuck you to all the well meaning people here, but because they sounded good.
― sanskrit, Saturday, 6 October 2007 22:59 (seventeen years ago)
sorry, that's how my stomach works. tell me your getting curry at 11am and i'm hunting for indian restaraunts by 1pm.
Rice pringles? I just looked and they are not available in the US. Why does the UK get fancy pants Pringles when WE invented them?! (Didn't we?)
I also saw "Light Sensations." Interesting.
― Jesse, Sunday, 7 October 2007 00:42 (seventeen years ago)
The rice Pringles are good but I don't notice a huge amount of difference with the old Lites. I assume they've just replaced some of the potato flour with rice flour in the mix. But yeah, they're all seedy and super habit-forming and feeling bad about yrself in the morning.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 7 October 2007 09:21 (seventeen years ago)