I have never used a 'rampant rabbit'
Or any of it's variants, of which there appear to be many.
One of my friends said "you must be the only woman who's never tried one - you don't know what you're missing!"
Er, firstly I DON'T think I'm the only woman who's never used one, and secondly, I'm not missing anything - that's one of the reasons why I don't need one of these mechanical, noisy contraptions.
Fucking rabbit.
― *rumpie*, Thursday, 8 November 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)
Old ILX thread.
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 8 November 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)
this flippant remark is worse than apartheid
― That mong guy that's shit, Thursday, 8 November 2007 10:33 (eighteen years ago)
In case anyone is wondering what this thread is about:
http://i18.tinypic.com/8aa88s2.jpg
― StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 10:44 (eighteen years ago)
They are giant, and noisy, and intrusive.
Well maybe they are supposed to be two of these things but there's no denying they are damn ugly.
I wonder if any of the Dragons would have invested if they had first been touted on their show.
― *rumpie*, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:01 (eighteen years ago)
I bought my gf one of these at the weekend. She was sceptical but curious before, and now she thinks it's brilliant. Make of that what you will.
― The Wayward Johnny B, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:05 (eighteen years ago)
what is that? a toilet plunger?
― Heave Ho, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:08 (eighteen years ago)
(my gf already has a toilet plunger, btw)
― The Wayward Johnny B, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:12 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, it is. (that image was also a joke, the Rampant Rabbit is actually something else) (xpost)
― StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:16 (eighteen years ago)
Was she as much of a sceptic as me? I seriously struggle to comprehend how one of these could 'do it' for me.
When it comes to vibrators, dildos, whatever I've never really been that tickled.
― *rumpie*, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
I've got one, but don't like it much. It's a bit *too* efficient.
― C J, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:41 (eighteen years ago)
I don't think she was a sceptical as you maybe are, but she's ended up really liking it. She didn't think it would play with her g-spot as well as me but by all accounts it did okay. I got her one with multiple settings for the cl1t vibrate. Her being greedy wanted it on full, but the ever-changing settings (high,low,high,high,low,low,high,low,vhigh etc) made her very happy indeed!
They do look a bit scary and ugly, but they're scientifically designed to get women off. I suppose if you don't think it'll do it for you, it probably won't, sexuality being as it is.
― The Wayward Johnny B, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:59 (eighteen years ago)
just use an electric toothbrush ffs
― Just got offed, Thursday, 8 November 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)
Somebody else's preferably
― Tom D., Thursday, 8 November 2007 12:50 (eighteen years ago)
I bought one for my wife a year ago or so, she used it a couple of times, but didn't get too into the sensation, which she described as being like being railroaded to orgasm. That sounds GREAT to me, tbh, but there you go.
― Pashmina, Thursday, 8 November 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
"scientifically designed to get women off, being railroaded to orgasm" - is it me or do these things sound like they were made by male engineers? Where's the "taking her out to a romantic dinner/talking for hours" part that women apparently tend to like as well?
― StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
unlicensed vibrator repairman kenan hebert to thread
― and what, Thursday, 8 November 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
http://i9.tinypic.com/6u5g3r9.jpg
― StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 15:13 (eighteen years ago)