Your 2008 Democratic Presidential Candidate (Poll!) (Closes 11/16)

Who we would vote for, or who we predict will win it all?

"Who are you supporting" = Who would you vote for

ten points off for using "deboringify"

as of now. we can do this again.

oops, i didn't read the poll text. my bad.

it's such a good word

the leading Stop Rodham candidate on the morning of Feb 5

there will be other polls. later polls. this is now.

If, like me, you get kicks watching these electables thrown together in a room, ignoring questions in favor of prepared statements, don't miss the debate tomorrow night on CNN. Laffs are promised. Hillary's going to be presented an oversized novelty driver's license.

the leading Stop Rodham candidate on the morning of Feb 5

-- Dr Morbius, Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:31 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

morbz still going for rudy?

god, I guess Kucinich by default

I would cite Bill Richardson maybe -- if I thought he had a snowball's chance in hell of actually winning. i don't know. I'm so left with the exasperated feeling of: "Is this really the best we can do?"

What's with the middle initials btw?

Alex OTM: though I'd wager he's a good bet for HRC veep. He and Edwards would be an interesting ticket.

if anyone cares, he's my order of preference:

(1) edwards -- hands down the best candidate on the issues of most importance to me (read: economics issues) -- if it wasn't for him, i really wonder if any of the other candidates would be anywhere near as "populist" as they have been. probably won't be nominated, though.

(2) hillary -- probably the best qualified of all of the candidates. even though i don't like some of her associates (read: mark penn and the DLC crowd) and there's the whole iraq war thing, i also think that she'd be very conscientious in both keeping different party factions satisfied as well as taking the serious problems that this country will face seriously. plus she WILL fight, which AFAIC is a prerequisite in this age of O'Reilly and other assorted right-wing/neocon freaks.

(3) dodd -- also well-qualified. plus his economic/financial background will be a plus in what i firmly believe will be the oncoming economic/financial shitstorm b/c of financial/housing market turbulence. plus he's made the right noises/moves on FSA/constitutional issues. on the other hand, could be too cosy to Wall Street (i'm suspicious that we'd end up with a massive, taxpayer-financed subprime bailout under his watch that does more to bail out Wall Street, mortgage bankers and flippers than actual homeowners) plus he probably has no chance of winning in the primaries either.

(4) richardson -- dunno about him, one moment he's OK the next he sounds like he fell offa the turnip truck. pluses are his federal and gubernatorial experience. will keep my eye on him, but i also don't think that he has a chance.

(5) obama -- still cannot figure out just WHY he's running. plus i can't shake the feeling that he's a big phony, an empty suit who talks like Bobby Kennedy and acts like Joe Lieberman. additionally, his "followers" that i've met are some of the most smug people i've met this side of nader's supporters in 2000. finally, i firmly believe that the GOP will play him like a chump, that he doesn't have the stomach or instincts for fighting. not ready for prime time.

(6) kucinich. pfft. might as well just write in Shirley McLain or Jon Anderson (if he were a US citizen). too much of a flake to win anything.

(7) biden. closest thing to Joe Lieberman running -- which is very, very bad and totally unacceptable. at least Joementum is acceptable on many economic issues. i might as well vote for Citibank or Bank of America as support him -- it'll be more efficient, cutting out the middle man. has absolutely no chance of winning.

Is Mike Gravel gone?

See "None of the above"

turns out that rock was actually uranium
he had to blow the rest of his campaign cash on cleaning the lake

hahaha

why is Hillary the best qualified of all the candidates?

Oh shit, I forgot she was co-president.

barack b., but i'm a young college student who won't vote for him when he wins the nom anyway so w/e.

i picked him too. but i'm a canadian who can't vote for him when he's in this "election" you speak of.

Edwards is not entirely offensive as a potential President - but I just can't shake seeing him on-screen debating Dick Cheney, Lord of All Evil. He seemed to be pushing the Clinton folksiness way too hard, without much effect other than smarminess.

I think he'd really suffer in comparison to a stiff upper lip Republican.

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

i never realised it was chris "x." dodd! awesome!

chris dodd dated bianca jagger and carrie fisher.

tho not at the same time.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

ILX Showdown: BO KOs HKC!

wow

THE MAGIC NEGRO

He's about to clean some clocks.

<Bob Dole voice>Agh, shoulda voted for Biden</Bob Dole voice>

But how will Barry Bee fare against Rudolph K. Giuliani or Mitt Q. Romney?

Rudy will self destruct. Romney will have to renounce his wives.

we should have a republican poll too for kicks

yah

What's the K for in HKC?

Ktypo

omg is anyone watching this debate

kucinich: heeelllloooo heeeellllloooo u missed me!

lol

richardson: even among republican math thats a failing grade.

me and Hoos monitoring it on the Demo candiates thread

hillary, dodd: yelling acting tough

Republican poll is hard - do you vote for who you think will win, who you want to win because he'll be crushed in the general or who you'd vote for an absolute last resort to keep that fascist Giuliani out of the White House.

ok, HMC just completely pwned everything

I will vote for Mitt in the Republican poll because he is v v pretty and has the best name

Republican poll is hard - do you vote for who you think will win, who you want to win because he'll be crushed in the general or who you'd vote for an absolute last resort to keep that fascist Giuliani out of the White House.

Answer: you vote for the one who will bring Morning in America.

Kucinich was great tonight.

His move about having a president who "got it right from the beginning" was great - he wasn't just pointing out that he had voted the right way the first time on the big issues or that he was more principled, but that he had proven to have better judgment than the supposedly more practical-minded centrists.

I feel like I've heard that 'got it right from the beginning' line before from some other candidate somewhere

I liked the whole context of the line, not just the line itself, because he was using it to suggest that he'd be more likely than the other candidates to make good, sound decisions as president. I thought this was a pretty smart move by someone typically painted as the outsider wacko leftist candidate.

can't bleeve I was the only No One supporter

http://www.cjsonline.gov.uk/image/gif/header_120.gif

no morbs it said "no fun"

I'm not surprised by the Obama/Clinton dichotomy. I am surprised by the lack of Edwards support.

he's no fun either

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/11/18/185540/52

Eisbaer ftw up there

how's Chris Dodd working out for SOPA opponents now.