Take Back the Night marches, C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I say dud because one went thru my neighborhood last night and woke up working people at 1am.

dally, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

bitches

gff, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

These things just embolden the marchers. I predict that soon enough they will buy tridents and hand-nets and begin to terrorize whole neighborhoods.

Aimless, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

I was generally supportive of these until I encountered one when walking back from my design studio late one night. Suddenly, simply for the crime of having a penis and walking in the wrong place at the wrong time, I became the target of taunts and anti-male chants. Massive dud.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

dom make yourself useful and pull up that 'i like where this is going' jpg

gff, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

and don't dilly dally on the way.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)

classic in principle, and in fact i've participated in one of these before, but like jon have also found myself made into a surprised target of frightening mob anger. can't say dud, but def not classic.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 December 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

world's worst month:

http://www.humboldt.edu/~hsuwomen/images/Take%20back%20the%20night%202006%20Calendarpic.jpg

scott seward, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:04 (eighteen years ago)

luckily, "party all the time" may was right around the corner.

scott seward, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:04 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.portlandstudios.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/3goatssmall.jpg

Noodle Vague, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

"male identified people needed"

dally, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)

check out the kid

http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper851/stills/425a29875ff75-87-1.jpg

dally, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

I am very opposed to all types of Take Back the Night events.

roxymuzak, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper851/stills/425a29875ff75-87-1.jpg

dally, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

Creating a climate of fear: C/D

roxymuzak, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)

fear is a man's best friend

dally, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, about as much as those women pictured above are a man's best friend

roxymuzak, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

i think the climate of fear is created by groups/people a whole lot more fearsome and influential than a bunch of women walking around one night a year

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)

i think this happened to eric forman

mookieproof, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)

i am okay with these marches but i don't go on them as they are not the way i do things

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, call me the eternal optimist, but i wish these marches were happier events. like celebrating people's power and existence and equality rather than being angry angry angry and yelling ow the yelling. i like yelling but not that kind of yelling. if it were happy whooping yelling, then i'd be in. hell, i'm angry at a lot of stuff re state of the world, but i don't channel it into more anger. also there is often really bad live music going on at some point agh whyyy

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:52 (eighteen years ago)

Hey, at least they're getting some exercise and fresh air... and are all gathered in one place and therefore easier to avoid.

Kerm, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)

Back in my day (An Old Man Writes...)they were called Reclaim The Night and they were often on response to calls from the police, which, back then in the early 80s, were often worded like "we would advise women not to go out at night" or "don't go anywhere without men" or just "don't go out" and quite rightly a lot of wimmin I knew didn't like that tone. In those circumstances I think they were probably a good thing. They used to be pretty cheerful events from what I gathered.

Also, lol at ilxors who can't take a bit of verbal from a bunch of girls.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)

hey, some of us are sensitive!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

yeah tho i will say my reaction to tones like "we would advise women not to go out at night" is 'fuck you this is fucking ridiculous! raar' so uh... i partly take back my happy stance above. sometimes anger gets things done.
xpost

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.police.edmonton.ab.ca/Pages/CanineUnit/Christmas%20Cards/We%20Own%20The%20Night%20(2003).jpg

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

Also, lol at ilxors who can't take a bit of verbal from a bunch of girls.

-- Ned Trifle II, Monday, December 17, 2007 2:55 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

keke

sleep, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)

I always think these marches have something to do with Sting.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

totally have this song in my head now guys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0brHGJ6xqbk

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

i think the climate of fear is created by groups/people a whole lot more fearsome and influential than a bunch of women walking around one night a year

Yeah, the other 364 days of the year they do nothing.

roxymuzak, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)

Also, lol at ilxors who can't take a bit of verbal from a bunch of girls.

Fuck you. Being called "rapist" and "sexually abusing asshole" for simply walking down the street /= "a bit of verbal".

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

otm

roxymuzak, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

hey, joanie loves chachi, you gotta learn when to keep it tucked in, son

"Rumsfeld", Monday, 17 December 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

In a funny way it's the analog to me/us getting called a "piece of ass" for walking down the street, equally undeservedly.

Laurel, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

Also, lol at ilxors who can't take a bit of verbal from a bunch of girls.

kinda condescending to both jon and the "bunch of girls", no?

will, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)

(i'm going to regret posting to this thread i think)

will, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)

more to the girls i thought. but it's just playground banter, i'd let it lie.

Just got offed, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)

i think the climate of fear is created by groups/people a whole lot more fearsome and influential than a bunch of women walking around one night a year

Yeah, the other 364 days of the year they do nothing.

i don't get what this means!
i meant that a group of women protesting does make a difference on however small a scale and that it doesn't create a climate of fear compared to places/people who really create climate of fear
:/

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)

Which, like, forgive me if you're all sensitive and enlightened and shit, but I've had too many perfectly "nice", "normal" men tell me "but but but it's not creepy when I whistle at/leer at/compliment women, because I'm not dangerous" to rush entirely to your defense.

Laurel, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)

2 rongs /= right

dan m, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

In a funny way it's the analog to me/us getting called a "piece of ass" for walking down the street, equally undeservedly.

And thats definitely not okay either!

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

xp No, but sometimes they are delicious.

Laurel, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)

(troll jpg otm)

rrrobyn, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

In a funny way it's the analog to me/us getting called a "piece of ass" for walking down the street, equally undeservedly

Yeah, but what about a person who calls you a piece of ass as a compliment?

My point is this - some guys are just ill-equipped to express their feelings of attraction to a woman in terms OTHER than ones similar to this. That doesn't mean that their expressed sentiment should be taken as any less complimentary than a guy who says "Great ass" or "Nice ass" or "Great dress" or "great hair."

It seems to me that complimenting someone on their physical appearance is never a bad thing.

NOW, calling someone a piece of ass like a totally de-personified object - that's a problem.

But a great ass is a great ass. And I reserve the right to compliment someone on said ass.

B.L.A.M., Monday, 17 December 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

ALSO - these marches are called "Take Back the Night"...

At what point in human history has it EVER been advisable for a woman to walk alone at night in the first place? I'm not saying its right or wrong, but I think not often. Therefore, did they ever HAVE the night to be taken from them in the first place?

B.L.A.M., Monday, 17 December 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

now THAT is a great argument

max, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

shit, a "piece of ass" isn't even a whole regular ass on a person

"Rumsfeld", Monday, 17 December 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

I hope you all know that at 8 p.m. EST, only women will be able to post on this thread.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

i remember my sophomore year roommate wanted to dress up in a bear costume and jump out of a bush screaming Rrrrrooaaawwr at the ladies of Take Back the Night. i told him to go for it.

sanskrit, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

Any man who posts will have his ass complimented.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 17 December 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

At my school one of these marches sparked a massive debate at my school, mostly between feminist groups and conservative frat guys, that turned really ugly and at the peak of it a really vocal feminist student lied about being raped. It polarized the whole school and did nothing for the debate. I'm not at all for condemning these marches but it would be nice to be able to show concern for the attitudes behind them without being automatically called 'condescending' and 'sexist.'

-- adamj, Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:57 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

so like we said at the beginning of the thread ... being a jerk, c/d?

but way to argue against a protest of rape by pointing out that sometimes people on the 'right side' can be assholes too

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:37 (eighteen years ago)

environmentalism, c/d?

dud, ecoterrorists ruin it for everybody!!!

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:38 (eighteen years ago)

if only those rape-concerned feminists had stayed home so as not to antagonize the jocks

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:42 (eighteen years ago)

Do believe I said "I'm not at all for condemning these marches." I was using it as an example of how it's fairly cheap to use rape's emotional impact for mudslinging, and that doing things like that lower the debate to insults and stereotyping, a lot like what has happened to this thread.

Is it wrong to speak out against ecoterrorism?

adamj, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:50 (eighteen years ago)

Come on deej, you're caricaturing dude's argument.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:52 (eighteen years ago)

"Stop lying about being raped, you're just antagonizing the jocks."

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:53 (eighteen years ago)

of course not, but its not like ecoterrorism is inherent to environmentalism, any more than folks faking rape is inherent to take back the night marches. obviously jerks are jerks, but even big hoos was on here saying "but def not classic" about a protest against rape. maybe there's some epidemic nationwide of these events sparking turmoil between jocks and feminists, causing folks to falsely cry rape or yell mean things at jon/via/chi but like i said, in my anecdotal exp. these things tend to be, on the whole, positive events calling attention to shit that needs attention called to it.

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:55 (eighteen years ago)

There's nobody in this country on the "wrong side" of the "rape debate"...

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:00 (eighteen years ago)

I said "def not classic" because of my antecdotal experience. A little further down, with the benefit of time to think, I also said I've organized them before and would organize them again. I just might caution my fellow marchers about where their anger is directed.

xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:02 (eighteen years ago)

There's nobody in this country on the "wrong side" of the "rape debate"...

-- Kerm, Tuesday, December 18, 2007 9:00 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

rapists?

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:05 (eighteen years ago)

people who think rape is not an issue worth paying attention to or talking about?

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:06 (eighteen years ago)

HOOS also said "classic in principle" which is probably the best you're ever really gonna get out of any protest/direct action no matter how noble the cause.

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

At my school one of these marches sparked a massive debate at my school, mostly between feminist groups and conservative frat guys, that turned really ugly and at the peak of it a really vocal feminist student lied about being raped. It polarized the whole school and did nothing for the debate. I'm not at all for condemning these marches but it would be nice to be able to show concern for the attitudes behind them without being automatically called 'condescending' and 'sexist.'

^^^^ i think probably the conservative frat guys were on the "wrong side" of the "rape debate" on this one, even if one--ONE--of the women lied about a rape.

max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:13 (eighteen years ago)

show concern for the attitudes behind them

what are these attitudes?

max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:14 (eighteen years ago)

Rapists don't debate. People who don't care or talk about rape don't debate it either. Just because someone thinks critically about your protest doesn't mean they're sexist or don't care about rape.

I'd be interested in what those "conservative frat guys'" positions were, but I very seriously doubt they comprised a pro-rape camp.

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:19 (eighteen years ago)

there is a whole range of positions within a general "anti-rape" rubric that are sexist, oppressive and generally harmful

max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:24 (eighteen years ago)

Like "don't trust men, they're sexual predators."

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:29 (eighteen years ago)

http://classes.design.ucla.edu/si06/student_html/desma2/sessionA/drew/narrative/referee.jpg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:36 (eighteen years ago)

I'm just going to get way, way the fuck away from this thread.

adamj, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://xs222.xs.to/xs222/07513/hoos_ref.png
l-r: everyone, hoos, everyone

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:46 (eighteen years ago)

9.5/10

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

kerm you aren't coming close to thinking critically on this thread

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:54 (eighteen years ago)

borderline trollish/banworthy obtuse more like

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:55 (eighteen years ago)

some of the trolls here would've loved the 70s
Why Was Rape Considered So Hilarious in the 70s?

gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:12 (eighteen years ago)

Come on deej ilx, you're caricaturing dude's every opposing argument.

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:20 (eighteen years ago)

Get over yourself, deej. You have done nothing but indict and accuse anyone who dares to think critically about Take Back the Night... You even asked "what's to debate?" How can you talk about critical thinking if you can't even THINK of anything anyone would want to take issue with here? The premise of the thread apparently offends you so much that you've recommended banning two people here already. If you don't want to participate, or it pisses you off too much to read what anybody else has to say, then follow the FAQ and take a break.

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)

Drug cartels aren't run by girls, and all men in Bogota aren't violent criminals. Ban women from going out for a day and see what happens to department store sales, then ask yourself which stereotypes you've resorted to and which gender you've disrespected most.

-- Kerm, Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:49 PM

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:27 (eighteen years ago)

FYI this thread sux

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:28 (eighteen years ago)

or is that BTW

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:28 (eighteen years ago)

See, there's this stereotype that women like shopping.

Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:29 (eighteen years ago)

i know!

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:33 (eighteen years ago)

lol? at

people who think rape is not an issue worth paying attention to or talking about? ET AL

followed by

kerm you aren't coming close to thinking critically on this thread

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:33 (eighteen years ago)

As much as I don't care about TBTN marches, one way or the other, I really don't think they're the least bit effective. If women started shooting the balls offa rapists, that might have a bit more of an impact.

libcrypt, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:53 (eighteen years ago)

roxy wtf are you talking about

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 05:24 (eighteen years ago)

Since someone has already made the Veronica Mars joke (damn you), I will just say this:

I think these events make more sense in certain kinds of environments (usually college campuses) where the night-time danger is shitty or violent behavior by your own social peers and fellow students: back in the 90s, at least, it seemed like they were pretty positive, and just generally fostered a sense of alertness/awareness and (most importantly) women looking out for one another. Not in a besieged or victimized way, either -- just looking out for one another, and in a public way that would hopefully send a message to some people/men that they should behave in the first place.

But I don't know if they've changed since then, because since then I've lived in exactly the kinds of urban environments where they don't make a ton of sense: there doesn't seem to be much point to them when the night-time danger is the kind of street crime that leaves men and women both mostly concerned about not getting violently robbed, and people are highly safety-aware to begin with. I can't imagine they've changed enough over the past years that shouting at random male passersby is anything but an abberation on the part of people who are Doing It Wrong -- but I'd also guess that the positive "let's look out for one another" vibe seems a little 90s and corny to some kids today, so maybe it's whittling down to the radicals or something.

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 06:29 (eighteen years ago)

well put, old bean

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 06:33 (eighteen years ago)

shouting at random male passersby is anything but an abberation on the part of people who are Doing It Wrong

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 06:36 (eighteen years ago)

big hoos i thought someone talked to you about doing that

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:43 (eighteen years ago)

and on a nabisco post no less! have you no sense of decorum

deej, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:43 (eighteen years ago)

O..O
vvvv
^^^^

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:50 (eighteen years ago)

vahid is that the monster from cloverfield??

max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)

saying that women don't share responsibility for their own safety seems like a distressed-damsel cop-out.

-- elmo argonaut, Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:05 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

wau you really are a grade-a cockwipe.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)

well put, old bean

-- moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 06:33

Nabisco WPOB

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

wow i really regret having my name pop up at the top of this thread every time

gff, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

so i should probably stop bumping it, huh

gff, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

that one guy, you have obvious reading comprehension problems

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.derekerdman.com/1/LOU_BEGA_THE_NIGHT.jpg

A Derek Erdman, Thursday, 20 December 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)

Lou Bega the night?!

roxymuzak, Thursday, 20 December 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

I'm impressed he knows all their names!

Mark G, Thursday, 20 December 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)

seven years pass...

fpd u for that nv

designated hitler (darraghmac), Wednesday, 17 June 2015 02:01 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.