Peter Jackson WILL make two "Hobbit" films

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Rejoicing in Dorkland, commence.

http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/18/breaking-peter-jackson-to-do-the-hobbit-and-a-sequel/

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

I am popping the cork on my last magnum of Jolt Cola even as we speak!

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

only funny part of Clerks II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0sc-gS9AqM

milo z, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

I'm sure it'll look nice.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

will he call the second one The Hobbit 2001

s1ocki, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

Basically this is just New Line grappling with the fact that their option to produce the films is running out soon (which it is). Heck, the Weinstein brothers were 'executive producers' for the LOTR films. I love all the usual backslapping language in the announcement -- utterly generic.

The second one will be Hobbitin' 2: Electric Boogaloo, of course.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

Suggested headlines

Peter Jackson Fast Developing Hobbit
Jackson: Hobbit-Forming

Tom D., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)

I thought PJ already made the sequel to "The Hobbit"

Sparkle Motion, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

I wonder if this still would have happened if Golden Compass hadn't bombed so hard.

Simon H., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

Hahaha, OTM.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

robert shaye is trying to save his skin

omar little, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)

porn parodies? the whorebit?

StanM, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

"Dirty Hobbits"

... prob'ly been done

Tom D., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

srsly what is the sequel supposed to be about? Mayoral elections in Hobbiton? What Rhadagast the Brown has been up to the whole time?

Sparkle Motion, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

Frodo meets King Kong

StanM, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)

"Three Men and a Little Hobbit"

Tom D., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

So all these announcements only confirm Jackson to exec produce the movies, does that mean he's not directing? Are there any names being thrown out as directors, does he have any obvious friends or proteges that might do it?

Alex in Baltimore, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

srsly what is the sequel supposed to be about?

there are other books, y'know

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

Gear calls it. Shaye had been blustering about 'never working with Jackson again!' and all that earlier this year. Financial writing on the wall here -- combined with the fact that Jackson doesn't *need* Shaye at all anymore, whereas ten years back it was a completely different story -- means this is just a handy business decision on Jackson's part where Shaye is freaking out a bit.

So all these announcements only confirm Jackson to exec produce the movies, does that mean he's not directing?

Probably. I'll bet anything that was Shaye's core demand too!

there are other books, y'know

Uh-huh. Unfinished Tales: The Movie.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

This whole thing reads like "We have the rights, we're desperate, can we please license the trappings of the LOTR production without having to work directly much with Jackson?" and Jackson going, "Hey, cash and work for the WETA team! Sure!"

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

Silmarillion?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

am I alone in thinking that it's going to be an uphill battle trying to make that last film seem exciting to the average moviegoer? "here, we've cobbled bits and pieces from unfinished manuscripts, in order to bridge...zzzzzz."

Simon H., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

in fact I think the whole idea of "bridging" rarely translates that well into compelling film.

Simon H., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)

I thought they just meant that it would take two movies to tell the whole Hobbit tale.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

or the Hobbit tale including material from other books, some of which may precede the book itself

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

Perhaps the sequel will be Bilbo at home, cooking. Special guest star: Martha Stewart.

Sara R-C, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

I thought they just meant that it would take two movies to tell the whole Hobbit tale.

Terrifying thought.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

The Slimeamillion.

libcrypt, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

That's the porn title settled.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

Jackson's lawsuit was for ~$100mn - I wonder what he got in the settlement?

milo z, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

the ring

Frogman Henry, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 19:22 (eighteen years ago)

I think the Hobbit story could easily be stretched into two 4-hour epics.

There could be at least 35 minutes of them floating in elfin wine barrels down a CIG river.

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:16 (eighteen years ago)

I have an idea for the second Hobbit movie:

Middle Earth Christmas Special!

latebloomer, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:21 (eighteen years ago)

That should have said CGI river. A cig river would be really gross though.

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:06 (eighteen years ago)

2nd movie will be Bilbo & Tom Bombadil in Cheech & Chong-like pipeweed comedy

gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:15 (eighteen years ago)

Bilbo & Tom Go to White Castle

max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)

but it would be an ACTUAL white castle

max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)

yes!

latebloomer, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:01 (eighteen years ago)

With Neil Patrick Harris making an appearance as a randy elf

latebloomer, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:02 (eighteen years ago)

Lindsay Lohan as goldberry

gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:12 (eighteen years ago)

k I wd watch that

Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:14 (eighteen years ago)

shaye you fuckin pussy, why let this fat, beady crepe anywhere near a film set? thank god he's only "exec-producing" (collecting cheques).

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 10:56 (eighteen years ago)

the hobit : even simpler pr0n parody title?

StanM, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 10:57 (eighteen years ago)

The Hit It

Raw Patrick, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

He's never going to top Meet the Feebles, is he?

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 13:00 (eighteen years ago)

He topped that with Heavenly Creatures already. I don't really understand the Peter Jackson hate. Sure, he's not an auteur or anything, but he's been making consistently good, entertaining film for 20 years now, there isn't a single bad movie in his filmography. Even the ones that are not-great (Bad Taste, Frighteners, King Kong) have lots of great moments in them.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)

there isn't a single bad movie in his filmography.

i dunno if they're out where you are bro, but he did these shitty-ass dungeons & dragons pics three years straight. and then he did fucking king kong.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 13:29 (eighteen years ago)

If you think those are actually bad movies, I'd say you haven't seen a lot of movies. All of them worked very well within their genre.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 13:54 (eighteen years ago)

Head, hands, yada yada yada

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 13:56 (eighteen years ago)

http://i.today.reuters.com/pictures/galleries/Stories/633260111339375000/Previews/08_RTR1L11X.jpg

ledge, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

20 minutes of the first is a crazy smoke-shapes blowing contest that turns into something like "Pink Elephants on Parade" in Dumbo.

Abbott, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

Half hour CGI spider-fight.

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

Bilbo all hating on poor care of dishes for 15 minutes.

Who will play Bilbo? And he'll be like Frodo-age in this one?

Abbott, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2006/0605/hoffman0508.jpg

M.V., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

Bilbo is slightly older than Frodo if I remember right. He comes across that way.

Controversial casting of Verne Troyer to save on CGI bill?

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

Half hour CGI spider-fight.

-- The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:11 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

^^^^^

lols

except: HE'S ONLY FUCKING EXEC-PRODUCING!!!! BFD!!!!!

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

Hahaha I was gonna suggest P.S. Hoffman!

Bilbo was older than Frodo in LOTR, but Hobbit is all about his begrudgingly Tookish youthful adventures.

Abbott, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

GOBLIN should do the soundtrack.

Abbott, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

He's still middle-aged in Teh Hob, I think.

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah but not elderly-age with intermittent gonzo-teeth devolution upon grasping the One Thing to Rule Them All.

Abbott, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

No true. But I kinda like the idea of him being prissy middle-aged dude having a midlife crisis rather than sexy doe-eyed twink.

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:24 (eighteen years ago)

Sorry, I meant "No, true." i.e. "That is true."

The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)

Are you sure? I thought that point was beaten in pretty well. I mean, long shots of the bad guys destroying forests all willy-nilly? And more time than needed spent on the trees fighting back? It was most definitely there.

-- jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 20 December 2007 09:04 (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Nowhere near the near-pagan theme in by the book.

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

-by

Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

I think King Kong is his only stinker. The rest are all great in their own ways.

Really, the Rings were one of the best adaptations anyone could hope for. If you don't care about The Hobbit--don't go see it!

Personally, I'd like to see this movie come to life without the storybook/narration voice that's used in the book. I find that distracting when I reread it.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 20 December 2007 05:00 (eighteen years ago)

Well The Hobbit is a much different beast than LOTR, and the narrative voice in it is suitable for a kid's tale, wry and witty.

Tom Ewing had some great thoughts on FT a little while back:

http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/11/thoughts-on-the-hobbit/

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 December 2007 05:02 (eighteen years ago)

That's a nice article. But I don't get this part:

7. IT’S GREBT READ IT AGAIN.

LOL.

Nate Carson, Thursday, 20 December 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)

the hobbit is a terrific book! i much prefer it to LOTR. you can read it in an afternoon, for starters.

J.D., Friday, 21 December 2007 02:07 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2248286,00.html

omar little, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:52 (seventeen years ago)

Okay, I'm interested again.

chap, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

I'd be more than fine with that.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

Smaug with eight thousands eyes all over him...

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

Del Toro would be a popular choice with commentators and Tolkien fans alike. He has an excellent pedigree in fantasy with Pan's Labyrinth and did decent work on the comic book adaptations Hellboy and Blade II.

weird editorializing...

s1ocki, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:56 (seventeen years ago)

I bet it will have a framing device revealing that Middle Earth is in fact the hallucination of a child caught up in the Spanish Civil War.

chap, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:57 (seventeen years ago)

"I, Gandalf, cannot make the journey here, but my associate Hellboy has kindly indicated he's available."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

hellboy was fken awesome. fuck a pans labyrinth tho.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:09 (seventeen years ago)

(and fuck 'the hobbit' obviously.)

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:09 (seventeen years ago)

controversial!

Jordan, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:11 (seventeen years ago)

it is still weird that they are considering filling in the story between the two.

akm, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:32 (seventeen years ago)

first 30 mins of hellboy is pretty awes then it gets pretty lame. especially when the pretty boy other protag gets brought in.

s1ocki, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:46 (seventeen years ago)

Official

chap, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:17 (seventeen years ago)

you talking about the new Hellboy, slocki?

milo z, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:19 (seventeen years ago)

Surely he means the first. The new one doesn't come out until, what, June or something?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:20 (seventeen years ago)

hellboy is awesome if you don't expect much more from it than SMASHING NAZIS.
fuck blade II though! backhanded compliment, to just mention that one rite?

ian, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:20 (seventeen years ago)

I don't remember another pretty boy protag in Hellboy, though. I R confused.

milo z, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:28 (seventeen years ago)

Hellboy is just about the best comic book adaptation to date. It's careful with fx, solidly entertaining, and it never gets all self-important or overstays it's welcome.

del toro cares about his characters as much as the spectacle and makes nature look sexy, so he's basically Peter Jackson hopefully minus the slow motion hobbit dancing in white pajamas. best thing that could have happened.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:59 (seventeen years ago)

I, for one, am geeking out.

Capitaine Jay Vee, Friday, 1 February 2008 08:49 (seventeen years ago)

Plz to be holding yr horses: Tolkien estate sues

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7240421.stm

StanM, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 11:24 (seventeen years ago)

in hellboy 1 they bring in some other dude as a ostensible audience-identifiable dude character and he kind of sucks. after a great opening the movie really peters out.

s1ocki, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:05 (seventeen years ago)

in hellboy 1 they bring in some other dude as a ostensible audience-identifiable dude character and he kind of sucks.

He was like Josh Hartnett except even more lame.

Nicole, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:19 (seventeen years ago)

I can't even begin to imagine.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Shaye and Lynne out at New Line, Jackson gets the last laugh.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 February 2008 02:49 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

And now officially official. Peter Jackson and Tom Ewing Guillermo del Toro celebrate:

http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2008-04/38196386.jpg

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 April 2008 02:49 (seventeen years ago)

I do love how Guillermo is as much a geek as the rest -- he even posted on theonering.net forums about it.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 April 2008 03:02 (seventeen years ago)

this is a good choice, this will make them feel significantly different from the rings movies in feel and look. it's interesting that del toro is actually a much darker director and the hobbit is so much lighter in tone.

akm, Friday, 25 April 2008 05:52 (seventeen years ago)

still can't accept non-fattey Peter Jackson

gershy, Friday, 25 April 2008 06:00 (seventeen years ago)

Don't worry. Del Toro will get him on some enchiladas right quick.

Capitaine Jay Vee, Friday, 25 April 2008 06:34 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

Come on, give the man his money, it's a contract from 1969.

http://www.guesswhichmovie.com/news/280

Also: how does this tie in with the production of another movie?

StanM, Monday, 26 May 2008 14:29 (seventeen years ago)

Transcript of a webchat with Jackson and Del Toro here: http://www.wetanz.com/holics/index.php?itemid=695&catid=2#more

chap, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 01:28 (seventeen years ago)

I'm just pleased to be getting Gandalf the Grey back for two more movies. Ian and I loved him best. We were a little sad when the Gandy the White took over.

hahaha, Oh man. I think this is the polite way of saying they found 'Gandy the White' bor-ring.

Abbott, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 02:21 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.