never had one of these before. but now i do thanks to messenger. and while occasionally nice in the delusion it brings that the other person might feel the same, it generally just feels quite pathetic.
― veryloggedout, Monday, 24 December 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)
yea it's kinda pathetic unless u actually get to know the person. i mean if you're in love with a typeface, u have some self-discovery ahead of you. but i don't think the internet is a bad way to meet ppl at all.
― Surmounter, Monday, 24 December 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
Well it's way easier to be charming,confident and almost enigmatic if you want to be on the internet than in real life. So that could be a contributing factor. Still, you'd want a bit of personal contact for confirmation I think. I know some people who are totally different on the internet than in real life.
― I know, right?, Monday, 24 December 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
totally! that's the problem tho -- you can't rely on your typing to get you through relationships. i think you can learn from your internet personality though. you seem like someone who isn't so different in real life, I know, right.
― Surmounter, Monday, 24 December 2007 17:19 (eighteen years ago)
ilx 2007 revealed that it's a dud for a few people.
― omar little, Monday, 24 December 2007 17:19 (eighteen years ago)
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b151/Dino-kun/1183064455517.gif
― bnw, Monday, 24 December 2007 17:22 (eighteen years ago)
xpost
i be tellin it like it is yo
― I know, right?, Monday, 24 December 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)
(you see!)
haha
― Surmounter, Monday, 24 December 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
ive done the complimenting (but without being wet about it) and flirting thing, to see if my crush reciprocates. but she doesnt really. or if she does compliment back, i get the feeling its just polite or compliments that youd give a friend ('youre funny' etc).
as far as net vs real life differences, we have spoken on the phone twice (a couple of hours last time) but no, i dont think this is going to move up from being an e-crush. plus she lives about 2 hours away.
― veryloggedout, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 13:48 (eighteen years ago)
luna?
― sanskrit, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
Well it's way easier to be charming,confident and almost enigmatic if you want to be on the internet than in real life.
I am far more comfortable and self-assured IRL than on the computer, but that's not saying a lot.
Hey did Tombot and Ally break up or something, he mentioned something about not getting his Christmas lay.
― wanko ergo sum, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
is it in the FAQ?
― wanko ergo sum, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
the line that must not be crossed
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
"you're funny" = not a good sign :(
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
- "i think you're amazing and pledge to you my undying love" - "you're funny"
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
"you're funny" = not a good sign :("
well no, but she keeps telling me i look like famous people she fancies. which ok, might mean nothing. but still. and, AND, AND she says things like how she likes that im good at intellectual sparring and things like that.
ok, none of this means anything. i know.
― veryloggedout, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)
well no, but she keeps telling me i look like famous people she fancies.
NEUTRAL
she likes that im good at intellectual sparring and things like that.
NEUTRAL TO BAD
― wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
"you're funny"
CHAOTIC EVIL
― wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)
good at intellectual sparring => probably bad at barbaric shagging.
― ken c, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:25 (eighteen years ago)
i'm so sorry :(
you guys.
― Rubyredd, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:25 (eighteen years ago)
i'm sure he feels SO much better about his e-crush now
― Rubyredd, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:27 (eighteen years ago)
you are not refuting our expert analysis
― wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)
lol @ 'expert'
― Rubyredd, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)
ken-doll is my e-crush
― Rubyredd, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:39 (eighteen years ago)
his intellectual sparring makes up for his lack of barbaric shagging
no wait
his barbaric shagging makes up for his lack of intellectual sparring
― Rubyredd, Thursday, 27 December 2007 13:40 (eighteen years ago)
maybe the truest thing ever written
― sunny successor, Thursday, 27 December 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)
that people tend to make this assertion is maybe the truest thing ever written but the assertion itself is bunk.
― wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 27 December 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)
that first 'assertion' shd be 'assumption'
debunking my bunk
― sunny successor, Thursday, 27 December 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://members.aol.com/TheWireHBO/images/thewirebarroom.jpg
(l to r: ken c, wanko, veryloggedout)
― lucas pine, Thursday, 27 December 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
i don't wear pinstripes
― wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 27 December 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)
thats just your cool guy internet personality talking
― lucas pine, Thursday, 27 December 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
lolol xxp
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 27 December 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
im actually pretty good at intellectual sparring WHILE shagging barbarically.
― veryloggedout, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:33 (eighteen years ago)
that's quite a talent
― Rubyredd, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
I barbarically spar while shagging intellectually.
― Just got offed, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:44 (eighteen years ago)
whatever you say
― electricsound, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)
i don't think i want to know how one shags 'intellectually'
― Rubyredd, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)
its a headfuck.
*bows*
thank you, ill be here all week.
― veryloggedout, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)
nice one ;)
― Rubyredd, Friday, 28 December 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)
i have decided there are only three options for this. either i say a) 'lets meet up!' and then we do (perhaps) and i see what happens. or b) i just say 'i think i have a crush on you' and get it out in the open. im going to do c) which is not do either.
― veryloggedout, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:42 (eighteen years ago)
nicely done lucas
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 31 December 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)
i'm bad at both intellectual spars and barbaric shags.
i don't really know what rubyredd sees in me sometimes.
― ken c, Monday, 31 December 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
it's true - love is blind ;_;
― Rubyredd, Monday, 31 December 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
It doesn't smell so well, either
― nabisco, Monday, 31 December 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)
it's a terrible driver
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Monday, 31 December 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)
"Veryloggedout", my god! At best be a little grown and tell the us the world your own name.
― Pål Útlendi, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 08:28 (eighteen years ago)
"let her go"
i am, i just feel bad not replying to her txts (not that theres been loads, just 1 or 2) properly. and i generally just feel like an arsehole! both for leading her on and for the fact that i dont fancy her (which i knew in the beginning, i just thought i would/should get over it, but it didnt happen being that im a superficial git).
anyway, hope this thread is instructive to anyone with an e-crush. dont do it it kids!
― veryloggedout, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:54 (eighteen years ago)
Dude, I can understand some neurosis in life, but this is neither epochal nor "instructive" -- you were interested in someone, went out with her, realized she wasn't a good fit for you. This is the part where you say that maybe it's not the best match / "chemistry" but you'd very much like to hang out and be friends, if she's interested. And then the sun rises tomorrow, as per usual.
― nabisco, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
but whoa it would kinda suck if it didn't
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:04 (eighteen years ago)
and like the rest of your life was spent appeasing the sun gods and you never got to go out with any girls again ever
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:05 (eighteen years ago)
i don't know, that would give your life a sense of purpose dating might not.
― horseshoe, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:06 (eighteen years ago)
who needs girls when you're shoveling fire all day!
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:07 (eighteen years ago)
Then you might have problems.
― Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:08 (eighteen years ago)
CONTROL F
"ME" NOT FOUND
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:09 (eighteen years ago)
veryloggedout, are YOU pretty?
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
veryloggedout i think homosexual II has an e-crush on u
― deej, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:12 (eighteen years ago)
MY HART BELONGS TO JON WILLUMS
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:13 (eighteen years ago)
Oh dear.
― Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:13 (eighteen years ago)
FRIDAY AFTERNOOON
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:14 (eighteen years ago)
i have an e-crush on teh sun gods they send me msg abt lottery winnings i aam a winnar!
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:15 (eighteen years ago)
SOMETHING SMELLS LIKE BROWN SUGAR AND CINNAMON IN THIS OFFICE AND I HAVE A CRUSH ON IT. assuming it's a foodstuff and not an actual person.
― chicago kevin, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:18 (eighteen years ago)
veryloggedout whatever you do don't click on the ariane thread
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:18 (eighteen years ago)
I am having a love affair with this box of cheez-its.
― horseshoe, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:19 (eighteen years ago)
I HAVE CRUSH on that CORRECTIVE TAPE ROLLER DISPENSER THING as its providing entertainment for me right now!
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:20 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - saying 'lets be friends' is a big fat DUD. just ending up 'being friends' however is much better. im going to look into sun worshipping.... ;)
homo, i dont know if i am pretty. its quite possible that i am not. although various people (not my mother, honest) think i am quite handsome. i myself swing from 'fuck im good looking!' to 'dear god i am repulsive'. depends if the sun is shining, if the birds are chirping... anyway, this isnt about me thinking 'im out of her league' if that is what youre thinking, its more just about that 'i fancy you' impulse not kicking in. but yes, maybe i have an over inflated sense of self importance and need to take it down a few notches and shrink my ego a bit. i know some people who havent realised that they are not adonis and have ended up alone.
― veryloggedout, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:22 (eighteen years ago)
omg dude you just weren't into her it's okay. relax.
― horseshoe, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:23 (eighteen years ago)
okay heres a better thing to tell her - say something douchey like 'I DONT THINK THERE'S CHEMISTRY!"
better than "not pretty enuf" yanno?
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:23 (eighteen years ago)
I think I could be good friends with this bottle of Baileys but I don't think I really love it.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:24 (eighteen years ago)
If this thread keeps going along like this, I'm definitely going to post my colonoscopy pictures.
― Pleasant Plains, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:24 (eighteen years ago)
i have had a fair amount of e-crushes but they are kinda twee huh
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:30 (eighteen years ago)
aaw
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
PP DO IT
hopefully no polyps
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:34 (eighteen years ago)
if there's one thing i learned from sex and the city it's that 'he's just not that into you' is a simplistic sound bite that will make you a lot of money if you turn it into a book
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:34 (eighteen years ago)
POLYPS yes
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:35 (eighteen years ago)
well no
― rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:37 (eighteen years ago)
God this is so Internet Drama 101. How many times does the quadratic have to be solved, peeps?
― libcrypt, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:42 (eighteen years ago)
I kinda think that some of my GFs had me shoveling fire, tho.
― libcrypt, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
Seventy times seven, apparently. xp
― Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
Saying "let's be friends" feels weird but check out this blinding logic: if you have gone out on a date with someone started off in a romantical direction you do in fact actually have to say something along these lines, you can't just keep hanging out with her and not touching her and then eventually go "oh, did I forget to mention that I'd re-classified you as friends-only?"
Christ on a bike
And the voice of the blindingly obvious spake unto us and it said: if you go on a date with someone and then intend to hang out with her soon afterward and not have it be another date, you have to mention that
― nabisco, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
Oh is that right?
― Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:45 (eighteen years ago)
P.S. I am eating cheez-its too! but a bag, not a box :(
― nabisco, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:48 (eighteen years ago)
I led a girl on for a long time whom I liked as a friend but I really didn't want to make sweet love to her. Eventually I got married to someone else and she got really angry at me and wrote a "book" of sorts wherein I was the evil antagonist who kills her lover, etc.
These boundary kinds of things do need to be made clear, I have learned.
― libcrypt, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:50 (eighteen years ago)
is that how you came up with your username?
― estela, Friday, 18 January 2008 22:58 (eighteen years ago)
I don't get it.
But no, I was just looking through all the libraries on a unix computer and chose it at random.
― libcrypt, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:08 (eighteen years ago)
i have a crush on everyone whos posted on this thread
― max, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:13 (eighteen years ago)
and on my peanut m&ms
― max, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:14 (eighteen years ago)
seeing eastern promises gave me a little crush on naomi watts too
― max, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:15 (eighteen years ago)
"And the voice of the blindingly obvious spake unto us and it said: if you go on a date with someone and then intend to hang out with her soon afterward and not have it be another date, you have to mention that"
this is hard to do this without insulting someone. but hopefully she wont care and will insult me for making that assumption.
im alright now. (must be all the 'christ!'s) but its still crap to be the person someone isnt into.
― veryloggedout, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:28 (eighteen years ago)
well gosh, it's so magnanimous of you to leave her twisting in the wind and imagining all kinds of horrible scenarios in which you hate her and no longer even want to speak to her, rather than just telling her how you feel
― bernard snowy, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:54 (eighteen years ago)
stay out of this bernard
― homosexual II, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:55 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, sorry, that was probably unnecessarily harsh; just sayin' that in my experience the "oh god why has this person stopped talking to me, what did I do wrong?" feeling is much worse than the "aw man, someone I kinda like just wants to be friends with me" one.
― bernard snowy, Friday, 18 January 2008 23:56 (eighteen years ago)
My least unsuccessful relationship to date is the one where I wasn't that into him but figured I would go with it for a while and see what happened. It was the only one where after the initial day of "oh my god so awesome" I didn't start worrying about how I thought I was into him but is this really right oh noes until I didn't enjoy it any more. I became that into him, eventually. Maybe even over-dependent. But. You know.
...wait, that is not so much any meaningful advice as an admission of how lousy and to be honest short my relationship history has been. Never mind. Tell her nicely, then.
― a passing spacecadet, Saturday, 19 January 2008 02:10 (eighteen years ago)
you will never get 100% of what you want from a person. so 70% isnt so so bad, you just take a loss on the physical front.
― mr x, Monday, 21 January 2008 17:31 (eighteen years ago)
something quite bad has happened. the site we both met on, i posted under a new log in, and what i thought was a different posting style, but clearly not diff enough, and my former e-crushette has somehow found me out! now this wouldnt be a problem ordinarily if i was just posting random stuff, but i posted some comments which she has spotted were about her/me and her. now i could pretend its not really me (but this would probably be pointless) or i could just own up to the fact im a dickhead. or i could not say anything, thereby confirming the latter. i think we all know the best option.
god i hope she doesnt know about ilx.
― veryloggedout, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 14:12 (eighteen years ago)
... LJ?
― Laurel, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 14:42 (eighteen years ago)