Atheists are “coming out of the closet” and becoming more vocal about their message that “there is no God.” Professor Richard Dawkins (Britain’s leading atheist) is encouraging those who share his views to express their opinion. Author of The God Delusion, Dawkins says he wants to “free children from being indoctrinated with the religion of their parents or their community.”1 Will Christians be prepared to “give an answer” to the atheists’ claims?2
Materialistic atheism is one of the easiest worldviews to refute. A materialistic atheist believes that nature is all that there is. He believes that there is no transcendent God who oversees and maintains creation. Many atheists believe that their worldview is rational—and scientific. However, by embracing materialism, the atheist has destroyed the possibility of knowledge, as well as science and technology. In other words, if atheism were true, it would be impossible to prove anything!
Here’s why:
Reasoning involves using the laws of logic. These include the law of non-contradiction which says that you can’t have A and not-A at the same time and in the same relationship. For example, the statement “My car is in the parking lot, and it is not the case that my car is in the parking lot” is necessarily false by the law of non-contradiction. Any rational person would accept this law. But why is this law true? Why should there be a law of non-contradiction, or for that matter, any laws of reasoning? The Christian can answer this question. For the Christian there is an absolute standard for reasoning; we are to pattern our thoughts after God’s. The laws of logic are a reflection of the way God thinks. The law of non-contradiction is not simply one person’s opinion of how we ought to think, rather it stems from God’s self-consistent nature. God cannot deny Himself ( 2 Timothy 2:13), and so, the way God upholds the universe will necessarily be non-contradictory.
Laws of logic are God’s standard for thinking. Since God is an unchanging, sovereign, immaterial Being, the laws of logic are abstract, universal, invariant entities. In other words, they are not made of matter—they apply everywhere and at all times. Laws of logic are contingent upon God’s unchanging nature. And they are necessary for logical reasoning. Thus, rational reasoning would be impossible without the biblical God.
The materialistic atheist can’t have laws of logic. He believes that everything that exists is material—part of the physical world. But laws of logic are not physical. You can’t stub your toe on a law of logic. Laws of logic cannot exist in the atheist’s world, yet he uses them to try to reason. This is inconsistent. He is borrowing from the Christian worldview to argue against the Christian worldview. The atheist’s view cannot be rational because he uses things (laws of logic) that cannot exist according to his profession.
The debate over the existence of God is a bit like a debate over the existence of air.3 Can you imagine someone arguing that air doesn’t actually exist? He would offer seemingly excellent “proofs” against the existence of air, while simultaneously breathing air and expecting that we can hear his words as the sound is transmitted through the air. In order for us to hear and understand his claim, it would have to be wrong. Likewise, the atheist, in arguing that God does not exist must use laws of logic that only make sense if God does exist. In order for his argument to make sense, it would have to be wrong. How can the atheist respond?
The atheist might say, “Well, I can reason just fine, and I don’t believe in God.” But this is no different than the critic of air saying, “Well, I can breathe just fine, and I don’t believe in air.” This isn’t a rational response. Breathing requires air, not a profession of belief in air. Likewise, logical reasoning requires God, not a profession of belief in Him. Of course the atheist can reason; it’s because God has made his mind and given him access to the laws of logic—and that’s the point. It’s because God exists that reasoning is possible. The atheist can reason, but within his own worldview he cannot account for his ability to reason.
The atheist might respond, “Laws of logic are conventions made up by man.” But conventions are (by definition) conventional. That is, we all agree to them and so they work—like driving on the right side of the road. But if laws of logic were conventional, then different cultures could adopt different laws of logic (like driving on the left side of the road). So, in some cultures it might be perfectly fine to contradict yourself. In some societies truth could be self-contradictory. Clearly that wouldn’t do. If laws of logic are just conventions, then they are not universal laws. Rational debate would be impossible if laws of logic were conventional, because the two opponents could simply pick different standards for reasoning. Each would be right according to his own arbitrary standard.
The atheist might respond, “Laws of logic are material—they are made of electro-chemical connections in the brain.” But then the laws of logic are not universal; they would not extend beyond the brain. In other words, we couldn’t argue that contradictions cannot occur on Mars, since no one’s brain is on Mars. In fact, if the laws of logic are just electro-chemical connections in the brain, then they would differ somewhat from person to person because everyone has different connections in their brain.
Sometimes an atheist will attempt to answer with a more pragmatic response: “We use the laws of logic because they work.” Unfortunately for him, that isn’t the question. We all agree the laws of logic work; they work because they’re true. The question is why do they exist in the first place? How can the atheist account for absolute standards of reasoning like the laws of logic? How can non-material things like laws exist if the universe is material only?
As a last resort, the atheist may give up a strictly materialistic view and agree that there are immaterial, universal laws. This is a huge concession; after all, if a person is willing to concede that immaterial, universal, unchanging entities can exist, then he must consider the possibility that God exists. But this concession does not save the atheist’s position. He must still justify the laws of logic. Why do they exist? And what is the point of contact between the material physical world and the immaterial world of logic? In other words, why does the material universe feel compelled to obey immaterial laws? The atheist cannot answer these questions. His worldview cannot be justified; it is arbitrary and thus irrational. Conclusions
Clearly, atheism is not a rational worldview. It is self-refuting because the atheist must first assume the opposite of what he is trying to prove in order to be able to prove anything. As Dr. Cornelius VanTil put it, “[A]theism presupposes theism.” Laws of logic require the existence of God—and not just any god, but the Christian God. Only the God of the Bible can be the foundation for knowledge (Proverbs 1:7; Colossians 2:3). Since the God of Scripture is immaterial, sovereign, and beyond time, it makes sense to have laws of logic that are immaterial, universal, and unchanging. Since God has revealed Himself to man, we are able to know and use logic. Since God made the universe and since God made our minds, it makes sense that our minds would have an ability to study and understand the universe. But if the brain is simply the result of mindless evolutionary processes that conveyed some sort of survival value in the past, why should we trust its conclusions? If the universe and our minds are simply the results of time and chance, as the atheist contends, why would we expect that the mind could make sense of the universe? How could science and technology be possible?
Rational thinking, science, and technology make sense in a Christian worldview. The Christian has a basis for these things; the atheist does not. This is not to say that atheists cannot be rational about some things. They can because they too are made in God’s image and have access to God’s laws of logic. But they have no rational basis for rationality within their own worldview. Likewise, atheists can be moral, but they have no basis for that morality according to what they claim to believe. An atheist is a walking bundle of contradictions. He reasons and does science, yet he denies the very God that makes reasoning and science possible. On the other hand, the Christian worldview is consistent and makes sense of human reasoning and experience.
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
just one and a half paragraphs of that made me nauseous did you even read it?
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
I stopped reading after this para (the third) because there is the most massive leap of reasoning I've ever seen in there which nullifies anything that could possibly follow. "This is the case because God exists" is not the same as "God must exist because of". It's idiocy.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)
he truly is an awesome god
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
You can’t stub your toe on a law of logic.
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
I read it all! It's funny, almost every single sentence is balderdash.
The materialistic atheist... believes that everything that exists is material.
No, that is not a world view that was held by anyone ever.
― ledge, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ should be the new OTM
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
heres who wrote this piece
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/j_lisle.asp
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
Dr. Lisle is not the stereotypical “egg-head” research scientist who has difficulty communicating at a layman’s level.
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
Funny how an astrophysicist with a Ph.D is so in need of basic science 101.
― ledge, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
or logic 101
or basic reasoning 101
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
imagine if this guy was your dad & you disagreed with him on something
I just hope U of Colorado Boulder is embarrassed. Why can't you redact somebody's Ph.D like you can get disbarred or lose your right to practice medicine? I suppose because science is all a lie anyway! Thanks Bible!
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)
Mind you many not batshit scientists have a pretty poor grasp of basic philosophy.
― ledge, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.nbc.com/30_Rock/images/episodes/season1/118/rok_118_08.jpg thanks BIBLE!
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
Atheism and theism both involve leaps of faith that go beyond reasoning.
However atheists more commonly accept a contingent methodology (scientific enquiry) to their worldview, whereas theists generally fit the world to their view, which seems wrongheaded.
I'm a devout agnostic.
― Mister Craig, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:19 (eighteen years ago)
RONG
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
How so?
And a RONG answer is no answer. Refute my balls.
― Mister Craig, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
ho boy this is gonna be fun, at least until ethan says 'why am i arguing with this jerkwad' and goes off to google for more christian fallacies ^_^
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
I'm willing to be refuted. I'd love it, I want to love TEH LORD.
― Mister Craig, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
You're a moron.
― milo z, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
everyone's a moron
― sleepingbag, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)
atheism is not a positive belief, it's lack of a belief. nothing can be 'proven' besides boring math stuff, and you can't disprove a non-testable hypothesis like 'god exists'. but aside from personal testimony there's no reason to believe god exists, and religion's popularity is the only reason people act as though it takes some leap to not belief in something without evidence. no one would propose that belief in, i dunno, dragons and non-belief in dragons require equal amounts of faith and therefore they're just gonna sit this one out. its bullshit semantical fencesitting.
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)
^_^
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.clydecaldwell.com/jpgs/large_images/dragon_steed.jpg
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)
sweet ride
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)
t'mboto
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)
Nice dragon, mookie. Although I'm not sure those 'fuck off' spurs are necessary, given that said dragon is well bitted.
― Guilty_Boksen, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
First assume we have a can-opener, basically.
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)
TL;DR.
Mind you, back when Ma$e stopped rapping because he'd gotten religion, I had to seriously consider this as evidence of a benevolent God.
― j.lu, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
well, as far as christianity is concerned I'm atheist, but I think it is a leap of faith to claim that there is definitely no sort of paranormal agency. it's not a very hard leap of faith to make (and i myself believe it to be highly probable), but you can't totally rule out the possibility of any deic force unless you trust your own judgement to a certain extent....jeez the more i think about it, the more atheist i get.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)
you cant rule out the possibility of anything
only with supernatural religious bullshit do we make claims like this
does it take a leap of faith to assume the earth isn't hollow and populated with a secret nazi base that caused 9/11? yeah, i guess
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
paranormal agency vvv http://www.armyofinbetween.com/images/films/ghostbusters.jpg
― gff, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)
I can't rule out the possibility that the world is full of mysterious particles and waves and little invisible fairies that have no effect on anything whatsoever, to include being completely useless even as a predictive tool for developing any testable hypotheses, so I guess that makes me a "doubter."
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)
the earth isn't hollow and populated with a secret nazi base that caused 9/11
blasphemer
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
well, most or all current religions are chock full of supernatural fallacy IMO, but there are always going to be universal unknowns. my point is that i am only agnostic by default of pedantry; i'm largely on ethan's side in the great religious debate. certainly i wouldn't advocate subscribing to religious belief, but hey, although i severely doubt there's any kind of deity, i don't feel i can entirely rule it out and be 100% right for absolute certain. it doesn't affect the way i act or think.
it has been proved, for instance, that the earth is not hollow. but as for whether there is an overall force in a higher dimension that we can't detect which controls certain aspects of existence...although hugely improbable, we can't prove against it, nor should we try to. it really doesn't matter.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
you can't prove the earth is not hollow - the nazis who live in the center developed a high-tech system that makes it seem to all scientific instruments as though it isn't
― and what, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ this is basically 'we can't know if there is or isnt a god'-logic
http://www.anointed-one.net/atheism.html
lol
fair enough, the improbability of your straw man probably approaches that of there being a god in the christian sense. :D
and probably in any sense, to be honest. whatever doubt there is, isn't worth paying much mind to. "pedantic atheist-agnostic" is henceforth my position on the matter.
xp
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
listen
something that is completely unfalsifiable is not "probable" or "improbable" it is a CONCEPT
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
i love concepts
― max, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
...by which we measure our pain, right. (xp)
― Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
inasmuch as the word god has any meaning it is in how we relate to that word and how that affects the way we as individuals use that relationship to inform our behavior in the world. to even pretend that god holds some meaning in terms of logical or scientific inquiry outside of observing the relationship between human behavior and their religious semiology is like step one on the path towards "science is just another religion"
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
the concept of inner-earth nazis doing a James Bond Invisible Car thing on seismic waves has a probability, and one which approaches 0 very very quickly.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
how do you test for that? propose an experiment
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
show me how your experiment will prove or disprove the existence of this idea
oh wait the idea already exists, see, ethan wrote it down 22 minutes ago. it's there already, you can't disprove that it exists, therefore you might as well assume it does
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)
we create a machine that can burrow into the centre of the earth. when it doesn't bump into a nazi, as expected, we know that the concept is a false one. or we just assume it doesn't exist because it is batshit.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
no you said "the CONCEPT of inner-earth nazis." you were going to prove that the CONCEPT of inner-earth nazis had a probability approaching zero. DO YOU SEE.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)
Rodney M. Cluff From the Author...
As a young man, I had two favorite subjects, science and religion. In my study, it became my conviction that ultimately science and religion will become one and the same, science being the study of God's creation; and religion consisting of the revelations of God to mankind. Both are ultimately manifestations of the truth of all things given to man by God in His infinite kindness and love to bring about the happiness of His children. It is from the Book of Mormon, an ancient text of scripture written by ancient American prophets of God that I gained the desire to obtain the object of both true religion and true science: the search for the truth of all things. The ancient American prophet of the Book of Mormon concluded this book of scripture with a perfect scientific test anyone can perform on that book to know it is of God. Moroni wrote 421 A.D.:
"Behold, I would exhort you that when ye shall read these things, if it be wisdom in God that ye should read them, that ye would remember how merciful the Lord hath been unto the children of men, from the creation of Adam even down until the time that ye shall receive these things, and ponder it in your hearts.
"And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.
"And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things."
It is by application of this scientific test to that book of ancient American scripture that I came to a knowledge that it is of God, because God did answer my prayer and let me know by the power of the Holy Ghost of its truthfulness. Millions of Latter-day Saints have performed this same test and received the same answer of the divinity of this book. Therefore, it could be said that Mormonism is a scientific religion. The acquisition of this one precious truth has given me the impulse to discover the ultimate: the truth of all things. And my search has not been in vain. In fact, my search is a much more efficient one because my hits in the dark are much more infrequent when I have the power of the Holy Ghost to lighten the way to the next truth. Thus my search has been an exciting one and I hope some of the things I have uncovered concerning this earth of ours will be as exciting to you as it has been to me.
Would you like to receive a free copy of The Book of Mormon? Then click here.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.ourhollowearth.com/ourhollo/rod.jpg
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)
is Tahiti Denmark Florida Calif. Italy the hollow world version of NYLPM?
― gff, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)
RODNEY M. CLUFF, author of World Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow! was born and raised in the American colony of Colonia Juarez in northern Mexico. He became interested in the Hollow Earth Theory at the age of 16 while working on a New Mexico farm where the farm manager told the workers of the theory. He thought, What an ideal place for the Lord to hide the Lost Tribes of Israel!
After graduating from high school, Mr. Cluff served a full-time mission for the LDS Church in Mexico where he met his wife. One year after his release, they were married in the Arizona Temple and now have five lovely children and nine lovelier grandchildren!
They moved to Phoenix, Arizona, and one day Mr. Cluff noticed an advertisement of Raymond Bernard's book, The Hollow Earth in a tabloid newspaper. He sent for it and thereby began many years of study and writing which has led to the present work. Today, Mr. Cluff works as a computer programmer/analyst, and continues his research into evidences for hollow planets as a hobby.
He firmly believes: OUR EARTH IS HOLLOW! Backed with scientific evidence, including satellite photos of the polar holes, analysis of the observations of polar explorers, analysis of earthquake data and much more--coupled with evidence from the scriptures that the Lost Tribes of Israel are now FOUND within the Hollow of Our Earth, he presents his argument in favor of the Hollow Earth Theory.
It is his hope that someday, he may have the privilege of visiting his cousins of the Ten Tribes in the North Countries of the Hollow Earth! The author's own ancestry is of Israelitish origin, of the Tribe of Ephraim, and can be traced back to the Exile of the Ten Tribes from Palestine when they were carried captive into Assyria in 721 B.C.
The Ten Tribes were held captive for over a century by the Assyrians, but then escaped over the Caucasus mountains sometime before Babylon conquered Assyria in 605 B.C. They made their home in the region of the Crimea and the Steppe of Russia just north of the Black Sea up until the first century B.C. While there, they were ruled by an illustrious leader named Odin. The Roman armies threatened to conquer the region so his ancestors, because of their fierce love of freedom and independence, determined to migrate. From their custom of burying their dead in burial mounds, their migrations have been traced from the Black Sea up the valley of the river Dnieper in Russia to the Baltic Sea and from thence to northern Germany and Scandinavia.
One branch of these people became known as the Sakae or Saxons and settled in Northern Germany. Shortly after the Romans left the British Isles in the fourth century A.D., certain Celtic tribes of the British Isles invited the Engles, Saxons, and Jutes (who had previously raided the east coast of England as pirates) to bring their bands over and help defeat other Celts. From the eighth to the eleventh century they were known as the Scandinavian Vikings. They became the most volatile seapower and military force in Europe. They often attacked coastal areas with fleets that ran into the hundreds of ships and highly organized armies of several thousand. The French became weary of being looted each harvest season and so they invited the Vikings to accept a large section of France and raise their own crops. The Norsemen agreed and the territory became known as Normandy, or loved of the Norsemen.
The Author's Clough-Cluff forefathers were of the Saxon Vikings who settled Normandy in France. They came to England with William The Conqueror in 1066 A.D. In the distribution of lands among his officers, a large estate fell to one CLOUGH in Yorkshire. This estate has been transmitted from father to son until the present time and is known as the Esquire Clough Estate, and is situated about 26 miles from the old city of York, from which the Pilgrim Fathers sailed in 1620 for the New World.
In the year 1635, fifteen years after the first Pilgrims immigrated to America, at about the age of l9 to 2l, John Clough with his brother sailed from London, England on the Clipper ship The Elizabeth. Upon arriving in America, John Clough settled in Massachusetts. One of his descendants, David Cluff, changed the spelling of his last name when he joined The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (commonly known as the Mormons) in 1830. Therefore, all Cluff's in the world, to this author's knowledge, are descendants of this David Cluff, whose ancestry can be traced back through the Saxon Vikings to the Tribe of Ephraim of the House of Israel.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
OMG, Ethan must have gotten his idea from this!
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)
After opening a door he was told not to enter and touching a mysterious box inside, every citizen in the village is frozen. The only person not affected by the curse, the Elder of Crysta, guides him to resurrect the continents of the world in order to unfreeze the people. A way out of his hometown appears, and for the first time ever a human being leaves Crysta to explore the underworld which is portrayed as a frozen wasteland of imposing crystal mountains, crossed by rivers of magma. He conquers the trials of the five towers - each representing one continent - and revives the mainland of the Earth. Upon returning to his hometown, the Elder instructs him to travel to the overworld and to resurrect all living beings. With a heavy heart, Ark says goodbye to his lifelong devoted friend Elle and sets out to the Lightside.Having crossed a dimensional crevasse that closed itself after his appearance on the overworld, Ark is confronted with the barren land that once was the Earth's surface. His first task is to free the giant tree Ra from the parasite he is afflicted with. This causes the resurrection of all plants in the world resulting in Ark's being able to cross the mountains of Guyana. He travels further into the world, reviving birds, the wind, animals and eventually mankind.After that, the Elder appears to Ark in a dream and tells him to keep helping humankind grow, as the world is still in the fledgling stages. He continues his journey, traveling and expanding cities, assisting with the invention of groundbreaking technologies and ultimately, freeing the ingenious Beruga from his sleep in a cryogenic chamber. The professor provides Ark with an insight into his personal image of the paradise. He envisions a perfect world by killing all insignificant life with a virus named Asmodeus and turning everyone else into immortal beings. Ark tries to attack Beruga after this revealing twist but is stopped by robots, injuring him heavily.The Elder once again appears to him, saying that his mission is fulfilled and he may now pass away. Ark realizes that he's been used by Evil to lead the power which created him to world domination. Just as he is about to die, Kumari, a wise human who watched the world's growth through reincarnation, teleports Ark out of Beruga's laboratory. He then instructs him to go search the five Starstones and to lay them at the grave at time's end in order to call the golden child. Ark obtains the stones one after another and sets them into skull statues at Dry Valley, the location at the South Pole where the final confrontation between Good and Evil once took place. This leads to the appearance of Ark's Lightside self, the person Evil - now given the name Dark Gaia - used to create Ark himself. He tells him that he's the legendary hero and then kills him.However, Ark is reborn through the power of Good, Light Gaia, and departs to defeat Beruga. After having conquered the professor, he returns to the underworld to defeat Dark Gaia. The victory over that entity brings forth the destruction of the Darkside. In the end, however, a major purpose is served and Ark, although sealing what appears to be his own demise as well, realizes he and all of his loved ones are bound to meet again in future reincarnations. Thus he goes to sleep, after being told that he, as creator and defender, is what the outside world would call a "god".
Having crossed a dimensional crevasse that closed itself after his appearance on the overworld, Ark is confronted with the barren land that once was the Earth's surface. His first task is to free the giant tree Ra from the parasite he is afflicted with. This causes the resurrection of all plants in the world resulting in Ark's being able to cross the mountains of Guyana. He travels further into the world, reviving birds, the wind, animals and eventually mankind.
After that, the Elder appears to Ark in a dream and tells him to keep helping humankind grow, as the world is still in the fledgling stages. He continues his journey, traveling and expanding cities, assisting with the invention of groundbreaking technologies and ultimately, freeing the ingenious Beruga from his sleep in a cryogenic chamber. The professor provides Ark with an insight into his personal image of the paradise. He envisions a perfect world by killing all insignificant life with a virus named Asmodeus and turning everyone else into immortal beings. Ark tries to attack Beruga after this revealing twist but is stopped by robots, injuring him heavily.
The Elder once again appears to him, saying that his mission is fulfilled and he may now pass away. Ark realizes that he's been used by Evil to lead the power which created him to world domination. Just as he is about to die, Kumari, a wise human who watched the world's growth through reincarnation, teleports Ark out of Beruga's laboratory. He then instructs him to go search the five Starstones and to lay them at the grave at time's end in order to call the golden child. Ark obtains the stones one after another and sets them into skull statues at Dry Valley, the location at the South Pole where the final confrontation between Good and Evil once took place. This leads to the appearance of Ark's Lightside self, the person Evil - now given the name Dark Gaia - used to create Ark himself. He tells him that he's the legendary hero and then kills him.
However, Ark is reborn through the power of Good, Light Gaia, and departs to defeat Beruga. After having conquered the professor, he returns to the underworld to defeat Dark Gaia. The victory over that entity brings forth the destruction of the Darkside. In the end, however, a major purpose is served and Ark, although sealing what appears to be his own demise as well, realizes he and all of his loved ones are bound to meet again in future reincarnations. Thus he goes to sleep, after being told that he, as creator and defender, is what the outside world would call a "god".
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
i believe in the hallow earth!
― carne asada, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
http://greyfalcon.us/picturesh/reed3.jpg
http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/41SPN1ZNA5L.jpg
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
From their custom of burying their dead in burial mounds, their migrations have been traced from the Black Sea up the valley of the river Dnieper in Russia to the Baltic Sea and from thence to northern Germany and Scandinavia.
Wait a second. Did the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel use burial mounds before they were captured by Assyria and escaped over the Caucasus, or only after they escaped?
Wouldn't the present day Israelite tribes of the diaspora continue to make burial mounds, too?
― Aimless, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
gff totally otm upthread
― max, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
Terranigma was a cool game you dooshbags
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
It infuriates me how christians insert bible quotes into their 'logical' arguments for god's existence. I do not believe in the bible, that's not going to sway me one jot.
― chap, Thursday, 27 December 2007 02:17 (eighteen years ago)
Proof that God exists:
http://cdn.last.fm/coverart/300x300/2031483-1352787762.jpg
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 27 December 2007 02:27 (eighteen years ago)
^^^picked this up the other day for $1. The Lord Hath Smiled Down Upon Me.
― will, Thursday, 27 December 2007 05:07 (eighteen years ago)
their message that “there is no God.”
"lol"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 27 December 2007 05:08 (eighteen years ago)
I've always thought that Terranigma would make a great song, like Scott Walker's take on the Seventh Seal; only trouble is, whoever did it would probably botch the lyrics.
― Belldog, Thursday, 27 December 2007 05:30 (eighteen years ago)
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b361/tapestore/frankensteins_cousin_grave_md_wht_2.gif
Jesus Christ! Outspoken atheists are just as annoying as fanatical Christians.
You can discuss this all you want, but no one really knows the answer to the proposed question. So when you shove your belief in others' faces (as if it's 100% true), you just come across as a dickhead to realists (agnostics, in this case).
:) http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b361/tapestore/dancepeanutdance.gif
― Tape Store, Thursday, 27 December 2007 05:47 (eighteen years ago)
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b361/tapestore/sad.jpg
^^^ That, too
― Tape Store, Thursday, 27 December 2007 05:49 (eighteen years ago)
uh oh
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 27 December 2007 06:12 (eighteen years ago)
YOU'RE RETARDED
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 27 December 2007 06:55 (eighteen years ago)
ain't nothing like animated gifs to humiliate your opponent
― m bison, Thursday, 27 December 2007 06:57 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.sweetsncandy.co.uk/prodimages/milfis_l.jpg
^^^^ proof that white chocolate exists
― Frogman Henry, Thursday, 27 December 2007 07:16 (eighteen years ago)
gah i suck and am hungover
still: milfis?
― Frogman Henry, Thursday, 27 December 2007 07:17 (eighteen years ago)
I went to church for a little while in high school. I was very much a loner when I was 15 and felt empty and plus my parents sort of forced me to go to youth group because they thought it was good for me to interact with other people.
I remember being in this fundie church though that had a workbook we worked out of that was the biggest piece of shit propaganda ever.
One shining quote (it was from someone famous but I can't remember who) used the logic that the Bible could not have been merely an 'invention' of good people, because if it was, the 'good' people would be telling a lie, which would mean they were not good. Furthermore, the book explained, the Bible could not have been invented by 'bad' people because they would be condemning themselves.
The quote concluded that therefore, as a result, that proved the book was a Divine work and thus true.
I don't know what was more alarming, the insulting logic used or the idiots that accepted it as a valid argument.
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 30 December 2007 04:59 (seventeen years ago)
I'm probably a hopeless optimist, but I think the core reasons for believing in God will tend to be a little more subtle and difficult than the OMG LEAVES! and OMG CLOUDS! and OMG EYES! line of thinking. When we get to questions from "why can't I conceive of space and time as being finite OR infinite?" to the more religion-specific "why do I feel like I'm levitating as my heart bursts out of my chest when I hear this hymn?", surely we're talking about examples where finding the most convincing explanation to be "because there is a God" isn't really so awful and absurd a line of thinking?
Original article is nonsense, obv.
― Merdeyeux, Sunday, 30 December 2007 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
this is the same reason i can understand that peoples dreams are important to them without actually literally thinking my little brother was chased by dinosaurs last night
this is like one of the greatest things I've ever read
― J0hn D., Sunday, 30 December 2007 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
-- Merdeyeux, Sunday, December 30, 2007 3:08 PM (43 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
how is refusing to dispel your own ignorance is a better reason than OMG CLOUDS
― and what, Sunday, 30 December 2007 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
ignorance about what?
― Merdeyeux, Sunday, 30 December 2007 20:56 (seventeen years ago)
When we get to questions from "why can't I conceive of space and time as being finite OR infinite?" to the more religion-specific "why do I feel like I'm levitating as my heart bursts out of my chest when I hear this hymn?", surely we're talking about examples where finding the most convincing explanation to be "because there is a God" isn't really so awful and absurd a line of thinking?
― and what, Sunday, 30 December 2007 20:58 (seventeen years ago)
there are valid explanations for those things which are available to anyone unless you're so lazy and uncurious you just say 'god did it' to every question
― and what, Sunday, 30 December 2007 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
"why do I feel like I'm levitating as my heart bursts out of my chest when I hear this hymn?"
individual religious devotion proves that god exists? so was jim jones god?
― and what, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:03 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.kingsizemagazine.se/bilder/jimjones.jpg
― jim, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:05 (seventeen years ago)
but those examples aren't the same as the cop-out leaves sure are fancy, ain't they? examples. When you're talking about what people perceive as direct encounters with a transcendent other, scientific reduction of that isn't necessarily enough to satisfy the questions and neuter the thoughts the experiences bring up. It doesn't mean that Jim Jones was God or that Christian God is God, but it also doesn't mean that to deal with these experiences in a religious way is necessarily choosing ignorance over bothering to learn.
― Merdeyeux, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:09 (seventeen years ago)
look, ethan, i may agree with you on this issue, and you may indeed be right, but you're not gonna get far by being so abrasive. if you want to convince people that they're being misled by a vast religious corporation, be funny, be reasonable, and don't go on the offensive at the drop of a hat. it's not like ILX is a gigantic christian commune you've somehow got to fight your way out of.
― Just got offed, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
thanks for the advice louis jagger
― and what, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
it's not like ILX is a gigantic christian commune you've somehow got to fight your way out of.
;)
― Merdeyeux, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:16 (seventeen years ago)
― Lingbert, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
ethan p4dgett is...THE SECULATOR
― Just got offed, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
modern churches (maybe all churches ever) are basically just social fraternal orders, like elks club with magic
-- and what, Wednesday, December 26, 2007 7:51 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Link
yeah i think there is something to this. but i'm not sure whats wrong w/that. we are social creatures. we need community. that doesn't makes churches bad or good. other things do though!
― artdamages, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:23 (seventeen years ago)
e didn't you used to get all aggro on me when I'd get all irrationally pissed off at Xians y/n
― J0hn D., Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
Yes, right behind all caps name-calling
― Tape Store, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
Whatever. ThatThis thread was shitty from the start; i only acted obnoxious to get some sort of revenge for my wasted time (the thread should have some attached note: "don't waste your time on this pretentious discussion; instead read d'Holbach")
-- Tape Store, Friday, December 28, 2007 7:07 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link
― Tape Store, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:26 (seventeen years ago)
-- J0hn D., Sunday, December 30, 2007 4:25 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link
lol contrarianism
― and what, Sunday, 30 December 2007 21:29 (seventeen years ago)
e didn't you used to get all aggro on me when I'd get all irrationally pissed off at Xians y/nsay ann coulter was pretty
lol I have actually mellowed in my "their shit is so annoyingly irrational" stance this year, although the threadstarting question is like GOD DAMN YOU GUYS QUIT TALKING BULLSHIT PLZ
pretty much any time you see the term "worldview," that's your signal to locate the exits imo
― J0hn D., Sunday, 30 December 2007 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
the materialistic atheist's worldview
http://www.uffsite.net/ff4/images/maps/overworld.jpg
― Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 30 December 2007 23:08 (seventeen years ago)
i know what map that is. i am sad.
― abanana, Sunday, 30 December 2007 23:09 (seventeen years ago)
I've been to Chocobo Forest sometime in my life.
― Tape Store, Sunday, 30 December 2007 23:23 (seventeen years ago)
I did not know what map that was, but did recognize several similarities between it and the world of dragon quest viii. clearly, god is involved.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 30 December 2007 23:26 (seventeen years ago)