I had a very hard time watching the debate knowing that Kucinich had been excluded.
I'm often shocked by how un-shocking a candidate he is. He's well-spoken, reasonable, a good communicator. He's had a lot of experience in politics, working with people on both sides of the aisle. He's hardly as "left" as some other Democratic candidates of the last 10-15 years who seemed to receive at least a bit more serious attention. Sure, he has his "new age" side that I don't find particularly appealing, and I know that he would never have a chance of winning. But his presence adds something to the debates that, say, Richardson will never add.
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:41 (seventeen years ago) link
Richardson's bringing the turkey neck. Anything else?
― Abbott, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:42 (seventeen years ago) link
Richardson isn't articulate enough to challenge the blandishments, banalities, and self-congratulation of the other candidates, even when they're discussing issues on which he holds decidedly different opinions. Kucinich sometimes makes the others look like prevaricators.
I can't really see any reason he was excluded except for this. It's not as though if they changed the terms of inclusion to allow his participation, that they'd have to accept anyone else.... Kucinich, while he didn't fare quite as well as Richardson, is a serious, nationally-known candidate with a great deal of support and almost universal ballot presence.
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:47 (seventeen years ago) link
"great deal of support"
fake amateurist???
fwiw, i do think he should be included until he drops out, but c'mon
― gershy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:50 (seventeen years ago) link
I can't believe Ron Paul was on but Kucinicj wasn't.
― Abbott, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:51 (seventeen years ago) link
paul polls around 10%, kucinich only polls around 2%
― gershy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:54 (seventeen years ago) link
My world is WEIRDENED
― Abbott, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:55 (seventeen years ago) link
I suppose that could be easily misinterpreted as my overstating his support. By great deal, i mean he has thousands of supporters in nearly every state. He has endorsements from magazines like The Nation--left, of course, but hardly fringe, and certainly respected and well-established.
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:55 (seventeen years ago) link
look, the guy has been around national politics for decades and can never get above 5% support in his own party. maybe the reasons why he can't do that involve some media and/or party establishment dirty tricks or whatever, but he's a losing proposition at this point. of course, huckabee was an afterthought 2 months ago, so you never know....
― gershy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:59 (seventeen years ago) link
My point, in any event, is not that he's a likely nominee but rather that his presence adds a great deal to the debates and that there's little justification for his exclusion (especially if Richardson is included).
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:00 (seventeen years ago) link
i think only dennis kucinich should have been in the debate. kucinich vs. gibson.
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:00 (seventeen years ago) link
true, but richardson's support, however miniscule, is running 2-3 times that of denny. arbitrary but that's how it goes. xpost
― gershy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:01 (seventeen years ago) link
ABC included anyone who polled above 5%. Richardson did, Kucinich didn't. it might be little, but it's justification.
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:02 (seventeen years ago) link
Which polls? I might be wrong about this, but I recall seeing a few polls in which the difference between Kucinich's level of support and that of Richardson (and not long ago, Biden) wasn't very great.
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:04 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.pollster.com/08-NH-Dem-Pres-Primary.php
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:04 (seventeen years ago) link
Does Kucinich's exclusion from those polls suggest that his numbers are infinitesimal or has he just been cut out because he's the lowest-polling candidate on average?
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:11 (seventeen years ago) link
All I think about when I hear Kucinich mentioned is this:
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/9838/picture1xc9.png
Liz: he's also playing Barack Obama! Angie: No. We support Kucinich. Liz: Angie, I'm sorry I lied, but you gotta give me another chance. Angie: excuse me, but did you just try to control my body with your white hand? Don't make me contact Reverend Sharpton
― caek, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:13 (seventeen years ago) link
anti-vegan bigotry xpost
― gershy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:15 (seventeen years ago) link
so gonna happen http://veganica.com/works/a1/p1806_me-dennis-elizabeth.jpg
― gershy, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:16 (seventeen years ago) link
I was wondering how long it would take before his wife came up. I find that very irritating, but Kucinich hasn't helped by featuring her in his campaign material.
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 06:17 (seventeen years ago) link
ABC included anyone who polled above 5%.
heh, that's handy isn't it? hope next time he makes it to 6% and they have to raise that to 10%.
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Sunday, 6 January 2008 09:59 (seventeen years ago) link
lol @ caek
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 6 January 2008 10:05 (seventeen years ago) link
why don't you look at the polls themselves? this involves "clicking" on "links"
or running for President to find a mate
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 13:40 (seventeen years ago) link
but i'm sure americans would love to vote for a guy with a wife who isn't a citizen
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 13:42 (seventeen years ago) link
congrats on yr successful trolling
hmm i swore i just posted this but:
gabbneb do you think if someone had found a few polls with kucinich at 5.1% the debate producers would have sat around going "well, i don't know! he's at 5.1! gotta include him!"
i think the idea that the debates are based on neutral, objective criteria is ridiculous -- they never have been
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 6 January 2008 13:54 (seventeen years ago) link
Are there 2 gabbnebs with exactly the same display name or something???
― libcrypt, Sunday, 6 January 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago) link
i wouldn't rule out the idea that if Richardson were polling above 10% and Kucinich were polling between 5 and 10%, they would have drawn the line at 10%, but otherwise the answer to your question is yes. the rule would have applied equally to dodd and quite possibly biden if they hadn't dropped out (and to richardson, if he hadn't maintained above 5% in at least one poll - there was one that had him at 4, but others were above).
ABC had no problem including Kucinich in its August 19 debate
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 15:05 (seventeen years ago) link
as much as i'd like to include everyone, if you've been paying attention, you know that last night was probably the best debate there's been in the whole campaign, and it's in no small part because we're not just giving everyone tiny soundbites because there are so many people on the stage
― gabbneb, Sunday, 6 January 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago) link
<I>congrats on yr successful trolling </i>
Why are you being so belligerent? That's patently not the tone I've taken here. I was given a link to a poll aggregator that didn't even have a column for Kucinich, and was wondering why this was.
I'll crawl back into the shadows now, good riddance, "gabbneb."
― amateurist, Sunday, 6 January 2008 16:59 (seventeen years ago) link
amateurist don't worry about it - something about democratic politics gives gabbneb 'roid rage
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 6 January 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link
Living around here you wouldn't think Kucinich is a fringe candidate. He has a little sign in every other front yard.
― admrl, Sunday, 6 January 2008 18:22 (seventeen years ago) link
-- amateurist, Sunday, January 6, 2008 6:17 AM (12 hours ago) Bookmark Link
i would post that quote from 'the departed' that tracer posted for obama again but you get the idea.
why is gabbers so upset?
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 6 January 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link
i mean really re his wife, way to fuckin go, den!
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 6 January 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link
I know you're in L.A. now, Adam, but I remember when I was in San Francisco four years ago, I saw a flyer on someone's doorknob advertising Kucinich's candidacy in Chinese, and something about that seemed so quintessentially San Francisco, I would've taken a photo if I'd had a camera.
― jaymc, Sunday, 6 January 2008 22:57 (seventeen years ago) link
Also reading a thread with both Adam and Amateurist really makes me feel like it's 2004 again.
― jaymc, Sunday, 6 January 2008 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link
Well, I probably live in one of the more "San Francisco-esque" of Los Angeles neighbourhoods.
Glad I could bring a bit of 2004 to your day!
― admrl, Sunday, 6 January 2008 23:04 (seventeen years ago) link
Ron Paul is a maniac, but now I know what would happen if Jimmy Stewart and Ian McKellen spawned a savant libertarian manbaby.
― admrl, Sunday, 6 January 2008 23:07 (seventeen years ago) link
he does look like ian mckellen!
― horseshoe, Sunday, 6 January 2008 23:11 (seventeen years ago) link
don't sweat it amateurist, not everyone here can reach the heights of political insight contained in such gems as "but i'm sure americans would love to vote for a guy with a wife who isn't a citizen."
― J.D., Sunday, 6 January 2008 23:45 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=267005
― amateurist, Monday, 7 January 2008 22:45 (seventeen years ago) link
saw Viggo and Kucinich on Fox News yesterday and cracked up, Viggo brought the zings
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 7 January 2008 23:51 (seventeen years ago) link
Dennis was very classy, too, especially when the host was fishing for him to denounce Hillary Clinton.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wdiDYlX6tl4
Unfortunately a Fox News appearance isn't going to do much to boost his visibility among those who matter.
― amateurist, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 01:13 (seventeen years ago) link
I like him
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 01:23 (seventeen years ago) link
he's a likable, sensible little dude who hangs out with paladins
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 11:05 (seventeen years ago) link
BIG KOOS
viggo mortenson basically has the life i want - a child with exene cervenka, a past as a truck driver, and a wicked way with an elven poultice
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 11:08 (seventeen years ago) link
Kucinich is a Catholic vegan!
Interesting link.
― Z S, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:44 (sixteen years ago) link
He eats all kinds of vegans?
― gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:50 (sixteen years ago) link
I like how not one, but TWO congressmen list their religious affiliation as Foursquare Gospel. That sounds like a church I'd like to attend.
http://celebration4square.org/images/C4SL.jpg
nice logo...looking good...
http://speakingoffaith.publicradio.org/programs/sisteraimee/images/bridalcall-thumb.jpg
...international membership, ok...
http://www.geocities.com/ascendedmaster/aimee4.jpg
...and charismatic leadership FTW!
― Z S, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:55 (sixteen years ago) link
friend of mine who lives in kucinich's district says some DLC guy is trying to take his house seat, he seemed pretty worried about it :/
― ciderpress, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link
greenwald at his best, imo: http://www.salon.com/2012/03/10/dennis_kucinich_and_wackiness/
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Sunday, 11 March 2012 01:28 (twelve years ago) link
kucinich got a raw deal imovoted for him in 04 primary, my first electionwkiw at vegan restaurant
― arsenio and old ma$e (m bison), Sunday, 11 March 2012 01:42 (twelve years ago) link
he really got shafted by the dnc on this
― these pretzels are makeing me horney (Hungry4Ass), Sunday, 11 March 2012 03:56 (twelve years ago) link
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/01/dennis-kucinich-joins-fox-news.html
― iatee, Wednesday, 16 January 2013 21:40 (twelve years ago) link
so this dude actually supports Trump? wtf?
― I am a free. I am not man. A number. (Neanderthal), Monday, 1 June 2020 03:01 (four years ago) link
i remember going to see this dude speak in 2004 and finding him so inspiring. but tbh it doesn't surprise me too much that he turned into sort of a tulsi gabbard type.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 1 June 2020 05:14 (four years ago) link
https://image.shutterstock.com/z/stock-photo-sen-dennis-kucinich-and-elizabeth-kucinich-at-the-afi-life-achievement-award-honoring-shirley-330407780.jpg
maybe he couldn't help it
― j., Monday, 1 June 2020 05:16 (four years ago) link