What Class do you consider yourself to be?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Well go on then:

Poll Results

OptionVotes
Upper Middle Class 35
Lower Middle Class 32
Working Class 22
Aristocracy 7
Underclass 6
Monarchy6
Upper Class 3


Ed, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

we don't have class in america

Gukbe, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:34 (eighteen years ago)

working class FTW because all those privately schooled ILXorz went on a scholarship, duh

DG, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:36 (eighteen years ago)

we don't have class in america

And the streets are paved with cheese.

No wait...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:36 (eighteen years ago)

Where is actual-middle-class?

nabisco, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:37 (eighteen years ago)

Actually no, it was smart to leave that out, or else everyone in the entire US would pick it

nabisco, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

i went for 'aristocracy'

DG, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

depends on what you mean. if we're talking about my parents (and btw, i do not have a trust fund), i'd say upper-middle class. they also don't give me any money at this point (yes they did pay for the schooling). and judging from the fact that i pretty much eat eggs, bread, and steal prepackaged ham and cheese to survive is a good indicator of where i am at the moment.

the table is the table, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

Demigod

The Reverend, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

What do you bread, table? (haha sorry)

nabisco, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:45 (eighteen years ago)

I put upper-middle class based on how I grew up. My parents weren't rolling in it or anything - they drove a ford taurus and a nissan sentra and we had a modest-sized house I went to public schools, but I grew up in an affluent area and had a lot of things I consider privileges, and I was able to go to a public college without taking loans or working the whole time.

Hurting 2, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:53 (eighteen years ago)

Also I'm probably going to law school.

Hurting 2, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:54 (eighteen years ago)

HIGH class

carne asada, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:54 (eighteen years ago)

Rogue

max, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

Chaotic neutral.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

that's alignment, dude

max, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

Assassin

Noodle Vague, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

We were heading down that path anyway, max.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:07 (eighteen years ago)

Beginning Typing

Michael White, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:07 (eighteen years ago)

Or maybe French 3

Michael White, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:08 (eighteen years ago)

The different classes can be arranged into four boat types:

* Dinghy: Finn, Europe, Laser, 49er and 470.
Sailors steer dinghies using a rudder and the crew use their body weight to counterbalance the forces developed by the sail and their common characteristic are lifting centreboards.

The Finn, Europe and Laser have a single sail, while the 470 class has a two-sail rig. Both the 470s and the 49ers also have an additional sail for downwind, called a spinnaker.

* Keelboats: Yngling and Star.
They have a fin fixed below the hull - otherwise known as the keel - while the Yngling boat also has a spinnaker.

* Catamarans: Tornado.
These are twin-hulled boats with a centreboard and a rudder on each hull, a two-sail rig and a mainsail.

* Mistral: Mistral sailboard.
A type of windsurfer, consisting of a board with a mast and a sail. The sailor controls the mast with their arms and steers in a standing position, moving body weight to guide the vessel.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

ohio class, motherfucker.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:14 (eighteen years ago)

Destroyer

Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/images/alfa-DNSC8205636.JPG

carne asada, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:16 (eighteen years ago)

Isn't middle-middle class an option, Ed?!

toby, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

got no

andrew m., Friday, 18 January 2008 20:20 (eighteen years ago)

I thought about it but I thought it's not that commonly used. xpost

I am upper middle class through and through really.

Ed, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

came up lower middle. now working.

andrew m., Friday, 18 January 2008 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

Issaquah 130

gabbneb, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

No class.

Bill Magill, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.campaignbadges.co.uk/mixed%20as%20gif/class%20war.GIF

rrrobyn, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

I'm currently offering two classes, both for undergraduates:

Introduction to Literary Study
Milton in Debate

Drew Daniel, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

yeah I'm not sure how I would fit into this... to me, "upper-middle" suggests a household income close to or in the lower reaches of the six-figure range. Is "lower-middle" anything $80K and under?** That certainly isn't how I think of it. I could be way off-base here with these numbers.

**these figures would obviously be adjusted for cost of living wrt region/ number of dependents in household, etc...

will, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

working

milo z, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

working

who will choose "underclass"

and what, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

Based on reading the recent batch of class war threads, being a statistics nerd, and curiosity after getting W2s in the mail yesterday for the first full year of "real" jobs, I found this last night:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States

Lowest fifth $0
Second fifth $18,500
Middle fifth $34,738
Fourth fifth $55,331
Highest fifth $88,030
Top 5% $157,176

It says the New York Times refers to these quintiles as lower class, lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, and upper class.

joygoat, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

Those numbers are the lower limit in terms of income, by the way.

joygoat, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

according to that i'm practically lower middle class o_O

and what, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

All told I think I still came in a tick under the second fifth in 2007

milo z, Friday, 18 January 2008 20:59 (eighteen years ago)

same here

doing it real big

and what, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

pre-taxes >:(

and what, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

according to that, our little household is upper middle class... it also means that most other couples we know (married or living together)are upper class. seems fishy to me.

lauren, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

class is about more than income.

sexyDancer, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

breeding, darling.

lauren, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:04 (eighteen years ago)

That is a national average. New York, will have higher thresholds. Income and net worth are only par tof what goes to make up class, though.

xpost

Ed, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:05 (eighteen years ago)

also nyc income vs most other places income no?
xpost!

sleep, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

I've noticed different class-identities within blood-related families

sexyDancer, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

NY City NY State U.S.
Median household income (1999) $38,293 $43,393 $41,994

but doesn't really all the boundaries

Ed, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:09 (eighteen years ago)

upper middle class all the way, and I still get to wear jeans and doc martens to work

El Tomboto, Friday, 18 January 2008 21:09 (eighteen years ago)

creative class not an option?

Eric H., Friday, 18 January 2008 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

yeah

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:20 (eighteen years ago)

Exactly what I said, middle class

Tom D., Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:20 (eighteen years ago)

lol I think Bennett is alright. A lot of his work is tackling the same stuff as the social realists but from the other direction. Dad was a butcher? That's not proper middle middle class I reckon.

Noodle Vague, Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:22 (eighteen years ago)

I'm wasn't criticising him! Background not unlike Thatcher's?

Tom D., Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:23 (eighteen years ago)

"Well-to-do" shopkeeper?

Tom D., Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:23 (eighteen years ago)

Probably not far off eh? Obvious argument to be made that the Tory party needed a vulgar go-getter from the aspiring lower middle class to break out of their post-Macmillan nap.

Noodle Vague, Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:25 (eighteen years ago)

Ted Heath!

Tom D., Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:26 (eighteen years ago)

Ted was more like the Grammar School oik desperate to prove he knew which fork to use at dinner, right?

Noodle Vague, Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:27 (eighteen years ago)

Ed (or anyone else) - How would you define 'working' v 'lower middle' v 'upper middle'? (In Britain, that is, not in America where it just seems to be a question of income)

Still need an answer to this.

Nasty, Brutish & Short, Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:50 (eighteen years ago)

I thought we could do a whole other thread on that once people had finished self identifying. Note the thread title.

Ed, Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

Upper working class = skilled manual, lower middle class = clerical.

Stevie T, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

ie ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NRS_social_grade

Stevie T, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:37 (eighteen years ago)

(though lol at nurse being considered solid B)

Stevie T, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:40 (eighteen years ago)

What, no landed gentry?

Masonic Boom, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:41 (eighteen years ago)

"Only around 2% of the UK population identifies itself as upper class,[2] and this group is not included in the classification scheme."

Stevie T, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:42 (eighteen years ago)

I thought we could do a whole other thread on that once people had finished self identifying. Note the thread title.

please gawd noooo. hasn't it been done to death on ILX already? discussing class here is terrible because the range represented is so narrow (well, inevitably)

blueski, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:47 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, it's really not about income in the uk, unless you come from monied lineage. can someone assess me please? never thought about it in this much detail. is which newspaper you read a good clue or a red herring?

family background:
dad = comprehensive school headteacher, mam = primary school teacher. i went to the schools they worked in. grandparents on both sides definitely working class. grew up in working class and poor area in south wales valleys, we were better off than most people there. we had tons and tons of books spanning several centuries and many genres - milton to airport trash to sci-fi-to modern lit to science/nature to philosophy. as well as a kickarse rock and pop record collection from around 1960 up to around 1980, there were classical and opera records in the house, they weren't played as much as the others but they were played, mostly by my dad. ridiculed for liking classical music when i was 7 or 8, didn't really get why. we took probably three holidays a year, to france (camping for a month every summer), lake district (visiting maternal grandparents, climbing hills, skating on frozen tarns), generic resorts eg tenerife/gran canaria/the algarve, once to scotland, once to florida for disneyworld etc. i remember being 6 or 7 and another girl saying her mum had called her "mrs news of the world" for gossiping, she thought this was hilarious, i didn't understand and had to ask why. the newspaper we got in our house was the sunday times, i still do not understand why. sometimes we went to the cinema, usually to see the big film of the moment. no pets.

other:
applied and got in to united world college rather than staying home to do a levels (this is scholarship-based, though they do ask your parents to contribute if they can. i am sure mine will have done, i don't know how much). went to uni (in another working class and fairly poor area), this was before they made it fee-paying, i did not have to work to support myself. i did take out a loan two of the years (didn't need it to live, wanted it to buy records, go out, travel to other towns for gigs), none of which i have paid off yet. came to london in summer 1999, working in music industry. first job paid £9,360. second job started at £10,400 and rose over five or six years to £11,440, at some point while i was there i started getting my travelcard (around £80pcm) paid for me too. as of one year ago i'm on £22k and i feel loaded! read the guardian on the internets. last two holidays = went to rome for a weekend to see sonic youth in july, to dublin with friends for 4 days in october. i live in one of london's (and the uk's i think) poorest boroughs, in a cheap but nice rented flat. i have no savings.

emsk, Saturday, 19 January 2008 13:59 (eighteen years ago)

is which newspaper you read a good clue or a red herring?

I'm pretty sure there's not been a British paper that, big scare quotes, "represents" the working class in any meaningful way. Certainly not in my lifetime. So, red herring

DJ Mencap, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure there's not been a British paper that, big scare quotes, "represents" the working class in any meaningful way. Certainly not in my lifetime. So, red herring

-- DJ Mencap, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:07 (5 minutes ago) Link

Pre-Piers Mirror?

Dom Passantino, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:13 (eighteen years ago)

but groups of papers - maybe i mean buy, rather than read. does anyone other than working class buy tabloids? anyone other than upper middle/upper buy daily mail? i do not know the answers, these are not meant to be rhetorical questions. i know 3 ppl who buy tabloids, only one of them gets defensive about it. guardian means nothing i think. i'll read anything i find but would never buy tabloid or daily mail or telegraph (mostly as do not want to support the perpetuation of evil, rather than think i am above it or something), occasionally buy indy/guardian/obs for long train journeys.

emsk, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:16 (eighteen years ago)

LMC would buy both redtops and Daily Mail (i speak from experience ha)

blueski, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:18 (eighteen years ago)

actually i'm not sure i ever did buy them myself (def not the Mail) and i probably wouldn't have at any point, they were just purchased by relatives or colleagues a lot.

blueski, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

(do people you stacked shelves with in the local supermarket count as 'colleagues'?)

blueski, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

can someone assess me please?

nouveau pauvre - not a bad thing to be at all if you value what you're doing with the majority of your time above simply making money.

Bob Six, Saturday, 19 January 2008 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

Tabloids are read by people who are not that bothered about reading uh 'hard' news surely? Which is something I'd say cuts across the classes totally. I guess more than ever these days there's a lot of froth and quasi-tabloid type content in the broadsheets, either way I've never thought of the Sun as a paper 'for' the working class. Re: the Mail - there's an almost-stereotype of an old woman in a council flat who's voted Labour all her life and still buys the Mail cos of habit, or cos it's stuck several decades in the past, or both these things

DJ Mencap, Saturday, 19 January 2008 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

emsk - i would say middle middle! family background sounds pretty similar to mine tbh.

toby, Saturday, 19 January 2008 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

I'm a social worker. That's Aristocracy, right?

miryam, Saturday, 19 January 2008 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

i know 3 ppl who buy tabloids, only one of them gets defensive about it.

:-)

i'm solid upper middle. that's it really

CharlieNo4, Saturday, 19 January 2008 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

Mine is too confused for me to easily self-identify - I plumped for 'lower middle' because none of the others feel right. Mother from a pretty dead-on middle class family (although her father's family were v. poor that may have been the Depression). Father's family pretty well off in West Africa, came over here as refugees in the 60s upon which they were considered pretty much below working class. Parents now both in teaching.

Me = comprehensive school + university education, management-level job, no debt but no real savings either, rented house that costs much less than it should in area that is pretty much the definition of upper middle-class.

Matt DC, Saturday, 19 January 2008 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

Family = upper middle-class, but based on current lifestyle and (negative) income and fundamental ideological differences w/ aforementioned family = I have no idea what I am.

admrl, Sunday, 20 January 2008 01:21 (eighteen years ago)

To me, upper class is the same as aristocratic. If you're not in some titled family, then you're just upper-middle-class.

Alba, Sunday, 20 January 2008 01:33 (eighteen years ago)

Knows all the words to Black Lace's "I Am the Music Man" = still WC for life, bitchez.

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 20 January 2008 12:54 (eighteen years ago)

True working class dance routine:

Clap your hands and bend your knees in time to the music.
Sleep - Hands together - as in prayer - right side of face then left. Bend head sideways.
Wave - Hands in the air - wave from side to side.
Hitch a Ride - First right hand then left. Hitch a ride (over shoulder).
Sneeze - First right hand then left - index finger under nose - say 'Atchoo!' x 4.
Walk - 4 steps forward, 4 steps backwards.
Swim - First right arm then left - as in crawl.
Ski - Hands together - ski - first right side then left.
Spray - First right arm then left in the air - as if spraying deodorant under arm.
Macho - Flex arm muscles as he-man - first right arm then left.
Horn - Hands together in front - press downward motion - make sound of horn.
Bells - First right hand then left in the air pulling on supposed rope-bell.
O.K. - First right hand then left - make O.K. sign with thumb and index finger.
Kiss - First right hand then left - blow kisses.
Comb Hair - First right hand then left - comb hair.
Wave - Hands in the air - wave from side to side.
Wave - As above.
Superman - Right arm in the air as in Superman - 4 steps forward. Shout 'Whoa!'.
Each exercise is done 4 times in time to the music except in the last round when it is only done twice.
Have a great time

Dom Passantino, Sunday, 20 January 2008 13:02 (eighteen years ago)

We did that one too, dude. Friend's son's birthday party, upstairs in pub, randomers getting down to the Black Lace, three C classic.

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 20 January 2008 13:07 (eighteen years ago)

Sadly no "We're Having a Gang Bang" but it was a kids party so best not probly.

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 20 January 2008 13:08 (eighteen years ago)

i like the sound of nouveau pauvre!

i know 3 ppl who buy tabloids, only one of them gets defensive about it.

:-)

-- CharlieNo4, Saturday, January 19, 2008 4:09 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

yes you were one of the 3 i was thinking of, and not the one who gets defensive..

emsk, Sunday, 20 January 2008 13:23 (eighteen years ago)

Upper Working Class

roxymuzak, Sunday, 20 January 2008 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

Polls presenting a set of choices should not begin with 'what.'

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 21 January 2008 03:25 (eighteen years ago)

^ this makes me upper middle class

Autumn Almanac, Monday, 21 January 2008 03:26 (eighteen years ago)

upper west side

gabbneb, Monday, 21 January 2008 03:27 (eighteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

ILX System, Thursday, 24 January 2008 00:01 (eighteen years ago)

http://hardcore4life.imeem.com/music/WxG5C27F/7_seconds_no_class_no_way/

dan m, Thursday, 24 January 2008 01:16 (eighteen years ago)

i come from a working class background but have ascended to lower middle class. weee.

rockapads, Thursday, 24 January 2008 01:30 (eighteen years ago)

my grandpappy was a coalminer

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 January 2008 01:40 (eighteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

ILX System, Friday, 25 January 2008 00:01 (eighteen years ago)

I chose upper middle but only because I'm surrounded by BOGANS.

Autumn Almanac, Friday, 25 January 2008 00:30 (eighteen years ago)

I really find it hard to say what class I am... Based on my family and where I grew up I'm working class, but my studying for a degree at the university could mean I'm upper middle class, and the job I currently have is lower middle class (though it's only a part-time job to support my studies). Then again if you look at my income and possessions I'm definitely below middle-class, but that might obviously change after I graduate. I ended up picking working class, but I could've easily chosen lower middle class as well.

Tuomas, Friday, 25 January 2008 06:23 (eighteen years ago)

fifteen years pass...

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3adgnk/american-nepo-babies-have-nothing-on-the-british

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 January 2023 18:25 (three years ago)

Nice enough piece on what we already know.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 26 January 2023 18:26 (three years ago)

Druid I guess?

ian, Thursday, 26 January 2023 18:48 (three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.