n/m
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
good thread
― and what, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
title doesnt need the word 'unfair'
maybe they were butthurt before you spoke to them?
― Mark G, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
Do they now? I only know public school scuzzos.
― RabiesAngentleman, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
The question surely is: where was John McMahon on the night of Maddy's disappearance?
― Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
just a guess but maybe because most people don't like having themselves and/or their families insulted?
― bernard snowy, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
Dom, it's okay, we know you miss Louis, but this won't bring him back.
― Matt DC, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
it's a good question
see also butthurt for suggesting that private schools dish out 'unlikely' numbers of scholarships
― DG, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
bernard probably otm
― J0rdan S., Monday, 21 January 2008 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
Dutch English dom stupid, dull, cathedral, foolish
― stevienixed, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
there was a fair amount of butthurting going on at my private school. lol sensitive choice of words.
― ailsa, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:23 (eighteen years ago)
The question surely is: Why do NME features editors who were privately educated get so butthurt that they have to send out 180 text messages complaining about the bias towards privately educated musicians in the Observer Music Monthly?
― Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:25 (eighteen years ago)
"Inasmuch as ressentiment functions as an underlying affective condition that permeates one's conscious intentionality, there is no simple experience or apprehension of ressentiment. It is manifested in myriad ways. Yet, this whole affective unit has a number of essential constituents. Initially there is a desire for the values apprehended as possessed by others and as borne by certain goods. For example, there are the values of physical strength, health, beauty, liberty, intelligence, wisdom, integrity, fidelity, and holiness. This list follows roughly the course of Scheler's a priori hierarchy of values. The mere apprehension of values possessed by others and borne by specific goods is not distinctive of the man of ressentiment. So far, as we have seen, the aspiring noble man and the arriviste also apprehend such values. We must add to this apprehension the fundamental sense of insecurity and lack of self-worth, which the man of ressentiment shares with the arriviste. What sets the man of ressentiment apart from the arriviste is his sense of impotence, his feeling of weakness. Yet, it is possible to feel incapable of striving for what one apprehends as valuable, and simply resign oneself to one's lot in life; and such resignation is not invariably unhappy, resentful, or despairing. In order for ressentiment to take hold there must be the addition of certain negative affects in response to this perceived inability to attain what one so deeply desires . "- from "Ressentiment and Rationality" by Elizabeth Murray Morelli
― Drew Daniel, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
To feel as if you've been kicked in the ass by a steal-toed boot.
The etymology of the word stems from the ancient Greeks observing a descrepit puppy being kicked in the bum by an unwelcoming shop owner. Once a well placed kick has contacted the said bumhole the puppy will run off crying with its tail between its legs.
― blueski, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:30 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.infoshop.org/graphics/classwar_07.gif
― DG, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:32 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ reminiscent of BNP
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
Privately educated indies = double butthurt??
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
N*ck Griffin, he was privately educated.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah? I bet he likes Scouting for Girls as well.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
I wonder what privately educated Al Murray As The Pub Landlord has to say about this.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
I like to think he'd be ironically racist about it.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
"unfair" hehe
― sleep, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
Why does anybody CARE about where or how someone was educated? What does it matter?
― Dr.C, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:52 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.vggallery.com/graphicworks/images/f_1662.jpg
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:52 (eighteen years ago)
http://i.today.reuters.com/pictures/galleries/Stories/633260111339375000/Previews/08_RTR1L11X.jpg
― onimo, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/6419/chinatowntg8.jpg
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
Of course it matters! If it didn't matter one way or the other then parents wouldn't spend thousands of pounds on it. Which is why it's a bit silly anyone getting defensive, getting an unfair advantage is the point of private education.
― Matt DC, Monday, 21 January 2008 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
I get pissed off about it because when people "suggest I had an unfair advantage" they act like such cocks about it! I only really get pissed off with middle class people who go on about it, because they almost certainly had more privileged backgrounds than me, just cos they didn't go to public school, they didn't grow up under the poverty line!
― Colonel Poo, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, obv it matters in that sense. But why do people obsess over it after the fact? Yeah, it gives some people an advantage to have a private education. So what?
― Dr.C, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:04 (eighteen years ago)
why do the same 3 people obsess over it on ILX after the fact?
― blueski, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:04 (eighteen years ago)
Self-referential thread titles, C/D?
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
getting an unfair advantage is the point of private education
why is it always assumed that a private education is an advantage? or that parents making a large financial sacrifice is an advantage? inverse snobbery nonshocker again.
― whatever, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:07 (eighteen years ago)
Because ALL kids who can't afford private education turn into FERAL YOUTHS. It was in the Observer yesterday so it must be true.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
thread title was missing a "Why oh " at the beginning.
― Mark G, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
Perhaps because, correctly or incorrectly, education is widely seen as a foundation for future life success?
― Bonita Applebum, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
(plus this assumption that your parents must have paid loads of money for it, see DG's bizarre denial that scholarships exist)
― Colonel Poo, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:09 (eighteen years ago)
ha yeah
jeremy clarkson for PM
― DG, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:09 (eighteen years ago)
Where does that place Siralan Apprentice and all the other University of Life Innit graduates, though?
― Dingbod Kesterson, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
haha @ Chinatown.
Then again, maybe it's that YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH
― kenan, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.maltp.com/train/screenshots/groups/tommy-spud-begbie-sickboy-rents.jpg
10 seconds prior to start of thread.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
Our teenagers are feral. Literally.
In the wild, if a young member of an animal group misbehaves, the alpha male(s) rough him up as a firm lesson in social behaviour.
But we have no alpha male authority because we've tied ourselves in legal knots to protect the little darlings from 'dangerous' adults.
Now every town in Britain has a pack of wild animals roaming the streets, baying and howling, in full physical control of the environment.
They have become dominant.
Pickled Walter, Macclesfield
Recommended by 635 people
― blueski, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
It's not inverse snobbery, it's a statement of fact. No parent in their right mind would spend thousands of pounds over several years on their child's education if they or the child didn't think it would give them an advantage over having gone to the free comprehensive down the road.
― Matt DC, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
why is it always assumed that a private education is an advantage?
It's pretty simple. If you are privately educated, you have a statistically far higher chance of going to university. If you get a university degree, you have a statistically far higher chance of gaining fulfilling, high-paying employment.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:12 (eighteen years ago)
Although I am no fan of Jeremy Paxman, I believe that he is quite right with regards to his criticism of certain M&S products. I myself have noticed a gradual deterioration in the quality of underwear items in particular over the last few years, with an emphasis on lower price rather than good quality which traditionally has been the hallmark of the company's products. I hope Mr Paxman may be able to influence matters positively. David Pagett, Malvern, Worcestershire.
Recommended by 1,232,864 people
― blueski, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:12 (eighteen years ago)
^ ban
― DG, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:13 (eighteen years ago)
YEAH AND THE SALADS ARE CRAP AND ALL
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:13 (eighteen years ago)
why is it always assumed that a private education is an advantage? or that parents making a large financial sacrifice is an advantage?
^^^^^^this.
in terms of being taken seriously in my place of work, i've found my private education to have been more of a disadvantage than a help over the years. it's helped me in other ways though, i guess.
― CharlieNo4, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:13 (eighteen years ago)
This is like Titus Bramble whinging that Cristiano Ronaldo has more goal-scoring opportunities.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 21 January 2008 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not sure how, but it is.
Whoa what do music lessons have to do with anything here? imo it's just another thing to get overzealous parents to dump their $ into, see also: karate lessons
― ♫ don't you have your own computer? ♫ (flamboyant goon tie included), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:17 (twelve years ago)
Music lessons code as middle class in the UK.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:20 (twelve years ago)
Start-up capital is hugely important but so is social capital. A pretty significant number of entry opportunities are never advertised, they're found through networking and being in with the right families, via school links, can have a major impact on that.
University links can be just as important but there's also a clear correlation between private education and having access to the most prestigious institutions.
― Des Fusils Pour Banter (ShariVari), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:23 (twelve years ago)
many privately educated kids do not have access to those networks and those institutions, is the thing
― flamenco drop (lex pretend), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:25 (twelve years ago)
Anyone seen godiva since
― mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:26 (twelve years ago)
I don't think anyone would dispute that the advantages don't apply equally to all, even within private education, xp,
― Des Fusils Pour Banter (ShariVari), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:27 (twelve years ago)
itt a bunch of butthurt privately educated kids
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:31 (twelve years ago)
lol, OTM.
― emil.y, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:36 (twelve years ago)
guys, this is a dom thread.
― pssstttt, Hey you (dog latin), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:37 (twelve years ago)
Obv the poor kids post to the sub thread
― mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:39 (twelve years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RubBzkZzpUA
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:39 (twelve years ago)
my own private butthurt
― ♫ don't you have your own computer? ♫ (flamboyant goon tie included), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:41 (twelve years ago)
lg and lex, two shy retiring types imo
coming from you, darragh? yeah your education really left you afraid to express your opinions! in any case i resent being lumped in with somebody else based on my 20 posts a month here.
i don't presume to know how confident or happy anyone else is, or what advantages life doled out to them. i think plax is otm upthread tho, money gives advantages, not private school necessarily.
itt a bunch of butthurt privately educated kids people
― Tioc Norris (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:06 (twelve years ago)
Im deeply damaged u fucker its different
and nobody claimed yis were happy, just better
― mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:08 (twelve years ago)
you did say confident though.
― Tioc Norris (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:15 (twelve years ago)
Fair cop
― mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:18 (twelve years ago)
i think it is obvious that social connections are massively important as well, and I do think that access to particular institutions of learning are important for this. i say this as someone who has had two very different experiences of institutions of higher learning, one where wealth never really seemed to enter the equation, surrounded by a very averagely financed peer group, affluence never really permeated anything, the building was falling apart, opportunities were limited. And then another where there was an immediately shocking (to me) culture of bored privilege, iphones, marc jacobs packpacks, unlimited drug money. going to house parties is still kindof pretty expensive. And money circulates in and out of these institutions in vague and difficult to trace ways that link social worlds to startup capital and back to the institution via like "economies of cool," and casual affiliation. Two obscenely wealthy classmates started their own project space with a deep pool of resources and things like this rebound back into prestige and clout that the university can wield, but the people that go to their opening nights are obviously friends and scene-ey people. its complicated and convoluted and yeah i think the confidence of prestige-via-proximity comes into it. but its difficult to unpack and no one element accounts for the whole.
― plax (ico), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:21 (twelve years ago)
There is a stereotype of the public school hooray-henry whose father dines with members of the media elite and managed to somehow get a key position after just 6 months' internship at his newspaper based on his connections and credentials. And yes, these people exist and I have met them and many many of these people are insufferable.
Equally, I have also met public schoolmembers who go about their business with perfect humility, didn't gain jobs off the backs of their credentials/capital, and wouldn't dream of bragging about their upbringings.
This thread was started by the same guy who said that graduates who leave university to go and work in the video shop are "the worst of the worst", so go figure.
― pssstttt, Hey you (dog latin), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:21 (twelve years ago)
I'm perpetually confused by the divide between US and UK definitions of "public schools" as they mean just about the opposite thing. What do people in the UK call schools that would be public schools in the US, local non-exclusive schools that are paid for through taxes rather than tuition and open to the general public?
― Moodles, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:29 (twelve years ago)
state schools
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:30 (twelve years ago)
got it - thanks
― Moodles, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:30 (twelve years ago)
The term "public school" in the UK is pretty misleading, must admit.
― pssstttt, Hey you (dog latin), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:32 (twelve years ago)
From wiki:
A report published by the commission formed the basis of the Public Schools Act 1868. In the Act a public school was defined as one open to the paying public from anywhere in the country, as opposed to, for example, a local school only open to local residents, or a religious school open only to members of a certain church, or private education at home (usually only practical for the very wealthy, such as the nobility, who could afford tutors).[7]
― Mark G, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:40 (twelve years ago)
tbh when we say "public schools" we often mean "fee-paying selective schools", rather than strictly the headmasters' and headmistresses' conference schools.
― 凸凹凸凹凸凹凸 (c sharp major), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:50 (twelve years ago)
One of my colleagues was denying he went to a public school, saying it was just an "independent" school. I shut him up by pointing out his school was in the conference and therefore was officially a public school.
The same school Radiohead went to fwiw.
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:55 (twelve years ago)
the narcissism of no differences
― 凸凹凸凹凸凹凸 (c sharp major), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:56 (twelve years ago)
Basically unless you went to your local comprehensive and got savagely bullied, you're a cunt.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 19:45 (twelve years ago)
What was the question again?
ps anyone seen godiva
― mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:45 (twelve years ago)
'conference schools' makes me think of john cleese in clockwise
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 22:50 (twelve years ago)
I expect the reaction to the effects on public schooling on a messageboard like this is skewed somewhat towards the type of people who end up on a messageboard like this. The proto-prince-Harry types aren't going to be whining on the internet about the shitey breaks they've had in their life now, are they?
― ailsa, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:35 (twelve years ago)
i was definitely not whining, it was more an "it's more complicated than people usually think" but darragh seemed more interested at laughing at his own jokes so w/v
― flamenco drop (lex pretend), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:38 (twelve years ago)
it's been a bracing dose of 2007 here on ilx today
― delete (imago), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:40 (twelve years ago)
i laughed at all the jokes and i whined all the whines
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:46 (twelve years ago)
and all i got was a messageboard like this.
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:47 (twelve years ago)
That wasn't directed at anyone in particular, just a general observation. Six years of public schooling didn't teach me clarity.
― ailsa, Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:09 (twelve years ago)
spose most forms of privilege are unconscious & you tend to be oblivious to how they work in yr favour. i'm not sure what i think about the effects of different schooling overall but the concomitant resentment/defensiveness seems real & unhealthy
― ogmor, Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:36 (twelve years ago)
do ppl who were privately educated tip better or worse?
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 00:41 (twelve years ago)
what *does* dom p do these days? i know he's much-hated round here, for valid reasons as far as i can tell, but he was never boring.
― NI, Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:03 (twelve years ago)
http://soupleys.com/files_uploaded/Dom-Perignon-Experience-L4fMS5jBFf8uDs.jpg
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:08 (twelve years ago)
― delete (imago), Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:40 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i hope this thread keeps going for a week, at least.
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:09 (twelve years ago)
here u go tuoNI: http://dompassantino.tumblr.com
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:10 (twelve years ago)
such a miserable failure.. and yet such clean design!
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:13 (twelve years ago)
his blog!
http://www.burgerbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/lovinit.jpg
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:17 (twelve years ago)
i also love noted misogynist william bennett
― Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:18 (twelve years ago)
cheers marcelloproof!
― NI, Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:40 (twelve years ago)
did have a little love for that 100 worst twitterers. would have been more acceptable if they'd balanced it with '100 best twitterers' but i guess that's not how he rolls :(
anyone know the real reasons it got closed down? murmurs of legal threats which seem a bit heavy-handed for some internet snark.
― NI, Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:43 (twelve years ago)
lol xo
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:49 (twelve years ago)
DP works in b2b comms now. Specifically defence/security industry journals, I believe.
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 21 March 2013 06:38 (twelve years ago)
Lex dont hate cos you didnt get the comedy module at hogwarts or w/e
― mister borges (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 07:13 (twelve years ago)
assembling sandwiches 201
― mookieproof, Thursday, 21 March 2013 07:19 (twelve years ago)