Your Favorite (US) Book 1900-1904

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Yes, fiction and non-fiction together at last.

Poll Results

OptionVotes
William James- Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) 6
Jack London- Call of the Wild (1903) 5
L. Frank Baum- The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1900) 4
Theodore Dreiser- Sister Carrie (1900) 4
W.E.B. DuBois- The Souls of Black Folk (1903) 3
Henry Adams- Mont-Saint-Michel & Chartres (1904) 3
Henry James- The Golden Bowl (1904) 3
Helen Keller- The Story of My Life (1902) 2
Edith Wharton- The Descent of Man & Other Stories (1904) 2
Jane Addams- Democracy & Social Ethics (1902) 2
Jack London- The Sea Wolf (1904) 1
Henry James- The Ambassadors (1903) 1
Charles W. Chestnutt- The House Behind the Cedars (1900) 1
Lincoln Steffens- The Shame of the Cities (1904)1
Henry James- The Wings of the Dove (1902) 1
George Santayana- Interpretations of Poetry & Religion (1900) 0
Theodore Roosevelt- The Strenuous Life (1900) 0
Frank Norris- The Octopus (1901) 0
John Muir- Our National Parks (1901) 0
O. Henry- Cabbages & Kings (1904) 0
Jack London- People of the Abyss (1903) 0
Booker T. Washington- Up From Slavery (1901) 0
Kate Douglas Wiggin- Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm (1903) 0
Paul Laurence Dunbar- Sport of the Gods (1902) 0
Owen Wister- The Virginian (1902) 0
Jack London- The Son of the Wolf (1900) 0


mulla atari, Saturday, 2 February 2008 23:59 (seventeen years ago)

varieties of religious experience

akm, Sunday, 3 February 2008 01:20 (seventeen years ago)

wrong James

Noodle Vague, Sunday, 3 February 2008 01:33 (seventeen years ago)

i like it better

akm, Sunday, 3 February 2008 01:40 (seventeen years ago)

Santayana was American? Why the hell did I think he was British all this time.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 3 February 2008 02:29 (seventeen years ago)

wiki sez:

A lifelong Spanish citizen, Santayana was raised and educated in the United States, wrote in English and is generally considered an American man of letters

mulla atari, Sunday, 3 February 2008 02:55 (seventeen years ago)

Clarity.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 3 February 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)

I thought the Varieties came out in 1905.

Casuistry, Sunday, 3 February 2008 09:48 (seventeen years ago)

I've only read one of these books, and a few pages of one of the others. I own a few more, but I admit I'm unlikely to actually read "The Virginian" any time soon. So. I dunno. I like Oz well enough, but.

Casuistry, Sunday, 3 February 2008 09:50 (seventeen years ago)

Sister Carrie pwns

m coleman, Sunday, 3 February 2008 13:47 (seventeen years ago)

Varieties is the only one of these I've finished. For some reason, I thought Shame of the Cities came out about ten years later than this.

C0L1N B..., Sunday, 3 February 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)

i like dreiser & henry james about equally. i rate norris & wharton too but haven't read those works from the list

gershy, Sunday, 3 February 2008 20:38 (seventeen years ago)

The Golden Bowl over Sister Carrie

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 3 February 2008 20:44 (seventeen years ago)

I've read 7 of them. I voted for Varieties of Religious Experience. My runner-up would be People of the Abyss, which, although it is marred by having been tossed off in a hurry, effectively neutralizes any nostalgia one might summon for the 'golden' Edwardian period before WWI.

Aimless, Sunday, 3 February 2008 20:46 (seventeen years ago)

Oops, didn't see Souls of Black Folks on there, which I've also finished.

C0L1N B..., Sunday, 3 February 2008 21:27 (seventeen years ago)

The Ambassadorsover Sister Carrie, but Mont-Saint-Michel & Chartres by James' old buddy Henry Adams is one of the strangest, loveliest books ever written.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 3 February 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)

The only one of those I've read is Sister Carrie, which I liked, but I'm not sure if it would be fair to vote.

o. nate, Sunday, 3 February 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)

The TR book is HI-larious: it's one of the better written proto-fascist texts.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 3 February 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)

WIZARD OF OZ, no contest.

Abbott, Sunday, 3 February 2008 23:14 (seventeen years ago)

if you think about it the first and last entries on this list have more in common than meets the eye

J.D., Monday, 4 February 2008 09:10 (seventeen years ago)

baum = midwestener exposes pretentions of phony political boss and drives him out of the city he holds dictatorial sway over
steffens = californian does same

J.D., Monday, 4 February 2008 09:15 (seventeen years ago)

call of the wild is the only one i've read on this list, but it was one of my favourite childhood books. pretty brutal for a children's story, and incredibly tragic, but i loved it. it gets my vote.

Rubyredd, Monday, 4 February 2008 10:28 (seventeen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

ILX System, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

henry adams ppl! represent!

balls, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:43 (seventeen years ago)

I don't have any favorites among this list, but can I cast a vote AGAINST all three Jack London books? Hate that fucking guy. Sole reason I got a C for a quarter of 7th grade English is because I refused to read Call of the Wild.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 04:51 (seventeen years ago)

um, i got a B- and i flicked a pen into the bitchy teacher's eye

remy bean, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 05:00 (seventeen years ago)

/irrelevent

remy bean, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 05:01 (seventeen years ago)

So, uh, Jaymc, why do you hate jack london so much?
Do you hate hardman arctic adventure?
"To Build A Fire" bum you out too hard?

ian, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 05:53 (seventeen years ago)

the only jane addams i've read was the spirit of youth and the city streets but she wins for founding hull house.

get bent, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 07:36 (seventeen years ago)

I think I might hate Varieties of Religious Experience. Well, hate is too strong a word. But I think it might be useless.

Casuistry, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 07:37 (seventeen years ago)

Care to expand on that?

C0L1N B..., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:26 (seventeen years ago)

Well, for one thing, he only hones in on basically a single variety of religious experience. And then -- I dunno, I came to the book as someone who doesn't really get what "having a religious experience" is like except through metaphor, and the Varieties (or the half of it that I read until I got tired of it) didn't get me any closer to understanding it. And his constant disparaging (while claiming not to) of anyone who wasn't, basically, Protestant, got to be a bit grating after a while, but I could have put up with that if the book had been the least bit illuminating.

He does have a nice enough prose style, I guess.

Casuistry, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)

I've mild cavils too, mostly structural: all that testimony is wearying to read. But the first and last third are wonderful.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)

Do you hate hardman arctic adventure?

Pretty much. I mean, this was over 15 years ago, but I seem to recall my objections having to do with the fact that it's like one guy out in the wild, with no one else to talk to, and not really doing anything interesting besides "surviving." I also have no special love for dogs. Btw, I wasn't really a fan of Gary Paulsen's Hatchet, either.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)

(Although as a YA book, Hatchet went down a little more smoothly.)

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

I once wanted to write a comic short story where the James brothers (Henry & William) traded places with the James brothers (Frank & Jesse).

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)

The Assassination of the Coward Henry James

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)

http://media.twango.com/m1/large/0078/c6d2eb7051e249bab7c858c3935f7863.jpg

get bent, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 18:04 (seventeen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

ILX System, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

Jack London is really fucking good

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:15 (seventeen years ago)

Like most worthwhile authors, Jack London is both fucking good and has traits like that make you want to beat him with a crutch.

Aimless, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

he had that whole crazysexycool thing going on. with a heaping helping of crazy:

http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=10203&rendTypeId=4

http://www.orwell.ru/people/london/img/jl_l.jpg

http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/tf5t1nb563/hi-res

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)

Jack London- Call of the Wild (1903) 5

ok i only know jack london as the guy all my 6th grade classmates were into, this is totally wau wau wau to me

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)

daring hat period:

http://london.sonoma.edu/Writings/DutchCourage/frontispiece.jpg

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)

"Jack London, Consumer of Daring Haberdashery"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 19:39 (seventeen years ago)

http://london.sonoma.edu/Images/S0000008.jpg

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)

Well I know who to call next time I need to see a bunch of undies pix of Jack London.

Casuistry, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:51 (seventeen years ago)

Scott has to hide these photos from his chidren.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)

i missed this! Ambassadors! i can't believe he wrote that + wings of the dove + golden bowl in the span of five minutes.

also, thank you to scott seward. i never knew jack london was hot!

horseshoe, Friday, 15 February 2008 01:59 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.