New Labour's Modest Proposal: Back To The Workhouse, Scum

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Thrusting Blairkid's unworkable cunning plan.

And here are the ever reliable idiots to back her up.

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 12:54 (seventeen years ago)

How long till Cameron says, "I thought of it first". Clegg to say "transparency" again.

Tom D., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:00 (seventeen years ago)

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44404000/jpg/_44404402_flint203b.jpg

How much hair has she got?

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:02 (seventeen years ago)

Flint was educated at Twickenham County School for Girls (the school transferred to Waldegrave School for Girls in 1977) on Clifden Road in Whitton and Richmond Tertiary College before earning her BA (Hons) in American Literature and History combined with Film Studies from the University of East Anglia.

Along with several other Labour women MPs, she is a member of a tap dancing troupe known as the Division Belles. Other members include Hazel Blears, Laura Moffatt, Meg Munn, Joan Ryan and Dari Taylor.

aldo, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:09 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.thecentrepac.com/Miss_K2.jpg

DG, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:14 (seventeen years ago)

I'm sick of these spongers wasting our taxes on tap dancing.

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:18 (seventeen years ago)

Jeez, for a minute I thought that said "lap dancing"

Tom D., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:19 (seventeen years ago)

now that would be a news story worthy of a HYS

Thomas, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:22 (seventeen years ago)

All of the foamin-at-the-mouth comments on the BBC start with "I pay my taxes"

... what do they think taxes are for if not to subsidise the poor and unempowered, who otherwise would be dying on the streets?

Thomas, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:26 (seventeen years ago)

No silly, taxes are for kicking foreigners out of the country and buying submarines.

Ed, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:28 (seventeen years ago)

If you don't want to die, get a job

Tom D., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:28 (seventeen years ago)

The search is now on for really tacky Division Belles publicity photos:

http://www.daritaylormp.co.uk/images/division20belles.jpg

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:30 (seventeen years ago)

xpost oh... ...sorry I was just waking up from a strange dream involving Nye Bevan......what's going on here?

Thomas, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:32 (seventeen years ago)

Nye Bevan and Tom Driberg by any chance?

Tom D., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:33 (seventeen years ago)

not that type of dream.

Thomas, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:39 (seventeen years ago)

er, yeah... think ya boy bevan was about full employment, first and foremost. (but then the problem with full employment is, you can't hammer people down on wages if they don't have to worry so much about getting re-employed.) this is a stupid policy that if enacted would end up costing more than it "saves", but the notion that a labour government should use taxes to "subsidise the poor and unempowered" is pretty depressing. even in a much worse economic climate after the war labour did not give up on the idea of an egalitarian society.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:41 (seventeen years ago)

yet more of nulabours great peonage expansion scheme

laxalt, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:45 (seventeen years ago)

Considering a) they're playing catch up to the Tories and b) the Lib Dems are now irrelevant, crass right-wing populism is pretty much the only card Labour can play right now.

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:48 (seventeen years ago)

What do New Labour think taxes are for, if not to subsidise dodgy building societies and the lifestyles of MPs' Hooray Henry offspring?

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 13:57 (seventeen years ago)

... Labour government should use taxes to "subsidise the poor and unempowered" is pretty depressing

why? surely this is part of the redistribution necessary to move towards an egalitarian society? or are we misinterpreting each other?

Thomas, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:45 (seventeen years ago)

Strictly speaking they should be using taxes to help the poor and unempowered stop being poor and unempowered, which isn't the same thing as subsidising them since that implies that they are kept poor and unempowered.

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:48 (seventeen years ago)

I knew we'd be tripping over the word "subsidise" . What Dingbod said is what I meant. cheers!

Thomas, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)

... or poorer and less empowered than their betters at least, so at least they behave themselves a bit better (xp)

Tom D., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)

aye what dingbod said.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:52 (seventeen years ago)

When you've got the Centre for Policy Studies on side you've really gone too far.

Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 14:55 (seventeen years ago)

I've got a couple of mates who scam benefits by faking depression...is it left wing to hate them because they are parasites of the workers, OR is it right wing to hate them because they are taking advantage of the welfare state?

TBH, I don't really really care either way.

Bodrick III, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

the idea that people fake depression to claim benefits depresses me.

blueski, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

you can get benefits for being depressed?! deal me the fuck in.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)

If a doctor signs you off work with it, sure. These guys are also prescribed anti-depressants which get thrown away.

Bodrick III, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 20:49 (seventeen years ago)

sheeeit, i could have used that info a few years ago. but signs you off work for how long? ('signed off' usually means the company eats x time as sick pay -- obviously not forever, and it depends on the employer.) still, it doesn't sound like a winning long-term strategy (nor, really, a depression-fighting one), unless you want to live on like £40 a week and have to tell prospective employers why you've been out of work.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 21:03 (seventeen years ago)

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/5/57/300px-Scum_Carlin.JPG

Laurel, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 21:08 (seventeen years ago)

One of these fellas has been on £90 a week since he left uni nearly 5 years ago, never really had a proper job in the first place.

Other guy signed off a job in NHS admin, got full pay for six months.

But...if they weren't depressed in the first place, they probably are a bit now.

xpost

Bodrick III, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)

Back to the original topic:

Are they really going to go round evicting people by force?

Or are they hoping private landlords short of payment will do that dirty work for them?

Bodrick III, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the planet there is Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

And this is the best we can do?

Dingbod Kesterson, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 08:24 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.