L'amour a trois

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

stereo total make it sound fun. have you ever? would you ever?

― , Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes.

― Moomin, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Blimey with Snufkin and the Snork Maiden?????

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OI THREAD STARTER! If you're going to use a fake address then dont click the 'send me replies' button cos it means we all get no- response spam.

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

PHWOAR! That bracelet doesn't just have uses on her ankle HUR HUR.

― Moomin, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Always seemed sorta selfish to me if it's you and two representatives of the gender you're attracted to. Would you be willing to be one of those representatives yourself in a different situation? Then again, maybe I don't naturally attract those kinds of invitations either way. ;-)

― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But you/they might be attracted to both genders?

To answer the question - I haven't. I would in theory but I wouldn't in practise.

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned, problem solved by having all three of the same gender. See?

― Pyth, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Pity the poor heteros like myself. ;-)

― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Two resonably attractive blokes outside a club asked me if they could both take me home. I gave it consideration, being very, very drunk, and then thought ... no.

Also that kind of behavior gets you left for dead at the bottom of cliffs in the Peak District.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh well, at least that way you die an interesting death which makes up for living a nondescript life.

― N., Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey Nicholas - just because I said no to three in a bed sex with two random strangers at three in the morning in rainy Sheffield - this does not mean my life is non-descript!

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Do not feed the existentialist.

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry. I considered using 'one' but settled on the very ambiguous-in-this-context 'you' for some reason. I should have just written 'I', actually.

― N., Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what's this "two" genders nonsense?

― mark s, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Jesus, N., would you quit moping in the sex & booze threads? There's a perfectly good depression thread down the page. Actually, it's kind of a crap thread. I don't know why I even bother. *sigh*

― fritz, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have many times. In my experience one person always gets left out. I would not, however, ever do it with someone I was dating or really attracted to; I'd get far too jealous.

― Sean, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

See Sartre and De Beauvoir at three in the morning in rainy Paris ...

Actually I have given up on existentialism after I had a good look at my underwiring in the loos just now.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Have you considered marketing your bra as a anti-depressant? For vegans.

― N., Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Why of course! The sight of my bra has cheered many people and will continue to do so.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Poor joke. Sorry.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Poor joke or PARADIGM-SHIFTING REALIZATION?

There's something of a biotech boom going on at the moment. What you should really do is put your bra out there and watch the cash come rolling in (minus my cut for marketing and management, of course).

― Dan Perry, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes but what if unscrupulous scientists cloned Anna using only her bra?

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Some would call that prostitution Dan. Or at least glamour modeling.

Still if we can dress it up in some fancy post-feminist reclaiming women's bodies natural healing bio-tech way, then plan ahead.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

They better have my money or else they're asking for a smack.

― Dan Perry, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I misread this as L'Amour a troll.

― jel --, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(Alas, Anna's lightning-fast response has spoiled my pimp joke.)

― Supafly, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That would be where the Moomin thing comes in Jel

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry Dan. I won't do it again. There's your money. It's okay because I know you love me really.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Snorkmaiden is kinda cute...

― jel --, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Snufkin is the most attractive Moomin character - although not a troll.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Snork Maiden is a bit of a prima donna but to be fair she doesn't have much competition in the lady-character stakes. Misabel is too Goth, Fillyjonk is clearly high-maintenance, Too-Ticky is ace but obviously taken (by Tove!) - BLIMEY WHAT AM I SAYING it has to be MYMBLE = Rowr!

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Did the young Bob Dylan ever read the Moomins and swipe his act from Snufkin?

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Snufkin is far lovelier than Dylan will ever be. Snufkin may be fictional but does not have a hexagonal head.

The Groke is female too, Tom. Although I think she may be rather chilly.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm leaving the Groke for Mark S for precisely that reason. Freezes everything she touches + all-over fun-fur = dream date!

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What is it with you people and sexual innuendo involving puppets and children's books and playtime? Is this an English thing? So creepy. This thread was meant to be about good clean group sex, not Bob Dylan and fuzzies.

― , Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But would the fun fur not get all soggy and dry in strange peaks once freezing fun was over?

(I do not wish to take the Groke from Mark S, just for him to be careful for his fun fur should Groke fun ever arise.)

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It was all those cold showers and jolly good fun in the dorm at Mallory Towers that did it.

― Anna, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

come to the uk: we lead the world in beastliness

haha i was larfing on the bus home at my misdirected solicitous mjemmeson-shaped concern lest the guid foax at hemulen.gangbang.com get unwanted spam: when this is the spam they surely want MORE THAN ANYTHING

beastliness pt ii, re little my: how soon before she is barely legal? Or is she just v.petite? (mmmm sharp teeth, punky ’tude, topknot... )

― mark s, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

She's older than Moomintroll OR Snufkin, cos she turns up in Exploits as part of the Mymble's infinite recursion series of children, but she is invisibly small at that point (shades of Flann O'Brien!)

Actually when I said rowr above I of course meant the Mymble's Daughter who I sympathise with cos she has to keep punXoR My in line, but maybe I should honour my mistake as a hidden intention.

― Tom, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

surely they wd only be a recursion series if each successive mymble child was actually PREGNANT with her next younger sister while inside her next older sister's womb? a beastliness too far possibly...

― mark s, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

NED STOP WINKING

― , Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's a tourette's twitch isn't it? Pretend you didn't notice.

― mark s, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I was about to say, I'm sure there are drugs and therapies for my condition, but I don't know if I'm covered by insurance.

― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I would do it, but only if I wasn't going out with either of the other participants.

― electric sound of jim, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I would do it, but only if I wasn't going out with either of the other participants.

Same here -- or at the least, I just started going out with one of the participants. And I'll up the ante... I wouldn't mind either girl/girl/me or girl/guy/me... though I'd certainly have a preference for the former, in most situations.

"Girl/Guy/Me" sounds like a great band name.

― Brian MacDonald, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

this thread is titled l'amour a trois and y'all seem to be talking about a getting-it-on session...what about like love relationships involving three people??? i mean, beyond all "making love" together at the same time once or twice or whatever.

― elizabeth anne marjorie, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think we've had the polyamory thread at least twice already. correct me if i'm wrong.

― electric sound of jim, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

here and kinda here too.

― electric sound of jim, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The first response to the poly thread is still an absolute classic:

my ex went poly after i broke up with her for blowing a co-worker behind the sandwich fridge during sophmore year of college

― RickyT, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i think Elizabeth's complaint was the inaccurate title of the thread, rather than why we're not talking about polyamory yet again.

― hamish, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Fair point. Just as long as we don't talk about polyamory any more.

― electric sound of jim, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if it's good enough for David Crosby, it's not good enough for me.

― unknown or illegal, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i only ever had a couple attempts at anything like that...didnt really go anywhere tho.

― unknown or illegal, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

basically it was sort of creepy.

― duane, Thursday, 14 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three months pass...

i'd love to have the letter of the music..... l'amour a trois !!! i'd love to singer it for some ones ... lol bacio da milano ..italia

― andre louis barzaghi, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ahhh buy the way !!!! i must to answer that question ;

not yet!!! but if i find the letter of the music !!! i do early!;.)

― andre barzaghi, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

right now i can't imagine being w/one person ever again in my entire life. who the fuck needs three?

― Ms. S., Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.