have we talked about this already? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=554870&in_page_id=1879 http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04_01/ChloeBikiniHELLO_468x840.jpg
clusterfuck, ensue
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
That pic smells of shop. Her head is way too small for that body. No, really.
― libcrypt, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
Dom is like ILX's own Perez Hilton, ain't he?
― libcrypt, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
^ban
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
Levels of bulimia are actually falling. Instead our high streets are packed with young girls - just like Chloe - with "muffin tops" of fat spilling over their jeans.
Chloe claims she "crept up" to a size 16 after dieting to a size 12 on top and 14 on bottom. She's kidding herself.
Her weight didn't "creep on" magically - she ate too much food.
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
whoa this monica grenfell is a crazy
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
Of course she's crazy! She writes for the mail!
― Pashmina, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:39 (seventeen years ago)
It would send an appalling - and very dangerous - message to other young women that it's OK to be fat.
lol this is what i always say--teenage girls are so off-puttingly in love with their bodies.
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
how can i get burt_stanton to post here
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:53 (seventeen years ago)
i think i went to high school with this chick
― and what, Friday, 11 April 2008 17:58 (seventeen years ago)
for real tho she is chubby but she is not like, rolly polly
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
So, basically, she thinks fat people are appalling? Or, maybe fat people would be ok, but only if we shun them. For their own good.
― Aimless, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
way to call a 17 year old girl fat + lazy in a headline, daily mail!
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)
she wants fat people to starve themselves (or become bulimic?) so she doesn't have to look at them on the street!
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
i am shocked the daily mail would engage in this kind of behavior
― and what, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, she's totally mournful about rates of bulimia falling.
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
Uh, guys, she's saying this girl isn't a good role model.
― Kerm, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:11 (seventeen years ago)
There's a whole genre of middle-aged pinch-faced rail-thin chain-smoking hard-shopping Mail-reading self-hating Women-know-your-placing Tory scum ladies out there, y'know. Most of them in Cheshire, by the looks of it.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:12 (seventeen years ago)
Oh sorry, she's a nutritionist:
http://www.monicagrenfell.co.uk/
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)
i'm sure there are many lovely nutritionists/dieticians, but so many of them seem to be in the throes of 7 eating disorders at once.
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
I'm sure the author of Crash Diet and Revenge Diet has a totally healthy attitude to food.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
lol revenge diet
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
-- horseshoe, Friday, April 11, 2008 6:17 PM (35 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
otm. see also: vegans
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:19 (seventeen years ago)
the real secret of this book is getting to grips with the demons that have been holding you back and helping you deal with tricky situations such as:
* the mother who forces food on you * the friends who try and sabotage your diets time and again * the negative boyfriend / husband who undermines your confidence
Hmmm, what kind of organisations do we know about that try to separate people from their family and friends?
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
I kinda love the idea of beauty contests admitting an aesthetics of weight. Most people would probably agree that there's weight that looks nice and weight that doesn't. Her weight is, you know, nice-looking, and probably not much more indicative of poor health habits than than that of the competition's hungriest-looking competitor. That should probably count for something: great genes to gain weight with!
― nabisco, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
also for lunch i had a salad with 5 buffalo wings on top of it.
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
i just wanted to put that out there.
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:21 (seventeen years ago)
But a single buffalo can weight up to 2000 pounds!
― nabisco, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:23 (seventeen years ago)
judging from vegans i have known, i think it involves eating french fries mostly?
― Jordan, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:23 (seventeen years ago)
Her weight is, you know, nice-looking, and probably not much more indicative of poor health habits than than that of the competition's hungriest-looking competitor.
the idea that you can tell what people's health habits are by looking at them is nonsense, seductive though it is. i love how the caption to one of the photos in that article says "Chloe claims to exercise every day..." fatties be lyin'.
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)
She has a BMI of 26, which is probably lower than, like, 90% of this board.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
Oh yeah but so seriously the thing that's annoying is a lot of arguments where people seem to assume women with cameras on them as being models that others follow and become like, which is idiotic (e.g., the fashion industry's promotion of thinness has not exactly sparked a real-world trend) -- it's more the indirect course of messages about weight/looks causing people to become disordered about those things in ways that have nothing to do with successfully imitating anyone, which is the sense in which having this woman in a pageant could well make more girls take up healthy, non-disordered, successful approaches to managing their weight well
(I have just typed a bunch of shit you all already know, I get that)
― nabisco, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)
ilx is 90% fattey?
― Jordan, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:28 (seventeen years ago)
Don't be afraid to have weird combinations of food. My mother once gave us hard-boiled eggs and peas because that was all there was. Now I think it's a great meal. If you keep feeding your children 'tasty' or sweet food, they'll get addicted. Cultivate a plain palate and you'll cultivate a slim body.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
duh everyone on the internet is fat
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
Sandwiches also freeze brilliantly. I made my son's entire Christening tea a month in advance, years ago. Cheese tuna and other fish work best, but chicken and beef are also good. Add salad and mayo later. You can freeze an entire month's worth of packed lunches too.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:31 (seventeen years ago)
sweet ('tasty') vs plain dichotomy = lol britishes
― Jordan, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)
Dude, that harridan does not speak for us.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)
And we're all great role models!
― Kerm, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
Someone should ask "Doctor" Gillian McKeith what she thinks
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
i am picturing this kid showing up to school with a packed brown baggy of frozen peas for lunch ;_;
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51PVBJE8QGL._SS500_.jpg
― and what, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, there's somebody who looks awesome on their healthy diet.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)
i know, her poor kids.
xpost okay, her face would really benefit if she gained, like, 15 pounds./bitch
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)
That "revenge diet" seems to happen just naturally, much of the time; clever of her to brand it.
It's possibly also one of those great "revenge" things where you feel a sense of vengeance relating to a person who does not care and is not hurt at all (so everyone wins)
― nabisco, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:35 (seventeen years ago)
my revenge diet involves eating an entire bag of pepperidge farm cookies
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)
http://m.assetbar.com/uua65Tz4F.gif
― Jordan, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
Whatever happened to good old-fashioned lying your ass off about how awesome your life has been lately?
― nabisco, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:38 (seventeen years ago)
Not full of shit after all
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)
wait a minute in the article she says
"as a dietician I am so worried about the damage her well-oiled publicity machine is doing that I think it's vital to speak out."
but dieticians are registered, specifically educated people, its not just a title you can self-apply if you wrote a diet book
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietitian#Professional_associations
on monica grenfells website she calls herself a nutritionist and never once mentions any education that would lead to her actually being a dietician
http://www.monicagrenfell.co.uk/index.html
after all that bullshit about how this cuet girl should be hanging her head in shame for having a belly where does lying about being a doctor rank on that scale
― and what, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.miss-england.co.uk/images/model/179_1.jpg
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.miss-england.co.uk/images/model/179_1.jpg oh god this one
-- bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:32 (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
This is what British standards of beauty are.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)
Thing is I don't care what you look like, if you're "Miss Doncaster" I'm not gonna get my bone on.
-- Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:32 (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link
Believe this is known as the "Michelle Marsh speaks" effect.
http://www.miss-england.co.uk/images/model/135_main.jpg UUUUUUUUUUUUUURGNH
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)
Miss News of the World appears to be sculpted from porcelain
http://www.miss-england.co.uk/model/173.php
― ledge, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)
"Miss Middlesbrough"
"Miss Heckmondwicke"
"Miss Goole"
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:35 (seventeen years ago)
xp where'd my image go
http://www.miss-england.co.uk/images/model/173_1.jpg
― ledge, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:36 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.preetidesai.net/images/photogallery/large/image_06.jpg
this is who i was thinking of, she got the prize after d. lloyd had it taken away.
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:36 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.miss-england.co.uk/images/model/99_main.jpg is this "miss myspace"?
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:36 (seventeen years ago)
or maybe miss doesn't look good in closeups?
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)
"Miss Lidl"
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)
heck of an outfit
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)
There really is a Miss Grimsby and District
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)
Miss Bargain Booze Miss Favourite Fried Chicken Miss BetFred
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:40 (seventeen years ago)
Was hoping there was a Ms England competition for friends of Dorothy but when I google it I just get stuff about Lynndie.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
this chick is aite but i found some other pics where she was lookin madd generic.... i <3 indian girls like nobodys business but she aint a stunna
― and what, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
-- Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:41 (25 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
Mr Gay UK
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
http://mrgayuk.co.uk/home/index.php?image=41646&size=full
i work with like 80000x hot indian girls but they're all married. :(
― Jordan, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:44 (seventeen years ago)
Mr Gay Cockermouth
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/ruth_fowler/2008/04/flab_isnt_fab.html
Wonderful to see The Guardian hate fat people too.
― bidfurd, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
lol ILX pin-up journo ruth fowler
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:49 (seventeen years ago)
She's the powerblogger Tony Naylor could have been.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i witheld linking that owing to this being hate-on-the-times week but srsly guardian FUCK OFF.
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
xpost
yeah naylor kind of fell off? maybe we gave him too much attention too early.
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:51 (seventeen years ago)
Scott Carson of bloggers.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
Wow. What a bitch.
― ENBB, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
always seems to me there must be a link between the kinds of weight levels in eg UK today (probably US too), and relatively widespread affluence, society of consumption; 'fat is a capitalist issue'? (most, or at least many, of us are examples of this, M and F)
made me wonder what alternative / comparison would be - maybe eg. typical weight / body mass / shape in old Eastern Europe? I wonder if most (young?) women were thin in old East Berlin, Bulgaria etc
this is not at all an argument for being like them: it is good that totalitarianism fell.
contemporary capitalist society / culture with consumption everywhere, including food / drink, generates diet manias in reaction / compensation / etc? perhaps this seems obvious.
― the pinefox, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:56 (seventeen years ago)
she is the guardian's resident troll. did other articles like how liberals are gay and getting paid for giving blowjobs is cool, etc. challenging opinions indeed.
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:57 (seventeen years ago)
Like banry said tho, it isn't generally the most affluent people in our country that pile on the pounds.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:58 (seventeen years ago)
these articles are making me think that burt_stanton could have a writing career after all.
― bell_labs, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
xxp Son of Burchill
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 April 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
they should have centered the St. George's Crosses on her nipples
― milo z, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:02 (seventeen years ago)
NV, that is true, and I was thinking about B's point prior to thinking of mine. but I still think that in general, levels of consumption (of Everything!) are higher in UK than ever before. and I would guess that people in the UK (both sexes) are also heavier than ever before. in a way, the most affluent are protected from FX of this, or go out of their way to avoid it, with special regimes, diets, trainers, etc? so the big physical evidence of rising 'living standards' / affluence / whatever would not be among the rich.
another historical comparison would be eg UK late 1940s, when people were still growing vegetables, food was rationed etc -- surely if one could see figures, they would tell us average weight / size / fat in UK was much lower then?
this also makes me think that claims re what's 'natural' in contemporary capitalist society ('women naturally look big like that', etc), while perhaps well-intentioned, are not quite correctly phrased -- so much history / society has intervened.
― the pinefox, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:06 (seventeen years ago)
people in the UK (both sexes) are also heavier than ever before.
we're unquestionably *taller* than our parents' or grandparents' generation. and rich people are taller than the rest too.
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:08 (seventeen years ago)
It's certainly true that my parents' consumption of, for want of a better word, crap is way higher now than even when I was a child. I josh my dad about his experience of rationing giving him a ridiculously sweet tooth, but even when he makes an effort to eat well he seems oblivious to how much sugar, fat etc he's eating regularly. It's not at all surprising that if you can get these things cheaply you'll gorge on them - our brains are probably still hard-wired to do that.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:13 (seventeen years ago)
In all seriousness a bag of crisps was kind of a treat when I was 10. It appears to be a daily staple for most everybody I know now, including me.
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)
Pinefox, there's scads of writing on this topic -- what a lot of it would tell you is that it's not a matter of pure affluence allowing people to consume more, it's a matter of the things we're consuming becoming increasingly removed from the foods the human body is meant to operate on. (Processed foods, high-fructose corn syrup, modified fats, etc. etc.) This is part of why the U.S., at least, has higher rates of obesity among the working class (who are more likely to eat lots of low-cost processed foods) than richer people (who might have the money / leisure time to deal with lots of fresh produce and high-end health foods etc.). There are some cultural habits surrounding that, too.
As far as old Bulgaria goes, I think one huge difference in our thinking is that people used to be very much in touch with the idea that women's bodies tend to change across a lifetime! Which is something modern standards do a weird amount of work to pretend isn't (or "doesn't have to be") true.
― nabisco, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:19 (seventeen years ago)
http://logo.cafepress.com/2/3367831.3997742.jpg
― Jordan, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
Nabisco, I agree, and those thoughts are not very new to me, though I could not have named the products as you do. Nonetheless, people in our societies - not 'rich people' - are consuming more than they did. More iPods, more DVDs, more cars, more holidays. More alcohol, more fast food, more slow food, more food in between the other food. I certainly am (apart from the iPod). Maybe you are too. and I am sure that in an era when all consumed less, people were less fat. but you're right, what we eat matters. (but what I eat is quite healthy on the whole, and I still get fatter and fatter: the amount matters too!)
I agree re. the women's-bodies-changing point too, in old-Bulgaria or otherwise (picturing an ancient shawled crone, whether shrivelled or bulbous); and re. this becoming a problem, or something to be negated or deferred, in our society.
― the pinefox, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)
Dear R. Fowler, Since reading your controversial anti-feminist blog on the Guardian website, I think you would be proud to know that I have opened my mind and dared to think some very un-feminist thoughts. In particular, I have this recurring bolt of "daerest woman who churns out these 'I am a pretty young woman and my life has been easy, what are these disgusting uglies whining about?' articles, I am so gonna laugh when you get a bit older and saggier", oh, a couple of times a week since that first glimpse of enlightenment. Thank you! I am truly freed now. Yrs, Fattey McSpacecadet
― a passing spacecadet, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:14 (seventeen years ago)
god ruth fowler is a moron. why do papers print this shit?
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:24 (seventeen years ago)
1. Whip up zing-shark frenzy on ILX 2. ???? 3. PROFIT
― Noodle Vague, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)
i know. it was a dumb question; her article just reminded me of that ridiculousness the Atlantic published, "Marry Him!" which i know probably got them page views or whatever, but it's so embarrassing for a once-respectable magazine to publish stuff like that.
― horseshoe, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)
the phrase 'dom et al' is making me laugh more than it should do
― blueski, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:35 (seventeen years ago)
who is this al dude? is he in lbzc?
― banriquit, Friday, 11 April 2008 22:59 (seventeen years ago)
dom, ethan, al shipley
― and what, Saturday, 12 April 2008 00:55 (seventeen years ago)
they didnt approve my comment http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/f-u.gif
― and what, Saturday, 12 April 2008 13:42 (seventeen years ago)
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Launch?study=/user/education/weight/weight.expt.xml
― and what, Sunday, 19 October 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
As such, the score should serve as an opportunity for self-reflection
Fuck you, Harvard.
― Mark C, Sunday, 19 October 2008 21:28 (seventeen years ago)