Calculate and post your BMI

30.4

That's a rough guess - I'm 6'4" and although I haven't weight myself recently, about 250 lbs.

bmi is a pretty meaningless metric

21.1

Yeah, probably so, Elmo. I'm not going to post a picture of me with my shirt off (fortunately for everyone) but I'm not what most people think of as a fattey. Just tall and with a bit of beer gut.

.8

19.2

20.5

in order to have a BMI in the "normal" range i would have to weigh 190 lbs. or less which means i would look like i just came from Dachau

24.1

19.7

24.9

yeah elmo im about 22.5, which is apparently dangerously close to 'overweight' lol i i cant even fucking walk in heavy winds

19.2 damn son!

xp 19.7 damn son!

29.5

Don't need to calculate, had a check-up a few weeks back: 31-ish. lol I'm dead

21.3

how many girls do ppl think is gonna post to this thread i say 3

xp good job felicity!

A winner is me: 32.4

21.2

BMI's really a poor indicator of health, though, especially if you're really muscular, out of shape, or really tall or short.

F'real. I work on the tenth story and I can walk it without getting winded.

shocking: i'm underweight.

I can run a few miles without too much trouble, I just probably consume a few too many calories.

about 24.7, not as good as i thot

xp - what he said

maybe not so much with the macaroons and the tropicana this passover?

20.3

got a worried 'you look really thin' comment from the old dear when i saw her earlier so am pleasantly surprised.

I'm in the 27 range.

21.7

And when I say "27 range," I mean 27.1. Which I only mention because otherwise it looks like I'm trying to look good by calling a 27.9 a 27.

bmi was already determined to be useless on some beth ditto clusterfuck thread.

24

27.8

HEY JAYMC BRO IM IN THE "27 RANGE" WITH YOU

wanna just kick back... two straight guys exploring each others body mass indexes...

i am 21.0

lol ethan

25.7 currently.

Seem to have misplaced our scales but last time I checked I was under ten stone, which would put me at under 19. May have put on a few pounds since then though.

20.6

20.7

up from 19.2 two months ago!

hmmm...maybe living in the south and working in state offices has distorted my perception.

Nah, internet people are all either pencil-necked geeks or fatties.

24.2

yall some skinny mufuckas

18.3

apparently i'm underweight.

old skinny ass snoop dogg lookin mufuckas

pre-mono: 21.5
immediately post-mono: 18.7
currently: 20.1

lol one out of three ain't bad. xp

old skinny ass snoop dogg lookin mufuckas

-- and what, Friday, April 11, 2008 8:12 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

MOAR LIEK PRINCE MARKIE DEE AMIRITE LOL?

in order to have a BMI in the "normal" range i would have to weigh 190 lbs. or less which means i would look like i just came from Dachau

Yeah, BMI is weird. Right now I'm about 10 pounds over the weight at which I look best. If I were to lose enough weight to get to the middle of the "normal" range, I'd look disgustingly skinny. Maybe it's because I'm tall?

i always imagined ethan as super skinny.

19.8

19.5

how do you get more bone...?

ha

At 46 I'm thinking about warding off bone loss. Osteoporosis, don't you know.

eat less protein

19.5. used to be 18.8

23

wow apparently i was overweight when i was 13 and competitive nationally in athletics.

i have my suspicions.

23.9

32.3

― quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), 23 February 2010 16:48 (3 weeks ago) Bookmark

30.1 :D

29.5

― kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, April 11, 2008 3:21 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark

28.1

24.7
Need to get rid of belly though, too much beer and food.

look at that blubber fly. muscle mass plays havoc with bmi accuracy.

i'm about 19 too, none of that pesky muscle to bother me. i'm sure i was perfectly healthy when i was around the 18 mark, though. but i guess that diet of chocolate and crisps w/ dip has done wonders for me.

― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:12 (1 year ago) Permalink

now 20.8. Most of that 1.8 in the belly. :'(

25. Used to be 20. Like six months ago. I feel fat.

18.9

i'm six foot 3 and somewhat shy of 11 stone.

about a year and a half ago was 22.7. Lost about 2 stone. Fat, there wasn't and isn't much muscle on me.

Not sure how this happened, but I've lost about 20 lbs. within the last two years and am now "normal weight."

22.6 now.

18.7

18.7 too

long streak of piss....

heh...my dad says "tall drink of water", but I like "long streak of piss" better"...

man if were 18.7 i'd weigh < 120lb which is just bananas.

currently riding at ~23 but i'm pretty sure my legs are throwing the estimate way off

22.6. Down from 24.3 a few months ago. Thanks running, you're finally helping.

Move over BMI, there's a new sheriff in town:

BMI or Body Mass Index, a ratio of weight to height, has long been considered one of the best measures for assessing overall health risk.Getting your BMI into a healthy range used to be considered a top health priority. However, recent research shows that there is a new
sheriff in town: your waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Studies now indicate
that WHtR is a much better measure than BMI for assessing obesity and cardiovascular risk.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/93638-whtr-the-new-determinant-health-risk/

BMI or Body Mass Index, a ratio of weight to height, has long been considered one of the best measures for assessing overall health risk.

GRRRRR HULK SMASH

(ss i know you're not saying this, but goddamn am i tired of hearing it)

This is great because I go from "Overweight" on the BMI scale to "Extremely Slim" on the WHtR scale.

No longer am I penalized for being athletic.

exactly!

BMI applied to individuals is just grrrrr arrrgh.

i am only healthy.

now shasty nobody was actually penalizing you. did nutrition nazis take away dessert or something?

cause i'll take that dessert if u not eating it

22.4

23.7

WHtR: 45.4545454545…

19.2

― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, April 11, 2008 7:14 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I am now 23.2

Read somewhere that ideal WtHR was 1:3 please tell me that isn't the accepted wisdom

Well, if you're 6' tall and have a 24" waist, there should be cause for concern.

WOMEN
• Ratio less than 35: Abnormally Slim to Underweight
• Ratio 35 to 42: Extremely Slim
• Ratio 42 to 46: Healthy
• Ratio 46 to 49: Healthy
• Ratio 49 to 54: Overweight
• Ratio 54 to 58: Seriously Overweight
• Ratio over 58: Highly Obese

MEN
• Ratio less than 35: Abnormally Slim to Underweight
• Ratio 35 to 43: Extremely slim
• Ratio 43 to 46: Healthy
• Ratio 46 to 53: Healthy, Normal Weight
• Ratio 53 to 58: Overweight
• Ratio 58 to 63: Extremely Overweight/Obese
• Ratio over 63: Highly Obese

Whoo, downgraded to merely overweight.

i was downgraded from "normal" to "extremely slim" ?

still hovering around the 30.1 range on BMI, bang on 50 on WtHR, wouldn't mind a little improvement on both tbh but WIP

just had my body fat measured. either they're wrong or my brain is made of flab.

https://i.imgur.com/bR1yDJv.png

22.0 (shrugs) ― Aimless, Tuesday, February 23, 2010

presently 22.5

23.8

Thats the last time I weighed myself, I think I may be less heavy now but probably not much.

It's OK, anyway

24.5 = normal (just)

since xmas i now fast walk 4km a day (40 mins), and that has definitely helped me get back down to my usual 75kg as i had put on a couple of red wine enhanced kilos over lockdown.
but seems like the daily walk has helped me find the balance between enjoying wine and exercise.

I think BMI is not considered pretty meaningless

er NOW considered

18.4. I've somehow lost wait during the pandemic.

and the ability to spell

BMI is such an inaccurate tool it can't be used for any purpose that requires real data.

Reminds me of this:
A man in his 30s with no underlying health conditions was offered a Covid vaccine after an NHS error mistakenly listed him as just 6.2cm in height.

Liam Thorp was told he qualified for the jab because his measurements gave him a body mass index of 28,000.

25.8. Technically overweight. Can't escape my family legacy of thicc thighs.