...and its unwieldy title?
Anyway, trailer.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)
That main image of the Prince I'm seeing around is, how you say, camp. There's a 'heroic' one but this other one has him looking straight at you with a smirk on his face and his big ol sword pointing outward.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:46 (seventeen years ago)
..and its unwieldy title? - Next time around, it will be Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader.
― Pillbox, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:48 (seventeen years ago)
The first film was flimsy, insubstantial, and cute. For little kids. That makes it look darker. Hmmm.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:52 (seventeen years ago)
I think I'll pass on the next five and then see how they handle THE LAST BATTLE.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:08 (seventeen years ago)
the first one far surpassed my expectations. i'll be going to see this.
― darraghmac, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
are they really gonna do these in order? seems ridiculous.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
ya this is hardly an unwieldy title in these post-SW prequel, pirates o' caribbean days.
anyway i have to see this, i'm sure it'll be as bad as the last one.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
Wld rather they were making movies of his OUTERB SPACE trilogy. Those things were trippy!
― Abbott, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
And following that, The Chronicles of Narnia Will Know You By the Trail of the Dead.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
the first one was a giant disappointment except for tilda swinton, so, no
― akm, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
those fuckin talking beavers
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
I liked the first one just fine. This one looks like it's being marketed as Lord of the Rings: The Defender of Narnia.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
s1ocki is my co-pilot
― David R., Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
^^^cosign
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:59 (seventeen years ago)
otoh can see how marketing a movie called "That Hideous Strength" would be sorta difficult
I loved these books (with the exception of the first one in the series).
― youcangoyourownway, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)
They should just do a CG recreation of Tolkein and Lewis having a huge argument.
― Jarlrmai, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)
or a mudfight!
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)
This was my least favorite of the books by FAR (even below the endless Horse & His Boy), the only one I never even tried to re-read later. Although I wonder how much that was to do with its flat, stiff cover:
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/%7Eaahobor/Lucy-Day/Images/Covers-50/Prince-Caspian.jpg
Can't we just skip to Dawn Treader?
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 24 April 2008 01:30 (seventeen years ago)
yeah this was a boring book. the rest will be great tho.
what was wrong with the first movie?
― J.D., Thursday, 24 April 2008 01:33 (seventeen years ago)
This was my least favorite of the books by FAR (even below the endless Horse & His Boy),
Interesting, cuz after admiring The Lion it took Prince Caspian to really fall hard for the Pevensies, especially Lucy. One of the more harrowing things sixth-grade Soto read was the scene in which Lucy finally sees Aslan, and he explains quietly that things won't work themselves out like they did in the last book. Lewis always wrote about and to children as if they were adults.
Also terrific: the scene with Nikabrik trying to conjure the spirit of the White Witch is harrowing in a low-key way; Lewis lets the reader understand the horror of the situation without pushing too hard.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 24 April 2008 01:35 (seventeen years ago)
I'll concede that Caspian's more attractive in the next book.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 24 April 2008 01:36 (seventeen years ago)
Dawn Treader = my favorite, and Horse and His Boy is both an Orientalist nightmare and a great story.
Although I wonder how much that was to do with its flat, stiff cover:
Haha, those were the editions I had too -- the covers were always a little weird.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 April 2008 02:22 (seventeen years ago)
I had, and FOOLISHLY donated to the school library, the seven-book box set of those. Read Dawn Treader, Last Battle, and portions of The Silver Chair over and over. I'm not sure any of the covers were really great, but all of them - including the Caspian one - are way better and less generic than any other packaging I've ever seen on the books.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 24 April 2008 02:33 (seventeen years ago)
i liked the magician's nephew least. it faintly enrages me that some editions put it first rather than in the order they were written
― mookieproof, Thursday, 24 April 2008 03:05 (seventeen years ago)
is this was the one where they were walking around in the giant letters then later they met those dudes who told them abt eating fresh rubies and emeralds deep in the earth then this was my fvorite one
― jhøshea, Thursday, 24 April 2008 03:34 (seventeen years ago)
im think abt the silver chair maybe
― jhøshea, Thursday, 24 April 2008 03:35 (seventeen years ago)
whatever, magician's nephew rules 'em all
― remy bean, Thursday, 24 April 2008 03:48 (seventeen years ago)
MN was one of the best but lewis was totally wrong to suggest you should read it first (which he only ever did once, in an off-hand way, in some letter). it loses a lot of its impact if you haven't read the other books first, espec the first one.
― J.D., Thursday, 24 April 2008 10:41 (seventeen years ago)
I think I liked the one with the mugwump and swamp best.
― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 April 2008 11:31 (seventeen years ago)
I'm by no means a fan, but the Phish song named after this book/character makes the trailer much more appealing...
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 26 April 2008 02:14 (seventeen years ago)
Ugh, the Magician's Nephew was my least favorite by far!
I actually loved the Horse and His Boy. The Last Battle tripped me out when I was younger.
― youcangoyourownway, Saturday, 26 April 2008 02:25 (seventeen years ago)
Opens soon.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 15 May 2008 02:53 (seventeen years ago)
With songs from Regina Spektor and Switchfoot!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 May 2008 02:55 (seventeen years ago)
Owen Gleiberman no like
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 15 May 2008 02:57 (seventeen years ago)
The first two-thirds make a hash out of the book. A curious decision to make up the Telmarines like Raul Julia and talk like Sandinistas.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 18 May 2008 14:25 (seventeen years ago)
Oof. Think I'll wait on the DVD.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 May 2008 14:39 (seventeen years ago)
BUT the movie nicely stirs up an issue the book ignores: who the hell is in charge when you got four former kings and queens and one prince bickering amongst themselves?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 18 May 2008 14:45 (seventeen years ago)
I saw it and it was much better than the other CoN film. The kids are stronger and braver now. The content had stuff for both adults and children. The couple jokes in the film were funny and the biggest surprise was that the cinematography and fight scenes actually kicked ass. The location where they filmed the forest and ruins was very pretty and one particular fight scene (1 on 1) was filmed to perfection.
Complaints - it did drag a bit. the content was mostly revolving around a war with the narnians and humans - which can get boring like the war scenes in Lord of the Rings. However, the war scenes in this film were actually more interesting.
Pros- graphics kicked ass, more mature than the first film, some cool fight scenes and great scenery. Story was OK (good enough). Cool creatures.
― CaptainLorax, Sunday, 18 May 2008 15:41 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, it was one of the best sword fights I've seen in recent years.
Another complaint: the relatinonship b/w Trumpkin and the Royal Children isn't well fleshed-out.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 18 May 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)
SPOILER ALERT
Best moment: the (brief) return of the White Witch. It's so imaginatively conceived that the rest of the movie can't follow up on it. And Swinton is incredible.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 18 May 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
I've been wondering about that (had already read a mention of it). It would be interesting if reductive if they had her play the Emerald Witch in The Silver Chair.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 May 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
All the people who say "lol Xtian allegory" will have little problem with this one -- and the rest of the series, frankly.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 18 May 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
definitely better than the first one. this one defly had its moments. but god it is so long.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 18 May 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
and ya, it's no more xian than any other fantasy film.
The important thing to remember about Prince Caspian is that it is a coded message of support for the Palestinian people. Narnians = Palestinians, Telemarines = Israeli settlers.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Sunday, 18 May 2008 22:57 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not quite sure where Bacchus and the Zodiac Mindwarp bit fit into this analysis.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Sunday, 18 May 2008 22:58 (seventeen years ago)
this was really violent, but loads better than the crapheap of a first one
― remy bean, Sunday, 18 May 2008 23:06 (seventeen years ago)
http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/05/thanks-to-iron.html#more
Waldorf75: this is a film with fatal swordplay, a mass drowning, and -- unless I'm mistaken -- a minotaur getting an arrow in the crotch Statler76: Any movie where a talking badger is carried off a battlefield, "platoon" style, is OK with me. It probably shouldn't be, but it is.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 05:42 (seventeen years ago)