Can someone stick up for this stuff? Last Tango in Paris or, say, In the Cut have the same tenuous relationship to the idea of “people having sex” that Bad Boys has to “police work.” Where is the outrage that the same limited set of drama-club play-pretend tropes of “adult themes” is used to make another 15 movies every year? “Frank sexuality,” give me a fucking break – have you, or anyone you know or have ever heard of, been involved in a dangerous, unstable love affair that challenges identities and cauterizes the senses. No, you haven’t. Relationships, even totally ill-advised ones, start out cheerful and then go awkward and boring, possibly a little acrimonious and boring. Everyone alive knows this, and yet, here we go, filing into the theater to see the desperate extremes of longing when all the masks of conventional relations are stripped away. Closer?? Just go fuck yourself, seriously, who are you kidding. If the characters are inexplicably miserable, you can’t call it softcore, is that the deal? While I’m at it, is there a more unflinching auteur of the toxic interzones of human attachment than…Max Hardcore?
PS thread inspired by my babygirl Vera Farmiga, who starred recently in “Never Forever”, summarized thus: When an American woman begins a dangerous relationship with an attractive immigrant worker, in order to save her marriage, she finds her true self iow guuuuuuwjhdfhjdffdalksfdj
s/d if you like.
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 21:55 (seventeen years ago)
I was just talking with someone about what a piece of crap Last Tango is.
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 21:57 (seventeen years ago)
Some films are not about stuff that happens often in everyday life.
― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
Are we talking more Cronenberg's 'Crash' or do you include such things as 'Rochelle Rochelle' or 'Les Cousins Dangereux'?
― Abbott, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:01 (seventeen years ago)
But, you know, not imaginy ones.
if Vera Farmiga is naked in that movie i'm all for it
― carne asada, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:02 (seventeen years ago)
i saw "under the skin" with samantha morton recently and while it fits this question to a t, i frankly can't defend it
however, the current "the last mistress" also fits this question to a t and i love it so i will have to think about it
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:06 (seventeen years ago)
i'm not a big fan of last tango and in the cut was terrible, but i love in the realm of the senses. it's not really more plausible, i guess, it's just more delirious.
― tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:14 (seventeen years ago)
Oh man, I know! I hate unrealistic movies like this! I went so see this one movie, fuckin' Harry Potter. Have you seen that? SHIT FLOATS. That's total bullshit, man. When I put a unicorn hair in a stick and shout bastardized latin, y'know what happens? FUCKING NOTHING. Assholes.
― en i see kay, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:26 (seventeen years ago)
agreeing that these kinds of movies are escapist children's fare isn't much of a defense dude
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)
last tango is pretty amazing stuff when it's just brando monologing, but all the 'raping a young french girl' stuff is just prurient and gross.
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:31 (seventeen years ago)
I'm kind of arguing that all films by there very nature are subjective and deeply unrealistic, and that they should really only be judged by their internal logic and maybe the logic of their genre.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I can't stand pretty much any of these myself, but criticizing them for being unrealistic would seem to assume that there are films which aren't. Which is silly.
― en i see kay, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
All of the movies mentioned that I've seen have been terrible (plus The Dreamers, which is THE WORST MOVIE EVER), but I don't think it was because their relationship with reality was iffy.
― milo z, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
re: tango: but what about gigantic hair pie?
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
Does Closer count? I didn't mind that one.
umm that bit you're saying about how all relationships essentially follow this fairly predictable and healthy model is kinda some bullshit
I'm not gonna get into disclosing on a public board under my own name but:
have you, or anyone you know or have ever heard of, been involved in a dangerous, unstable love affair that challenges identities and cauterizes the senses.
I don't have the faintest what "cauterizing the senses" might involve but relationships that 1) were genuinely dangerous to my physical health and 2) did a fucking number on my identity, umm, yeah, anybody who hasn't had one or two of those hasn't really lived IMO
― J0hn D., Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
OTOH trying to make a movie about that kind of experience is obviously a nonstarter
― J0hn D., Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
i think the complaint is that the depiction of these kinds of relationships in movies is usually wholly unconvincing on the psychological/character level. the movies don't have to be "realistic," but they have to seem like more than an excuse for a lot of fucking.
― tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:35 (seventeen years ago)
the dreamers = shit nine songs = shit
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:35 (seventeen years ago)
-- J0hn D., Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:32 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
OTM
-- J0hn D., Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:33 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:37 (seventeen years ago)
don't forget 9 1/2 weeks.
― tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)
what about Annie Hall?
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)
Well I can certainly get on board with that. I think this is just a case where the conventions of narrative film are wholly inadequate to express what the filmmakers are trying to express and that they'd be much better off sticking to more non-representational forms.
xxxxpost
― en i see kay, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)
I am going to make one of these movies. It will be called An Excuse for Fucking.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:41 (seventeen years ago)
i've dated crazy and been off the charts depressed because of it too. funny how the movies about this kind of experience never dramatize the crucial events: the long sequence of moments when you get the f out of that situation and finally forget about it.
i'm being a dick on this thread but hint hint i think there's something really suspect about this genre. there's a consistent misrepresentational through-line to all of them, and the attitude to sex and attraction itself really myopic and hateful
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
high brow tit flicks are okay
― M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:44 (seventeen years ago)
celebrity breast!
― carne asada, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:44 (seventeen years ago)
Celebreast
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:45 (seventeen years ago)
Night Porter worked out OK
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:46 (seventeen years ago)
the sequel to 9 1/2 weeks is beyond retarded
― M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:47 (seventeen years ago)
night porter is great!
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:48 (seventeen years ago)
i dont know, i find the idea of fucking immigrants a great plot twist - can't wait to see this film!
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:48 (seventeen years ago)
i suspect the problem with these movies is often that the director can't resist casting the most fuckable woman he can, regardless of whether or not she can act - which explains why night porter and the last mistress both manage to evade lameness and are in fact both great
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:49 (seventeen years ago)
yeh see? imagine a breezy, sun-dappled comedy where naomi watts takes her shirt off. you can't really, it could never exist. these movies are prurient garbage.
i've got ai no corrida in my netflix queue, guess i'll add night porter as well.
haha who's even in 10 1/2 weeks?
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:50 (seventeen years ago)
The film spawned two direct-to-video sequels, Another 9½ Weeks in 1997 and The First 9½ Weeks in 1998.
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:54 (seventeen years ago)
I hate movies where people have sex, and then SUFFER for it. It's just puritanism in disguise.
― Soukesian, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 22:57 (seventeen years ago)
i liked in the cut
― akm, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:02 (seventeen years ago)
but it was more like In the Cunt, amirite?
― akm, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:03 (seventeen years ago)
akm I did see that one and it was pretty light on the psychology, I have to sa
― J0hn D., Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:04 (seventeen years ago)
y
imagine a breezy, sun-dappled comedy where naomi watts takes her shirt off. you can't really, it could never exist.
french movies to thread?
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:04 (seventeen years ago)
What, like Belle du Jour?
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:05 (seventeen years ago)
if Adrian Lyne had actually directed a sequel to 9 1/2 weeks and called it Beyond Retarded he would be officially the greatest man of all times
― J0hn D., Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:05 (seventeen years ago)
tbh the conjection of the name "naomi watts" with "breezy" and "sun-dappled" and "shirt off" is causing my entire brain to seize up completely
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:05 (seventeen years ago)
i cunt even spell right
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:06 (seventeen years ago)
Most of these films are a step away from Skinamax, admittedly. I don't watch most of them because they embarrass me, even if I'm watching them with my wife. Even Swimming Pool made me uncomfortable (also, it sucked).
― akm, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:06 (seventeen years ago)
yes this is kind of an american pathology, but those people eat snails dude
― gff, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:07 (seventeen years ago)
i will grant you that the french definition of "comedy" often looks suspiciously like "cruel weirdness"
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)
nothing wrong with films of this type, a lot of them are great.
― omar little, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)
I really rate Tinto Brass, who usually gets lumped in with this stuff, but his work contains no inexplicable misery - or puritanism - whatsoever.
― Soukesian, Tuesday, 27 May 2008 23:38 (seventeen years ago)
tie me up tie me down - almodovar dont move - with penelope cruz.
Exotica is amazing - esp. with it's buildin- narrative techniques, where everything that starts blurry comes together neatly tied in the end.best in second viewing.
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 14:36 (seventeen years ago)
Sex & Lucia only had quite a lot of sex in the first half hour or so right? Then it settles down after that, from what I remember, to tell its story.
Caught a bit of The Dreamers on TV a couple of nights ago and it seemed much better 2nd time around. I think I saw more connections between the outside and the inside.
The Piano Teacher is not that strange given Haneke's bio (he ws thinking of becoming a classical musician wasn't he?), its just about the world of the conservatoire and the life that ppl can potentially love out in that world (or at least it plays to certain stereotypes of it)
In the Realm of the Senses is a very great movie. I must read the BFI book on it (and I want to see Cruel Story of Youth, which came out recently on DVD)
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)
So far in, and no Shortbus?
― CharlieNo4, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 14:55 (seventeen years ago)
From the perspective of living in France, where even the yoghurt ads on TV tend towards the erotic, the question is rather why there are so few naked bodies in American movies? Personally I'd go for more sex and nudity and less violence.
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)
fuck you, how's that for more sex?
― n/a, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
So, can we go back to this and point out how ridiculously untrue this is?
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)
that HBO series "Tell Me You Love Me" i kinda likes it though.
― carne asada, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
you haven't lived until you've had somebody tell you that you haven't lived
― n/a, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:23 (seventeen years ago)
"Shortbus" is the worst movie I have ever seen in my entire life. I think when one of the characters mentioned 9/11 steam started shooting out of my ears cartoon style.
I don't think "The Idiots" fits the bill here at all. I like "The Idiots," I just don't think it's this type of movie.
I forgot "Late Marriage" existed until seeing it mentioned on this thread and remembering what an amazing movie it was.
I think the sex scenes in these movies are always really funny, where people smash shit/knock stuff off tables/rip clothes off/gasp for breath. It never, ever, ever seems the least bit sexy.
I'd take any interchangeable Shannon Whirry/Shannon Tweed/Andrew Stevens "Animal Intstincts" "Body of Influence" "Mirror Images II" 90s VHS erotic thriller over any of these.
What about "Betty Blue"? People seem to have both a literal and intellectual boner for that movie. I didn't really get it, though.
― Savannah Smiles, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:23 (seventeen years ago)
It could happen.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:27 (seventeen years ago)
i liked shortbus a lot but it doesn't have anything to do with this thread.
― jed_, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
swimming pool had HQ boobage, love that flick. i didn't really "get it" though.
― M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)
i liked secretary! it played s&m psychology for laffs, and it turned 'touching' and even sappy.
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
secretary is a great movie
― deej, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
I haven't really lived, apparently. I KNEW IT!
The first film that came to mind is Roeg's disturbing Bad Timing.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:00 (seventeen years ago)
really, most of my "relationships" (God, I hate that usage) have been called off bcz I'm all NO DRAMA, plz. Haven't got the time.
If he was really hot I might cut more slack.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
The Center of the World is OK and has a woman putting a lollipop in her yinyang.
― Eazy, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:05 (seventeen years ago)
Fear, with Marky Mark and Reese Witherspoon, is the best movie about the 90s.
― Eazy, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:08 (seventeen years ago)
i have seen this fear
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
It's like Urban Outfitters and the Gap fighting for this teenage girl's soul.
― Eazy, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
quite a roller coaster ride, as i recall
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
zactly, my man, that's a good sex scene.
― Eazy, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
i need to see late marriage again. not that it really belongs on this thread
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
woah it's molly parker in center of the world?! that's goin on the q
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:14 (seventeen years ago)
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times "You want real? This movie shows you real." ... Read More
A.O. Scott, The New York Times "The self-consciously rough, low-budget surface of The Center of the World can't disguise the slick cheapness at its heart." ... Read More
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle "Mindless and prurient." ... Read More
i just netflixed it.
xp (late marriage)
― Jordan, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
"Center of the World" is credited From A Story By Wang, Miranda July, Paul Auster And Siri Hustvedt.
― Eazy, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)
because of the Miranda July
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
-- gff, Wednesday, May 28, 2008 12:14 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
i know i know the widow garret omg rawr
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:27 (seventeen years ago)
what's great about the sex scenes in Don't Look Now isn't the sex itself so much as how its positioned as a fond immediate memory Christie and Sutherland have as they're getting dressed afterward.
xpost
obv. we have two topics going here -- that of the thread title and just non-porn movies with interesting sex scenes
― Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
haha apptly molly parker has a whole career of this stuff
Kissed (1996) Ever since she was a young girl, Sandra Larson (Molly Parker) has been fascinated with the darkness of death. But when she takes a part-time job as an embalmer at a funeral parlor, her obsession with the afterlife and the study of necrophilia begins to consume her every desire. As her boyfriend (Peter Outerbridge) struggles to relate to her new lifestyle, he jumps through hoops to prove he'll do anything for love.
Bliss (1997) Joseph (Craig Sheffer) and Maria (Sheryl Lee) are a young married couple in serious trouble. Although they love each other, Maria has difficulty opening up to Joseph, and, after 6 months of marriage, he makes the unhappy discovery that she's been unable to have an orgasm with him. Enter Balthazar (Terence Stamp), an unlicensed sex therapist who agrees to initiate Joseph into the mysteries of tantric sex that could save his marriage.
In the Shadows (1999) Cash-strapped waitress Cynthia (Molly Parker) takes a job caring for moneyed cancer patient Eleanor Dunston (Joely Richardson). When she shows an interest in Cynthia's boyfriend, Buck (Aden Young), Cynthia persuades him to pose as her half brother so he can seduce the dying woman into leaving him her fortune. Writer-director Meg Richman transplants Henry James' classic novel The Wings of the Dove to Seattle's 1990s grunge scene.
Suspicious River (2000) A fatalistic hotel receptionist (Molly Parker) who exhibits many self-destructive tendencies is compulsively drawn into a dark netherworld of crime. After playing the prostitute to several willing guests in the hotel where she works, she spirals into a heated romance with a sadistic lodger who allows her to be gang-raped. Soon, it seems that her behavior might lead her to the same fate as her mother, who was brutally murdered.
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:02 (seventeen years ago)
jesus christ
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
Writer-director Meg Richman transplants Henry James' classic novel The Wings of the Dove to Seattle's 1990s grunge scene.
wow
― max, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
ha
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
http://bestmessageboardever.com/style_images/1/folder_post_icons/icon74.gifhttp://bestmessageboardever.com/style_images/1/folder_post_icons/icon74.gifhttp://bestmessageboardever.com/style_images/1/folder_post_icons/icon74.gif Writer-director Meg Richman transplants Henry James' classic novel The Wings of the Dove to Seattle's 1990s grunge scene. Writer-director Meg Richman transplants Henry James' classic novel The Wings of the Dove to Seattle's 1990s grunge scene. Writer-director Meg Richman transplants Henry James' classic novel The Wings of the Dove to Seattle's 1990s grunge scene.
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
totally. molly parker is terrible.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
that list is like everything wrong with english-canadian cinema
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
still, would smash
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
BLISS is a movie every couple, married or not, should see to better improve their relationship with their partner on not only a sexual level, but an emotional and spiritual level as well. Many viewers will not go beyond the initial subject of sexual abuse plot setup and thus will miss the pure meat of this film. After the introduction of the sex therapist, dramatic and subtle secrets are revealed on how to woo and keep a partner intimately aroused. Anyone who has engaged in tantric sex knows that there is more to "the act" than just a localized feeling...that it can be experienced with the total body and for absolute endless hours! This is not orgy, but is rather arrived at with a slow hand and a controlled spirit. This is the first movie to delve into the God Power of the sexual act. Brilliantly written, exquisitely filmed, and supurbly acted, I would say this is one of my most treasured & recommended films.
107 out of 123 people found this review helpful.
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
shes good in deadwood
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
The mixed reviews say more about the viewers than the film. First, this is a film with sex in it, not a sex flick. It has excellent cinematography, score, acting, production values. And yes, a handful of sex scenes. The sex is grown-up, hot, emotional, and intense, but not explicit (no genitals). In short, it is serious. Can you handle it? Get past the sex to really appreciate it. I say rare because few films can handle sex directly without being voyeuristic or falling back to violence or juvenile humor to defuse the tension. Four stars for this film, and an extra one for breaking the tired old mold.
51 out of 55 people found this review helpful.
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
I think that if men could understand the deeper levels of sexuality that this movie demonstrates, there would be fewer divorces.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
― gff, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
I know some of you disagree, but Bitter Moon is a terrible entry in this genre.
― Eazy, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
OK there the NFT over here appear to be doing a whole season of this stuff.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 27 November 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago)
I've seen Realm of the Senses and Onibaba, both are very good.
― Neil S, Thursday, 27 November 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
ey thanks 2 everyone who talked up 'late marriage', what a great movie
― laying | (goole), Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
Aren't *all* films w/ Sex in, stylised?
how many actual 'couplings' in a film, can you say reflects anything you have actually done to a greater extent?
I'm not saying 'none', there's just so few of them.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
28
― laying | (goole), Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:51 (sixteen years ago)
yeah 'late marriage' is great.
― meat of beef (Jordan), Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
xpost OK, names!
― Mark G, Wednesday, 25 March 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)