So I was kinda 'who cares' about this film until I caught the most recent trailer, if only because the outer space sequences looked pretty great. Also because I got a sense that there's relatively little dialogue in the film, which was confirmed over here:
Directed and written by Andrew Stanton, the creative force behind “Finding Nemo,” the picture tells the story of a cuddly trash-compacting robot who lives on an abandoned, heavily polluted Earth 700 years in the future. His sidekick is a perky cockroach named Hal.“Wall-E,” which features long sequences without dialogue, is under extra pressure to perform at the box office because of soft initial receipts for a recent Disney film, “The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian.” Adding to the weight are Pixar’s last three films; though all were blockbusters, they have gradually trended downward at the domestic box office. A reversal would quiet critics who say the studio’s best days are behind it. (Disney notes that an increase in foreign box office sales has offset the slide.)As with “Cars,” Disney is counting on “Wall-E,” set for release on June 27, to take off with a tough crowd: little boys. It has prepared a collection of 300 robot-themed consumer products that will arrive on store shelves over the next month.“There are some great toys, and we are working on a variety of potential applications for our parks,” said Mr. Iger in a conference call with analysts on May 6. “So we are poised to take advantage of broad and deep success when it comes.”(He added that he has particularly high hopes for a “Wall-E” remote-controlled robot. “Having played with it, I think it’s going to be a hot seller for Christmas,” he said.)Wall Street, which closely monitors major animated movies because of their huge cost, is not yet sold on the robot, which was been criticized by some as looking too much like the star of the corny 1986 film “Short Circuit.”“I can see how it could work and be huge and I can see how it could not,” said Richard Greenfield, an analyst at Pali Research.
“Wall-E,” which features long sequences without dialogue, is under extra pressure to perform at the box office because of soft initial receipts for a recent Disney film, “The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian.” Adding to the weight are Pixar’s last three films; though all were blockbusters, they have gradually trended downward at the domestic box office. A reversal would quiet critics who say the studio’s best days are behind it. (Disney notes that an increase in foreign box office sales has offset the slide.)
As with “Cars,” Disney is counting on “Wall-E,” set for release on June 27, to take off with a tough crowd: little boys. It has prepared a collection of 300 robot-themed consumer products that will arrive on store shelves over the next month.
“There are some great toys, and we are working on a variety of potential applications for our parks,” said Mr. Iger in a conference call with analysts on May 6. “So we are poised to take advantage of broad and deep success when it comes.”
(He added that he has particularly high hopes for a “Wall-E” remote-controlled robot. “Having played with it, I think it’s going to be a hot seller for Christmas,” he said.)
Wall Street, which closely monitors major animated movies because of their huge cost, is not yet sold on the robot, which was been criticized by some as looking too much like the star of the corny 1986 film “Short Circuit.”
“I can see how it could work and be huge and I can see how it could not,” said Richard Greenfield, an analyst at Pali Research.
So, who knows?
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 31 May 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
I love the trailer for this. And if Ratatouille is any indication, it'll be really good.
― Mordy, Saturday, 31 May 2008 21:45 (seventeen years ago)
This looks awesome. I turn into a little kid every time I see a poster for it. "Look, John! It's wallllllllllllllleeeeeeeee!"
― Abbott, Saturday, 31 May 2008 21:58 (seventeen years ago)
the robot is tremble
― Abbott, Saturday, 31 May 2008 22:02 (seventeen years ago)
I love the way he pronounces his own name too at the end of the trailer; Wallllllll-e.
― Mordy, Saturday, 31 May 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
Do you know about the human beings in the movie? The ones who trashed earth and moved away? And who are all grossly obese and get around in hover-chairs or something?
I can't believe that Disney is actually relying on this being a huge blockbuster.
― Deric W. Haircare, Saturday, 31 May 2008 22:24 (seventeen years ago)
teh new trailer looks awesome!
― s1ocki, Saturday, 31 May 2008 22:28 (seventeen years ago)
I think this could well be phenomenal. I love the design.
― chap, Sunday, 1 June 2008 01:25 (seventeen years ago)
Looking forward to this more than Batman. Apparently Apple design guy Jonathan Ive helped in the look: http://pixarblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/jonathan-ive-helped-design-eve.html
― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 1 June 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, EVE looks very much like an iThing.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 1 June 2008 03:33 (seventeen years ago)
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y215/cortneyhead/johnny5isalive.jpg
― dmr, Sunday, 1 June 2008 03:49 (seventeen years ago)
Saw this thread after I posted i got high hopes for wall-e. to the pixar thread - I'm not alone, hooray!
Re: the lack of dialogue - the robots' "voices" are by sound designer Ben Burtt, who did R2D2. This is a Good Thing.
The trailer in HD looks soooooooo good.
― ledge, Sunday, 1 June 2008 10:04 (seventeen years ago)
This looks like an especially ambitious Pixar, they've gotten over having an "effect" (hair, water, etc.) now I think, but I don't know if that's a good thing or not, it should be good but I loved being wowed by their overenthusiastic lighting of the Incredibles.
― I know, right?, Sunday, 1 June 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
actually, it's probably space, right?
Yes.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 1 June 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)
Good!
― I know, right?, Sunday, 1 June 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
I cannot wait to see this!
― hyggeligt, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 08:38 (seventeen years ago)
Terrific trailer. I was sold from the moment Wall-E clasped his little tin hands together whilst watching the film, but when he later gets to dip a hand into Saturn's rings this made my "opening night" list, hopefully at the digital 500-seat screen in town for full sensory overload.
Am sure this has been addressed on many other threads, but can *any* other studio compare to Pixar for consistent quality?
― Bill A, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 12:30 (seventeen years ago)
so this isn't a movie about the playground footy game?
― Ste, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 12:39 (seventeen years ago)
Wall-E looks like the BOB the KITTEN of Pixar fillums.
― Upt0eleven, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 12:43 (seventeen years ago)
a cuddly trash-compacting robot who lives on an abandoned, heavily polluted Earth
vs.
a collection of 300 robot-themed consumer products
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 12:59 (seventeen years ago)
i.e., the right glove of The Mouse knows not what the left glove does
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 13:00 (seventeen years ago)
I am stoked for this.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
I am always excited for new Pixar.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
I am stoked for ANY pixar, xpost. This + Hellboy II are the summer must sees.
― forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
space is dope imo and i will see this
― carne asada, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
This looks frustratingly irresistible. I may have to see it.
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
seeing it tomorrow. pretty stoked.
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
wall-e is the cutest savage in all the world imo
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)
My Pixar-employee drummer </s-drop> called me up for a Sunday morning screening but I was aslumber and missed it. Looks lots more promising than Cars, which I really hated.
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
I never saw Cars or The Incredibles because they just didn't draw me in, but Ratatouille was pretty good and this looks great so far.
― mh, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 20:56 (seventeen years ago)
my wife asked my 4 year old daughter if she wanted to see wall-e. she spent a couple minutes jumping up and down, excitedly yelling "wall-e! wall-e!". then she calmed down a little and started explaining how wall-e used to have horns because he was a demon but he cut them off because he wanted to be more like a human.
turns out my daughter is very excited to see hellboy II.
― Edward III, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 21:22 (seventeen years ago)
I am hoping to take my 2 y.o. neph to this who has never seen t.v. before but I think his head might explode.
― bnw, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 21:26 (seventeen years ago)
every time i see a still i think "short circuit bot- HATE"
― Hunt3r, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 23:00 (seventeen years ago)
― get bent, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 03:03 (seventeen years ago)
i keep singing the title of this movie in my head to the tune of "jolene".
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 13:35 (seventeen years ago)
I'm beggin' of you, please don't take my RAM
― some dude, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 13:36 (seventeen years ago)
have you guys seen the new trailer?
wall-e
― Edward III, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 13:39 (seventeen years ago)
ARGH
xpost
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 13:39 (seventeen years ago)
I want to see this v. badly. Village Voice has me excited. Any chance it's as good as ET?
― Tape Store, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 23:11 (seventeen years ago)
genuine laff out louds during the trailers/teasers etc. first cinema experience for my 5 year old definitely.
― mark e, Thursday, 26 June 2008 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
i liked this!
let me be more clear... i LOVED the first half but the second was not as satisfying. kind of amazing to have no dialogue for such a long stretch... longer even than "there will be blood"! take that, plainview...
at heart this is a surprisingly dark, even haunting--though not particularly subtle--movie. and sweet.
i liked it.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 26 June 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)
Is it really R2D2: A Love Story?
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 26 June 2008 03:14 (seventeen years ago)
Am I going to cry like I do every time I watch Iron Giant
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 26 June 2008 03:54 (seventeen years ago)
EL HOGARTHO
― remy bean, Thursday, 26 June 2008 04:13 (seventeen years ago)
aww... ilu tbot
Totally stoked for this though aside from Pixar pedigree it's not Brad Bird.
― rogermexico., Thursday, 26 June 2008 06:37 (seventeen years ago)
slocki where is your write-up
― El Tomboto, Friday, 27 June 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
the Washington Post review of this sucked btw I'd temp ban that fucker if he worked for me
― El Tomboto, Friday, 27 June 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
ive not been a fan of the digital animation for everyone but this looks kinda great
― jhøshea, Friday, 27 June 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
In the vignettes he's a teeny bit too much like a mechanical Mr Bean.
― Mark C, Friday, 27 June 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
is there anything on the 3-disc worth getting that's not on the 1disc?
― uәʇɹɐƃu!әʍ ˙ƃ ʎәu!Ⴁʍ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 1 December 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago)
spoiler thing:
I was unable to read every post, but I'm pretty sure no one has yet mentioned the zero-gravity sequence w/ the fire extinguisher, which is one of the most beautiful scenes of any recent movie I can remember.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 2 December 2008 07:07 (sixteen years ago)
whiney: I got the three-disc because it was basically only like $4 more than the one-disc on amazon and the answer appears to be NO becuase disc #3 is just some kind of disney fucko "digital copy" crap with an unlocking code that you can "enjoy on your favorite device" e.g. copy to your hard drive without being brought up on felony charges
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 2 December 2008 07:10 (sixteen years ago)
watched this last night, totally agree that the human element ruined what could have been a great robot romantic movie. and also
one potential bum note - when the ship tilts and the ppl pile up against the wall, their red costumes bear more than a slight resemblance to Liverpool home kit = Hillsborough echoes?
i totally got this too, really unfortunate scene.
The moments on Earth though were brilliant, should have just been all that.
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Friday, 5 December 2008 09:54 (sixteen years ago)
max's usage of the word 'rubes' is p. delightful 2 me
― cankles, Friday, 5 December 2008 10:00 (sixteen years ago)
I admit part of me really hoped they'd go with the memory-wiped Wall-E.
ok i would have drowned in a room of my own tears if they'd done that
― Ant Attack.. (Ste), Friday, 5 December 2008 10:09 (sixteen years ago)
needs geekier commentary rather than the story evolution commentary that we got.
― koogs, Friday, 5 December 2008 11:23 (sixteen years ago)
Having watched this on DVD recently, I enjoyed it more second time around (although, as detailed above, first viewing was not quite ideal). There was a lot less time spent on the Axiom than I remembered, and the human involvement was less than I remembered too. Or went quicker. And the space dance! Wow.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 5 December 2008 12:03 (sixteen years ago)
but I'm pretty sure no one has yet mentioned the zero-gravity sequence w/ the fire extinguisher, which is one of the most beautiful scenes of any recent movie I can remember.
― billstevejim
yep - it was something special.
― moley, Friday, 5 December 2008 13:44 (sixteen years ago)
― uәʇɹɐƃu!әʍ ˙ƃ ʎәu!Ⴁʍ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, December 1, 2008 10:08 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
the main thing on disc 2 worth seeing is about 10 minutes worth of Buy N' Large corporate messages to the shareholders / training film for the Axiom Captain's first day / advertisements for BNL history: "After our initial series of mergers, Buy N' Large began lead the world in every industry, including... World Leadership!"
there's also about 8 minutes of very rough, non-animated early storyboard alternate takes, which are interesting once. originally the captain was even more of a wide-eyed limbless balloon who could barely form complete sentences, and it's hard not to think about how great it would have been if they'd held on to more of that characterization -- as much as I love this movie, the captain is the weakest link of the entire film, every one of his scenes is nearly painfully mediocre. though I know that if they hadn't made him a Hero character, this film would have ceased to work as a film for kids.
― Milton Parker, Friday, 5 December 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
yeah basically I think if you're much harsher on the human beings than this movie already is it basically becomes Silent Running
― El Tomboto, Friday, 5 December 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago)
now would that have been so bad
― Milton Parker, Friday, 5 December 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago)
aw how nice, the person who posted that transcibed Joan Baez's lyrics in the sidebar
Gather your children to your side in the sunTell them all they love will die,Tell them why in the sun
― Milton Parker, Friday, 5 December 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/3081904301_2519404f94.jpg
― Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Saturday, 6 December 2008 00:23 (sixteen years ago)
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/1848/imageuploadimagemo3.jpg
― яσσʍ♭ⱥȵℹҁᔔ ᴗȵȴℹʍℹȶ∊∂ (libcrypt), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 05:09 (sixteen years ago)
dremel work never really has the charm of actual carving.
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 05:11 (sixteen years ago)
STEEMPUNK
― three henny opera (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 05:11 (sixteen years ago)
I'm awaiting the Wall-E trash compactor and Chia-Eve.
― яσσʍ♭ⱥȵℹҁᔔ ᴗȵȴℹʍℹȶ∊∂ (libcrypt), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 05:18 (sixteen years ago)
Wood-E
― StanM, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
Wall-E Wood (comix joek)
― served by boot-face (contenderizer), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
so fucking good
― Timezilla vs Mechadistance (blueski), Sunday, 4 January 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)
so great when wall-e arrives in the main body of the cruise ship and is suddenly surrounded by robots of every description, waxing, scouting analyzing, buffing - wall-e's a trash collector but these guys are high-gloss cleanliness technicians!
my biggest laugh was at the double take of the doddery desk guard robot, when wall-e wheels eva into the elevator. i wonder how the animators work out the timing for these things - do they block out the scenes with actors first and then use the same timings for their animation or what?
i sorta feel this was all premise and no payoff. once the plot mechanics kick in it's rushed and by the numbers - wall-e gets physically battered while saving the day and hey presto we're on earth. and the citizens of buy n large came around with no effort at all; one minute they're passive drones and suddenly they're like whoa yeah, we have nothing to lose but our slurpees!
the number of amazing little moments here would fill three other normal movies, but the story felt small. what i would have liked: the ship comes back to earth about midway through the film. NOW what mothafuckas
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 5 February 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)
I am sure I am not alone in finding the cross-species implications of the relationship between Wall-E and Eva slightly disturbing. You tell me how they make babies.
― moley, Thursday, 5 February 2009 01:38 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.black-sabbath.de/lyrics/te.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 5 February 2009 01:40 (sixteen years ago)
Well Ned, exactly.
Another niggle for me is that in real life, let's face it, Eva wouldn't go for Wall-E. He's not crisp enough.
― moley, Thursday, 5 February 2009 01:59 (sixteen years ago)
There's sort of a Mac/PC thing going on there.
― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Thursday, 5 February 2009 02:00 (sixteen years ago)
tracer i agree with 95% of what you said there—plot wasn't entirely satisfying, but at the same time the movie is so good otherwise that it's almost completely forgivable.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 5 February 2009 02:02 (sixteen years ago)
not a dry eye in the house at the theater in which i saw this
― steve goldberg variations (omar little), Thursday, 5 February 2009 02:04 (sixteen years ago)
was tempted towards weepiness in the final moments, but managed to restrain the free exercise of grubby human feelings. hooray me. still the best movie i saw last year.
― Calling All Creeps! (contenderizer), Thursday, 5 February 2009 07:02 (sixteen years ago)
now that i think about it.. auto controls the whole ship, so why is he still sending out the EVAs if he plans to do nothing about them?
and, fred willard said there wasn't any life on earth anymore, so don't bother coming back.. but isn't the whole point of the EVAs for exactly this circumstance? if life exists on earth, the EVAs aren't needed
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:17 (sixteen years ago)
or rather if life is KNOWN to exist, the EVAs aren't needed
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:18 (sixteen years ago)
the Burn-E minisode on the DVD is also fantastic (vendorbot drops the rod when asked for a THIRD one)
― O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:22 (sixteen years ago)
Burn-E was great, especially because when I rewatched the movie I was like "hey, I didn't notice this the first time, but what ever ended happening to that robot who got locked out...?", and then I go to the special features and BAM!
― georgeous gorge (bernard snowy), Thursday, 5 February 2009 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.)
That's true - I missed that.
― moley, Thursday, 5 February 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
glad to see that i am not the only one who saw the similarities b/w wall-e and the lyrics of gary numan's "m.e.":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnakzyCKhiA
... though i would've used different film footage if i made this video.
― Mein bester Freund, die Kackwurst, wird bis zu einem Meter groß. (Eisbaer), Thursday, 17 September 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)
Honestly the first 20 minutes completely won me over and then the rest of the film mostly just held my attention. I want to see Pixar do a dark 2-hour meditation on the solitary life of a trash-collecting robot on a waste planet.
― Bay-L.A. Bar Talk (Hurting 2), Thursday, 17 September 2009 12:21 (sixteen years ago)
why did president fred willard secretly change the instructions for the spaceship again? the entire plot turned on that but i don't think i ever understood it
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 September 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
"The Captain replays EVE's visual recordings and sees that Earth is still devastated and nothing like the imagery of it that he has seen... The Captain, meanwhile, comes to the conclusion that humanity must return to Earth to restore the planet. Auto, however, reveals that he was given a final directive: when the cleanup project had been deemed a failure, the BnL CEO ordered all autopilots never to return to Earth. When the Captain resists it, Auto stages a mutiny."
"Fred Willard as Shelby Forthright, historical CEO of the Buy n Large Corporation. Known for his seemingly unending optimism, Forthright proposed the plans to evacuate, clean up and recolonize the planet. However, he gave up hope after realizing he underestimated just how toxic the planet had become."
― koogs, Thursday, 17 September 2009 12:53 (sixteen years ago)
I've read interviews by Christian magazines with both Andrew Stanton and the Monsters Inc. guy. It's weird to be reading 'robots space the future animation other robots Jesus robots" – wait what? This one ends with a Watchtoweresque sidebar trying to mesh Wall-E and the Bible. "In contrast, WALL•E, the meek little trash collector, accepts stewardship in a way that people have rejected. And because love springs from service, he comes to love the creatures that inhabit Earth. That's not an environmental message, it's a biblical one."
― girl moves (Abbott), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
I don't find this bad or sinister, fwiw, just odd.
predicted upthread:
you really wish wall•e was more like the story of jesus?
― s1ocki, Monday, 7 July 2008 20:15 (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― joe, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)
I am all for people who want to draw good lessons from the words of the Bible and inspiration to do good from the words and example of Jesus. It is when the lessons are all shitty ones and the inspiration is toward smug self-righteousness that I cringe.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
<3 Wall-E
― StanM, Thursday, 6 January 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
so great. had some non English speaking family over. i couldnt think of anything for them to watch so i threw this on, they loved it.
― Aerosol, Thursday, 6 January 2011 20:46 (fourteen years ago)
http://blastr.com/2012/08/guys-spends-two-years-bui.php
Cool story, bro.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 3 August 2012 17:11 (thirteen years ago)
Anyone watch Wall-E (2008) recently? Looks a bit different from 2020. It came out the year after the iPhone was invented and it seems like our take away was Ok, so we can just look at these screens 24/7 and eventually a trash compacter will tell us when it's time to rebuild.— Miranda July (@Miranda_July) February 18, 2020
― jaymc, Tuesday, 18 February 2020 18:18 (five years ago)
Now here is some news:
We're proud to announce our first collaboration with @Pixar: WALL•E (2008), directed by Andrew Stanton, entering the Collection on 4K this November! https://t.co/1T7kQ7nsSY pic.twitter.com/MG7WOoP1zR— Criterion Collection (@Criterion) September 8, 2022
Our director-approved edition features two commentaries, a masterclass with Stanton, behind-the-scenes footage, more than a dozen documentaries, deleted scenes, a tour of the Pixar Living Archive; selections from Stanton's sketchbook, and so much more! pic.twitter.com/VXuo0bPgl1— Criterion Collection (@Criterion) September 8, 2022
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 September 2022 15:40 (three years ago)
https://www.criterion.com/films/33246-wall-e
― an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 8 September 2022 15:53 (three years ago)
Oops, missed that the link is in that first tweet.
― an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 8 September 2022 15:54 (three years ago)
No Hello Dolly, No Cred
― an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 8 September 2022 15:55 (three years ago)