Some very good threads are sinking beneath the waves so shall we have a new board for the discussion of Economics and Finance? I have mentioned this to a few people and i can think of a few more who'd be into this?
Anyone got any views?
― Ed, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 13:57 (seventeen years ago)
Make it so.
― Allen, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)
go!
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
I would be interested. Shouldn't this be on modreq though?
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)
'sinking beneath the waves' indicates inadequate demand, no?
― bnw, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
I will go to modreq in good time, but I thought I would float the idea where everyone can see it.
― Ed, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)
i would read it
― gbx, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:30 (seventeen years ago)
"sink" "float"
it's economics all right
― dan m, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)
yes.
― toby, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:48 (seventeen years ago)
We can just rename Cape of Good Hope. That shit bombed.
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
I kind of oppose this really, it impacts on politics and other aspects of life so much and the Shitbin threads on ILE have been really good. Don't think there are really enough Economics and Finance threads to require their own board and it would slow to a crawl pretty quickly.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
I used to be of that view about sub boards but I like how ILTRMB has developed from the ILTRMB thread.
― Ed, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
My other reservation is that things like 'the state of the US economy' are really big issues that huge numbers of posters will have opinions on/experience of. On ILE everyone can and will chip in, I suspect not enough will look at I Love Economics to make it worth ghettoising that kind of discussion to a sub-board.
I'd be anti I Love Politics for the same reason.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)
this new board would make john maynard keynes very happy:
http://www.liberalhistory.org.uk/uploads/keynes.jpg
― Eisbaer, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)
in other words -- YES
― Eisbaer, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I'm kind of leaning anti-board on this for reasons noted above.
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my. I hadn't even seen that. Oh my.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
im with matt dc on this, if this became a board it'd become a 2-posts-per-day ghetto eventually. the threads on here are more than good enough.
― s.rose, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:23 (seventeen years ago)
I think we should just work at keeping them in New Answers.
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
You can recruit posters from ITR for that; they're good at bumping threads.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I have an interest in threads like this, but they do tend to get lost in the shuffle. If they were consistently bumped and/or easy to find (read: logically titled), I don't see the need for a separate board.
― Deric W. Haircare, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:05 (seventeen years ago)
Why not just make this a rolling Economics thread, and then people can pull out stuff that's interesting for its own thread?
In other news, I have an exam in Development Economics in 1 hour and 53 minutes, so if anyone has anything useful to tell me about the evolution of measures of development and the Human Development Index, different perspectives on the role of the sate, or the impact of foreign direct investment on development, go for it.
― Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
start a board because there aren't enough posts on the threads that exist?
― darraghmac, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
I think the point is that economics threads are much slower burning and tend to get lost in the ILE scrum. ILTRMB is a good example of rolling threads expanding into their own space.
― Ed, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)
It's a little late for this, but can someone explain growth regressions?
― Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
i fi could do that, then i wouldn't have this hairline ithangyew.
― darraghmac, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
boom tish
― Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
-- The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:49 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
it'd be a good way to keep the discussion to the same couple of posters if that's what you're after
― sonderborg, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:06 (seventeen years ago)
we'd have no interesting threads on ILE if we hoiked all the politics and economics threads to their own thread. please dont.
― Thomas, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:48 (seventeen years ago)
i don't think this is a good idea. will be like i love film.
― banriquit, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:49 (seventeen years ago)
The shitbin threads haven't been lost in the scrum at all, dunno about any others but I think in those cases the thread starter should at least be able to keep discussion ticking over for a day or so. We still need a longer New Answers page really.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:51 (seventeen years ago)
still don't understand how people don't get the 'everything' part of 'i love everything'
― DG, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:56 (seventeen years ago)
if a thread is sinking, you only need to revive it.
― banriquit, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:57 (seventeen years ago)
No chance of bringing back thread categories?
― G00blar, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:57 (seventeen years ago)
-- banriquit, Thursday, 19 June 2008 13:57 (56 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
That's the kind of petty childish revivalist bullshit that Ed's trying to get off of ILx, though.
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 19 June 2008 12:58 (seventeen years ago)
http://prayerfoundation.org/books/book_r169.jpg
― Tom D., Thursday, 19 June 2008 13:00 (seventeen years ago)
Just bookmark the fucker and then write interesting stuff in it when it occurs to you. Easy solution.
― Raw Patrick, Thursday, 19 June 2008 13:02 (seventeen years ago)
I forgot Ed was in favour of locking all old threads.
Can we have an Ask Ed board instead?
I'd hit it.
― G00blar, Thursday, 19 June 2008 13:08 (seventeen years ago)
As you may have noticed am am staring this as a virtual board within ILE by starting threads with titles beginning with [ILEcon], join me.
― Ed, Friday, 18 July 2008 09:59 (seventeen years ago)
I think that's a good approach, Ed.
― mitya, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:34 (seventeen years ago)