it's got Brad Pitt in it but it may still be good in spite of that.
trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DelAqaM_p1Y&eurl=http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/06/13/trailer-review-the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button.aspx
― jed_, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
the trailer looks gorgeous.
― jed_, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)
saw the trailer for this the other day & meant to start a thread -- looks fantastic
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
Except for Brad Pitt (and his fake accent) it looks like it might be interesting.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
very strange lit piece to become a huge-budget movie. I smell Fight Club box-office disaster again.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:05 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah this is a bit of wishcasting to imagine this as any sort of box office smash.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
I mean, Fitzgerald -- I think every film of Gatsby has died...
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
the re-use of Morricone's "Days of Heaven" music is mighty queer. was it not recycled in another movie fairly recently?
― jed_, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
fight club was a box office disaster???
― gbx, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
It was a "disappointment."
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
In US theaters, FC grossed less than half of what it cost.
I bleeve that music from DoH is in fact Tchaikovsky?
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:11 (seventeen years ago)
-- jed_, Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:09 PM (58 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
it's used everywhere. last time i remember seeing it in a movie was in "femme fatale," but that's just because it's become the cannes music, and the openign scene is at a cannes premiere.
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:11 (seventeen years ago)
xp to morbius: it's actually saint-saëns, "the aquarium"
weird. everyone i knew saw it---i thought that, for better or worse, it had become one of those movies that everyone has seen
xp
― gbx, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:12 (seventeen years ago)
I still haven't seen it!
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
i just saw it again like two weeks ago. i still like it ok but the ending is atrocious
― gbx, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
oh, is it? i thought it was Morricone. it's still way overused, though.
many xposts
― jed_, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
im sure it has, by now
thinking back to its actual release though, i do recall it being a disappointment
anyway i think we can all agree that the fact that hollywood gave fincher tons of dough to make this is a good thing
xps
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
morricone riffs on it for the DOH score xp
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)
Fight Club was a BOMB. It did well opening weekend, and when the frat boys discovered it was not a hurray-let's-fight bonecruncher, it died.
(I'm sure it went into the black eventually in its retail afterlife)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)
when the frat boys discovered it was not a hurray-let's-fight bonecruncher, it died.
It isn't?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
no, honey
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
it is, but its themes were much to intellectual for its target audience to get a handle on
-_-
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
drink yr urine, deez
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
trailers usually have some random-ass music that's not in the film, right?
― Jordan, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)
Quite often.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)
i feel like i've seen eight hundred trailers recently using that really bombastic track from Kill Bill.
― Jordan, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)
Or the theme from Requiem For A Dream.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
ya it always happens. lots of them use the music from "aliens"... or "solsbury hill"... etc etc
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
there seem to be trends in it too
yeah "Solsbury Hill" used to be cliched in trailers but after that fake Shining trailer I think it's just hilarious.
― some dude, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
"in da club"
― Jordan, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
Budget $63,000,000 (estimated)
Gross $37,023,395 (USA) (27 February 2000)
"Did not make back estimated budget," yes. "Less than half," no. "Slightly more than half," yes.
"Fight Club won the 2000 Online Film Critics Society Awards for Best DVD, Best DVD Commentary, and Best DVD Special Features,[52] while Entertainment Weekly ranked the film's two-disc edition #1 in its 2001 list of "The 50 Essential DVDs", giving top ratings to the DVD's content and technical picture-and-audio quality.[53] In 2004, after the two-disc edition went out of print, the studio decided to re-release it due to fans' requests.[54] The film grossed $55 million in video and DVD rentals.[55]"
Anyway, this like pretty great. I was curious if the whole "aging backwards" thing would be done in ludicrous Jonathan-Winters-on-Mork-&-Mindy stylee, but seeing the trailer, I think the execution looks really, really cool.
― Pancakes Hackman, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
xp to morbius: it's actually saint-saëns, "the aquarium" There is a great animated version of this on HBO's Classical Baby 2.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
you can throw Fox's marketing costs into the FC theatrical release. I always read the budget was about $75 M.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 17 June 2008 17:49 (seventeen years ago)
holy shit what a great trailer!
― s1ocki, Saturday, 21 June 2008 04:41 (seventeen years ago)
the shot of the bullets coming at him on the boat is like :O
― s1ocki, Saturday, 21 June 2008 04:42 (seventeen years ago)
quicktime version here
the idea of a young babyface carrying the weight of loss/experience by the end makes this so much more intriguing than your run of the mill oscar bait. that and Fincher, obviously. Camerawork is totally on par for him. stellar.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 21 June 2008 07:59 (seventeen years ago)
woah
and robert redford cameo too?
― banriquit, Saturday, 21 June 2008 09:02 (seventeen years ago)
wow, this looks incredible the HD trailer.
― jed_, Saturday, 21 June 2008 12:51 (seventeen years ago)
http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTczMjIzOTY2M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzM3NTYyMQ@@._V1._SX274_SY400_.jpg
― abanana, Saturday, 21 June 2008 12:52 (seventeen years ago)
this guy he is from ork
― jhøshea, Saturday, 21 June 2008 12:58 (seventeen years ago)
zodiac's probly my fav serious movie of the last 10 years or so and this looks like some old bullshit imho
― and what, Saturday, 21 June 2008 13:45 (seventeen years ago)
music in trailers is often recycled when the movie score isn't finished yet.
― akm, Saturday, 21 June 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
it's not out till the autumn: doubt the picture is even locked, knowing fincher.
― banriquit, Saturday, 21 June 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
i love trailers that are all music, maybe some VO & little to no dialogue or sound from the scenes you're seeing
― s1ocki, Saturday, 21 June 2008 17:39 (seventeen years ago)
New trailer brings out how problematic the story could be for film, but it looks, uh, ravishing.
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/thecuriouscaseofbenjaminbutton/
― caek, Sunday, 28 September 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
how do you mean?
― s1ocki, Sunday, 28 September 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
i think it brings out how problematic brad pitt could be for film.
― jed_, Sunday, 28 September 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
xp, structurally. To see the premise in effect on screen makes me worry, but the screenplay is supposed to be OK so perhaps all is well. Definitely looking forward to it.
― caek, Sunday, 28 September 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)
amazed that eric roth could put the line "in life you never know what's coming to you" in a movie after writing gump's "box of chocolates, never know what you're going to get" line. shameless
― s1ocki, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:12 (seventeen years ago)
i am way more interested in the second disk in that criterion edition than watching the movie ever again
― caek, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:14 (seventeen years ago)
ya i have the feeling this might be one of those cases where i enjoy teh making-of more than the movie
― s1ocki, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:15 (seventeen years ago)
wow, one line pissed you off in 160 minutes?
I thought it was some of the best Hollywood craftsmanship since Ratatouille!
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:16 (seventeen years ago)
morbs did u actually like this??
― s1ocki, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:17 (seventeen years ago)
I did, at least I teared up a couple times. Not as much as Kent Jones did. I'd put it my top 15 of last year (admittedly a shit year).
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:21 (seventeen years ago)
I'd put it my top 15 of last year (admittedly a shit year).
me too
― caek, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:23 (seventeen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, May 7, 2009 2:21 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
did you like forrest gump? serious question
― s1ocki, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:32 (seventeen years ago)
never saw it.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 7 May 2009 02:43 (seventeen years ago)
this was meh in the extreme and I really wanted to like it. the biggest problem for me (aside from annoying framing story and useless katrina ) was cate blanchette. I mean, she is incredibly beautiful, but also was really unlikeable in this. maybe she was trying too hard to pull off her accent or something. tilda swinton's character had 1000x more charisma in the one minute she was in it.
― akm, Sunday, 24 May 2009 06:12 (sixteen years ago)
I haven't seen this movie but I had a dream last night that I was watching it. And boy did the movie piss me off just like when I saw the previews.
― goodbye horses, I'm crying over you (Mulvaney), Sunday, 24 May 2009 13:58 (sixteen years ago)
not enough of "a ride" to be popular.
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 May 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)
A new video essay on the film by Matt Zoller Seitz, along w/ the text:
By stripping away the political context that made Gump a pop culture hot potato, Button isolates and magnifies the story's emotional appeal: the sense that, no matter how strongly we believe in the notion that each person is the captain of his or her own ship, the unfortunate fact is that most of us are passengers on this voyage. ... Button is entirely about this sense of life: the realization that we’re quite small and powerless in the great scheme of things, and the most sensible response to this realization is to try to be as caring and decent as we can and appreciate the life we’ve got.
It seems odd to describe a $150 million Brad Pitt movie as unconventional, but in the context of commercial narrative cinema, the label fits. Show business is exactly that, and one of its imperatives has been to give viewers an escape from the world they know—a world in which it's damned hard just to get through the Department of Motor Vehicles line during lunch hour, let alone win the love of your ideal mate, show some two-bit thug what's what, or save your town, your nation, or the galaxy from evil....
None of the above should be construed as a condemnation of the usual modes of movie storytelling. They've been around for over a hundred years, they're descended from models hundreds, even thousands of years older, and they've inspired many satisfying and occasionally profound entertainments. But there are so many examples that it's easy to forget that there is another way of doing things—another kind of story, one that addresses the hard reality of everyday existence even as its imagery and situations reach toward the mythic, the symbolic, and the dreamlike.
http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/present-tense-20090508
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
this movie is all eye candy, zero content beyond a sort of glazed-over wistfulness.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:15 (sixteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, May 24, 2009 6:35 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
a "ride" is all BB is. it's like a CGI demo reel stretched out to three hours. the main character is a total zero, just a really cool special effect.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:16 (sixteen years ago)
I empathize with all attempts to defend it, but mostly think the movie's long and relentlessly underwhelming.
― nu hollywood (Eric H.), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:16 (sixteen years ago)
honestly i went in really rooting for it... but the script is just terrible. cuts the movie off at the knees.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:18 (sixteen years ago)
this movie is all eye candy, zero content beyond a sort of glazed-over wistfulness.― s1ocki, Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:15 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― s1ocki, Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:15 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is OTM. the whole time i was watching it i was like "this looks beautiful... why does it suck?"
Except for that CGI hummingbird, that looked fuckin awful
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:22 (sixteen years ago)
which is totally recycled from the forrest gump feather scene too
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
not exploring new territory heah
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
i still say watch it again when you begin to feel old.
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)
That's like saying listen to "Losing My Edge" when you turn 30. Pretty duh.
― nu hollywood (Eric H.), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)
i won't deny there's some poignant stuff in this movie (especially the last 15 minutes or so which were kinda haunting). but it's not really earned and thus barely got to me.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)
i just do not get the point of the katrina framing device. I think my favorite part of the movie (aside from the tilda swinton section) was the beginning with the guy building the clock.
― akm, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
"earned" wtf
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
as in, i didn't care enough about any of the characters for it to seem any more than just... kinda spooky.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
it wasn't enough to convince me that this movie was about actual human beings and not CGI-matting technology.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
i mean this movie is basically the equivalent of a star wars prequel with a classy finish.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, the most interesting section of the entire film for me was the child-with-dementia angle. I was sort of disappointed that added up to about a minute and a half. I know stretching that out would've been unnecessarily painful, but I'd still prefer that to the crap about the buttons and the boat and the 10 minutes of Magnolia prologue leading up to Daisy's taxi cab accident.
― nu hollywood (Eric H.), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
the 10 minutes of Magnolia prologue leading up to Daisy's taxi cab accident
this was ridiculous - the whole "causality is crazy, man!" thing has been done to death so many times and HOW exactly was BB supposed to know all those details anyway!
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
i think we've done this and tho im a defender, i don't want to see it again too much. but i rarely agree w/ morbs and he is right about this.
i think the rainstorm katrina thing makes total sense. almost in a meta way: the film was set up for new orleans before katrina happened, and they worked it into the film. the meta thing being: david fincher is such a control freak, and his films are all "about letting go."
the whole "causality is crazy, man!" thing has been done to death so many times
maybe, but without such talent and shit? i thought fincher rocked it with that section anyway.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
The justification for the Katrina framing device is weird. The framing device was already in there (w/o the hurricane), Louisiana offered better tax breaks so they chose there over Maryland. Then Katrina happened as they were about to move the production down there, and they thought "how can we ignore this?" I'm not sure I would have found that device compelling without the hurricane, but with it it just feels really off balance and distracting. Like this very significant weather event is an important part of the film, rather than just something they thought was dramatic or cool and was there for people to make what they will of it.
― caek, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
The Sliding Doors thing is just completely anodyne and doesn't really make a point. Eric Roth's defence of it (apparently that and the lightning guy were the cuts suggested by the studio) was really unconvincing
― caek, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
fwiw i'm not mad at the katrina thing, i think it was a fine way to frame it
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)
i think SOMEBODY's been listening to the creative screenwriting podcasts!
anyway that sort of causality shit is pretty much late-night dorm room stoner conversation level at this point, along with "what if we all see colours differently?"
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:51 (sixteen years ago)
― s1ocki, Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:51 PM (2 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
WHAT IF WE DO THOUGH?
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
hi i read boing boing (and don't i actually mention that podcast somewhere on this thread?)
― caek, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
haha.
i listen to it too!
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
and HOW exactly was BB supposed to know all those details anyway!
jeezus, this is like "how does Gavin Elster know Scottie won't make it to the top of the tower"
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
i think it was the spielberg thread i mentioned it actually. it is a good interview.
b buttons is a really interesting film, and in my head i want to see it again, but i remember being so frustrated by it the first time. i will probably end up with the criterion version though.
― caek, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
well how was he! i don't mind plot inconsistencies if they don't jump out at me but this was big enough to be a distraction xp
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
the making-of, from what i saw of it, was actually a much better movie
Katrina brings the finality of destruction and oblivion, just faster than a natural lifespan does
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
I liked the Matt Zoller Seitz stuff you pasted upthread, Morbs, but the drama, speed, uniqueness, etc. of Katrina doesn't seem to fit in with that view to the extent that it ends up rather than adding to a film like the one Seitz is talking about.
― caek, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)
I thought Katrina made an old city young again.
― nu hollywood (Eric H.), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
ololo
(i meant to say "to the extent that it ends up _detracting_ rather than adding")
― caek, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)
the curious case of why is this fucking movie so slow
what the fuck
made it one hour in, i surrender
― GO THICK AMOS! (jjjusten), Friday, 13 November 2009 03:29 (sixteen years ago)
punk ass forrest gump leaning posing the amazing oh gee never heard it before "what if everyone other than you got old and died" philosophical immortality quandry PIECE OF SHIT
― GO THICK AMOS! (jjjusten), Friday, 13 November 2009 04:39 (sixteen years ago)
Made me more angry than any film I've seen since Requiem for a fucking Dream. Worthless, vapid, self-important GARBAGE of the most execrable sort. Go fucking die already.
― from alcoholism to fleshly concerns (contenderizer), Friday, 13 November 2009 05:22 (sixteen years ago)