Now we are provided hotpants and legs and shoes inspection as the woman grotesquely admires her assets.
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/lumps3.jpg
http://urbansemiotic.com/2007/04/06/a-meme-of-craven-semiotics-my-lovely-lady-lumps/
― Edward III, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)
love this guy
he has deconstructed the thorny knot of signifiers that is "my humps"
― Edward III, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
This is the kind of thread triggerhappy mods should be deleting, tbh
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
that's just a Feminist 101 reading of the song with semiotics terminology thrown in for effect
― amateurist, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)
Now the costumes change to reveal golden lumps hidden under the indicative innocence of baby blue hooker outfits. Touch the lumps. Pump up the lumps with the palms in beat with the music.
Dude, you are overthinking this...
― snoball, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)
it's the flat tone married to the disapproving stance that gets me
The true dyad of this Craven Semiotic Meme is finally revealed: The pimp and the whore.
― Edward III, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
now that is a suckass blog
― goole, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
he's like lacan wedged in jerry falwell's ass
― Edward III, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
It's like saying that Baccara's "Yes Sir, I Can Boogie" isn't about dancing. Yes, we know already...
― snoball, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know why it's amusing me so much
slow news day I guess
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/im_bored.gif
― Edward III, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
listen man y u gotta state the obvious when u get past her ET face her doodoomaker got it goin onnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
― Pooping Christ, Thursday, 17 July 2008 03:37 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ POSTER OF THE YEAR
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:14 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know who the woman in those pictures is, but she does look awfully attractive in some of them.
I don't know why the article repeatedly uses the word 'craven'. Maybe he's thinking of John Craven?
― the pinefox, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:40 (seventeen years ago)
Or Beverley Craven?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:41 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18fUkRuKXYc
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:42 (seventeen years ago)