who CARES who killed roger ackroyd?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Sherlock Holmes is a bore. Father Brown = pure Absence of Character as lit.devioce (the anti-Holmes), but he is the vector for Chesterton's topsyturvy romantic-populist-reactionary paradox horse-sense. I am ambivalent about Lord Peter Wimsey: Sayers has good observational judgment abt behaviour esp. among unhappy bohemians. Poirot and Marples I am indifferent too: Christie is said to have an excellent ear for subtleties of speech. Inspector Roderick Alleyn can FUCK OFF with his rubbish poetry (tho "Ngaio" is a nice name) and Adam Dalgliesh is WORSE. (Which one writes the poetry? Who CARES!!!)

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

do not read if you hate roderick alleyn

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

do not read if you value your sanity

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Didn't Chandler get it spot on abt English 'Detective' fiction (ie it's all cozy crap, basically)? It's semi-interesting the way that the confident, refined, Upper Class English Gent amateurs like Lord Peter gave way to the rumpled, baffled, flawed Morse types - English crime fic obsessed w/ class, American crime fic obsessed w/....?

Andrew L, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

no i don't buy that (well ok i sort of do, hence my ambivlance, but i have grown greatly to dislike chandler, who is much more noxiously cosy in his idiom and context [check out the stuff on black foax in FAREWELL MY LOVELY] than — ok surprise surprise – sayers is in hers... just finished WHOSE BODY in which LPW has a significant shellshock flashback (it's set in 1923 or so); i think sayers is really good, really perceptive, on the anomie and nihilism and sheer fractured unhappiness of her post-war generation... also good on women

chandler's "cosy" = it features believable women (unlike his) (lauren bacall = the traci lords of her day)

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Who Killed Roger Ackroyd? is a good book. Interesting though.

powertonevolume, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Does Chandler adhere to the Twenty Rules for Writing Detective Fiction, which the likes of Christie does (the premise of the Who Killed RA? Book).

powertonevolume, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Twenty Rules: http://gaslight.mtroyal.ab.ca/vandine.htm

powertonevolume, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Does Chandler adhere to the Twenty Rules?

No.

michael, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

michael, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it was m jemmeson in the kitchen with the italics

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

those rules really try and take all the interest out of the story, don't they? some of them make sense, but to say stuff like 'there should be no love interest' is just rubbish

michael, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Edmund Wilson: "I had often heard people say that Dorothy Sayers wrote well, and I felt that my correspondents had been playing her as their literary ace. But, really, she does not write very well: it is simply that she is more consciously literary than most of the other detective-story writers and that she thus attracts attention in a field which is mostly on a sub-literary level. In any serious department of fiction, her writing would not appear to have any distinction at all." (From: "Who Cares Who Killed Roger Ackroyd?")

The thing is, at this distance, some of the things I like about DLS are as much symptoms as intentions. She DOESN'T write especially well (by contrast, Chesterton is one the great English writers): she's more interesting - because she was there and because she was sharp — about the observed sociology of minor english art in the 1920s than she is on Art as Art.

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ngaio paints a bit like the panties-fall-down guy

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sherlock Holmes is a bore.

justify!

toby, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i love the stories but i find the character tiresome => brown is boring too as a character but he is mainly a mouthpiece for GKC who is anything but boring => wimsey is fascinating cuz of DLS's total crush on him, and her attempt (derailed of course because of the stuff that tumbles in with his being titled) to create a kind of jazz-age new man who disguises his hyper-intelligent super-sensitivity with mannered and flippant uber-woosterism

mark s, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i can kinda see what you mean (i thought you were saying that the stories were a bore which = mentalism), although i find holmes less a bore than somehow irrelevant - granted he is in no way real/human and not in an interesting way - but i don't really find that this gets in the way of the plot.

(also the showing-off deductions are a joy, to me at least)

so in what way is father brown the anti-holmes? are you suggesting that holmes = too much character??

toby, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Those categories are so deliciously anti-rockist, I think I'm in love.

Except they're rubbish, o.

Graham, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sherlock Holmes is a bore.

justify!

No, ancient.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what about Maigret?

I wuv father brown, but I don't think they're meant to be read as detective stories in the same way as the other writers here... I mean, there's one about robots for chrissake.

My favourite is 'The Honour of Israel Gow'. Very dour and scots.

misterjones, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah i tried maigret when i was too young (like 13 or 14) and nevah went back (wondering abt him — and othas i missed — is kinda why i started this thread)* => FB is the anti-holmes becuz he erm privileges (sorry i only just woke up) EMOTIONAL LOGIC not forensic deduction (eg in israel gow he points out how the same bunch of clues could produce five or six progressively more ludicrous solutions, if you don't include how people — well, how israel gow — might actually behave, and not behave)

*i also read a non-maigret simenon abt a man going through mid life crisis: he pisses in a bottle and the piss is full of little white bits so he throws the bottle into the street... i was not in fact ready for this kind of behaviour in tec novels aged 13 (tho this was not a tec novel, but whatevah)

mark s, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

chesterton uses the tec story the way oscar wilde uses the fairystory: discuss (well, no, don't discuss, just agree...)

mark s, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Chesterton totally breaks all those rules, so much so that the reader has absolutely no chance of working out who did it. however, since the stories are all about 5 pages long this doesn't matter at all, and there's a real 'wow!' moment when Father Brown explains all.

michael, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that's an important point. There is no way that you can work out whodunnit with FB - the ending is always an imaginative leap. So they aren't whodunnits. I think there's some expectation amongst readers of 'trad' tec fiction, esp british (love that 'cozy' description btw) that there should be enough in the text to decipher the culprit/ending, and that this is part of the experience. I'm not that keen on that kind of tec fiction - it's all a bit smug and self contained or summat. I do however like Maigret, and the Lieutenant Boruvka stories by Josef Skvorecký - also very downbeat. And I luuuurve FB but it's something else altogether.

misterjones, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah but you can't work out whodunnit in sherlock holmes either

in sayers you usually know whodunnit by about page five, you just don't know HOWdunnit (or why)?

it's interesting that ther formalisation of reader involvement — the whodunnit as riddle — actually makes them lamer rather than richer (not so much in the Edward Wilson "sub-literary" sense, or at least, by scaring up that tired old hare he's missing a better point, about success and failure in writing)

mark s, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what do people think of Margery Allingham? i've read some good books of hers, but some of them are absolutely nuts. you'd expect her to fit into the 'cosy' English style, and she does to an extent, but some of her stuff is totally loopy. i think 'Sweet Danger' was particularly 'whaaat???'

michael, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, 'whydunnits' and 'howdunnits' are good. there's a Ruth Rendell one where she says 'x killed y' in the very first sentence, and the rest of the book is finding out why.

michael, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate whodunnits because ultimately I DON'T CARE WHODUNNIT. I get sent massive amounts of crimfic at work and I wind up firing it into the bin or giving the gothy ones to my morbid co-worker Kate ('ooh, *cudgels* ').

Except for Sara Paretsky, who rocks.

suzy, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think that Holmes really fits into the cozy genre as we've been discussing it. It's seen as the thing that coined all those cliches but really it doesn't have very much in common with them, other than the fact that it's about catching a perpetrator of a crime.

misterjones, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ok but now we need to say who IS in the "cosy" genre: eg NOT conan doyle, chesterton, sayers (arguable), christie, simenon, allingham, rendell OR james?? surely that can't be right? esp. if wde hoof chandler INTO it as i am perversely inclined, along with that twee bastard mickey spillane

and do "cosy" and "the 20 rules" exactly overlap?

mark s, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to love all crimefic when I was a kid -- from about the ages of 8 to probably 14. I think I read every Agatha Christie book, but I liked Holmes as well. And some others, like Ed McBain. Lots of police procedurals.

I don't have anything against them, but I can't say that I've read anything like that in years.

Nicole, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well I'd be inclined to stick Christie/Poirot in the cosy box. But I suspect that's just because I don't really like them. I do like Holmes though. Geek with muscles = My Hero.

Sam, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I fink 20 rules = cosy, and smug, and the formalisation of reader involvement — the whodunnit as riddle = cosy. Basically whodunnit = cozy

everything else = notsocozy.

Myself I lead towards the notsocozy.

misterjones, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that barely made sense.

misterjones, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Cosy" is a bit of a critical non-word, no? It has the same kind of critic-flattering function as "safe" in pop music writing. ("Safe" in the not-dangerous sense, not the Paolo Hewitt sense).

Tom, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Can cosy = return to status quo at the end of the book. Since it is not the crime which destabilises the world of the the book but the fact that it is unsolved. The fact that the crime can actually change the world of the characters is rarely broached. Equally the lack of character development of the lead 'tec though there are a number of books about them leaves me wholly unengaged.

COmpare this to McBain's police proceedurals where the detectives in the precinct have grown older, married, died etc etc. While the crimes are often very interesting, I go back to see what has happened to the characters.

Pete, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, in ackshewl publishing, 'cosy crime' as genre is in the Murder, She Wrote vein. You know: small village, tweeds and tartans, some evidence of class system, yada yada.

suzy, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oooh I just remembered Josephine Tey - 'The Franchise Affair' and 'Daughter of Time' - best English female crime novs that I've ever read.

Andrew L, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Poe has taught us it is always the orangutang wot done it.

Bob Zemko, Friday, 5 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ok i just THE NINE TAILORS which i think i nevah read before: at the time i was uber-consuming dls it was the one i had seen recentist on TV (ian carmichael = wubb wimsey) so i did not bothah... => anyway i discovered something top!! NT = DLS's erm "rewrite" of M.R.James's :"The Treasure of Abbot Thomas" => the "evil bell" in NT — it has killed two men — is called "Batty Thomas" after the unpleasant priest who had it cast, Abbot Thomas, and the central mystery is solved by a code involving three quotes from the bible...

DLS was a known expert on James, and also Sheridan Lefanu => she had grisly gothic darkness deep in her soul. Climax of NT = a mruderous fenland flood and wimsey trapped in the belfry under SONIC ATTACK!! "Cosy": pshaw....

mark s, Sunday, 7 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Funny thing about Christie, reading over this thread -- my mom is a big fan of the books, but growing up it was actually the films and TV productions that caught my attention most, and to this day I've only read a couple of the original books. At their best, the various 70s and 80s variations on the source material captured a bemusing blend of elegant nostalgia and puzzle. Even though David Suchet's performances I think rank for many (including my mom) as *the* Poirot interpretation, my fave filming is still Peter Ustinov in Evil Under the Sun. It's just a lovely film to look at, really, thanks to a flat out gorgeous Mediterrenean setting, and the conceit of using Cole Porter tunes throughout as a motif further helps capture a whole 30s setting that could afford to steer clear of both the Depression and fascism -- if only for a while. The casting balance as compared to Orient Express (Finney was great, to be sure) and Death on the Nile is much improved as well -- first time I ever saw Jane Birkin, Sylvia Miles and Diana Rigg in anything, for a start! -- while Guy Hamilton made for a great director. It's a romp, it has lots of fun humor without losing sight of seriousness too much, and I've watched it more times than I count.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
may need to start(revive?) a mystery thread but to focus on Ned's last post, seeing a review on Popmatters about a Agatha Christie box reminded me of how uch i loved the books and the films as a kid. the box reviewed did not appeal (http://www.popmatters.com/tv/reviews/a/agatha-christie-megaset.shtml) but it did give me some info i did not have abt all the different porots.

but even as a kid i remember being amazed at the starstudded casts of the christie films, what was it - a cousin of the 70s disaster films (the only comparable thing in terms of huge all star casts, execpt those mainly took the opportunity to abuse their stars) or an attempt to go back to Grand Hotel style filmmakig and also by revisiting the time period, let stars feel like Stars and look all glamorous and shit.

the casts are insane, just the mid 70s thru late 70s major Christie movies have in Death on the Nile
Peter Ustinov, Bette Davis, Mia Farrow, Angela Lansbury, David Niven, Maggie Smith (as just a few)

Murder on Orient Express (probably my fav)
Albert Finney Lauren Bacall, Ingrid Bergman, Jacqueline Bisset, Sean Connery, John Gielgud, Wendy Hiller, Anthony Perkins, Vanessa Redgrave, Richard Widmark, Michael York

(btw, how come jane birkin was in 3 or so christie movies?)

H (Heruy), Monday, 31 May 2004 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Because she's Jane Goddamn Birkin.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)

ah, of course

H (Heruy), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah jane is still hotttttt
even after all these years
france must keep ya young

Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.