― geeta, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jeff W, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel --, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I often have the tv on w/ the sound off so that I can listen to music at the same time. Ceefax subtitles are gd, too.
― Andrew L, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Does that make me a bad person?
― Mark C, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
^ no 1stborn, you can't watch simpsons cuz im watchin EDEN with Lily uuuummmmmmmmm ^
^jez^ bowen has a tache - that bill guy is fuckin kreepy, sian an sophie should lez up
― a-33, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― wouldn't have it in the house, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― RickyT, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Tonight there is a fight between Cutting It - described this morning as BBC's answer to Footballers Wives! - and I Saw You = no doubt terribly smug & punchable 30 something horror but as I head that way myself I need all the help I can get.
Tonights TV looks rub - I'm going to see a Mexican Sex Comedy instead. See my notes on TV on the other rival TV thread for further thoughts on this.
― Pete, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Footballers WIves= illusive attractive bimbos with unreachable lifestyle.
Hairdressers=Skanks who have crap hair themselves, overcharge you and don't do what you ask them to, wrinkly fingers and thoroughly reachable lifestyle.
I think that's the point the bBC is missing. But I could be wrong (however Charlies Angels style billboard ad is horrifically poor).
― Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But it could be GRATE.
― mark s, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But I am reseving my right constantly here to be very, very wrong.
― Tom, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
The adverts for Cutting It has the tagline "Rivals at work and in love" - with what I presume to be our two rival salon owners and the man in the middle. The idea that this advert is putting out is that this will be a steamy, contemporary sexual drama (something the BBC has not of late excelled at), and that it will have a considerable amount of plot regarding the business rivalry. Whilst rivalry in any contexts will set up the necessary conflict - the business rivalry that appears to being set up looks particularly false (is the world of hairdressing that dog eat dog).
Programmes are rarely solely about characters - because events and situation will inform and push the characters into conflict and action. I am suggesting that the situation alone does not appear promising. (The situation in Footballers Wives looked promising, and was then improved upon by bonkahs scriptwriting).
Oh, and last word on Clocking Off - even the title suggested that this was about what happened when they are not working. Cutting It suggests the opposite (and is a rubbish play on words too).
― alext, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
1) It makes me laugh. This is a good start, when even Frasier etc. just makes me snicker, chortle, or smile amusedly with a seen-it-all air.
2) It used the phrase 'bum-love' which is just funny.
3) I like the idea that they are trying to do an affectionate portrait of non-middle class young people -- ie they are not students as set out in last week's episode -- and absolutely failing.
4) The characters are quite sweet and cuddley, even when trying to be laddish.
5) I quite fancy the blonde one.
6) They go down the pub the WHOLE TIME as if this was in itself enough of a gimmick to define the sitcom as in some way original, but probably only means it was written by some media-tossbag who has never been in a pub (how quaint) or watched Men Behaving Badly.
― chris, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― maryann, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nathalie, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― di, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
it was brought home to me when one sunday morning recovering from a particularly vicious evening's substance abuse somewhere in greenwich's halls of residence, we sat through a feature length mcguyver (spelling?!). mcguyver and the lost city i believe it was. anyway when the final credits rolled my dear friend guy said, "you know, the worst thing about that is that is two hours of my life i'm never going to get back."
but of course without it we would never have had the line "motherfucker's like mcguyver, no, motherfucker's *better* than mcguyver!". awesome.
― another james, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i am thee playbwoy ov tha westrn whurld
― a-33, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark C, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― maura, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alan Trewartha, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)