Conversely, have you ever caught yourself basing career choices on the basis of what might be a chick/guy
― N., Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― chris, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mark C, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Of course, I'm now single and unemployed :-)
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Sleeping with people of the same job type just leads to gossip, talk and reputations.
― Anna, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Having said that, I've always wanted to meet a nice librarian.
― emil.y, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I am afraid I have not changed since age 16 on these issues, see above.
On my own career choice, it gives access to a large number of single males, most of them scoring very low in sex appeal. However, it has the advantage of impressing social science/arts/fashion graduates very easily.
― Arantxa, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Emma, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Other than that, it doesn't matter an awful lot to me. My boyfriend is a 3D artist/animator; it's nice to be with someone who is creative and has an artistic sensibility, but if he were doing something else I wouldn't think any less of him.
And Chris, depending on where you work librarians can get paid a lot - - there was a job I really really wanted to interview for (but didn't because I didn't have my degree yet) that started at $70,000.
― Nicole, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Archel, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I'm a vaguely nice library assistant, so there's that. ;-) I guess I could apply to library school if I ever wanted to, but the problem is I've had enough of grad school and just don't want to go back.
The larger question -- heavens, it doesn't matter to me. The person not the job is important, and one can work an on the face of it boring job and be utterly captivating. :-) I guess my only thought, as was muttered on the financial 'mine'/'yours'/'ours' thread, is that it's better for both sides to have their own approach/source of income/whatever, and that if there's a major joint purchase that's needed, the split should be based on who could afford more. But I'm speaking from the 'as yet to regularly live with anyone' perspective. :-/
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The easiest way around this is to get married. "Your" money automatically becomes "our" money.
― Dan Perry, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Queen G, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mandee, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― PM, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jel --, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Ideally my partner should be a major pop star with a vast fortune and enormous sex appeal and an interesting mind. Anyone know if Madonna's fallen out with Guy yet?
― Martin Skidmore, Thursday, 25 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― misterjones, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jel --, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The people I know who actually work in libraries but don't have degrees have a lot more knowledge and experience with how to deal with things than most of the people in my classes.
― Nicole, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ronan, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Billy Dods, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I can't see much in the way of stock options there.
Nicole and Ned are OTM re: Librarians!
― Dan Perry, Friday, 26 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― chris, Saturday, 27 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
FWIW, that sums up a unhealthy percentage of the NYC legal profession in between the ages 25-40. Not including the frustrated filmmakers, actors, and writers.
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Saturday, 27 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― PM, Saturday, 27 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 03:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 10 March 2003 03:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 March 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 08:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)
I agree that certain occupations are more sexy, and that yes, it changes with age, as most (non?-)superficial attaction criteria change with age.
I'm thinking about the competency issue. I don't think how *much* a bloke earns is really that much of a consideration for me - so long as he *has* a job, really. (Bitter after the two years with the trustafarian artist, moi?)
I think, though, in all honestly, if it was a choice, I'd go for someone who was actually *happier* and more content with his job (even if it was lower paid) than someone who had a job they hated, regardless of how much it paid. Less wear and tear on a person and therefore their relationship.
― Paranoid Spice (kate), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:40 (twenty years ago)
At least not in my hearing.
― Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)
(Data Analyst it wasn't)
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:45 (twenty years ago)
i don't care about the job of a significant other, but i worry that working at a stupid and unproductive job making decent money but not inspiring me or using my brain at all makes me significantly less attractive.
― carly (carly), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:45 (twenty years ago)
I mean, hair colour, eye colour, pointiness of nose are also silly things to think of as criteria, but my libido can't help what it is.
― Paranoid Spice (kate), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)
― Paranoid Spice (kate), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:50 (twenty years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)
Maybe take up a needle craft?
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)
ooh, aldo, are you an efficient and ruthless killing machine?
― carly (carly), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)
― Paranoid Spice (kate), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)
― Paranoid Spice (kate), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)
x-post to myself
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
Haha in mine neither! I'd have noticed. It's a pretty vague term though, probably encompassing wildly divergent types of jobs, so surely that's why it's hard to single out (as opposed to eg "bus driver", "biographer of footballers" or "archbishop")?
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)
― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)