http://www.zazzle.com/mensrightsguy
― go read a blog you illiterate son of a bitch (internet person), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago)
"I hate feminist"
"Also: grammar"
― Black Seinfeld (HI DERE), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago)
Those pink swastikas sure add a nice touch.
― afin d’y être sublime sans interruption (Michael White), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago)
the extra bits on the lady swastika don't match up. there must be some symbolism to that.
― as a dude (goole), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
no comments :(
Yeah, the bar on the bottom-most 'F' is too near the center.
― afin d’y être sublime sans interruption (Michael White), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
family love feminist
― :) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago)
i need one of those shirts
― schwww im tired (harbl), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
a activist anti antimale bumper clinton equal feminazi feminism feminist group hate hillary i mens misnadry parenting rights stand sticker up
― as a dude (goole), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago)
We need to email mensrightsguy and ask him to customise a shirt with both "We hate feminist" and the faulty swastika on it
― country matters, Monday, 1 December 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago)
working on it, should be available next week.
― mensrightsguy (internet person), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
...
There are two of them on the page.
srsly, if you're going to laugh at someone for being a dumbass, try not to be a dumbass yourself.
― Black Seinfeld (HI DERE), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:46 (sixteen years ago)
sorry, THREE of them
dear self, take yr own damn advice
the feminazis and our matriarchal governments.Thursday, July 19, 2007Moved to WordpressI have moved my blog to wordpress since apparently they still believe in free speech and I refuse to support blogger anymore since they believe in censorship of any opinion that opposes feminism.
http://truthformen.wordpress.com/
Give me some time to move my articles and make a few updates since unlike modern american whores like Paris HIlton I have a job and a life.
It really is sad and EXCRUCIATINGLY pathetic for feminists and left-wing nutjobs to try and silence any opposing voice.
Why not engage in a healthy debate or a discussion?
Well the reason is that once the facts are revealed to the general public the feminazis and ultra-liberals will be the butts of every joke.
This is much the same as fem-bot bingo that us MRAs enjoy playing.
Basically any time one of us would challenge feminist policies such as murder of children or extermination of men we don't receive a debate, rather we get made fun of.
In essence feminists, Islamofascists and the like are all just a bunch of spoiled rotten little children that pout and cry and whine when they are put on the spot.
They can't handle a good debate, or anyone with an IQ over 75, so they try to silence.
The fairness doctrine is trying to do just that by trying to silence conservative talk radio in the US.
Fairness is having an unbiased media, not silencing the opposition.
While I surely disagree with feminists and their ilk, I would never try to silence them, since I am a patriot and champion of people's rights above all.
― mensrightsguy (internet person), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago)
Categories
* alimony (1) * american woman (5) * Anna Nicole (1) * arsenic (1) * bastard children (1) * blasphemy (1) * Chameleon (1) * child support (1) * Chrisitian (1) * christian (1) * Church (1) * civilization (1) * crucifix (1) * divorce (1) * Don't ask don't tell (1) * DUI (1) * Emotion (1) * equality (1) * fake (1) * feminism (3) * food (1) * General Pace (1) * gold digger (2) * homicide (1) * homosexuals (1) * hypocrites (1) * insanity (1) * interest level (1) * liar (1) * Logic (1) * madonna (1) * makeup (1) * Marines (1) * marriage (1) * Men (3) * mental (1) * MRA (1) * murder (1) * myspace (1) * Oprah (1) * Paternity (1) * princess (1) * Reasoning (1) * responsibility (1) * shelter (1) * Single mother (3) * slut (1) * society (1) * Success (1) * trump card (1) * Uncategorized (132) * water (1) * whore (5) * woman-only (1) * Women (1) * work (1)
If only I could work out if he had some of agenda.
― Holden McGroin (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago)
some KIND of agenda
― Holden McGroin (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago)
Screwed that up didn't I? Typical liberal feminist commie.
Feminist Hate You
― Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago)
doesn't a whore by definition have a job?
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
I saw an interesting commercial on network TV while excercising at the gym, it was for a Helmet heroes by Playskool. Seems innocent enough at the surface, but when you look a little deeper, it is very disturbing. The commerical is of a little boy wearing a police helmet pulling his father over and placing him in jail. I guess they need to start the HItler Obama youth early and teach them that Dad is bad and needs to be punished.
― atty at LOL (Jenny), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
OH GOD EVEN BETTER:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1087092/Oops--Female-astronaut-loses-tool-bag-Shuttle-spacewalk.html?ITO=1490While I am sure that this may not be the first incident of lost tools in space, I am sure a man somewhere has lost something in space, the manner in which the tools were lost is pretty stupid.
While I am sure that this may not be the first incident of lost tools in space, I am sure a man somewhere has lost something in space, the manner in which the tools were lost is pretty stupid.
― atty at LOL (Jenny), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago)
A woman stupidly lost a tool in space, and therefore he hate feminist. IT IS ALL LOGICAL.
Why did I click that link????
― atty at LOL (Jenny), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago)
need to pimp my own thread:
committed anti-feminists are among the creepiest people alive imo
― joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago)
this dude is a class act:
http://truthformen.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/the-1-rule-in-dating-dont-waste-your-time-with-someone-that-doesnt-want-to-be-with-you/
Second, if you find yourself in a situation where the woman gives you hints of not being that into you, ie low interest level, then save yourself time and money and get out. No amount of flowers, mixed tapes or CDs with love songs, fancy dinners etc will fix that and “make” her like you. In fact these techniques do just the OPPOSITE.
Unlike what your mommy told you, this technique has no basis in logic. Most women want a challenge, they don’t want a nice guy pushover. Even though Oprah says that women want men to open up to them, women don’t want this. They would rather have a guy bend them over a table and fuck them in the ass than a nice guy getting them flowers. Sure women love flowers, and there are proper times to get them, just not how most men have been brainwashed into believing.
I will compare woman here to a young child, since today’s feminasties have basically regressed to this mental state.
― joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago)
Well one thing to look for is a lack of physical closeness. Women have this uncanny nature to really let you know they have low interest level in you. A classic example is the “born-again virgin” tactic. This is used time and time again by women who have had many partners before, but just refuse to have sex with you. Some women do this because they have been fucked so many times they actually start to feel guilty about it and thus they pursue a nice guy that does nothing for them, but Oprah tells them that they should date. Women are far more sexual than men, they were designed that way. Ask yourself this, if Brad Pitt, or whomever is their hunk of choice came by, would they sleep with him? Aha, see my point, they are really only being a born-again virgin with you. Some women do it so that they don’t have to make up excuses when they are dating you and don’t want to go any farther than simply kissing or fondling.
― joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago)
Want to get more sex in your marriage than you ever have? Then start saying NO. No to being used as the romantic tampon, no to being used as the emotional tampon, and no to being used as the sucker.
Want to control the access to sex rather than have her control the access to sex, deny her. Our culture does nothing but emasculate men and teaches them to put women on a pedestal. You are better than that, if women are supposed to be your equal, why do you treat them better than your guy friends?
A guy doesn’t buy his buddy beers for no reason, he gets them if his buddy helped him move or helped him fix something or otherwise did something of value for him. So why do men continue to operate with the notion that they should buy women’s affection?
^^ wow you're a sociopath asshole, congratulations
― joule kilcher (goole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
You know, going out on a limb here, I think he may just have had some problems with women in the past.
― Holden McGroin (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago)
A romantic tampon?
― Holden McGroin (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago)
just say no
― Not in top 100,000 (haitch), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago)
I Hate Romantic
― Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago)
okay has anyone already changed their handle to "the romantic tampon" or what
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago)
No.
― Not me I'm the Emotional Type (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago)