Religions - Search/Destroy

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Basically, are all Religions equally good/bad, or are some Religions better than others? More pertinently, are some Religions more reprehensible than others?

Is it acceptable to say of a Religion that you think it's a load of rubbish, or has very bad social effects, or whatever?

DV, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, yes (on a subjective scale). Yes.

Yes, yes, yes (whatever the whatever is).

Pete, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what pete said

Alan T, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the point where religions diminish social freedoms is where the line is crossed for me. i have no time for any religion, but if people want to whatever thats fine with me, but not when others freedoms come into question. to me it seems all religions seem to cross this line at some point. so i have no problems with being anti-religious. and i have no problems with expressing anti-religious views

gareth, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Religion is good for rich people but the poor should be kept away from it at all costs

dave q, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

salute the dawning of the age of aquarius

mark s, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dave Q = Karl Marx!!!!

RickyT, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

search: being a hippy which is not so much a religion, more like a way of life. destroy: man, don't destroy anything. peace and love all round sez i ;)

katie, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

All the major religions are in some way bad as they all involve denial of the body and/or grant a certain "chosen people" status to their practitioners (can you spell disaster--yes you can it's spelled M-A-N-I-F-E-S-T D-E-S-T-I-N-Y).

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

obviously all religions bar Tobism are false, and make their practitioners look stupid.

DV, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

DestroyDestroyDestroy!

I suggest reading Philip Pullman's wonderful recent His Dark Materials trilogy. It's marketed at kids, and one central theme is that religion, even if it is all true (as it is in this fantasy world), is still a very bad thing.

Martin Skidmore, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

From the Catholic forum: "It is very interesting at times to listen to the thoughts of an athiest as Freud was one until nearing the end of his life when he began to truly question. His work " Totem and Taboo " gives great insight."

-- Jean Bouchard (jeanb@cwk.imag.net), March 17, 2002.

kiwi, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Some are probably more reprehensible by conventional western standards, and I presume it works the other way aswell.

Is it acceptable to say of a Religion that you think it's a load of rubbish, or has had very bad social effects, or whatever?

I think, in Ireland for example it would be really easy to say this, and I hear it all the time, having done about 3 weeks of seminars about Religion in Sociology. But UNUSUALLY FOR ME(ahem) I'd blame the society in general which accomodated a Catholic Church which operated the way it did.

I think it's pretty absurd when you have all these fucking arty types blaming religion for wars and things. I mean give humans some credit! We could have and always would have found something else to cause wars over.

Ronan, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's an entirely subjective question. Religion is just there, and always will be as long as people feel the need to name and define something "other" in their existence. I agree with Ronan though, it's not religion which causes is suffering, it's people.

Matt Fallaize, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it's pretty absurd when you have all these fucking arty types blaming religion for wars and things. I mean give humans some credit! We could have and always would have found something else to cause wars over.

fair point, I reckon atheists like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Genghis Khan & Pol Pot have racked up much higher body counts than any religious fanatic, and not just because there was more people they could kill.

my basic point in this thread: you often hear people talk about Islam as though it is some kind of especially "bad" religion - generally illiberal, sexist, homophobic, etc. What I'm asking is firstly, can we talk about religions like that, attempting to say that some are nicer than others? Secondly, are the kind of points people make against Islam in any way justifiable, or are they comments that could be made against all religions?

DV, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Search: Greek Orthodox! An hour and a half of chanting in various cool modes supplimented by hymns and responses. Also, doing that was the highest-paying substitute-gig I've ever gotten.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's in the way they present themselves. The problem with Islam is it seems so desperate and needy, like a stalker who turns violent if you don't pay attention, they're forever bitching and moaning. Christianity is like a lovable bastard in comparison. Buddhism is like somebody who everyone thinks is deep and profound when they're really just catatonic.

dave q, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

so, Quakers then...

Alan T, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

was genghis khan an atheist? i find this highly unlikely...

mark s, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I put Genghis Khan in for the laugh. He prolly wasn't an atheist. But he was in no sense motivated by religion either. He did get a load of religious types to come and talk to him late in life when he went through a "all I seem to do is kill... there must be more to life" phase.

Nixon was a Quaker.

DV, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

To be a Quaker who would have to act like a Quaker, particapte in their goals et. al. Nixon didnt do that.
Now Religions- I think alot of people need a mould to guide the mystries, a place to put their mythologies-sometimes it manages to do that and therefore it is worth it for those who particapte in it.

anthony, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If we believe that they are all bollocks and therefore scientifically equal, and they mostly propose sound morals with some aberrations, and there's not too much to choose between them on these grounds, we can try aesthetics. The Hindus have the best stories, for me. The Bhagavad-Ghita and Ramayana are like superhero stories, with lots of top fight scenes and stuff.

Martin Skidmore, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I suggest reading Philip Pullman's wonderful recent His Dark Materials trilogy. It's marketed at kids, and one central theme is that religion, even if it is all true (as it is in this fantasy world), is still a very bad thing.

I was just thinking about those books today because I'm reading the Aeneid and in Book VI it unexpectedly gets interesting because Aeneas goes into the underworld. T are definite differences between the Aeneid and The Amber Spyglass but I think Pullman must have drawn a lot from it because of the similarity in style between the scenes in both books. And this is the only interesting part of the Aeneid and I'm very excited! Er, thank you.

In answer to your questions, sure it's acceptable, but saying that is the same as belonging to one religion and saying all others are wrong. If I was religious that's probably what I'd think, so I'm not saying thinking you're Absolutely Right is bad, but that IS what you're doing.

Maria, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

my basic point in this thread: you often hear people talk about Islam as though it is some kind of especially "bad" religion - generally illiberal, sexist, homophobic, etc. What I'm asking is firstly, can we talk about religions like that, attempting to say that some are nicer than others? Secondly, are the kind of points people make against Islam in any way justifiable, or are they comments that could be made against all religions?

I'm not particularly religious myself, so I can't say destroy them, in all honesty. If it comforts you, it's all good.

However, I think that the mentalists find them too easy to hide behind. For example, Islam isn't worse than any other. Right now, it's cool to say that it causes terrorists to wage war. By most accounts, it is a peaceful one. It's not Islam that caused events like 11th September to happen; it was the 19 men themselves.

Nichole Graham, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Maria, the Aeneid VI is the BEST BOOK BY FAR!! Some of the language — the stuff about how horrible war is basically — is terrific!! Of course Virgil is saying war is horrible so be happy when Rome conquers you because you will have peace, which was doubtless not how (for example) the Carthaginians or the Jews saw it...

mark s, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've always had the idea the Aeneid is NO GOOD when compared to the Iliad and Odyssey. Partly it's just a rip off of them, and partly it's more mediated - Virgil is self consciously trying to create epic poetry rather than just getting on with it.

but anyway, religion... maybe we could do this like in Duel. which is the worse religion, Islam or Asatru?

DV, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

DV: true except for BOOK VI which is GRATE!!

mark s, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I haven't read the Iliad or the Odyssey but as books VII through XII are all about bloody wars in Latium I'm agreeing with Mark: Book VI is the best!

Maria, Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

DV: true except for BOOK VI which is GRATE!!

yeah, but that's a rip off of when Odyseus goes to the underworld.

DV, Thursday, 9 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I did the part which begins with Aeneas telling Dido about WoodenHoursegate. I thought it was pretty entertaining, though having to learn it all off by heart in English with a psychotic teacher made it less so. In the end the exam was ten days after all my others and I wasn't motivated and left it after an hour to go and celebrate no more school forever.

Ronan, Thursday, 9 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The problem with Islam is it seems so desperate and needy, like a stalker who turns violent if you don't pay attention, they're forever bitching and moaning.

I think this is a cruel misrepresentation of Islam. on what basis do you make this comment?

DV, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Search: Egyptian Coptic Church, Jainism, Polynesian tribalists, New England Unitarians, Shinto, Aboriginal songlines, Pentecostal serpent handlers.

Destroy: Southern Baptists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Wahhabism, The Nation of Islam, Hollywood kabbalists, Scientology, and most, not all, fundamentalist interpretations.

bryan, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

are Hollywood Kabbalists that bad?

DV, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

anyway, I'm a Shia man myself.

I wonder is there some way of merging the Church of England with Shia?

DV, Tuesday, 14 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.