Stanley Fish's Best Ten American Movies Ever

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/the-10-best-american-movies/

None of these films would make my ten, but I figured I'd make it a poll anyway.

Poll Results

OptionVotes
Vertigo (1958) 19
Groundhog Day (1993) 13
Double Indemnity (1944) 10
Sunset Blvd. (1950) 8
The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) 3
Meet Me in St. Louis (1944) 3
Raging Bull (1980) 3
Red River (1948) 1
Shane (1953) 1
A Tree Grows in Brooklyn (1945) 0


Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.theu.com/images/celebs/insurance_agent_ned.gif

what U cry 4 (jim), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

Alex the SF Vertigo Heretic!

Dr Morbius, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

Probly Double Indemnity out of those, however huge a Hitchcock fanboy I am.

Birth Control to Ginger Tom (Noodle Vague), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:02 (seventeen years ago)

Vertigo and Double Indemnity would be the closest.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

I also like Shane and Red River, but seriously come on. Also worst Kazan pick ever.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:05 (seventeen years ago)

I never get Raging Bull being one of the only modern classics. Maybe I should see it again. Never seen it with sound quality high enough to follow all the dialogue easily.

Eazy, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

when I see Fish on campus, I'm going to jump on his face and yell, 'SHAAAA-NNNE!'

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

Out of these, Vertigo wins hands down. St. Louis a strong runner up.

Eric H., Monday, 5 January 2009 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

I think when you see him on campus you should beat the shit out of him for having impure thoughts about Cathy Moriarity.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

I don't understand the Raging Bull love either. It's maybe Scorsese's fifth or sixth best movie.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:14 (seventeen years ago)

Second ten's a little more interesting, in both senses.

Eric H., Monday, 5 January 2009 18:14 (seventeen years ago)

let me guess: dude spent a lot of time at the movies as a kid, was stuck in a shitty marriage in 1980, then had a midlife crisis around '93.

i voted red river.

BONMOT (☪), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

lol @ ignoring 30s & 70s

buzza, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:16 (seventeen years ago)

let me guess: dude spent a lot of time at the movies as a kid, was stuck in a shitty marriage in 1980, then had a midlife crisis around '93.

Uh, hello, he's a Milton expert!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

"Second ten's a little more interesting, in both senses."

True.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

quiz show in his top 20, oy

buzza, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

I like Raging Bull and Groundhog Day just fine, but don't think of them as the two best American films of the last 50 years.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:31 (seventeen years ago)

Groundhog Day

ilx chilton (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:35 (seventeen years ago)

Best comment:

"50. As a 26 year old Minnesotan, I am absolutely astonished as to how my personal top 10 aligns with this list."

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:40 (seventeen years ago)

how many of us have seen A Tree Grows in Brooklyn? not me.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:41 (seventeen years ago)

It's the only one I haven't seen either. Right now I'd watch Meet Me in St Louis over Double Indemnity.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)

I saw it ages ago. It's good, but compared to A Face In The Crowd or On The Waterfront? Gimme a break.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)

I voted for the one I've seen.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:44 (seventeen years ago)

You've only seen one of these?

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:47 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, I've only seen one of these movies in its entirety ("Vertigo", which I love). I've seen parts of "Sunset Blvd", "Raging Bull" and "Groundhog Day".

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

Should I rewatch Best Years of Our Lives. I saw that when I was like 12-13 and my memories are fuzzy at best.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:52 (seventeen years ago)

I've only seen three of these.

nabisco, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:56 (seventeen years ago)

I was going to see Shane, but there are total spoilers at the end of that one Samuel Jackson police movie

nabisco, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:56 (seventeen years ago)

Double Indemnity is the only one of these on my personal 10 so it's the one for which I voted. Also lol @ nabisco having seen The Negotiator starring Samuel L. Jackson and Kevin Spacey.

stop HOOSing a boring tuna (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 5 January 2009 18:58 (seventeen years ago)

Shane is one of those movies you have to accept now seems a) really dated and b) really predictable.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 18:59 (seventeen years ago)

We have to accept those facts or we have to accept the movie itself?

ilx chilton (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:00 (seventeen years ago)

Well if you are going to watch it now and attempt to enjoy it, I think you have to accept that. I think you also have to accept that people who first saw it and loved it in 1953 were watching a different movie.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:02 (seventeen years ago)

It's not a great film either way, but it's better if you don't nitpick it's more cliche and dated elements (which is probably true of all old movies, I guess.)

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:04 (seventeen years ago)

I generally tend to like old movies whose cliche/dated elements have become charming or mysterious or even campy

nabisco, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:11 (seventeen years ago)

afaik this entering into the spirit of the '50s audience, which I heartily endorse, would best be done with the eighty or so '50s westerns that are better than Shane.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:14 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, but there is a kind of nuance going on here. This isn't the kind of "seems dated to people used to watching contemporary movies, but once you get into the style you won't worry and be charmed and perhaps even prefer this type of movie" this is the kind of "50s not as good as the 40s society changing studio system competing with television and slowly falling apart" dated.
(xpost)

ilx chilton (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

Ha, Morbius otm.

ilx chilton (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

I.e., not a matter of aesthetics, just a matter of sucking?

nabisco, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:17 (seventeen years ago)

"afaik this entering into the spirit of the '50s audience, which I heartily endorse, would best be done with the eighty or so '50s westerns that are better than Shane."

Okay eighty seems like too many.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, not like "Why are those chappies bursting into song all of the sudden?"

ilx chilton (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:19 (seventeen years ago)

ahem The Searchers

stop HOOSing a boring tuna (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 5 January 2009 19:21 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't say ONE seemed like too many.

Alex in SF, Monday, 5 January 2009 19:27 (seventeen years ago)

never heard of the guy, like his list though (any list that includes Beast Years of Our Lives) (so that gets my vote, obviously, off to find out what Shane, River, Louis and Brooklyn are all about)

Ludo, Monday, 5 January 2009 20:35 (seventeen years ago)

Beast years heh.

so Shane and River are westerns, I'll add A Tree Grows in Brooklyn to my watch-list.

Ludo, Monday, 5 January 2009 20:41 (seventeen years ago)

Weird list. Fetishizes the weakest era of American film.

M.V., Monday, 5 January 2009 23:39 (seventeen years ago)

the 1940s was the weakest era of american film?

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 04:08 (seventeen years ago)

Late 40s and 50s.

M.V., Tuesday, 6 January 2009 04:33 (seventeen years ago)

The 50s sucked for American film? News to me.

Eric H., Tuesday, 6 January 2009 04:51 (seventeen years ago)

when I see Fish on campus, I'm going to jump on his face and yell, 'SHAAAA-NNNE!'

― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, January 5, 2009 1:10 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

loooooool

negotiable, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 12:16 (seventeen years ago)

everybody needs to see double indemnity!!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 12:17 (seventeen years ago)

this is a mediocre list.

special guest stars mark bronson, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 12:21 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Saturday, 24 January 2009 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

"No Deer Hunter?" I know that's what my dad would say. Raging Bull was/is an awesome movie. I also never understood why many vote Killing of a Chinese Bookie. Can someone explain this to me? I liked the movie, but never understood why some automatically drool at the mere mention of said film. Anyhow, I voted RB.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Saturday, 24 January 2009 13:17 (seventeen years ago)

Shit, maybe I should have picked Vertigo. Hmm. Too late now.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Saturday, 24 January 2009 13:18 (seventeen years ago)

I also never understood why many vote Killing of a Chinese Bookie. Can someone explain this to me?

seymour cassel and ben grazza and the enitre sequence where cosmo breaks into the chinese dude's place and the gambling and comso getting kicked out by his girlfriend's mother it breaks your heart

Lamp, Saturday, 24 January 2009 13:38 (seventeen years ago)

afaik this entering into the spirit of the '50s audience, which I heartily endorse, would best be done with the eighty or so '50s westerns that are better than Shane.

srsly. Shane and not The Searchers? Feh.

J0hn D., Saturday, 24 January 2009 13:49 (seventeen years ago)

i almost died of boredom during 'bookie' and i think cassavetes is usually ok.

it's not only a bad list but a badly reasoned one.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 24 January 2009 14:12 (seventeen years ago)

ilx poster special guest stars mark bronson, are you actually leslie halliwell?

Lamp, Saturday, 24 January 2009 14:18 (seventeen years ago)

no.

halliwell would approve of this list, no? middlebrow fare.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 24 January 2009 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

cassavetes is not exactly middlebrow, insofar as lots of highbrows like him. cult o' primitivism thing? his shtick seems to be 'anti-intellectual'.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 24 January 2009 15:46 (seventeen years ago)

Vertigo for me with Double Indemnity a close second, because the fucked-ness of glamour and stardom and money is even more salient in the Hitch film. But Stanwyck rules.

eddhurt, Saturday, 24 January 2009 18:19 (seventeen years ago)

I'm almost sure most everyone in the '50s really thought Shane was a better film than The Searchers.

Eric H., Saturday, 24 January 2009 18:26 (seventeen years ago)

I'm almost sure most everyone in the '50s really thought Shane was a better film than The Searchers.

=proof it wasn't.

M.V., Saturday, 24 January 2009 19:48 (seventeen years ago)

Um, make that

"

most everyone in the '50s really thought Shane was a better film than The Searchers
=proof it wasn't."

Your observation, itself, is spot-on.

M.V., Saturday, 24 January 2009 20:05 (seventeen years ago)

why are we talking about killing of a chinese bookie? it's not on the list. anyway, i like cassavetes but don't see that movie as being regarded as one of his best, but that stuff changes all the time so who knows. this list is pretty dull. vertigo, i guess.

velko, Saturday, 24 January 2009 20:08 (seventeen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Sunday, 25 January 2009 00:01 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.