Taking Sides: Tony Blair vs Prince Charles

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Landslide-elected premier vs unelected head-of-state-in-waiting. But which does ILx prefer?

the pinefox, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

prince charles and the inner city beat band all the fucking way

fritz, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince Charles wins due to his penchant for donning ridiculous headgear.

Jonnie, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince Charles is really excellent. Tony Blair has bad breath.

N., Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Tony Blair cos I voted for him (once, a long time ago) and I never voted for big ears.

Pete, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

N: 1) how? 2) how do you know? [3) isn't your second objection unfair?]

the pinefox, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince Charles is a phillistine fuckwit. Tony Blair likes Simply Red.

Andrew L, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

*meditates duly on Andrew's comparison, weeps*

Ned Raggett, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Tony Blair smells of sunshine and apples. Prince Charles is nothing great.

Rainy Hand, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Modernity without content vs. braindead traditionalism. Both have discredited things I believe in (the Labour Party and organic farming respectively). Two voices I can't stand listening to for more than five seconds. Tough choice for the lesser of two evils, but overall I find Blair easier to take.

Robin Carmody, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Andrew is absolutely right, and therefore I can only say that I'd pay good money to watch them in a fight to the death. If they get to tagteam with a partner of their choice, I fancy John Prescott to have the edge over the Queen.

Martin Skidmore, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince Charles wants to be Camilla's Tampax. We like that kind of thing, but I still vote for Tony Blair.

Sister Disco, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"I fancy John Prescott to have the edge over the Queen"

Would you have fancied John Major in such a fight?

Robin Carmody, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince Charles wants to be Camilla's Tampax. We like that kind of thing, [...]

NOT THIS PART OF THE WE!

Dan Perry, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"but I still vote for Tony Blair."

Blimey - I didn't know you had a vote!

the pinefox, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

charlie is allegedly the sperm doner of my prince willie, whereas mr blair is a thatcherite in red clothing...

Queen G the abreviated, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

They are both k-lame, and neither would be welcome in my home

Norman Phay, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Imagine ... dik for dik .. in a land of never ending sorrow and joy

mike hanle y, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

A guess: most members and associates of the Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain despise Tony Blair. This is surely the most compelling reason for supporting him.

But then, maybe they despise Prince Charles too. But... do they *fear* him?

the pinefox, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Bit more complicated than that, Reynard:

Charles, now and forever = epitome of old High Tory (ie tradition over commerce)

Diana c.1985 = epitome of Thatcherite Tory (ie moneymoneymoney fuck tradition)

Charles's expression while watching eg Dire Straits with his then wife = epitome of old High Tory response to what Thatcherism set free (for High Tory Mark Knopfler = Merzbow)

Which is a roundabout way of saying that Charles's cultural values would resonate with High Tories, but he would be less to the tastes of those post-Thatcherite money-grabbing opportunist Tories who have always supported ie intensive farming over organic methods because It Makes More Money A Lot Quicker. Not that I endorse Charles's bonkers ideas on organic farming as more "authentic" and more "in touch with the land" - I simply support organic methods because I think they're better for the environment, end of story - but it's clear that, while Charles's cultural agenda is utterly opposed to New Labour, there is also a modernist, consumerist meme within the post-1979 Tory party that has scarcely more time for it. Reynard you were the one who made me realise just how anti-traditionalist much of Thatcherite Toryism was/is, and I'll never forget that.

(last genuinely traditionalist UK govt = Macmillan / Home 1959-64 = only two MPs still in the Commons, one Tory and one Labour, from that time = enough said I think)

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I told Tony Blair that he was a Tory in disguise on Millenium night, he smiled and waved, so I want Charlie to win this fight as I haven't had the chance to abuse him yet.

chris, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"it's clear that, while Charles's cultural agenda is utterly opposed to New Labour, there is also a modernist, consumerist meme within the post-1979 Tory party that has scarcely more time for it."

I agree - that's why I suggested that the Tories might despise Mr Windsor as well as Mr Blair.

But are we overstating the 'organic' side of Mr Windsor? Maybe he deliberately overstates it himself, to give himself an organic 'brand image'?

the pinefox, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Maybe he (C.Windsor) deliberately overstates it himself, to give himself an 'organic' brand image?"

I'm sure he does - after all he started manipulating that image for himself in the late 1980s, the highpoint of the heritage boom which proved, for a few years, a very successful means for the Thatcherites to reassure their heartlands and take attention away from their innate modernism. That his "organic" image is just as contrived and media-driven as were Diana's various images is the most important thing here.

As for whether or not Tories *fear* Blair, I would say, vis-a-vis my earlier comments, that they do for different reasons. The dying breed of High Tories fear his modernism, while the Thatcher-inspired aspirationalists fear that he has stolen their policies successfully enough that they might never get in again.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(further to the above I think High Tories feared Thatcherite globalist consumerism as much as they fear Blair for the same, but kept quiet about it, at least until the final years of the Major era, so as to retain the illusion of a "united" Tory party)

Robin Carmody, Monday, 13 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not registered to vote at the moment, Foxy, but that doesn't mean I haven't *got* a vote, does it? The last person I voted for was Neil Kinnock. The person I am most proud of having voted for is Winnie Mandela.

Sister Disco, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Then you are mad.

Sam, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not a fan of Tony. Charlie is okay.

jel --, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"I'm not registered to vote at the moment, Foxy, but that doesn't mean I haven't *got* a vote, does it?"

Yes.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not mad, Sam. Winnie's dark side hadn't been revealed at the time. Foxy, I've only just found out That I've dropped off the electoral register. I thought I was going to get to vote in the recent local elections, so you can imagine my disappointment. To make matters worse, there wasn't even an election in my area. Mugabe-esque.

I am still a British subject though, so I've decided to switch my allegiance to Prince Charles.

Sister Disco, Thursday, 16 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.