This looks like a fucking rad movie! The Ebert's scoop on the film & its creator basically being unable to release it due to using songs from the 1920s.http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/having_wonderful_time_wish_you.html#more
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/5sitav.jpg
― Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Thursday, 8 January 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
The trailer
― Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Thursday, 8 January 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
yeah that looks cool. the ramayana is ripe for cartoon treatment.
― Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Thursday, 8 January 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)
The comments on the thread have a lot of people complaining about this kind of adaptation of a religious text. I had never heard of the Ramayana and I am sure this is true of 90+% of the US population, so it'd be a learning experience.
― Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Thursday, 8 January 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)
I used to have indian ramayana comic books when I was a kid
― cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
I saw some of those online! They all looked Marvel-beefed and mulleted out but with blue skin.
― Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
the Ramayana's rough equivalent (very rough) is the Odyssey; the Mahabharat's is the Iliad (somewhat more of an apt comparison) - yet they are longer in both cases i beieve than their Greek counterparts, and filled with more extensive digressions and possibly characters? (human and especially animals! and all things in between, like spirits) .
the purists have NON legit reason to complain, since this non-Indian creator-woman - who got dumped by her conservative Indian husband unceremoniously , telling her he's going to stay in Bangalore instead of coming back to see her!- this woman has a lot of chutzpah and courage to do this, and a desire for her own healing. For as you can remember, Rama wound up eventually ::SPOILERS:: banishing Sita in the end by himself, even after making her suffer the LITERAL trial-by-fire post siege-of-Lanka. It's a very rich text to "explore shades of feminism" within- and i can't believe i typed such a lame sentence
The purists are going to be the ones getting embarrassed in the end since in the meantime Nina Paley is only increasing visibility of the Ramayana (and by extension the Mahabharata) - surely what a lot of these "bloggers" pushing outrage have to end their own desire for change
― Vichitravirya_XI, Friday, 9 January 2009 07:55 (sixteen years ago)
My girl helped spearhead getting the full-length piece on Channel Thirteen's website to stream.
http://www.thirteen.org/sites/reel13/blog/watch-sita-sings-the-blues-online/347/
I saw an early cut of this at a fundraiser that Nina held on her roof and was completely enchanted; really pissed about the copyright issues that are making this impossible for her to release commercially but very happy that she's taking a 'fuck the system' tact. Donated a hundred bucks; if you love this as much as I do, I'd recommend dropping her twenty or so here:http://blog.ninapaley.com/category/money/
― Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 1 March 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I saw a mention of this elsewhere the other day, neat to see it getting further attention. (Now of course I should actually watch it!)
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 1 March 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
I've watched it about four times; it's completely great. The only beef I'd have is that the opening can be a bit indulgent.
― Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 1 March 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
Found it on demonoid
― Benjamin Motherfucking Franklin (Oilyrags), Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
It's really, really awesome. After four times, maybe I'll see something to complain about, but not yet.
― Benjamin Motherfucking Franklin (Oilyrags), Sunday, 1 March 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
oh, cool!
― tokyo rosemary, Sunday, 1 March 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
> The only beef I'd have is that the opening can be a bit indulgent.
Okay, after my second viewing I kind of agree with this, and also think the intermission and rotoscoped dance number don't add much to the movie besides eyecandy. It's pretty great eyecandy, though, and doesn't take away from the rest of the movie, so I'm still okay with it.
― Benjamin Motherfucking Franklin (Oilyrags), Monday, 2 March 2009 13:03 (sixteen years ago)
From what I understand; that stuff is intended to be there so that someone who donates a ton of money can change it however they want. It's open incentive for producers.
― Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Monday, 2 March 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
I read that about the intermission. I didn't know that about the techno numbers, though.
― Benjamin Motherfucking Franklin (Oilyrags), Monday, 2 March 2009 14:06 (sixteen years ago)
I loved this movie.
Really loved it.
And watched it at thirteen.org, so thanks to the above poster's girlfriend!
― Eazy, Sunday, 3 May 2009 03:38 (sixteen years ago)
P.S. It's also downloadable now at http://sitasingstheblues.com/
― Eazy, Sunday, 3 May 2009 03:39 (sixteen years ago)
Really!
― Eazy, Monday, 4 May 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
Netflix has this!
― a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 00:23 (sixteen years ago)
awesome news!
― im a fucking unicorn you douchebags (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 02:28 (sixteen years ago)
Hey, this is my favorite movie in 2009, if it counts as 2009.
Streaming here.
― Action Orientation (Eazy), Thursday, 10 December 2009 00:25 (fifteen years ago)
really enjoyed it too, although from watching the dvd extras i don't think i would want to hang out with the creator for really long.
― rinse the lemonade (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 January 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)