'sententious hooey'

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

it says here. note rating at end, heh heh.

― Josh, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

expecting ned post in about five minutes max.

― Josh, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm not registering with the ny times so i can read something probably about star wars.

― jess, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've already read everything from raving praise to acid-stained revulsion. I'll wait on seeing the damn thing before deciding.

― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But you are right about the time, Josh -- if only because I'm waiting for a favorite breakfast place to open. ;-)

― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh but it's really mean jess. you'd like it.

― Josh, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

here's the rating at the end of the review (for jess and other people w/o registration):

"Star Wars: Episode II — Attack of the Clones" is rated PG (Parental guidance suggested). It has many violent scenes, none of them terribly upsetting or, for that matter, interesting.

hee hee

― geeta, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ooh, that does sound good.

― jess, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey, what do you know, another NY Times review of a Star Wars film that's negative.

― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 11 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Luke, I am your Father. Now Behave for daddy

― mike hanle y, Sunday, 12 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.