I thought the results (so far) were interesting but the whole thing is weird cause
a) it's not made clear how much the participants have to stick to the prisoner/guard rules (could the guards have got slung out for not locking them up at all and having one big party?)
b) the inevitable ban on violence means the guards had no rock on which to build their authority - if prisoners refuse to go to their cell they can't be frogmarched there so what do you do? The whole thing is a sham in that sense.
That reformed crack addict really wound me up, though with his philosophy on life. I was that conflict-avoidance internet entrepreneur.
― N., Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Archel, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alan Trewartha, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonnie, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally C, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lynskey, Wednesday, 15 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
They should redo Milgram's obedience experiment with the 40 people left in the world who haven't heard of it.
― mark s, Saturday, 18 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― N., Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)