During my time there he always seemed a fairly honest bloke and I never got any trouble off him, plus I have an address and phone no. for him. So - should I trust him and send the cash or leave well alone and just take the £150 hit? (Is this common practise for an agent-held deposit, in other words?)
― Tom, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― N., Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I like to haggle.
Oh alright then, I'm mean.
― Dr. C, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sarah, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Having called around, we think we can push for another month since we weren't given 30 days notice. That should give us a chance to find a new place if it comes to that. Of course we'd like to stay and are hoping that he's willing to negotiate. The plan is to call him later today.
Anyone have any advice (sympathy would be nice too)?
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 18:43 (twenty years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)
So it looks like we'll be fighting him on the increase next month and looking for a new place to live. What a cock.
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)
― S!monB!rch (Carey), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)
― S!monB!rch (Carey), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)
From another thread:
Who knows about California landlord law? Am I right in assuming that after a tenant moves out, a landlord is required to apply a fresh coat of paint to the walls?
We painted two of the rooms during our stay. The landlord has left us with a single can of primer and said if we need anymore we should buy it. And now it appears she is out of contact. Does it seem weird for us just to apply primer and then leave? But if there was a certain color (even white) that she wanted, wouldn't she have been more specific?
― admrl, Friday, 27 July 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)
I HATE THIS STUFF
That kinda wacky vagueness is totally crap, esp. expecting you to shill out for primer & possibly paint. Just burn a copy of the movie Primer & leave it there for her with your extra keys & forwarding address.
How'd the garage saley hawking things go?
― Abbott, Friday, 27 July 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
It went great! Thanks for asking. Consensus here at the office is that we should just prime it and leave.
― admrl, Friday, 27 July 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
You got all your shit packed? Asides from cleaning out oven/fridge & cleaning blinds, packing is my least favorite. I have learned from stressed experience not to procrastinate it, however.
― Abbott, Friday, 27 July 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
Stuff is about 75% packed. We have 4 days to paint, clean and finish packing.
― admrl, Friday, 27 July 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
srsly, landlords are scum (with some exceptions).
― admrl, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
Haha at least you are out of that place.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
just the fact that they're called lords
― Surmounter, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
it prolly gives them a complex
― Surmounter, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
Scumlords
― Tom D., Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:11 (seventeen years ago)
Unfortunately leaving appears to be only the begiining
― admrl, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
Really? What's the issue? Is he not giving back your deposit?
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
He is not giving us back our deposit and he may even ask for more despite the fact that we left the place better than we found it. Because he is a crook.
― admrl, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
How can he get more? Is he going to try to take you to small claims court?
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
Not if we do that first
― admrl, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
Good luck! Is there a tenants' union in LA that can help you out?
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:33 (seventeen years ago)
We moved out of state two months ago and haven't seen our security deposit. We're getting everything ready to file in small claims court. We just heard from some current tenants that the bat bugs are back. So glad we're out.
― kate78, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
xp
good call, I will take a look
― admrl, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
i think you should burn his house down
― akm, Thursday, 7 August 2008 17:52 (seventeen years ago)
Will be difficult. He spends a lot of time watering it.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 7 August 2008 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
he does!
― admrl, Thursday, 7 August 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
i dont know anyone but am nosey, can u post pls
― let's bitch about our stupid, annoying co-ilxors (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 12:31 (thirteen years ago)
dunno if i want to leave my ad open to the castigation of the ilx hordes, having castigated others myself.
― Heterocyclic ring ring (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 13:04 (thirteen years ago)
'i don't know anyone but i'm nosey' was my application
― let's bitch about our stupid, annoying co-ilxors (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 13:28 (thirteen years ago)
this nightmare continues. yesterday somebody described themselves as "hardworking" in an email about the room. wtf.
meanwhile as i make clear i want somebody basically invisible the reason my current ultra-reserved flatmate was picked becomes clearer and clearer to her, and more awkward for all!
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Sunday, 20 January 2013 19:56 (thirteen years ago)
ha
― lemmy's rabbles (darraghmac), Monday, 21 January 2013 00:29 (thirteen years ago)
like being around for yr own underwhelming eulogy
otm. so awkward.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 11:08 (thirteen years ago)
I never tire of looking through flatshare listings where it's evident the lister would like nothing better than to be handed £500 once a month by an invisible person who's never, ever around to quietly enjoy the accommodation they're paying for.
― karl lagerlout (suzy), Monday, 21 January 2013 11:35 (thirteen years ago)
it's such an unnatural world. my ad i think isn't quite so overt that that's what i would want tho, given it's a joint ad with flatmate and she seems to want a NEW FRIEND. which i'm fine with really...
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 11:36 (thirteen years ago)
One place I lived was ruthlessly Shallow Grave about new flatmates - theoretically, nobody was considered for the house who didn't have a good, creative job or a place on a postgrad course that would lead to one. In practice, this meant architects and curators but not people in bands or people in advertising. I wasn't the instigator of this policy BTW.
― karl lagerlout (suzy), Monday, 21 January 2013 11:48 (thirteen years ago)
it's evident the lister would like nothing better than to be handed £500 once a month by an invisible person who's never, ever around to quietly enjoy the accommodation they're paying for.
Frankly if anyone can afford that level of rent they can live on their own easily (surely London isnt that far ahead of Melbourne in the Insane Rental Cost stakes), so more power to em. I'd happily have an invisible person living with me - and have, though it was a good friend, so I guess that may not count.
― Manti and the Catfish (Trayce), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:07 (thirteen years ago)
£500 would be a bargain.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:08 (thirteen years ago)
I'd live on my own if it wasn't going to cost me 1k a month, barring a move to some faraway hell.
Frankly if anyone can afford that level of rent they can live on their own easily (surely London isnt that far ahead of Melbourne in the Insane Rental Cost stakes)
Hahahahahahahahahaha
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:12 (thirteen years ago)
i hear leytonstone is lovely this time of life
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:16 (thirteen years ago)
Seems the right thread – I'm looking to take a lodger, but keep postponing hitting spareroom or whatever - seems a chore & I keep hoping circle of friends throws someone up. I think it might be a decent deal for someone who can tolerate a bookish man's slightly scruffy flat. If you're interested webmail and I'll elaborate.
― woof, Monday, 21 January 2013 12:26 (thirteen years ago)
(camberwell btw fwiw)
does anybody live in stepney green? are rents exorbitant there? for years i've somehow felt that stepney green is calling to me, but i wonder if it's more like a siren that will dash me into the rocks
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:26 (thirteen years ago)
think stepney is still fairly pricey, tho there are some cheap shitholes there.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:28 (thirteen years ago)
have you ever lived in a shithole? they are surprisingly cosy.
Stepney Green isn't cheap. One beds in ok condition tend to start at north of £1000 pcm.
― Tullamorte Tullamore (ShariVari), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:29 (thirteen years ago)
it's so annoying, you have to be absolutely mad/loaded simply to live on your own.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:33 (thirteen years ago)
Yep - a mortgage on a £160,000 flat might not even cost you that much if you had the money for a reasonable deposit.
― Tullamorte Tullamore (ShariVari), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:38 (thirteen years ago)
Actually, at current interest rates, you could probably borrow £160,000 and still be forking out less than you would to a landlord.
― Tullamorte Tullamore (ShariVari), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:44 (thirteen years ago)
have considered this a bit recently, but not sure i want to be tied into anything.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 12:44 (thirteen years ago)
Pretty sure rents in Hackney and the west side of Tower Hamlets will have gone up faster than most other places in London over the past few years. I remember when people lived in the East End because it was cheap.
― Matt DC, Monday, 21 January 2013 12:47 (thirteen years ago)
anywhere that's close to central london is expensive.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:02 (thirteen years ago)
ime, from looking at moveflat etc, recently. east london has just caught up with other places as far as i can tell.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:03 (thirteen years ago)
I guess Newham might still be relatively cheap.
In the absence of job security, i can see why people are enormously reluctant to get a mortgage atm.
― Tullamorte Tullamore (ShariVari), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:03 (thirteen years ago)
Not Melbourne cheap, but still...
― Tullamorte Tullamore (ShariVari), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:04 (thirteen years ago)
there must be flukey bargains out there if you look hard enough. my friend who lives next door to me pays about £450 a month, 5 mins from central line in bethnal green. landlord doesn't have a clue. i feel lucky at £567 to be honest, everywhere around me is about £700 generally, for far smaller/uglier flats, judging by the images anyway.
― Hutton dressed as Lahm (LocalGarda), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:06 (thirteen years ago)
Every time rents shoot up I'm incredibly grateful to be in the centre and out of the private rental market.
Lots of people moving to Leyton and Walthamstow ATM, Tracer. Friends bought just by Walthamstow station in anticipation of KIDS because the schools are great (they also enjoy the market and are happy their MP is Stella Creasy) and it's 20 minutes' journey to their Oxford Circus jobs. If you can get your head around [terror stab music] ZONE 3, definitely consider it.
― karl lagerlout (suzy), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:09 (thirteen years ago)
Walthamstow is great but, depressingly, probably only about two years away from being close to Hackney rents. Everyone being priced out of places like Bromley seems to be heading there.
― Tullamorte Tullamore (ShariVari), Monday, 21 January 2013 13:13 (thirteen years ago)
I'd keep quiet if I were you; David Cameron and Ian Duncan Smith will deport you to Scunthorpe for talk like that.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 21 January 2013 14:17 (thirteen years ago)
pretty crazy stuff in this court document by the city of westmount suing my ex-landlord
http://jugements.qc.ca/php/decision.php?liste=68811716&doc=C0F572EC5E0A350672108DC3CDBF7AC293A9FDE6E6BE5CF685FD0DCE5483ED28&page=1
[14] On October 23, 1998, Mr. Fattal wrote a letter to Ms. Joanne Poirier, Westmount’s director of urban planning.[1] He called upon Ms. Poirier to “cancel” the September court injunction and accused her of “malicious, painful and abusive activities” that wasted taxpayers’ money. Mr. Fattal stated that it was time for Ms. Poirier to end her “Gestapo style” behaviour. [15] In the top corner of his letter, Mr. Fattal reproduced a Second World War photo of a Nazi officer, with his boot over the neck of a prostrate concentration camp prisoner. In the background, several other prisoners in striped uniforms hung from posts. Mr. Fattal signed his letter to Ms. Poirier, “Your Hostage”.[16] Ms. Poirier was upset by the letter. Westmount’s lawyers wrote to Mr. Fattal, asking him not to communicate with Westmount officials and to direct all future correspondence to them.[17] A further incident in the autumn of 1998 alarmed Westmount’s building inspectors. One day, Westmount’s employee, Mr. Michel Poulin, was performing an electrical inspection at the Saint Antoine building. Mr. Fattal suddenly appeared behind Mr. Poulin wearing a Saddam Hussein mask and brandishing a baseball bat. Mr. Poulin was frightened, but Mr. Fattal later called it a joke. ...[24] Between 1999 and 2007, he faxed hundreds of pages of correspondence and photos to the City of Westmount and its employees. At times, the fax transmissions were so lengthy they choked the City’s fax machines and disrupted its communications. Often, Mr. Fattal faxed the same pages over and over again.[25] On a number of occasions, Mr. Fattal faxed gruesome photos of himself, bare-chested and gagging. One photo showed a tortured Mr. Fattal, with bulging eyes, and an iron bar across his mouth. [26] Mr. Fattal also wrote to Westmount employees at their homes, mailing large envelopes to them stuffed with letters of complaint, photos of a bare-chested Mr. Fattal in chains, and other offensive documents. ...[48] In 2011, Mr. Fattal got an iPhone and discovered text messaging. Over the next two years, up until the eve of trial in February 2013, Mr. Fattal sent hundreds of text messages to Mtre. Banon, at all times of day and night, on weekends and holidays, including New Year’s Eve in 2012. In his messages Mr. Fattal repeatedly insulted Mtre. Banon, declaring that he should be ashamed to represent “gangsters” and “criminals” who were intent on ruining Mr. Fattal’s health. In one instance, Mr. Fattal attached a photo of himself and photos of several tombstones, clearly implying that Mtre. Banon and his clients wanted him in an early grave.[49] Mtre. Banon repeatedly asked Mr. Fattal to stop communicating with him, but the messages continued unabated, sometimes at the rate of several a day.[50] Mr. Fattal found other outlets for his anger. He created a website on which he posted derogatory remarks and photos of Mayors Marks and Trent, Mr. St. Louis and Ms. Poirier. He attached large posters to the front of his Saint Antoine building that bore similar statements and photos, as well as his website address. These posters are still on the building today. One of them identifies the building as the “Musée d’histoire d’harcèlement par Westmount”. Mr. Fattal’s building is festooned with City of Montreal flags, indicating his displeasure at being located in the municipality of Westmount.
[15] In the top corner of his letter, Mr. Fattal reproduced a Second World War photo of a Nazi officer, with his boot over the neck of a prostrate concentration camp prisoner. In the background, several other prisoners in striped uniforms hung from posts. Mr. Fattal signed his letter to Ms. Poirier, “Your Hostage”.
[16] Ms. Poirier was upset by the letter. Westmount’s lawyers wrote to Mr. Fattal, asking him not to communicate with Westmount officials and to direct all future correspondence to them.
[17] A further incident in the autumn of 1998 alarmed Westmount’s building inspectors. One day, Westmount’s employee, Mr. Michel Poulin, was performing an electrical inspection at the Saint Antoine building. Mr. Fattal suddenly appeared behind Mr. Poulin wearing a Saddam Hussein mask and brandishing a baseball bat. Mr. Poulin was frightened, but Mr. Fattal later called it a joke.
...
[24] Between 1999 and 2007, he faxed hundreds of pages of correspondence and photos to the City of Westmount and its employees. At times, the fax transmissions were so lengthy they choked the City’s fax machines and disrupted its communications. Often, Mr. Fattal faxed the same pages over and over again.
[25] On a number of occasions, Mr. Fattal faxed gruesome photos of himself, bare-chested and gagging. One photo showed a tortured Mr. Fattal, with bulging eyes, and an iron bar across his mouth.
[26] Mr. Fattal also wrote to Westmount employees at their homes, mailing large envelopes to them stuffed with letters of complaint, photos of a bare-chested Mr. Fattal in chains, and other offensive documents.
[48] In 2011, Mr. Fattal got an iPhone and discovered text messaging. Over the next two years, up until the eve of trial in February 2013, Mr. Fattal sent hundreds of text messages to Mtre. Banon, at all times of day and night, on weekends and holidays, including New Year’s Eve in 2012. In his messages Mr. Fattal repeatedly insulted Mtre. Banon, declaring that he should be ashamed to represent “gangsters” and “criminals” who were intent on ruining Mr. Fattal’s health. In one instance, Mr. Fattal attached a photo of himself and photos of several tombstones, clearly implying that Mtre. Banon and his clients wanted him in an early grave.
[49] Mtre. Banon repeatedly asked Mr. Fattal to stop communicating with him, but the messages continued unabated, sometimes at the rate of several a day.
[50] Mr. Fattal found other outlets for his anger. He created a website on which he posted derogatory remarks and photos of Mayors Marks and Trent, Mr. St. Louis and Ms. Poirier. He attached large posters to the front of his Saint Antoine building that bore similar statements and photos, as well as his website address. These posters are still on the building today. One of them identifies the building as the “Musée d’histoire d’harcèlement par Westmount”. Mr. Fattal’s building is festooned with City of Montreal flags, indicating his displeasure at being located in the municipality of Westmount.
― flopson, Thursday, 16 May 2013 20:04 (twelve years ago)
lol at the saddam hussein story.
― oppet, Thursday, 16 May 2013 20:19 (twelve years ago)
ok so our doorbell has been broken for several weeks. i emailed my landlady last night to note that it still hadn't been fixed (after having emailed her about it, to no reply, several days ago) and asking when they might be able to come into the apartment. apparently she emails me back this morning around 11 AM, but I'm off doing other things and don't get the email. less than 90 minutes later she and her husband barge in and say "hello." I'm startled and in my underwear. I tell them, "you need to let us know in advance when you're coming in" (which is true, under our lease terms--they're required to give 24 hours notice unless explicitly invited in my the tenant).
they then commence a tirade of cuss words and expressions of obscene indignance. "fuck it! fuck it!" "this is bullshit." "fuck you." "you always do this" (I don't). "you make it impossible for us!" "you're being difficult." "fuck it!"
I ask them not to cuss at me in my own living space. her reply, "we can cuss at you. it's our building."
WTF. what do i do now?
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 1 June 2013 17:36 (twelve years ago)
(my partner was also home and was shocked.)
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 1 June 2013 17:39 (twelve years ago)
pretty sure what she did was totally illegal. like, isn't it a basic law that a landlord has to give 24hrs notice unless there's an emergency? and when you say she barged in, do you mean literally, as in, she didn't knock and just let herself in?
― just1n3, Saturday, 1 June 2013 18:08 (twelve years ago)
yes, it's in the lease.
she didn't "barge" in, but they just opened the front door, walked upstairs, then opened the apartment door, walked into the living room, and said "hello." i was startled.
it's not the first time they've done this. once they left a voice mail (I was cleaning and didn't get to the phone in time) and then showed up 15 minutes later, as though they had given me "notice."
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 1 June 2013 18:12 (twelve years ago)
(in other words, they didn't knock before they let themselves in. no chance to pull on some pants or anything.)
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 1 June 2013 18:13 (twelve years ago)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that is crazy! i don't think it even matters if the 24hr thing is even in your lease or not - that's a basic right as a tenant. i would try to find a local tenancy advocate group and see what recourse you have.
― just1n3, Saturday, 1 June 2013 18:30 (twelve years ago)
that's really awful. my landlord has been v sketchy on 24 hrs notice & similar things - tho much less outrageously - & idk what you can really do; it's all such minor stuff, i'm not sure how it cld be policed or how anything cld be made any better, the power imbalance is too great.
― ogmor, Saturday, 1 June 2013 18:36 (twelve years ago)
i'm mostly just wondering if they'll ever fix the doorbell.
also i kind of wish they wouldn't curse at me in my apartment again, that would be nice.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 1 June 2013 18:45 (twelve years ago)
We've been at our current place for over 3 years
We're moving right now and the landlord is telling us we have to pay to fix a bunch of shit that I believe should be covered under wear and tear:
The top hinge of a high up cupboard broke, splintering the woodThe caulking around the tub is peelingA poorly anchored towel rail came off the wall
Do we have to pay for this stuff??
― just1n3, Tuesday, 10 September 2013 18:59 (twelve years ago)
What are the tenancy laws where you live
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 10 September 2013 19:00 (twelve years ago)
No idea, I'm trying to find them but I suck at Google. el cerrito doesn't even have a rent board.
― just1n3, Tuesday, 10 September 2013 19:08 (twelve years ago)
So, California? That all sounds like normal wear and tear to me. You shouldn't have to pay for it.
http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 10 September 2013 19:10 (twelve years ago)
Thanks!
Yeah, I mean its not like we punched a hole in the wall or broke some windows
― just1n3, Tuesday, 10 September 2013 19:12 (twelve years ago)
ugh, my landlord is such a nasty woman.
even in the most routine correspondence or phone call she _has_ to contest something i said. and she is always wrong. this time i emailed her because a problem i had reported a month ago didn't appear to be fixed. in her email she insisted that i hadn't actually reported the problem a month ago but rather "just" two weeks ago... even though the email in which i reported the problem, dated mid-june, is right there in our email correspondence... if she would just scroll down. (and what does it matter anyway? just fix the fucking problem.)
she seems to perceive any question or concern as a kind of challenge, a kind of invasion of her private time. hence she _always_ tries to turn the tables and imply or insist that i've done something wrong—she'll even invent problems out of thin air to do this. even the most routine things--like asking them to fix a broken light fixture--are greeted with undue suspicion, as if she can't believe i have the temerity to bother her.
i am really glad i am not related to her. i get the feeling she would be completely insufferable. ugh.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Monday, 14 July 2014 14:54 (eleven years ago)