We went to the movies this afternoon and were confronted with this:
Umm... Seriously? This movie hasn't even been released and the trailer alone makes me want to go on a tri-state killing spree. Except I can't because I've already stabbed my eyes out.
― Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Monday, 6 April 2009 05:27 (sixteen years ago)
I will join you in this glorious crusade of loathing.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 05:38 (sixteen years ago)
haha, eggers + director of american beauty. all it needed was zach braff for some kind of trifecta of shit
― velko, Monday, 6 April 2009 05:48 (sixteen years ago)
jim from the office in a serious role is a fine substitute in that regard
― I DIED (deeznuts) (J0rdan S.), Monday, 6 April 2009 05:49 (sixteen years ago)
I swear, ILX is the *only* place around that is this rampantly, endlessly vicious and cynical about Eggers/Braff/Kelley/etc etc.
I mean they're not a pantheon of the gods or anything but I dont understand the unrepentant loathing.
― one art, please (Trayce), Monday, 6 April 2009 05:51 (sixteen years ago)
But...they suck.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 05:52 (sixteen years ago)
I liked Egger's autobiog *shrug*. I *LOVE* Jon Safran Foer. I thought Scrubs was a great TV series and yanno, Garden State is watchable enough too.
I'm not saying I adore any of em but kill murder death hate? Zuh?
― one art, please (Trayce), Monday, 6 April 2009 05:54 (sixteen years ago)
It just makes me think that whats at play here is actually "cynical middle aged men who think the stuff 18 year old girls like is loathesome"
even if it is, is there a problem with that?
― s1ocki, Monday, 6 April 2009 05:57 (sixteen years ago)
u r 18??????????????
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Monday, 6 April 2009 05:57 (sixteen years ago)
Nah that was the Twilight thread.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 05:58 (sixteen years ago)
i am a cynical middle aged man, and i will not be silenced!
― velko, Monday, 6 April 2009 06:01 (sixteen years ago)
I'll go with cynical middle aged men who loathe a rewrite of Juno for the thirty/fortysomething set.
― Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Monday, 6 April 2009 06:01 (sixteen years ago)
Seriously though, do you think this movie is being marketed to 18 year old girls?
― Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Monday, 6 April 2009 06:02 (sixteen years ago)
yeah this looks horrendous - echoing elvis' sentiment, it's my generation's "look at how quirky we are!" pop culture (she staples his itinerary to his jacket - the fuck outta here) for our parents
― I DIED (deeznuts) (J0rdan S.), Monday, 6 April 2009 06:05 (sixteen years ago)
I admit I wasnt talking specifically about this new movie, I will watch the trailer and if it looks shit I'll happily say so.
― one art, please (Trayce), Monday, 6 April 2009 06:25 (sixteen years ago)
yall were out of control on that where the wild things are thread but this looks like a pretty fair target for frothing at the mouth hatred
― A B C, Monday, 6 April 2009 06:32 (sixteen years ago)
So it's basically Children of Men except the baby isn't actually needed.
― Comprehensive Nuclear Suggest-Ban Treaty (Hurting 2), Monday, 6 April 2009 06:40 (sixteen years ago)
Nick Drake-ish acoustic guitar/gentle voice music has been a plague on movies and movie trailers in the last five years or so
― Comprehensive Nuclear Suggest-Ban Treaty (Hurting 2), Monday, 6 April 2009 06:43 (sixteen years ago)
OK eh now I've watched the trailer, I'm pretty meh, but because it looks like utter feelgood schmaltz, it comes across more pukey "Marley and Me" than "OMG Eggers is a cunt and should go to hell", but whatevs.
― one art, please (Trayce), Monday, 6 April 2009 08:30 (sixteen years ago)
Isn't that john Martyn on the trailer soundtrack? I kinda like Dave Eggers but yeah this looks like just another nail in the already rusty and pillaged coffin of US indie cinema.
― baaderonixx, Monday, 6 April 2009 08:36 (sixteen years ago)
This looks so obnoxious and terrible. I don't think there's a cliche from the quasi-indie, 'we so sad and dysfunctional, but we shall see it through with our love and retro stylings and ipods', quirkfest genre that was left unused. Fucking gag.
― ham hand (circa1916), Monday, 6 April 2009 09:15 (sixteen years ago)
"White Winter Hymnal" makes me think of trailers like this. And vice versa.
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 6 April 2009 09:55 (sixteen years ago)
i hated on juno like nobody's business but tbh hating on twee fake-indie* films is getting to be the hating on special-effects driven summer movies de nos jours. not necessarily wrong, just boring.
*not a super-useful descriptor at any time
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 6 April 2009 09:58 (sixteen years ago)
yeah this almost looks like a hoax! BUT i will rep for Eggers as a writer. We Shall Know Our Velocity was awesome (the staggering genius one too)
― Ludo, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:03 (sixteen years ago)
So in order to be exciting and one step ahead do I need to be either loving these piece of shit movies or at least indifferent to their existence, rather than hating them?
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:14 (sixteen years ago)
i think the inside thing is to REALLY LIKE THEM based on the trailer and nothing else.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 6 April 2009 10:18 (sixteen years ago)
I would love it if about halfway through there's a scream, startled looks, several fast fades down and then up on frightened faces, lightning flashes, and a menacing silhouette approaches with a goddamn machete.
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
"Are we losers? I mean we're like 34.."
"33."
"Yeah. And -- what was that noise?"
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:22 (sixteen years ago)
lol
"hey - I found this old board game, I used to love as a kid!"
"That is so cool! Don't you sometime think we lost something when we..."
*Lynch backwards voice effect - Office Jim wears a rabbit mask on his head*
― baaderonixx, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:31 (sixteen years ago)
miranda july also has a movie coming out this year, don't use up all your hate on this
― velko, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)
good lord guys
― HOOS talking about magic & spells & steen dude! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 6 April 2009 10:38 (sixteen years ago)
this looks okay to me. i actually laughed 2 or 3 times at the trailer alone. there are plently people on this thread more loathesome than eggers, imo.
― jed_, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)
So I've learned in the last 24 hours that ILX dislikes Dave Eggers, Hotel California, and Dora the Explorer. Good work, ILX!
― Mordy, Monday, 6 April 2009 10:58 (sixteen years ago)
IHX
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 6 April 2009 10:59 (sixteen years ago)
Mordy the list is far longer than that
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 6 April 2009 11:04 (sixteen years ago)
Not that I've learned in the last 24 hours.
― Mordy, Monday, 6 April 2009 11:07 (sixteen years ago)
Could sombedy pls explain the widespread hate of Eggers? For me, he's just that "staggering genius" guy - am I missing sth?
― baaderonixx, Monday, 6 April 2009 11:09 (sixteen years ago)
Hipster’s Head Explodes During Away We Go TrailerMar 17th, 2009 | By Dan | Category: Ham, The FilmsWilliamsburg-based Hipster Dan Rice died last night after viewing the trailer for the upcoming film Away We Go, directed by Sam Mendes and co-written by Dave Eggers. Upon watching it, his mind was literally blown, causing his skull to explode in his bedroom.Rice’s roommate, and fellow hipster, Matt, found him moments later.“I was reading my Believer magazine when I heard what I thought was Dan remixing the new Deerhoof album,” said Matt, who later realized that the explosion was not part of a noise-rock exploration. “I ran in with my washtub bass to join the action and found him on the floor, with the Away We Go trailer playing on his computer.”The film considered by many to be a “hipster’s dream” stars such hipster darlings as Maggie Gyllenhaal and Allison Janney. While its male lead, John Krasinski, operates outside the indie world, his mainstream appeal is masked by a thick beard and thicker glasses, making him the ultimate hipster.While these factors all contributed to Rice’s unfortunately hip death, it was the reveal that the screenplay was penned by none other than hipster icon, Dave Eggers, that was the final straw.“Dan loved Dave Eggers,” recalled Matt. “But not in the ironic way that he loved Judy Blume. In the ‘downloading his NPR podcasts and listening to them on the subway even though he had no reason to leave the house’ sort of way.”A forensic unit was able to uncover more causes to the head explosion.“We watched the trailer afterward for clues,” said the Chief Investigator, who claimed not to know what a Dave Eggers was. “We think the title cards were written in same font as Juno’s titles. That combined with the soft song by an under-the-radar singer songwriter certainly did not help.”
Williamsburg-based Hipster Dan Rice died last night after viewing the trailer for the upcoming film Away We Go, directed by Sam Mendes and co-written by Dave Eggers. Upon watching it, his mind was literally blown, causing his skull to explode in his bedroom.
Rice’s roommate, and fellow hipster, Matt, found him moments later.
“I was reading my Believer magazine when I heard what I thought was Dan remixing the new Deerhoof album,” said Matt, who later realized that the explosion was not part of a noise-rock exploration. “I ran in with my washtub bass to join the action and found him on the floor, with the Away We Go trailer playing on his computer.”
The film considered by many to be a “hipster’s dream” stars such hipster darlings as Maggie Gyllenhaal and Allison Janney. While its male lead, John Krasinski, operates outside the indie world, his mainstream appeal is masked by a thick beard and thicker glasses, making him the ultimate hipster.
While these factors all contributed to Rice’s unfortunately hip death, it was the reveal that the screenplay was penned by none other than hipster icon, Dave Eggers, that was the final straw.
“Dan loved Dave Eggers,” recalled Matt. “But not in the ironic way that he loved Judy Blume. In the ‘downloading his NPR podcasts and listening to them on the subway even though he had no reason to leave the house’ sort of way.”
A forensic unit was able to uncover more causes to the head explosion.
“We watched the trailer afterward for clues,” said the Chief Investigator, who claimed not to know what a Dave Eggers was. “We think the title cards were written in same font as Juno’s titles. That combined with the soft song by an under-the-radar singer songwriter certainly did not help.”
― Gerard (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 6 April 2009 11:09 (sixteen years ago)
I <3 maggie gyllenhaal. Also Revolutionary Road was pretty good, I loved Staggering Genius, but I was about 17 when I read it. I met Eggars at a reading once and he was really nice and incredibly hot.
I don't see where Scrubs comes into it, doubt the real thing will be such an iPod ad.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 6 April 2009 11:12 (sixteen years ago)
I don't mind Eggers but Mendes is consistently dreadful.
― Simon H., Monday, 6 April 2009 11:17 (sixteen years ago)
i meant to say surprisingly hot instead of incredibly : / at freudian slips
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Monday, 6 April 2009 11:21 (sixteen years ago)
ha, certainly the trailer is pretty bad (but then it's a carefully marketed trailer), but I read Staggering Genius just last year and thought it was great, and now I feel like I'm celebrating Dick Cheney's humanitarian efforts.
Also not quite sure what Zach Braff has to do with anything.
― Ralph, Waldo, Emerson, Lake & Palmer (Merdeyeux), Monday, 6 April 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
Allison Janney is a hipster darling?
― Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Monday, 6 April 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
You know hipsters like the West Wing.
― Mordy, Monday, 6 April 2009 12:31 (sixteen years ago)
haha, if you guys hate this wait until you see robert pattinson's new film, opening on ifc festival direct april 29
― caek, Monday, 6 April 2009 12:36 (sixteen years ago)
nice
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37 (sixteen years ago)
: )
― caek, Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37 (sixteen years ago)
but then it's a carefully marketed trailer
salient point. i usually hate trailers of frat pack movies. so coarse. but im still their biggest stan.
― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 6 April 2009 12:38 (sixteen years ago)
the first adventureland trailer was repulsive, but i know i'm going to love that film.
― caek, Monday, 6 April 2009 12:38 (sixteen years ago)
Sorry, I missed your stuff upthread.
this one is much more like Broken Flowers than Little Miss Sunshine.
Yes, that's a recommendation.
Although I'll say that even LMS I sorta liked while I was watching it, and it was only later that it began to leave a sour taste in my mouth.
― great gabbneb's ghost (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)
made a decision to have a kid after a life of selfishness
...thanks?
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)
I would love to see Sam Mendes and Ashton Kutcher team up for a documentary road trip titled America, You So Crazy! paid for by Twitter
― da croupier, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)
scott fwiw i have neutral-to-friendly feelings about dave eggers.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)
chaotic neutral to friendly
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)
and my main problem isn't necc with the main characters, despite their bizarre sulky entitlement (why a couple of 30somethings would flip out so hard when one set of their parents, who they clearly don't even like, decides to go on sabbatical is beyond me) but with the paper-thin, shrill and altogether boring supporting characters they turn up their noses at. the movie is full of the cheapest of shots.
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:29 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hahaha! yeah, really.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)
cuz everyone knows that having kids is the most selfless act on earth.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)
You know what quirky road-trip movie is the absolute worst, though? Transamerica.
― great gabbneb's ghost (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)
transamerica 2: revenge of the fallen
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)
haha
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)
I had an idea long ago for a road-trip movie with Jim Carrey and John C. Reilly where they would play everyone in the movie. Like, their car breaks down and they walk into a biker bar, and all of the bikers are played by them.
― Eazy, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)
speaking of ashton and road trips, this just might be the worst movie i've seen in years:
http://roddysrockinreviews.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/just-married.jpg
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)
Also FYI the film starts out with John Krasinski eating out Maya Rudolph under a blanket so maybe don't bring your 14-year-old sister to see it like I did.
that sounds mega-awkward (haha both for you and in terms of Krasinki's beard), but on the other hand: 14-year-old boys probably can't even get through a day without seeing something related to blowjobs, so this probably qualifies as a positive message
― nabisco, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)
hat sounds mega-awkward (haha both for you and in terms of Krasinki's beard)
Why did you even go there.
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
http://a0.vox.com/6a00c2252d77b88e1d00cd973bf6584cd5-320pi
― josh fenderman (jeff), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)
i decided to hate this movie not for the obvious targets - eggers, mendes - but for vendelea vida. she needs to be taken down a peg or two
― velko, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)
something for everyone to hate! they should use that on the poster.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)
i think i want that woman's doughnut...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)
who will you hate?
― velko, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)
vendela vida sounds like a name of someone who wrongly thinks she is really important
― harbl, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
That's clever.
― Eazy, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
thx
― harbl, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
harbl's favorite writer name, obviously
― nabisco, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
lol true! sorry though it just sounds like one of those names
― harbl, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)
"who will you hate?"
maggie gylllllenhayllll. just cuz. or maybe jim gaffigan. can't be hating on jeff daniels or catherine o'hara.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
dude from the office is such a non-entity to me. like he doesn't even exist. can't hate what you can't see.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
and i ain't hating on maya cuz her mother is one of my gods on earth and in heaven. that would be liking hating jeebus.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)
if he were invisible this would be a more interesting movie
― figgy pudding (La Lechera), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)
Maya Rudolph, her imaginary husband and her phantom pregnancy.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)
Loving You Is Easy 'Cuz You're A Hybrid Human-Lizard Creature
― tylerw, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)
not imaginary, but invisible. they wouldn't have even needed the blanket for that opening scene, for instance.
― figgy pudding (La Lechera), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)
on second thought, i guess they would since maybe maya rudolph wouldn't want to be on full display
i would watch jk and maya rudolph smashing if he was invisible
― Ømår Littel (Jordan), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
jfk
― Michael tapeworm much talent for the future (s1ocki), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
not imaginary, but invisible.
I prefer my take!
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)
maybe it could be a big reveal at the end of the movieomg HE'S NOT REAL
― figgy pudding (La Lechera), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
He's a ghost! The movie has run backwards in time! John Connor sent him back to prevent himself from happening!
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
Maya Rudolph sees dead people.
― incomprehensible Kool-Aid swallower (sarahel), Tuesday, 30 June 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
Gobble, gobble?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)
Haven't seen it, but I have to say, if I were about to have a kid I wouldn't be spending precious money I'd be needing to feed and take care of the child on an existential road trip.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 13 July 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)
The couple is living where they are living only because his parents are there, and his parents are moving away, and they both have jobs they can do from anywhere and are not slacker/bohemian/artist/writers but two professionals who can afford to figure out where they want to live.
― Eazy, Monday, 13 July 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)
I never said anything about their jobs, though.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 13 July 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)
I guess I'm an alarmist about money, though, especially when it comes to taking care of kids. (I don't have any, thank heavens, because I can barely afford to feed myself.)
― Matos W.K., Monday, 13 July 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)
I just saw this. It was okay. I can understand the knee-jerk reaction to want to hate it. It feels a little bit preachy, I guess. It's like the main couple is being held up as worthy of emulation, and many of the other characters they encounter are put there to teach a lesson by way of counter-example. It's a bit like "Pilgrim's Progress" in that regard - I guess the second part in which Christian is joined on his journey by his wife Christianna and they encounter characters such as Mrs. Inconsiderate and Mrs. Light-mind on their way through the city of Vanity to the Celestial City. It's like Eggers and Vida have swung so far in the anti-irony direction that they've ended up crafting allegorical tales of moral instruction. That said, I join Roger Ebert in finding this kind of willful uncoolness kind of refreshing.
― o. nate, Thursday, 22 October 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
Saw it recently too. Have a basic dislike for people with "jobs they can do from anywhere." Particularly the ones who move to Montreal and drive the rents up.
― fields of salmon, Thursday, 22 October 2009 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
Best review ever.
― Otter madness (Nicole), Saturday, 31 October 2009 03:09 (fifteen years ago)
This dude is AWESOME!
Dancing with the Stars? Might as well be Dancing with Space Aliens as far as I’m concerned. Who are these people?
― we are normal and we want our freedom (Abbott), Saturday, 31 October 2009 03:18 (fifteen years ago)
http://images.cnhi.zope.net/images_sizedimage_352121937/med
― banned, on the run (s1ocki), Saturday, 31 October 2009 03:40 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZXkHRi4sFY
― buzza, Saturday, 5 February 2011 17:47 (fourteen years ago)