Because if I don't put that qualifier in the thread title it'll be impossible to search for.
Pixar's next two films after this are Toy Story III and Cars 2 so let's take the time to celebrate this one all the more. I've thought Pixar's strongest overall years have actually been these last few and this film on top of Ratatouille and Wall-E has the makings of a hell of a trifecta.
NYT demi-whimper article with people complaining that it won't be a super-colossal hit but just a hit is good for laughs but contains these details:
The film, about the adventures of a cranky 78-year-old who ties thousands of balloons to his house, features dazzling animation that evokes the work of Hayao Miyazaki, the refined Japanese filmmaker and anime master. Like Pixar’s Oscar-winning “Wall-E,” there are stretches without dialogue. A few scenes are rendered in black and white.
... A commercial juggernaut or not, “Up” has struck many early viewers as creatively stunning. The story focuses on Carl (voiced by Ed Asner), a prune-popping balloon salesman who, after the death of his wife, sets out to see the wilds of South America.
His young companion, Russell (voiced by Jordan Nagai), is a “Wilderness Explorer” working on his last merit badge, “assisting the elderly.” An exotic bird joins the excursion, which encounters a hilarious squad of talking dogs.
The animation is heavily stylized. Carl is not realistic looking, for instance, but has square features: fingertips, face, liver spots. The color palette is notable for its turquoise and magenta.
Nothing involving the picture was rushed — Pixar spent four years on it — and, apparently, no expense was spared. Mr. Docter and some of his colleagues flew to Venezuela for a three-day helicopter and Jeep tour to study jungle scenery; others spent time observing a rare pheasant at the Sacramento Zoo.
“We wanted more ‘Dumbo’ and less ‘Star Wars,’ ” Mr. Docter said. “In certain parts, it’s more of a feeling we’re going after than linear storytelling.”
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 14:42 (seventeen years ago)
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/3673/imageuploadimageu.jpg
― Monkey Pocket Boob (libcrypt), Monday, 6 April 2009 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
Realistic!
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
Cars 2? Oh great, a sequel to the one Pixar film I couldn't even sit through until the end.
This one sounds pretty neat though.
― a passing spacecadet, Monday, 6 April 2009 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
*cough* sounds familiar...http://www.vgculturalcenter.com/images/event_images/james-and-the-giant-peach.jpg
― snoball, Monday, 6 April 2009 14:50 (seventeen years ago)
LA Times fluff but it provides more context and detail and etc.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 May 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)
Cars 2?
Hulk smash
― High in Openness (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 May 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)
There's been lots of noise about this being heavily miyazaki influenced; I'm pretty psyched.
― I’ve seen a lot in my days as an mp3 blogger (forksclovetofu), Friday, 8 May 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)
friend of mine who saw an early screening of this says it's fantastic
― Roz, Saturday, 9 May 2009 02:40 (sixteen years ago)
Russ Meyer's Up >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pixar's Up >>>>>>>>>>> R.E.M.'s Up.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 9 May 2009 02:43 (sixteen years ago)
^^^ this is likely factual.
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, 9 May 2009 02:54 (sixteen years ago)
all the trailers and sneaks that they've put on youtube are great. this will be the first movie I take my son to (he's 3); he's been asking about it every day for a month.
Not looking forward to Cars II unless they really improve on the first one (which is possible); Toy Story III will be excellent though.
― akm, Saturday, 9 May 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
I am probably alone in liking the first Cars movie, which I did expect to hate.
― Saula (Nicole), Saturday, 9 May 2009 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
It's far from their best film, but still miles ahead of any other studio animated movie.
― Saula (Nicole), Saturday, 9 May 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
http://img12.nnm.ru/2/0/8/4/9/52f7324d7446c6d51d781b18499.jpg
― ❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉Plaxico❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉❉ (I know, right?), Saturday, 9 May 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
Oh, that's right. I'll revise:
Russ Meyer's Up >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pixar's Up >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shania Twain's Up! >>>>>>>>>>>>> R.E.M.'s Up.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 9 May 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
Elvis T. is a major Cars fan so you're not alone on here at least.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 9 May 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
yeah didn't like Cars at first but it's grown on me a lot upon repeated viewings (my nephew's obsessed).
― Roz, Saturday, 9 May 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
Anyone seen it yet? (Will probably be catching it next weekend, though I do have the day off tomorrow so maybe then...)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)
Cars isn't their best, but I like it. My son went through a phase of watching it constantly, so I've seen it plenty of times.
I've been a pretty big Pixar fan, but I wasn't particularly thrilled by the Up trailer. Seems like people are enjoying it so far though...
― Moodles, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
I can find something to like about every Pixar film, and I don't expect Up will be any different. The trailer's not making me enthusiastic, but the article Ned posted to start the thread is.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
Linking to Armond White review here so Morbs doesn't have to:
http://www.nypress.com/article-19876-the-way-of-pixarism.html
Instructions to most fully enjoy link: do not click on link.
― nu hollywood (Eric H.), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
The comment section under the article is pretty enjoyable, though.
― Darin, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
Seeing this for five bucks on a weekend morning...excited. (Skipping the 3D.)
― Simon H., Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
Nothing involving the picture was rushed — Pixar spent four years on it — and, apparently, no expense was spared. Mr. Docter and some of his colleagues flew to Venezuela for a three-day helicopter and Jeep tour to study jungle scenery; others spent time observing a rare pheasant at the Sacramento Zoo.http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_D1ZZyTOG7tQ/RxEFGKS5WEI/AAAAAAAABJo/xAn3g6X3bAw/s320/DevilDoll.gifwhat
― Øystein, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)
Comments on the nyp article ARE entertaining
― im drunk so no forks (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)
there are bad critics and then there are bad people and armond white consistently seems like the latter imo
― gangsta hug (omar little), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
Haha CHICKEN LITTLE!
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
It's so hard to take him seriously. I mean he's obviously fucking with everyone here.
no i think he's "serious"
― gangsta hug (omar little), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)
i'm gonna go see this tomorrow in 3d and i'm going to argue with the ticket window girl about charging me extra for 3d glasses when i kept mine from when i saw coraline
― rosario speedwagon (nickalicious), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe you should make a list of your strongest points first. Preparation is key!
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)
"no i think he's "serious""
It's pretty hard to tell sometimes, I'll give you that.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)
can't wait for morbs to weigh in on this
― I know in my soul that history will avenge the Wayanses (jeff), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
Remember, tho, Morbs liked WALL*E.
― nu hollywood (Eric H.), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
He's such a sucker for cuteness, that Morbo.
― Alex in SF, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
morbz is obviously off somewhere buying balloons
― NEO-GEO v THE DREAMCAST (some dude), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)
ha ha hahhaaa!
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 28 May 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
i thought the previews for this looked pretty good!
That review - hoo boy!
The whole Pixar as corporate shill argument is cute and all, but if you're main line of attack against a film is criticizing a film studio for corporate connnections, then you probably need to either find a new line of work or move to Scandinavia.
― Moodles, Thursday, 28 May 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)
Fuck anyone who takes Zach Braff poultry for high art.
― Hatfail of Hollow (Nicole), Thursday, 28 May 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
no one revived this thread for 5 days?SHOCKING!i wanna see this badly
― Zeno, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)
Waiting on Saturday for me...
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)
i was reading somewhere that it's the saddest pixar movie yet,as opppose to the the trailer, which shows fragments of funny bits.makes me wanna see this even more
― Zeno, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)
Same here, which makes me think that the claims of this being especially Miyazaki-like in terms of tone aren't far off.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)
seeing this tonight in 3D!
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)
Saw it on Friday, I agree pretty much completely with: http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=1873... but I was also somewhat frustrated by the film’s somewhat transparent philosophizing (”don’t live in the past”, “don’t let your belongings hold you down”) and ham handed psychological metaphor (Kevin the Bird as mother figure, Doug the Dog as child, hefty round boyscout evoking wife’s spirit of adventure, Muntz the bad guy as castrating father). When so much thought is clearly given to every nuance of a film, I expect more complex subtext.
That said, it’s a must see; though perhaps not as good as Wall-E. It’s half a spectacular film and half a good film. The Miyazaki connection is pretty much only skin deep.Most of the theater I was in was bawling at one point or another.
― hot boobs of lohna (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
THIS MOVIE IS SO GOOOD :D A+++++++
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 11:37 (sixteen years ago)
and i got 3d glasses now so the world is in 3d SQUIRREL!!!
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 11:38 (sixteen years ago)
in the scene where u first hear doug and they think its a guy the theater was totally silent and a little girl yells out ITS THE DOG
LOOOOL
so many great moments
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 11:40 (sixteen years ago)
Oh god, that bit. Devastating.
I love the looseness of tone, but it could come across as uneven I guess. The whole visual side has really stuck with me too; Pixar have made a lot of great looking films, and this might be their most beautiful - the landscapes, and colours and hugeness of the environment are wonderfully done.
― that mustardless plate (Bill A), Wednesday, 13 June 2012 16:36 (thirteen years ago)
That's ironic, because I always thought of this as one of the lest visually interesting Pixar films. The jungle is empty - no creatures but that bird. The rest is set in a barren, rocky valley. Compared to the incredible water stuff in "Nemo" (my vote for best looking), or the planet in "Wall-E," or even the landscapes in the otherwise terrible "Cars," I think "Up" is just full of missed opportunities, on both the story and visual front. BUt dif. folks, etc. Obviously a lot of people like this one.
I had totally forgotten about the scrapbook bit. Yeah, that's brings back the heartbreak, all right.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)
This is a sparse movie. Maybe he really went back into the house and killed himself instead of unleashing the balloons. Everything after that moment is just his afterlife ride into salvation.
― pplains, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)
If the balloons were already inflated, they should have taken the house Up into the sky already. See what I'm sayin?
― pplains, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:21 (thirteen years ago)
Maybe he's still dreaming as a kid about his adventures as a lonely old man.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:21 (thirteen years ago)
And he's Korean.
― pplains, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:22 (thirteen years ago)
Maybe it's Doug's dream about talking humans.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:23 (thirteen years ago)
I just have a hard time negotiating my way back to that place after flying talking dogs and blimp battles and giant exotic birds and fat kids, et al.
Ehh, I think the movie was fine despite this. There's clearly a major shift in gears but there's really nothing wrong with a movie that tries to be two things
― frogbs, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:34 (thirteen years ago)
I mean, it's no Full Metal Jacket or anything.
― pplains, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:36 (thirteen years ago)
The sadness doesn't really go that far away though, it's always the why of what he's doing and where he's stubbornly going to. I mean yeah it gets sidelined by an adventure, but that kind of the point?
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
oh oh oh and I love the hero stubble. stubble! makes you tougher!
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 14 June 2012 00:54 (thirteen years ago)
Lots of stuff in this movie is hilarious. That's why I wish it was all dog and animals. Imagine a movie with a secret society of talking dogs left to fend for themselves in the jungle after their master died!
― Josh in Chicago
see this yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxJj64D5alE
― we gotta move these refrigerators (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:03 (thirteen years ago)
bah - embedding disabled - you'll have to click the link
― we gotta move these refrigerators (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:04 (thirteen years ago)
ha, thanks! hadn't seen that
― Nhex, Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:44 (thirteen years ago)
Wall.E way more uneven, to me, than Up.
― the mating calls of sarcastic sharks (jer.fairall), Friday, 15 June 2012 01:44 (thirteen years ago)
I've avoided spoilers, but apparently "Brave" gets derailed halfway through by its own silly digression. Still excited to see it with my daughters. They like silly digressions.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 19 June 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
Good point. The first section of WALL·E is so wonderful that I tend to forget how much I (now) actively dislike all the human stuff in the 2nd half.
― that mustardless plate (Bill A), Friday, 29 June 2012 07:07 (thirteen years ago)
it was all real!
https://p.twimg.com/AxWTRZyCAAAIYle.jpg
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 9 July 2012 13:31 (thirteen years ago)
I rewatched Wall-E a few weeks back and I don't think any of the spaceship stuff is so markedly worse than the (fantastic) opening act.
Was never a big fan of Up, in comparison to Wall-E or otherwise, but ... after the recent Cars 2/Brave twofer ... man ...
― frank o'sin (Eric H.), Monday, 9 July 2012 13:33 (thirteen years ago)
i'm glad this thread was revived with an adorable picture, i really hated to think the same circular conversation going on here a couple weeks ago was still at it
― some dude, Monday, 9 July 2012 13:42 (thirteen years ago)
A list of the Pixar movies that made me tear up:
Wall-EToy Story 3
― frank o'sin (Eric H.), Monday, 9 July 2012 13:46 (thirteen years ago)
So is Monsters Inc. 2 next up? Trailer for that looked sort of straight to DVD.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 9 July 2012 13:47 (thirteen years ago)
Watching almost anything with my kids makes me tear up.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 9 July 2012 13:48 (thirteen years ago)
Ratatouille was my most recent favorite. Toy Story 3 was great but still just a sequel.
Otherwise ive found diminishing returns with each film since 2007.
― Cunga, Monday, 9 July 2012 18:44 (thirteen years ago)
There are more Pixar films that make me tear up than don't.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 9 July 2012 18:54 (thirteen years ago)
If you did not cry at the "When Somebody Loved Me" bit in Toy Story 2, man . . .
― MacArthur Parkour (Phil D.), Monday, 9 July 2012 18:58 (thirteen years ago)
haven't seen Brave yet but imo outside the Cars movies Pixar is still pretty much unimpeachable with the 07-09 run being especially great
― some dude, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:07 (thirteen years ago)
Toy Story 3 was great but still just a sequel.
Matters not if both sequels are greater than the original.
So is Monsters Inc. 2 next up?
Wreck-It-Ralph is next in line.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:08 (thirteen years ago)
Wreck-It Ralph is Disney but not Pixar
― some dude, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
does brave have a crying moment?
― Authorities don't know who shot the 50 Cent the goose. (forksclovetofu), Monday, 9 July 2012 19:16 (thirteen years ago)
Scenes in Pixar movies that made Jer cry:
-the "When She Loved Me" sequence in Toy Story 2-the final shot of Monsters Inc.-the entire first 10-15 mins of Up-the final scene in Toy Story 3
If that doesn't seem like a lot--and if you think me heartless for not tearing up at Finding Nemo or Wall.E--know that I honestly think I've cried at less than 10 movies in my life as an adult, and there's four of them right there.
― to welcome jer.fairall, pie is served. (jer.fairall), Monday, 9 July 2012 19:18 (thirteen years ago)
xps oh I thought it was Pixar. d'oh
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:19 (thirteen years ago)
Cars 2 made me wanna cry, too, but for very different reasons than any of the aforementioned.
― to welcome jer.fairall, pie is served. (jer.fairall), Monday, 9 July 2012 19:22 (thirteen years ago)
The two Cars movies are the only Pixar works I've not seen (well, haven't seen Brave yet either). I think my cry moment's are the same as jer's.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:23 (thirteen years ago)
*moments
the final scene in Toy Story 3
The welling up bit for me was when the toys were holding hands sliding down towards the furnace. The final scene was ruined a bit by grown-up Andy being kind of a idiot.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 9 July 2012 19:25 (thirteen years ago)
Final scene's weight didn't have much to do with Andy, but rather the little girl and the toys' reactions to Andy.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:27 (thirteen years ago)
I should get around to seeing Toy Story 3 some day.
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:29 (thirteen years ago)
Cosign, especially on that last part.
I did, however, enjoy the Cars ride at Disneyland yesterday so hey.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 9 July 2012 19:35 (thirteen years ago)
Coming up on the tenth anniversary. Definitely a keeper. (All the complaints about the film on this thread leave me puzzled.)
Anyway, Disney shared this yesterday: the original storyboards for THAT sequence, set aside the final result.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoyZmu0IOKc
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 February 2019 17:38 (seven years ago)
i cried at the opening of this movie in the theatre.
i remember next to nothing about the remainder of the film, which i remember being bored by. the complaints upthread have jogged my memory.
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Friday, 15 February 2019 17:44 (seven years ago)
same. the opening eclipsed the rest of the film for me and I still feel awfully sad about that scene
― frame casual (dog latin), Friday, 15 February 2019 23:17 (seven years ago)
I haven't seen this in eons, but keep meaning to. Love it.
― Groove(box) Denied (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 16 February 2019 03:00 (seven years ago)
I don't know what's wrong with me, but the marriage portmanteau in this feels mawkish and manipulative, whereas the silent pathos of WALL-E quite reliably evokes a tear.(NB what is this "mawk" that "mawkish" things are like?)
― an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Saturday, 16 February 2019 03:22 (seven years ago)
Not least because Wall-e>>>>>>>>>>>Up
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 16 February 2019 05:07 (seven years ago)
Up is Pixar's most inventive film apart from anything else, perhaps the best as a result.
― nashwan, Saturday, 16 February 2019 13:32 (seven years ago)
it's certainly up there
I'm going to admit while at the Lego Movie last night when the trailer for Toy Story 4 came on (the teaser which is just the characters with "Both Sides Now" playing) I welled up in tears.
― akm, Saturday, 16 February 2019 17:06 (seven years ago)
Time to (re)mix it up! This pixel perfect adventure is one you don’t want to miss. pic.twitter.com/gDWWbRtwHb— Pixar (@Pixar) February 18, 2021
― That's not really my scene (I'm 41) (forksclovetofu), Friday, 19 February 2021 21:28 (five years ago)
wow
― Nhex, Friday, 19 February 2021 21:32 (five years ago)
official!
― That's not really my scene (I'm 41) (forksclovetofu), Friday, 19 February 2021 21:36 (five years ago)