Because it sure seems so. 5,000 marines, two weeks kind of thing.
― Super Cub, Saturday, 11 April 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
oh noes, what about the free spaghetti? :(
― banned like this (k3vin k.), Saturday, 11 April 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates/
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Sunday, 12 April 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
cheers gbx!
― ogmor, Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
Interesting piece, but the assertion that European powers are dumping nuclear waste into Somali waters makes almost no sense geographically. India maybe?
― excuse me, brutality here? (Hurting 2), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
they can't put their waste on barges and bring it to east africa? i mean it sounds weird but it doesn't not make sense
― patches (harbl), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:10 (sixteen years ago)
also could be from submarine reactors
― patches (harbl), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
Sailing it all the way around Africa or through the Persian Gulf doesn't make that much sense, but I don't know that much about such things
― excuse me, brutality here? (Hurting 2), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
I mean why not just dump it somewhere in the arctic or down in the South Atlantic?
― excuse me, brutality here? (Hurting 2), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
But I guess maybe if there were ships already sailing the Persian Gulf with some ostensibly legitimate purpose, it might not be hard for them to bring along some waste as well?
― excuse me, brutality here? (Hurting 2), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
I saw another article suggesting that European powers were doing illegal fishing as well as dumping there, and that somehow turned Somalian fishermen into vigilantes who first sought to protect their fishing waters and then turned them into pirates with their country a mess.
So while there might be some truth to Europeans committing fishing and dumping violations here (and wouldn't the dumping hurt the fishing?)not sure that it justifies kidnapping, or will prevent dumping and fishing violations.
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
i dunno, stronger governments might be able to prevent it from happening. this has slightly more info about waste dumping. it seems like the political conditions in the area make it easy whereas a lot more would be done re: int'l environmental laws and countries being able to protect their own coasts, especially if they tried to dump near the arctic. http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2008/10/2008109174223218644.html
― patches (harbl), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
xpost
So we're fishing in the same areas we're dumping nuclear waste, makes sense...
― Jarlrmai, Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
there's an addendum to that article reminding you the somali coastline is huge so no it's not impossible to do both
― patches (harbl), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
Postscript: Some commentators seem bemused by the fact that both toxic dumping and the theft of fish are happening in the same place - wouldn’t this make the fish contaminated? In fact, Somalia’s coastline is vast, stretching 3,300km (over 2,000 miles). Imagine how easy it would be - without any coast guard or army - to steal fish from Florida and dump nuclear waste on California, and you get the idea. These events are happening in different places but with the same horrible effect: death for the locals and stirred-up piracy. There’s no contradiction.
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
Must be some organisation between dumpers and fishermen then.
― Jarlrmai, Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)
why would that be necessary?
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Sunday, 12 April 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)
oh man the comments on that article
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Sunday, 12 April 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)
I wish the author of that article would use "Somali" rather than "Somalian".
― open up a cat of whup-ass (dan m), Sunday, 12 April 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)
The US navy has been involved in joint operations in the Horn of Africa with the EU and NATO for a couple years now. NATO handed off the operation to the EU around the turn of the year. Look up Operation Atalanta and EU NAVFOR Somalia. There's also CTF-150, which is a war on terror coalition naval force that's been patrolling the Horn of Africa since 2002, and has focused on combating piracy since 2006. I doubt we'll be sending in marines soon because that never seems to work in Somalia. Besides, the one American hostage is still on a boat!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_Task_Force_150
― elan, Sunday, 12 April 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)
So, to answer Super Cub's question, we already have a military operation against Somali pirates! It's at least three years old.
― elan, Sunday, 12 April 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)
oh, and now our hostage has been freed! http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H2KO80&show_article=1
― elan, Sunday, 12 April 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)
i want details of this undoubtedly glorious commando operation
― moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 12 April 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)
sounds like some jack bauer shit to be frank
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)
xpost - I realize we have a significant military presence in the Horn of Africa. I guess I meant a military operation in the grand tradition of American intervention - ala Panama, Haiti, and, er, the Barbary Coast. Seems unlikely though.
I'm also curious how this raid transpired. I saw a picture of the lifeboat, and it would be difficult to raid as best I can tell. It's totally enclosed with a few hatches.
Glad it worked out for the captain.
― Super Cub, Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
on abc news, they just said that the pirates were taken out when the capt went to the side of the lifeboat to take a piss
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
r u serious
― banned like this (k3vin k.), Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
3 of them are dead right?
sounds like a video game mission
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
one that takes forever to clear, because the hostage keeps getting killed
― Super Cub, Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
hostage-taking 101 fail
― patches (harbl), Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
(CNN) -- The American cargo ship captain held hostage by pirates jumped overboard Sunday from the lifeboat where he was being held, and U.S. Navy SEALs shot and killed three of his four captors, according to a senior U.S. official with knowledge of the situation.
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
so some dude on NPR was saying that technically these guys are brigands, not pirates ... did anybody understand what he was on about?
― moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 12 April 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
http://gawker.com/5209068/update-how-the-navy-rescued-capt-phillips
NBC News is reporting that three pirates simultaneously popped their heads out of their lifeboat and were taken out by Navy sharpshooters from the U.S.S. Bainbridge.
The surviving pirate had jumped ship and surrendered a few hours earlier. The Navy had surreptitiously attached a tow line to the craft to keep it from drifting to the Somali shore, and the pirates apparently looked outside in order to investigate.
― brocktune (jeff), Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
gangsta
that's crazy. holyshit training.
― Super Cub, Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)
The Navy had surreptitiously attached a tow line to the craft to keep it from drifting to the Somali shore
lololol
xpost to SuperCub
I doubt think that Obama will do anything to stay off of Somalian soil.
― elan, Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
oops! I think that Obama will do anything to stay off of Somalian soil.
snipers firing boat-to-boat is crazy
― moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
RIPirates
yeah, i figured they wouldn't even try.
― elan, Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
boat-to-boat simultaneously from long distance at a relatively small target.
― Super Cub, Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
that's the sitch! they must be good shots.
― elan, Sunday, 12 April 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/world/africa/13pirates.html?hp
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/04/12/world/13pirates5_600.jpg
<3 dude second to right
― iatee, Monday, 13 April 2009 10:31 (sixteen years ago)
is that billy bob thornton far right?
― caek, Monday, 13 April 2009 12:02 (sixteen years ago)
"I don't know what you're talking about. I'm a sailor."
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 13 April 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 12 April 2009 20:44 (Yesterday)
― goole, Monday, 13 April 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)
abu muqawama:
http://abumuqawama.blogspot.com/2009/04/on-sof-and-piracy.html
― goole, Monday, 13 April 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)
i think calling this a "win for obama" is beyond stupid, but if anything had happened to the guy it would def have been a "huge blow for obama" so fair's fair i guess.
― goole, Monday, 13 April 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)
so glad the president took Newt's advice lolz
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 April 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
Do sniper rifles come equipped with steadicams now?
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Monday, 13 April 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
poor Jonah:
Obama & the Rescue [Jonah Goldberg]
My morning in-box is full of snark and bile from some folks who think I shouldn't have congratulated President Obama for the rescue last night. It does sound like some of the reports saying he personally ordered the rescue were misleading. But you know what? Congratulations anyway. It's good news the captain was rescued; Obama is the commander-in-chief and this happened on his watch; if he were thoroughly Carteresque he would have ordered that the pirates not be harmed, and you can be sure some of the snark-and-bilers would be blaming Obama if this ended badly (and I might have been one of them).
Look, I think my credentials as a critic of Obama are pretty solid. But I find the idea that I have to be critical no matter what Obama does to be exhaustingly unappealing.
― I'm crossing over into enterprise (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 April 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
But I find the idea that I have to be critical no matter what Obama does to be exhaustingly unappealing.
traitor
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 April 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
Look, I think my credentials as a critic of Obama are pretty solid
I would never have guessed.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 April 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
Jonah sure loves his jangly adverbs.
― I'm crossing over into enterprise (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 April 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/world/africa/14pirates.html?_r=1&hp
Perhaps my initial take on things was not so far off.
― Super Cub, Monday, 13 April 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
you know i am old enough to realize that military ops are not "cool" but daaaaamn navy seals.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 13 April 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)
Former Speaker Newt Gingrich said on Saturday via Twitter that "President obama is making a major mistake in not forcefully oulining the rules of civilization for dealing with pirates." "We look weak," Gingrich wrote.
A day later, US Navy snipers, with authority from the president, killed three pirates and freed the American ship captain who had been taken hostage in the Indian Ocean.
I asked the former speaker, via Twitter, how he felt after the rescue.
He didn't respond directly to my question, but did point to a Tweet earlier today.
"The navy seals did exactly the right thing in rescuing the american captain," he wrote. "President obama did the right thing in allowing the navy to act."
stay classy Newt
― This Board is a Prison on Planet Bullshit (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 April 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)
"President Obama was more effective in punishing the pirates than President Reagan was in punishing the Achille Lauro hijackers."
"The Ship of State continues to sail strongly tonight. Thank You SEALS, U.S. Navy and Commander in Chief Obama for preserving our reputation."
I especially like these last two comments, for they show, yet again, how Democrats love spilling blood, believing they can do it better and more efficiently than those evil, crazy tea-bagging Repubs. The Dems as Michael Corleone to the GOP's Sonny....
http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2009/04/restoring-american-values.html
― Dr Morbius, Saturday, 18 April 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
Does that imply that Ron Paul is Fredo?
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Saturday, 18 April 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
Well, yeah, if one could watch The Godfather and conclude that the only meaningful differences between Michael and Sonny are intelligence and prowess, then I guess one could likewise conclude that those are the only meaningful differences between, say, Obama and Bush.
― M.V., Saturday, 18 April 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)
The Easter orgy of self-congratulation reminded me of Grenada '83, btw.
― M.V., Saturday, 18 April 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)