its not a vegetable or a fruit, its not a mineral, its not dairy, its not exactly meat but its made by animals ... so what food group does it belong in?
― girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
a sugar?
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
Commercially it is a sweetener, taxonomically it is an animal product like, eggs, milk, cheese and the rest.
― Mornington Crescent (Ed), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
it belongs with marmite and caramel in the 'viscous plant extract' cabal
― the hubby space veggiescope (country matters), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
yeast is not a plant, of course
does it have to be in a kind? a spreadable maybe?
― the hubby space veggiescope (country matters), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
Fats, Oils, and Sweets (use sparingly)?
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
"Honey is a sweet aliment produced by honey bees"
― ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliment
wait that's not right
― ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
honey is bee poop, thus it is poop food like marmite (koala poop) and gravy (turkey poop)
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
'plant extract'?!?
It's an animal secretion.
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
...made exclusively from nectar!
― the hubby space veggiescope (country matters), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
...and digestive enzymes
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
...the enzymes don't add anything of any significance to the actual honey, they just alter the state of the nectar...so, a naturally processed plant extract
― the hubby space veggiescope (country matters), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
Oh yeah, and my piss is spring water.
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
honey is regurgitated, not pooped
― latebloomer, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
if it was just a plant extract why do we bother using bees to harvest it - wouldn't we just be grabbing it straight from the plant? (in which case its essentially a vegetable, right...?)
― girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
we extract maple syrup directly from trees but that's not a vegetable
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
bee watersports
― bind music up, scratch my discs up (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
piss contains natural bodily impurities such as urea...honey contains nothing but altered nectar...and the bees both organise it into one easily-collectable space (in the cells) and process it into a slightly more easily-digestible substance
― the hubby space veggiescope (country matters), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
vegetable implies cellulose or at least fibrous organic matter
― the hubby space veggiescope (country matters), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
So how can people get botulism from honey if it's such a pure plant extract?
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
a ~delicious~ kind of food iirc
― there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
honey: you drink too much and then lay on your living room floor, drunk, and pretend to be Archie Bunker and drizzle honey into your mouth (I am told this is what my grandpa did)
― a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)
into bee watersports because u can't get AIDS tbh
― bind music up, scratch my discs up (Matt P), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
you can get colony collapse disorder!!!
― blobfish russian (harbl), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
CAN you get botulism from honey? I didn't know that. Honey contains potassium, for some reason, and is therefore basically naturally antiseptic/antimicrobial. So I'm surprised.
― Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)
iirc babies can, not adults
― blobfish russian (harbl), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah you can, that's why you shouldn't give honey to babies.
x-post
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah you can get botulism from honey, but only when it has been contaminated with, y'know, botulism bacteria. Ain't the honey's fault (or the bees').
― quincie, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
i've always wanted to give honey to an infant in spite of the warning on the back label. good idea? it seems like something babies would like
― harbl, Monday, December 8, 2008 10:27 AM (7 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Yes it is OK but please be sure to microwave it first. Infants don't like honey unless it's piping hot.
― ⅅ∊ȴℹҁℹσᴗᔔ Ӎℹȴⱪℹȵʛ (libcrypt), Monday, December 8, 2008 10:32 AM (7 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― blobfish russian (harbl), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
NHS recommendations:
http://www.cks.nhs.uk/patient_information_leaflet/babies_weaning/recommendations
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
Honey mostly KILLS other bacteria and molds and stuff, though, is what I'm saying. I guess the botulism is just too bad-ass for it.
― Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
It's the bees that put the spores in the honey surely?
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)
bees hate babby
― a muttering inbred (called) (not named) (Abbott), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
Y' can't give bees t' baby <------------ UK TV reference alert
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
it's nice, so it's meat.
― cb, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
Huh well now that I think about it, perhaps it is just the botulism toxin (i.e., botox) that gets in the honey during the packaging process? Maybe not the buggies themselves? I dunno this is why I prefer to stick to viruses. BacT u r 2 complicated.
― quincie, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:04 (sixteen years ago)
OK wtf NHS why won't u give us 'mericans access to your shite without registering, huh?
― quincie, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
Coz our lovely free healthcare system is paid for by our taxes, so go get yr own!
― seni seviyorum / senden nefret ediyorum (Masonic Boom), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
Huh well now that I think about it, perhaps it is just the botulism toxin (i.e., botox) that gets in the honey during the packaging process?
So why would honey be any different from syrup or any other sugary goop as far as health warnings go?
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
So honey belongs to the sugary goop group of foodstuffs?
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:08 (sixteen years ago)
No no I just read up on this. The botulism bacteria is in the soil and dust, it's just in such minute quantities that adults are totally unbothered by it. Unpasteurized honey is the problem -- I think if it's pasteurized, the bacteria are killed dead. BTW corn syrup is ALSO unpasteurized so it is similarly a danger.
― Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)
So does the category "edible snot" contain entries other than honey?
― Hugh Manatee (WmC), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)
what about boogers?
― SBed à part (s1ocki), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)
Honey that's crystallized is edible boogers.
― Hugh Manatee (WmC), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)
Delicious, nutricious boogers.
― Hugh Manatee (WmC), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
I read that it should be replaced by agave nectar.
― Virginia Plain, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
No no I just read up on this. The botulism bacteria is in the soil and dust, it's just in such minute quantities that adults are totally unbothered by it. Unpasteurized honey is the problem -- I think if it's pasteurized, the bacteria are killed dead. BTW corn syrup is ALSO unpasteurized so it is similarly a danger
There is a hypothesis that the bacteria multiply rapidly on dead bees, so all the little bee corpses inside a hive are a possible source of contamination in honey. Hadn't heard that there was a problem with corn syrup.
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
Wait - didn't David Sylvian have an album called 'Dead Bees On A Cake'? Seriously, don't eat that cake people.
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
Well, milk is the excretion of a cow (or a ewe, or a nanny goat)....
― phlegm brûlée (j.lu), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 01:47 (fifteen years ago)
There is a hypothesis that the bacteria multiply rapidly on dead bees
Was thinking about this before falling asleep last night and I realized that bees clear out their own dead really quickly -- they put the bodies outside the hive entrance as soon as bees die.
But then I just googled "bee dead" and I guess in cold climates where they have to seal up hives in winter, the bees leave their dead on the floor until spring thaw. But then, if it's far below freezing, bacteria shouldn't be doing much anyway?
It's possible that I think too much.
― Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
You worry 'bout the wrong things, wrong things
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
so it seems that it's not live botulism bacteria that are found in raw honey, but rather dormant endospores which can develop into live bacteria after ingestion
― there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, it seems more likely that the spores are just in the soil & dirt & atmosphere along w every other allergen & thing that we breathe all the time. It's just that babies are more susceptible. Also apparently babies can have the infection w/o dying and w/o anyone even recognizing it -- symptoms are basically flu-like at low levels.
― Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:57 (fifteen years ago)
God I hope I never have a fucking baby.
― producto do Brazil (╓abies), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
I'll be a worried wreck X 1000, 100% of all the time
― producto do Brazil (╓abies), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
babies are not strong enough to survive in this environment, it's a wonder they have not gone extinct
― blobfish russian (harbl), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago)