― nathalie (nathalie), Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nude Spock, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Billy Dods, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Every time I look at this thread I think IMAX: Classic Or Dud but actually it's about something even duller.
― Tom, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Imacs: does the colur hold. All computer plastic does dingy and brittle after abt six months. What's the story here? (Story = I cannot possibly afford an upgrade so torture me with tales of benefits...)
― mark s, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Also it is a bit too reminiscent of Cinema 180 at Thorpe Park, with its 'scary' fire engine ride.
I really want IMAX to be grate because it so boring pointing out that it remains rubbish. Even the doc abt the 1996 everest attempt where 12 people died is kwite lame (even after rockin' start with hot chick-on-a-rope action: I fear I find gurlz who climb like apes seXoR), not least because the doc makers v. thoughtlessly PUT DOWN their cameras when disaster struck and helped their fellow climbers. We here in the peanut-gallery were not best pleased.
It was alright.
― He's Not Here, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Can anything be more classic than the iMac? People who bitch about what's "missing" just prove that they're worthless tossers who care more about cuntish meaningless numbers than actually using the computer for anything (unless you're one of the few people who need those extra features, or like me want a laptop). God this is dull. Did I kill anyone?
Mike: I can't drive, so I'm forced to put up with a 15" widescreen one-inch-thick titanium and carbon-fibre slot-loading DVD crashproof laptop supercomputer. My loss I'm sure.
― Graham, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanley, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanle y, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
http://www.bloggers.it/edoardo73/itcommenti/aquarium3.jpg
― ||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Friday, 6 August 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Red Panda Sanskrit (ex machina), Friday, 6 August 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 6 August 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Johnson (Plato Guy), Friday, 6 August 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 6 August 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)
Bad for home shit though
― Red Panda Sanskrit (ex machina), Friday, 6 August 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 6 August 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)
hullo ilx i need ADVICE!
1: my macbook is getting cranky and needs to be repaired reasonably soon: replacement keyboard plus the panel on the base has somehow got bent permanently open and needs bending back or replacing before the innards fall out entirely 2: my plan is to take it into apple and leave it with them -- it's way out of warranty and i don't currently know any reliable (cheaper) mac repairers in london (unless you do?) 3: either way it will be in dock for a week or three while parts arrive etc4: so i thought why not migrate everything to the iMac i got free from work when they were upgrading everything -- very little used, nothing on it i need provided i can migrate stuff from my laptop, no prob overwriting anything currently on the iMac 5: laptop = MacBook 0sX 10.5.8 and iMac = 10.3.96: basically all i need to be able to work with is WORD and the internet (via a dongle as iMac doesn't have eg airport): doesn't matter if it's a bit of a clumsy workaround 7: is this possible? what will NOT work?
8: and if it is how do i go about the basic migration? (i have an ethernet cable)
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 12:54 (thirteen years ago)
i know a guy, mark
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 12:59 (thirteen years ago)
the backward migration thing will possibly be an enormous pain in the tuckus
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 13:02 (thirteen years ago)
yes i kinda suspected that, the imac won't even read my back-up drives
it's not the fellow at m1cr0m3nd is it? he was always good and v.cheap and quick but you paid the price in his being the WORLD'S MOST BORING TALKER WHO WOULD GO ON FOREVER ABOUT NOTHING AND YOU COULDN'T ESCAPE BY ANY MEANS BEYOND MURDER WHICH IS UNACCEPTABLE PLUS YOUR MAC WOULD NOT GET FIXED.
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 13:05 (thirteen years ago)
I used a Belkin Wireless G Plus MIMO USB Network Adapter to connect my old-ass eMac to the internet before I could just plug it directly into the router. For some reason most wireless adapters don't work with Macs.
― corey, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 13:11 (thirteen years ago)
no he's a breezy impossibly good-looking guy who is no muss no fuss. he may try to convince you to pay an extra £25 to "optimise" your system, which is worth it if you don't know how to do it yourself
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:25 (thirteen years ago)
was gonna suggest upgrading the imac to 10.5 but it's a bit expensive on ebay, bloody hell :(
― Once Were Moderators (DG), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:31 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i'm not sure any actual upgrading etc is worth it -- the imac is old (obv) but little-used and i got it for nothing
i have them talking now, so the dox went across sweet enough -- i think the tricky bit will be getting the internet, the dongle i usually use is baffling it
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:40 (thirteen years ago)
the airport cards are cheap these days, which imac is it?
― Once Were Moderators (DG), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:44 (thirteen years ago)
^^^see above
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
so what's to stop me just connecting the router i use for wireless (to reach the laptop) into the imac with a (longer than i currently have) ethernet cable? is this where the problem corey mentions will kick in? what else will it fuck up?
(router=thomson tg585)
(apologies to everyone: this is dumm 101, but i have to do it out loud to get it clear)
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:58 (thirteen years ago)
mark that would totes work! just need a long enough cable.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
yes it does! though at the moment i have to lie on my tummy in the hall to use it -- LONGER CABLE AHOY
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 15:12 (thirteen years ago)
iMac = classic!
― mark s, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 15:13 (thirteen years ago)