kinda spiritual, kinda arty, kinda literary, um, not really new agey, very liberal/humanism thing going on?
have you ever even heard of it?
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2203/3531316487_14eb2f25c2.jpg?v=0
http://www.thesunmagazine.org/
― scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)
do they ride recumbent bicycles?
― scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)
they're based right here in durham!
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)
the first issue of theirs I ever read had a piece trying to rationalize adult/child sexuality in a historical sense and it really pissed me off!
go say hi!
― scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:02 (sixteen years ago)
oh x-post maybe don't go say hi
no they're all right, I am just really reactionary about some stuff
also I think they're actually chapel hill, or they were, there used to be a shingle outside their offices
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:03 (sixteen years ago)
I have a friend who used to subscribe, not sure if she still does.
The Chicago Reader wrote an article about the magazine recently:http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/look-into-the-sun/Content?oid=1098563
― jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:13 (sixteen years ago)
I have maybe 5 years of back issues up to now, it's a family thing. They fit the Unitarianish ex-hippie-but-a-little-older demographic. No recollection of the issue that pissed J0hn D off but the mag as a whole is frequently fascinating. My fave part is a short section where they have readers send in short submissions on generalized one-word topics (hiding, cars, marriage, etc) and they publish the best of them.
The interviews can be either tedious or interesting, the photos are usually good b&w stuff, the poetry really isn't my thing, and the memoir/fiction pieces are all over the place.
Overall I'm happy my mom buys the subscription (they run no ads and are totally sub-funded), but ymmv.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:54 (sixteen years ago)
um also their format is like a mix of b&w photos, memoir pieces, short fiction, poetry, a feature interview, and the "readers write" section in each mag. The interviews are very much in the more radical new age vein (Paul Stametz, Derrick Jensen, etc) with lotsa focus on nonviolence and spirituality. Plowshares interbiews, reconciliation, restorative justice, etc.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:58 (sixteen years ago)
=interviews
― sleeve, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:59 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, i've read some good interviews in the sun.
"They fit the Unitarianish ex-hippie-but-a-little-older demographic."
this is exactly what i would have said. which gives it a very specific niche in a way. not mean enough for rabid Nation-reading lefties and not hardcore spiritual enough for the new age types. it's a very mellow read.
― scott seward, Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)
that chicago reader story is great!
"I told Bremer I thought of the Sun as the sad magazine. "There's a lot of suffering in life," she replied. "Those experiences are universal, and you don't see them written about in a thoughtful way in a lot of the mainstream media."
it makes me want to subscribe!
― scott seward, Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)
yeah there has been some interesting dialogue in the letters section about the whole "how come so much of your stuff deals with depressing issues" thing. I think that's a good quote to defend the frequently intense themes.
― sleeve, Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:38 (sixteen years ago)
I got a subscription invitation in the mail (I guess because I subscribe to Aperture?) and my immediate reaction was "lol old hippies" and threw it right in the recycling.
― The Loneliness of the Single-Issue Googler (los blue jeans), Thursday, 20 August 2009 02:35 (sixteen years ago)