Interet Dating Dilemma - He wants to be my Facebook friend before we've even met

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

There's a guy on a dating website who has my email address, but chose to look me up on Facebook (which I don't really mind) Now he's sent me a friend request from f/b with his message. Now, I'm pretty picky about who I choose to 'friend' on Facebook anyways, but I don't know him, he's not my 'friend' yet and perhaps never will be and I don't want him to see all my silly pix and posts, but y'know I am interested a little bit. What's the best way of saying 'look buddy, I want to pursue this, but can we leave Facebook out of it' without seem rude, aloof or as if I've got something to hide? Answers on a postcard, sorry, post, please.

Nobodysprawn, Thursday, 10 September 2009 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

Is it too cliché to say just be honest?

I'm sure if you tell him you'd like to go out, but you don't feel ready to add him to facebook yet he would understand.

AlanSmithee, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

if that fails, have sex with him and then change yr email address

"So messy!" (HI DERE), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

"I don't Facebook until at least date three buddy, back off a little."

Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

you should mind him looking you up and should rethink wanting to pursue this. imo.

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

(goole OTM, ignore my flippancy)

"So messy!" (HI DERE), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

Like she hasn't googled him prior to the date, come on.

Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

I'd just say something like, "Hey, no offense, but I'm only Facebook friends with people I've met IRL" -- make it seem like it's not him, it's just this silly policy you have.

jaymc, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

the facebook stalk is normal protocol but friend request is not cool. (also dude is putting himself into the friend-zone right off which is a poor play on his part.)

bnw, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

xp (I don't actually think it's "silly" at all, but you could present it to him like this if you're worried that he'd be offended.)

jaymc, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

usually that happens because he doesn't want to pay for the dating site but wants to talk to you

cutty, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

you should mind him looking you up and should rethink wanting to pursue this. imo.

― goole, Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:04 AM

that's ridiculous. but yeah, it shouldn't be that hard to say 'i don't want to be facebook friends with someone i don't know yet, sorry.'

tehresa, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

if he has the email address, HE CAN SEND AN EMAIL

"So messy!" (HI DERE), Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

ha i hadn't considered that. that seems lame too tho.

xp2cutty

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

ha, good point! he just wants to scrutize your photos from every angle.

cutty, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

xp2dan

cutty, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

everybody looks everybody up but basically telegraphing "hi i looked you up!" is really over the line.

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

^OTM

Trip Maker, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

give him the link to this thread and we can all discuss it together

cutty, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

I appreciate that kind of honesty in stalkers.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

From that "random thoughts" list that's been forwarded/posted a lot recently:

When I meet a new girl, I’m terrified of mentioning something she hasn’t already told me but that I have learned from some light internet stalking.

jaymc, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

"Hey baby I was just stalking you. What's your twitter account name btw?"

Alex in SF, Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

you can select what he sees, no? i mean, shit, you can make it so he only sees what you're a fan of/friends with/... and that's it.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

give him the link to this thread and we can all discuss it together

― cutty, Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:16 AM (1 hour ago)

51 active users (sarahel), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

you should mind him looking you up and should rethink wanting to pursue this. imo.

You are being ironic, no?

Nathalie (stevienixed), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

nope

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

yeah seems kind of weird

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

is this really weird? some people just kind of friend pretty freely it seems. in any event if you decline to friend him for the reasons you stated and continue the conversation in e-mail or whatever, should clear up pretty quickly what his deal is.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

just delete him if it goes tits up

Crackle Box, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's weird. just poor etiquette at least. if he can't understand why you won't friend him or gets butthurt about it then you know he is probably a serial killer

harbl, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

agree w/ call all destroyer.

also you can accept him and set your privacy levels as high as you like

iatee, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

This whole dilemma just screams "socially incompetent" to me. (From his POV - I know you're perfectly socially competent, Prawn)

Looking someone up is fairly common but announcing it by sending a friend request before you've even met is a bit HI I DON'T KNOW HOW TO FUNCTION IN BASIC SOCIAL SETTINGS.

Unless he's never actually been on the internet before or something.

Would exercise extreme caution with this one.

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

just ignore his request until you know whether you want accept or refuse duh

ice cr?m, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

I took the screen name of a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid - a girl that made an account but for some reason never logged back in - I took her screen name and added it to my AOL buddies list. I saw that she logged in one night and I sent her a few messages about how I got her name from OkCupid and she should check her mail.. see if she wouldn't mind talking to me sometime. She didn't reply but It was late at night and I also wrote later at the end of the IMs I sent her.. I wasn't up for talking and I logged off of AIM in the next 5 minutes. Anyways I now don't know if she ever got that message or if she got it and ignored it. Yesterday I saw her logged in again and the second I sent her a message: "did you get my odd message about oksupid last night?", she logged immediately out. It said the message would send to her next time she logs back in.

Now I don't know whether I should ever IM her again. I already "stalked" her enough but I don't know if she ever got any of my messages to begin with. It's complicated being the person who has the other person's web address and tries to look them up somewhere else.

CaptainLorax, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

oh i think she got the message

harbl, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

she logged immediately out.

interesting way to put it

iatee, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

you should email her to see if she got the message

Mr. Que, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

fyi bro when some1 blocks you, it says they're "logged out"

k3vin k., Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

Now I don't know whether I should ever IM her again.

yes you do too know you fucking weirdo!!

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

xps wow that got the gallery awake

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

you should watch that swingers film captainlorax

Crackle Box, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

Ha!

All my friends are like "get AIM, get Facebook..." but reading this thread just realise that these things open a whole world of social cans of worms I just don't want to have to deal with.

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

she is just not that into you. she has not exactly been giving you mixed signals either.

musically, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

if i'd hit it off really well with a girl online and sent a fb friend request and she didn't add me up i'd just assume she had a boyfriend or she was hiding something terrible tbh.

really well = gonna meet up irl sometime soon.

Crackle Box, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

This whole dilemma just screams "socially incompetent" to me. (From his POV - I know you're perfectly socially competent, Prawn)

Looking someone up is fairly common but announcing it by sending a friend request before you've even met is a bit HI I DON'T KNOW HOW TO FUNCTION IN BASIC SOCIAL SETTINGS.

this is sorta overblown. facebook etiquette can really vary - some people add everyone. sometimes these people are not nec socially incompetent, they just take a different approach towards the site.

iatee, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

oh, Captain Lorax

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

if i'd hit it off really well with a girl online i would try really hard not to fuck it up by blasting her on every communication channel available to me

goole, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

xxxp I would never make that assumption -- some people are just selective with who they befriend on Facebook.

jaymc, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

you all already know the AIM protocol
'fyi bro when some1 blocks you, it says they're "logged out"'
I never heard that before.
I thought she just logged out quickly.
You all could be a little less mean when I am talking about something seriously. Way to go in for the kill there.

CaptainLorax, Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

Almost every woman I know is incredibly selective about who they will friend on FB. It's just part of "being careful" or something.

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

if a girl is on OKC...

Oklahoma City girls are especially prone to be snapped up, I presume.

Aimless, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:42 (fifteen years ago)

xp - I was being somewhat facetious, actually most of friends' posts are links or youtube clips or quiz results ... but yes, photos of children, pets, spouse, travel ... as well as the daily harvest from one's garden, job accomplishments, etc.

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:44 (fifteen years ago)

xpost YES all my Oklahomies know.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

How would one do that, Sarahel? Do you show photos of your house and dog and beautiful husband and all that? Brag about you job? Is Facebook for assholes only?

I've seen young women getting ready to go out on the town and before they go out one of them will say "bring the camera. tonight is a night for taking photos for facebook." so...

Cunga, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

Photobloggers are scum. Sorry if any of you are photobloggers.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

fb isn't all this subtle status competition ... one of my hs friends posted the best babby picture -- the kid was dressed in a homemade chicken costume.

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

I was just saying photobloggers. It was associative.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

xp
Facebook's design can encourage the worst behavior from people who already were self-conscious about their social life (Friend counters, notes about yourself, photo-sharing, job and school resume etc etc)

Cunga, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

FB to me doesnt count in overall online interaction because its the one place even "non computer" people tend to go, often they wont go anywhere else or even have PCs at home (they'll FB from work).

And the idea women dont do online comms (implication: lol girls cant use computers) is so offensive to me I want to shove an unshielded cable up someones ass.

Dearth Disco (Trayce), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah I don't think it's really too different.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 00:56 (fifteen years ago)

facebook is for storing photos, joining common-interest groups and keeping in touch w/ ppl - that is why i approve of facebook

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

you're quite fond of photos, aren't you? ;

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 00:59 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah photos is one of the only things I use it for. I'm unhappy at the idea many of my peeps now use it as their event organiser (and they wont email or phone to invite anyone), but whatEVER.

Dearth Disco (Trayce), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

it is also a subtle experiment in social engineering and hivemind which requires alertness to fend off - that is why i disapprove of facebook, although this aspect of it is played up somewhat

yeah sarahel i might be a 'photoblogger' :-/ but i think i'm safe for now

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

i might be a 'photoblogger'

that was not what i was thinking of ...

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:02 (fifteen years ago)

a narcissist? imo it shd be done as much for lolz as for vanity

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:03 (fifteen years ago)

I was referring to a few of your past "glories" documented on ilx ...

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

thanks in advance for locking this thread, mod

k3vin k., Friday, 11 September 2009 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

anyway ... the homemade chicken costume was pretty awesome.

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

If you have one of those columnar photoblogs hosted on tumlr or blogger or whatever, then you're over the edge, Country Matters. Otherwise I think you're in the clear.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:11 (fifteen years ago)

i've just never been into taking pictures of myself, friends, etc. I don't see being into it as a personality flaw ... I'm just conscious of the powers of the internet to propagate things and the abilities of photoshop, primarily.

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

Hm. I guess. I have at times been very open on the Internet and have always proved impervious. It's like some 1p3 thread, and it's obvious from the stats that only 3 people in the entire world have read it. I mean, I've posted my address in the middle of London online and a dozen lampposts and gotten no strangers to show up at my house. Stuff like that.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

I made peace with photoblogging until I went to some crummy indie dance night that was really just house music playing, and this guy was going around with an expensive camera documenting the modes of dress and faces and dances, and I got really annoyed and saw into a new side of the activity.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

i just don't like looking at photos of people that much ...

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

Then there's the art-student photographer who tries to inject poignancy to their skinny dipping or ice cream date or whatever. They're okay, I guess.

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

did they start by taking pictures in cemeteries?

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

i've just never been into taking pictures of myself, friends, etc. I don't see being into it as a personality flaw ... I'm just conscious of the powers of the internet to propagate things and the abilities of photoshop, primarily.

http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs204.snc1/7133_639311667500_36910239_40959431_1047921_n.jpg

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

Naw, not goth, just, like, "I'm in art school and I have a lot of really attractive friends, here are my photos with oblique framing and heavy grain and shit."

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

xpost lol

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

xp - congratu-fucking-lations!

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

XD <3

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

that was at a Lightning Bolt show ... can we call a truce before I compose 5 pages of your flaws and post them to ilx?

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:32 (fifteen years ago)

username search: haberdager, first 10 posts (more)

also yeah totally truce but nuff with the 'former glories' k :D

a chick I wanted to pursue on OkCupid (country matters), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

it's a deal.

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

TAKE IT TO AIM

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:35 (fifteen years ago)

j/k

bamcquern, Friday, 11 September 2009 01:35 (fifteen years ago)

this thread is like Towering Inferno or one of those disaster movies ...

51 active users (sarahel), Friday, 11 September 2009 02:50 (fifteen years ago)

I just want you all to know that some of you went out of the way to tell me that I'm a "fucking weirdo!!" or "creepy fuck" (goole and call all destroyer)...

please enjoy your well deserved suggest banns.
in the future try not to be such intolerant ass-jacks out to fuck people up

CaptainLorax, Friday, 11 September 2009 04:52 (fifteen years ago)

just glad to know i'm on the board tbh

call all destroyer, Friday, 11 September 2009 04:53 (fifteen years ago)

btw the closest i came to actually "insulting" you was sayin that you fucked up on the internet but you already knew that huh

i never called you a creep or weirdo--def not my style

call all destroyer, Friday, 11 September 2009 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

thx man, i'll think about it. i didn't really go out of my way tho.

goole, Friday, 11 September 2009 04:58 (fifteen years ago)

lorax persrvere man, lots of us out here support u

jergins, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:23 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah ― Alex in SF is the one who said "creepy fuck", you said don't fucking IM ppl... I probably didn't sb you just alex

CaptainLorax, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:26 (fifteen years ago)

captain save a captain

bnw, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:26 (fifteen years ago)

so you are ok call all destroyer.. lol. One less SB to worry about for now

CaptainLorax, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:27 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, I got you confused with alex when I was just looking back in this thread

CaptainLorax, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:34 (fifteen years ago)

Can I just say in fairness capn that what you said you did, it did come across as something that (from a woman's POV anyway) is kind of inappropriate. You sent a series of unsolicited messages to a complete stranger. I'd have blocked you too, out of "wtf". Its nothing to get angry over, but it wasnt the smartest thing to do.

Dearth Disco (Trayce), Friday, 11 September 2009 05:38 (fifteen years ago)

I only got angry at the people calling me "fucking" ____

CaptainLorax, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:43 (fifteen years ago)

but I'm sure that if some girl got some unsolicited message that she didn't care about it wouldn't freak her out; she would just block me or something. I mean I don't think she put any thought into who she blocks or what not.

the other case would be that she didn't block me. she may have went back and read my okcupid message.
but she hasn't logged back into okcupid for over a couple weeks (one thing you can tell by okcupid)... so whatever I quit on her. I wasn't going to email her more than twice. I really didn't do anything very creepy. I just tried to see if she was alive basically.

CaptainLorax, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:48 (fifteen years ago)

ok let's stop

jergins, Friday, 11 September 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.